backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 33 comment(s) - last by theapparition.. on Oct 17 at 8:20 AM


This still image is taken from one of the NAB-produced ads designed to warn Spanish-language TV viewers of the impending switchover to digital broadcasts in 2009.  (Source: National Association of Broadcasters)
Broadcasters have earmarked almost $700 million to warn viewers that their analog TVs could go dark in 2009.

The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has unveiled a sweeping $697 million USD ad campaign to raise public awareness about the coming switchover to digital TV broadcasting.

Calling it "the largest volunteer effort in the history of television," NAB board chairman Jack Sander said all major broadcast networks and 95 independent broadcasting companies have teamed up on the program with the aim of reaching nearly every television viewer in the United States.

The campaign will consist of TV ads in English and Spanish, a 30-minute educational video and text "crawls" that run at the bottom of television screens during other programming. The ads seek to warn viewers that all U.S. broadcasters will stop transmitting analog signals on February 18, 2009.

After that date, the only TVs that will be able to receive "over the air" (OTA) programming via antenna will be television sets equipped with an internal or external digital tuner capable of picking up ATSC signals. Older analog TVs can be converted to receive ATSC programming via government-subsidized analog-to-digital converter boxes. Beginning next January, every U.S. household will be entitled to two $40 coupons to partly cover the cost of buying two converter boxes.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez praised the NAB efforts. In a prepared statement, Gutierrez said the campaign "demonstrates that broadcasters nationwide will work to ensure that all households are aware of the... transition, so that no consumer will lose television reception because of a lack of information."

Consumer education efforts by industry, advocacy groups and government entities now total more than $900 million USD according to Gutierrez. "Industry and advocates are taking their responsibility seriously," he said, noting that the joint effort "far exceeds what the government alone could accomplish.”

The digital TV transition may still go largely unnoticed by most Americans, who have long since abandoned their rooftop antennas in favor of subscribing to cable and satellite TV programming services. Less than 20 percent of U.S. households currently rely on OTA antenna reception, according to a 2005 report by the Government Accountability Office.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Quiksel on 10/16/2007 10:12:31 AM , Rating: 6
... more like "confused and uninformed"... I'm all for the DTV transition, but the whole point of these boxes are basically for the people that won't really need or use them.

I can already see it now... I get a call from Dad, "Hey son, what's all this stuff on TV I'm seeing about this box thing, and they're shutting off my antenna??!! What's wrong with my TV, I just got it a few years ago!... Oh, so you say I don't have to worry about since I have digital cable? Oh, why didn't they say that on the TV then?"

Multiply by 10 for all the family members I will have to explain this to, rinse, repeat. UGH.




RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By darkpaw on 10/16/2007 10:17:54 AM , Rating: 3
I've already been doing this a while, anytime a relative hears their tv is going to stop working in 2009. None of them are using OTA, but then again what people are failing to consider is that most of the American public (or any public) for that matter is a bunch of idiots that believe anything they are told.

Average idiot- "Oh nos, someone on da internet told me my TV won't work anymore in 2009. Whatever will I do?"

I think they need to be really simplistic with the message to reach most people:

"Hey ya'll, don't you worry about that digital tv thing people are talking about. As long as you ain't using those old rabbit ears it ain't gonna affect you."


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By therealnickdanger on 10/16/2007 11:41:23 AM , Rating: 5
It's a little unfair to call the non-technical masses idiots. Just because they don't live and breathe the latest tech news doesn't make them idiots. I envy them in most cases - being able to enjoy everyday life and take it as it comes rather than hinging every decision on the prospect of something five years away and troubleshooting everything in your day to day life. I should grow out my beard and move to a cabin in the mountains.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Treckin on 10/16/2007 12:06:51 PM , Rating: 1
I just threw-up a little in my mouth...


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By augiem on 10/16/2007 1:04:17 PM , Rating: 3
I agree. It's called having a life.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 10/16/2007 1:23:01 PM , Rating: 3
Users are idiots, we know this, its no secret. Spend a week on any given helpdesk and you will ask yourself this simple question "holy shit we let these people vote?!?".

Puts into perspective why true democracy would never work. Makes me glad I live in a Republic.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By jmunjr on 10/16/2007 2:45:27 PM , Rating: 2
Dude you are way off. You realize a lot of the help desk support people are severely deficient in other IMPORTANT aspects of life. Everyone has their strengths and weaknesses. A lot of people are clueless about many things, and yes some it seems about everything.

Just because people don't match up to our standards and because we take a lot of things for granted doesn't mean they are all idiots.

Some of the smartest, most educated and knowledgeable people I have ever known are completely ignorant about technology. I guess that makes them idiots?


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By borowki on 10/16/2007 3:04:18 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Dude you are way off. You realize a lot of the help desk support people are severely deficient in other IMPORTANT aspects of life.


Like people skills? Dissing people is not a good way to get ahead in life.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Tsuwamono on 10/16/2007 6:07:46 PM , Rating: 1
agreed, you know how many people that work for me and ask me questions and i just stare at them and think "how the hell did you make it through childhood without being hit by a bus or some shit"

Even worse are the customers.. i work in retail and i hear "where are the lightbulbs" while they are stand INSIDE the light blub isle... i have gotten to the point where i just walk away from them rather then insulting them


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By jajig on 10/16/2007 9:23:13 PM , Rating: 2
When people ask you a question you either stare at them blankly or just walk away ignoring them. A lot of people probably think you're an idiot, also working in retail doesn't help your Intelligence Quotient.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By euclidean on 10/16/2007 12:56:31 PM , Rating: 1
Speaking of relatives...

