backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 13 comment(s) - last by Major HooHaa.. on Oct 26 at 12:20 PM

Programmers are sending lines of code to Hubble to help bring it back to life

NASA engineers believe they know what caused the Hubble Space Telescope to unexpectedly shut down two weeks ago, and have started to fix the problem.

If the repair goes according to plan, the aging space telescope could be fully operational on Friday.  

A computer glitch forced NASA to postpone a scheduled shuttle launch to help upgrade and repair Hubble for the last time before it is decommissioned.  The Side-A of Hubble's Science Data Formatter had technical problems; the unit was responsible for collecting data, analyzing it and sending it back to Earth, helping scientists view amazing astronomy photos.

The backup data system must now be turned on, but it has been more than 18 years since it has been last activated.  All collected data will now be sent to Side-B, and although there is a possibility the remote-control repair will not work, engineers expect the repair to move along smoothly.

Assuming the fix is successful; NASA will continue to rely on the backup system to collect data even though astronauts are scheduled to bring up a new system next year.

Since space has a "benign storage environment," electronics won't rust or corrode the same way they would if left on Earth, researchers said.

The manned shuttle launch to make other repairs and upgrades to Hubble will not take place until February, NASA previously said.  It will be the fifth and final repair mission for the space telescope.  NASA hopes it will remain in operation until 2013, which is when the James Webb Space Telescope would launch into space.

The current Hubble launch delay costs NASA around $10 million per month.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

call me crazy.....
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 10/16/2008 9:35:00 AM , Rating: 2
"A computer glitch forced NASA to postpone a scheduled shuttle launch to help upgrade and repair Hubble for the last time before it is decommissioned."

Electronics last longer in space, uses solar power, already built, already running, so why decommission it? Are they building a big better one? If building a better one, why not rent out time on the old one for schools, groups, or whomever to go look where ever they want?
I guess I just can not imagine this just not working and therefore becoming of little to no value to us.




RE: call me crazy.....
By AssBall on 10/17/2008 6:32:30 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah they are building a big better one. It's called Webb after James Webb.

http://jwstsite.stsci.edu/telescope/facts_.and._fi...

I think it should be ready to go online by 2014 or so... it takes forever to make the lenses (the glass has to cool for like years or something so it doesn't crack/imperfect).

Hubble is just getting too old and needing expensive repairs too often. BTW they already rent out time on it to schools/etc.


RE: call me crazy.....
By maven81 on 10/17/2008 2:06:55 PM , Rating: 2
It's not even slated to launch until 2013 at this point, and I don't think they even started building it yet. It has just recently passed all the design assessments.
Plus it uses mirrors not lenses, and they are made from beryllium (a metal). With these types of telescope optics I bet what will take long is the polishing and coating process.

In any case, what no one seems to talk about is that the Webb will be solely an infrared telescope, while hubble can also observe in visible light (obviously) and ultraviolet. Astronomers claim infrared will allow them to make better observations, but clearly this is not a direct replacement for the hubble. We are losing capibility.


RE: call me crazy.....
By Major HooHaa on 10/26/2008 12:20:55 PM , Rating: 2
I think that Hubble has changed how we see the Universe and has been an amazing scientific tool. I hope it gets its final upgrading and servicing mission. It would be a crime if it didn't.


Beware the spider people
By ggordonliddy on 10/15/2008 6:19:24 PM , Rating: 5
This death star is fully operational.

I am purchasing my $20 million escape ride with the next Soyuz launch. I just need to wait for my new Nigerian friend to deposit the money.




RE: Beware the spider people
By Fnoob on 10/15/2008 8:42:51 PM , Rating: 2
That 10% that you keep from depositing your Nigerian friends' funds should cover it. LEO is a good place to avoid the latest economic whoes... but, how much does a tripple mocha low fat latte cost up there? Surely there is a Starbuck's up there by now...?


"benign storage environment"?
By kontorotsui on 10/15/2008 4:27:18 PM , Rating: 1
"benign storage environment"?
Aren't cosmic rays supposed to be quite harmful?
And no corrosion? What about dust particles? On Earth they don't impact at 10m/s...




RE: "benign storage environment"?
By rcc on 10/15/2008 7:10:38 PM , Rating: 3
It really is. Once a satellite is up and on-station, space is a much friendlier place for electronics and other equipment than corrosive atmosphere at the bottom of a gravity well.

Of course the trip charge for repairs when needed is a bit steep.


By GaryJohnson on 10/15/2008 9:33:10 PM , Rating: 2
Intel has it covered; on chip cosmic ray detectors:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7335322.stm


RROD.
By austinag on 10/15/2008 5:09:53 PM , Rating: 2
Warranty probably expired though...




Most Expensive Camera
By SpaceJumper on 10/15/2008 7:01:23 PM , Rating: 2
Hubble is the most expensive camera in the world.




Standard Repair Reply
By nineball9 on 10/15/08, Rating: 0
CTRL-ALT-DELETE
By Mitch101 on 10/15/08, Rating: -1
"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber













botimage
Copyright 2008 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki