backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 21 comment(s) - last by theplaidfad.. on Aug 14 at 12:43 PM


Hubble's Image of Tarantula Nebula  (Source: NASA)
NASA plans one final update to keep Hubble going until 2013

It's hard to believe that NASA first launched the Hubble Space Telescope in 1990, making 2008 its 18th year of service. During all its years of service, it has seen numerous shuttle missions to fix and upgrade its systems. According to NASA, Hubble orbits the earth every 97 minutes at about 360 miles above the surface of the earth.

NASA announced today that the Hubble Space Telescope completed its 100,000th orbit. To celebrate its 100,000th orbit, NASA scientists aimed the telescope at a small portion of the Tarantula nebula that is a hotbed of celestial birth and renewal. With the myriad of updates and fixes the Hubble has seen during its 100,000-orbit voyage -- spanning the last 18 years -- it is easy to see the parallel NASA is trying to draw between the telescope and the image of the Tarantula nebula shot today.

NASA says the Tarantula nebula is near star cluster NGC 2074, which lies about 170,000 light-years away from the Earth. This region of space is the most active star-forming region in our local group galaxies according to NASA. NASA describes the image as containing dramatic ridges, valleys of dust, serpent-like "pillars of creation", and gaseous filaments glowing fiercely under torrential ultraviolet radiation.

NASA says that high-energy radiation coming from young, hot star clusters is sculpting the wall of the nebula and is slowly eroding it away. NASA reports that another young star cluster could be hidden beneath a circle of brilliant blue gas in the image. It's hard to get any sense of scale from the image, but NASA says the image is of an area almost 100 light-years wide. The seahorse shaped cloud pillar to the right and the image is 20 light-years long on its own -- roughly four times the distance between our sun and its nearest star Alpha Centauri.

"This morning, the greatest scientific instrument since Galileo's telescope has reached another great milestone - its 100,000th orbit around the Earth. Hubble has given us amazing insight into the origins of our universe, and I'm so proud of the men and women at Goddard and the Space Telescope Science Institute for their contributions and dedication to these great discoveries,” Senator Barbara A. Mikulski, D-Md., chairwoman of the Commerce, Justice and Science Appropriations Subcommittee that funds NASA said in a statement. “The entire world is looking forward to the Hubble servicing mission in October 2008, when Hubble will get new scientific instruments, new batteries and new gyroscopes. The servicing mission will extend Hubble's life and give it a more powerful view of our universe. Hubble is the telescope that could, and its best years are ahead of it!"

The Hubble Space Telescope has one more repair and updates slated for October 2008. This will reportedly be the final update or repair to the Hubble space telescope and is expected to allow the telescope to continue operating through 2013.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

w00t
By KeplersTwinkie on 8/13/2008 12:58:38 PM , Rating: 2
I just turned 18 as well.. lol but who cares

GO HUBBLE!




RE: w00t
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 2:32:41 PM , Rating: 3
and you've only orbitted the earth 6,570 times (ground level of course). You are a slacker. Hubble is 93,430...now pick it up. :)


RE: w00t
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 2:36:07 PM , Rating: 2
Hubble is 93,430...now pick it up.

Sorry forgot the, 93,430 a head of you...now pick it up.


RE: w00t
By costy on 8/13/2008 3:15:51 PM , Rating: 2
They are actually tied around the sun ~6,570 times each.

I imagine it is 100,000 to 0 around the earth. I know i have not been around once yet.


RE: w00t
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 3:44:47 PM , Rating: 2
100,000 to 0 around the earth.

Well that is why I stated ground level. Giving that if you stand still you still get one orbit per day. I know it's not right but will count it as one.


RE: w00t
By daftrok on 8/13/2008 4:13:26 PM , Rating: 2
This is what happens when people try to talk about relativity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M58vGDEF6YA&feature...


RE: w00t
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 4:31:27 PM , Rating: 2
that's funny. I wonder how you found it, but it is funny.


RE: w00t
By JonnyDough on 8/14/2008 2:24:45 AM , Rating: 2
You could compare it to his blood circulating around through his body. Imagine the miles it has traveled...

Life is to amazing as the Universe is to amazing.

They are equally amazing to me.


RE: w00t
By mkrech on 8/13/2008 5:42:10 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They are actually tied around the sun ~6,570 times each.


There you go... trying to be nit picky.
Check again though... 6,570 time around the sun would be most impressive! I personally am on my 40th orbit of the sun.


RE: w00t
By Visual on 8/14/2008 3:09:38 AM , Rating: 2
And the OP, as well as NASA on behalf of Hubble, clearly indicated they are just 18 orbits around the Sun.


RE: w00t
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 4:35:23 PM , Rating: 2
OK has nothing to do with any of this, just thought this was interesting. Time will tell if true or a prank...
However a couple of guys claim the found a big foot body... Video tape of body and now in for test...

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_r...


Hubble this
By chmilz on 8/13/2008 12:46:47 PM , Rating: 5
I think my neighbor has a nebula forming under his car; the swirling colors look the same.

On a serious note, the Hubble may be the best space-exploration investment to date, as I can't think of any other piece of equipment that's provided as much knowledge for this length of time for what it cost.




RE: Hubble this
By TheNuts on 8/13/2008 12:54:51 PM , Rating: 2
Aren't the MARS rovers lauched a few years back still alive and kicking?

Granted it hasn't been 18 years but I think the cost to production time ratio is real good


RE: Hubble this
By ebakke on 8/13/2008 3:31:20 PM , Rating: 1
Don't forget the orbiter that was lost due to the lack of standard/metric conversion. Whoops!


RE: Hubble this
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 4:41:36 PM , Rating: 2
It's going to take a longer time for the mars rovers to reach 18 years old. They age slower out on Mars. 668.5921 days on Mars to reach one mars year Or 686.9726 days on earth. So it will take close to 36 earth years for the rover to become 18 years old. :)


RE: Hubble this
By Solandri on 8/13/2008 2:04:08 PM , Rating: 2
HST's contributions aren't quite that rosy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescop...

A lot of Hubble's resolution gains over ground-based scopes were made obsolete by the development of adaptive optics. Where Hubble outperforms ground-based scopes are in wide-field views and broad-band (multiple wavelength) views. For most narrow field of view and narrow wavelength observations, ground-based telescopes surpassed Hubble long ago.

OTOH, Hubble's greatest contribution is probably meta-scientific. All those wonderful HST pictures splashed across the Internet have probably steered more people to careers in astronomy and astrophysics than anything in history, other than possibly the Apollo program.


RE: Hubble this
By Andy35W on 8/14/2008 2:07:36 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
OTOH, Hubble's greatest contribution is probably meta-scientific. All those wonderful HST pictures splashed across the Internet have probably steered more people to careers in astronomy and astrophysics than anything in history, other than possibly the Apollo program.


I think that is an excellent summation. A lot of small boys and girls, our astronomers and astrophysicists of the future will have been transfixed by some of the beauty and majesty those images show.


RE: Hubble this
By JonnyDough on 8/14/2008 2:31:48 AM , Rating: 2
What we need next is a Hubblish telescope orbiting some OTHER planet, like Pluto! Wait, that's not a planet, or is it? Anyway, it would be great to get some long distance shots of the earth using various types of sensors over a long period of time. If we had 100 years of Earth footage we might begin to understand our own planet better (is global warming natural or isn't it?), thus also understanding other planets a little better through the study of our own. Weather patterns, solar flare effects, the magnetic field, gravity, temperature fluctuations... these can all be monitored from space. We already are monitoring these things. But what we don't yet have is any long distance and long term monitoring of Earth. I would think that to really understand earth, you would have to monitor its relation to the sun and other planets from a distance. It would be easier to calculate and double check data of things like "distance between two planets" if we got an outside perspective.


...
By theplaidfad on 8/14/2008 12:43:48 PM , Rating: 2
The amazing thing about that picture to me is the realization that the image we see today is what it looked like 170,000 years ago. The further into the universe we see, the further back in time we travel... Simply amazing to me.




Everything was ok .....
By phxfreddy on 8/13/08, Rating: -1
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 8/13/2008 2:42:40 PM , Rating: 2
And by this statement I can see the media has your brain polluted with their BS story and altering of stories and facts.
Pick on a person in a party – bases on actions they carried out or tried to carry out. Do not pick on a person, just because they are in one party verse another party.


<