How many people have heard friends/family that are hard-core republicans (I'm independant, so living in my family is a little straining sometimes lol) talk about how the Liberals and Democrats are trying to take "Regular TV" away from the people and make everyone pay for TV instead of getting their news for free? That's all I seem to hear from them and I'm at the point of just shaking my head and moving on, Of course trying to explain to them that hardly anyone has a TV that would be affected by this, and that none of them have even had a TV that would be affected by this for at least 3 years just doesn't work...their still adament about blaming the Dems for taking away "regular TV"...

I think I stepped into the wrong career...Damn you IT!!! :\


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By porkpie on 10/16/2007 1:00:19 PM , Rating: 3
Funny, I haven't heard anyone say anything remotely similar to this. Are you sure you're just not trying to make a little political hay here, despite your oh-so-convenient claim to be an "independent"?


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By augiem on 10/16/2007 1:07:37 PM , Rating: 2
20 million people is hardly "hardly any".

But to spend 900 million bucks on advertising this seems crazy. That's 45 a person! Not counting the cost of the subsidized receiver.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By tmouse on 10/16/2007 3:02:25 PM , Rating: 2
It all averages out in the end, I've heard democrats complain the republicans have sold away the free TV to their business partners ;)


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By porkpie on 10/16/2007 10:18:27 AM , Rating: 1
Exactly. I haven't watched an OTA broadcast in over 10 years. This "transition" isn't going to affect me in the least.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Screwballl on 10/16/2007 10:27:11 AM , Rating: 2
as there is no OTA channels in my area it won't affect this area but when you're talking about what, 20 million people but the message will get out to so many more. There will be mass confusion. There needs to be a simple disclaimer, "if you already have cable or satellite, you will not be affected. Only people who receive their TV channels through an antenna or rabbit ears will be affected."

Of course how many people do not know if it comes in through an antenna or cable or dish???


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By zombiexl on 10/16/2007 10:41:48 AM , Rating: 2
Not even the saying if you use an antenna is clear enough. I used to get my HDTV via antenna with my sat. service.

Anyone who already has a tv with a digital tuner or an external box that has the tuner will not be affected.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By masher2 (blog) on 10/16/2007 10:44:28 AM , Rating: 2
The simplest thing to say would be "if your set actually *does* go dark in 2009, then take action".

But then some of our voting populace would actually risk being denied television for a few days, and the subsequent physical, emotional, and mental suffering thereof.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Spivonious on 10/16/2007 11:25:53 AM , Rating: 2
Then people might actually go outside and be forced to *gasp* talk to people! The horror!!!


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By iFX on 10/16/2007 11:46:38 AM , Rating: 4
I have taken the opposite approach. Even though I still keep updated on "technology" news I don't tell my family about it any more. Somewhere around the year 2000 I had had enough of being Mr. Free Tech 24/7. Now when I am asked about that my answer is "I don't know, I don't keep up on that anymore, my information is almost ten years old now." If some asked me to "look into" something tech related I come back with "I wouldn't know where to look anymore, why don't you try Google or Yahoo". Ahh life is good again. :)


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Treckin on 10/16/2007 12:10:52 PM , Rating: 3
Oh man, im the same way... I'm A+ certified, but that has become my biggest secrete! Knowing intuitively how to work technology is a curse akin to that of the neighborhood mechanic - Hey, theres something wrong with my computer... stuff keeps popping up and its really slow...
or HEY! how do I put more stuff on my desktop? I want to make my SCREEN bigger...

I just died a little on the inside


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 10/16/2007 1:29:23 PM , Rating: 2
Join the club, work got around that I was an IT engineer a while back and it sucked. Now when I move somewhere I take great care to never offer technical advice, and never let them know exactly what I do at work.

Working in IT is a living hell because everyone always wants something.


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By iFX on 10/16/2007 2:24:50 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed. I'm a Network/IT Enginner and I keep that a secret! :D

These days do do mostly Network Security (DLP, ISA, firewalls, etc, etc) and most non-IT people don't relate that with other IT functions so I have sort of "fallen" out of favor around the office when it comes to who can fix what - and that's not a bad thing either! :D


By DeepBlue1975 on 10/16/2007 3:56:54 PM , Rating: 2
I usually enjoy helping people out with technical stuff.
But there are times when I really hate it...

Examples:

The good: I have no problem with the occasional "hey dude, this ain't working here, could you lend me a hand?".

The bad: "this is not working and I need to finish some work with it by tomorrow!!"

The worse: "remember that you fixed here 2 days ago? well, it's broke again and I didn't do ANYTHING!"

The ugly: "something has broken RIGHT after YOU fixed that thing here some days ago. You HAVE TO help me! I can't finish my work because of what YOU did!"


RE: not "unnoticed" by Americans
By Oregonian2 on 10/16/2007 3:15:35 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm all for the DTV transition, but the whole point of these boxes are basically for the people that won't really need or use them.


I must not understand something, or this statement is absurd.

If these boxes are NOT for those who use their TV's OTA w/o an ATSC tuner (the whole point of the boxes), then WHAT do people use (other than that box) to watch over the air TV on an analog set (after Feb 2009)?

It's brand new TV or that box. That box is *exactly* what is needed by OTA analog-TV folk. Which includes the TV we've in our guest bedroom (no cabling to our DirecTV system) -- it's OTA only and we're not buying a new digital TV for that room that's empty most of the year.

My only conclusion is that it's being claimed that all those who are so backwards that they're not using cable, satellite, or have a new HDTV set are too unsophisticated to understand the concept of the converter box. Even my seventy-something VERY non-tech mother already understands (on her own) that she needs to do something (although she's leaning toward a new TV instead -- and having the store install it for her).

quote:
"Hey son, what's all this stuff on TV I'm seeing about this box thing, and they're shutting off my antenna??!! What's wrong with my TV, I just got it a few years ago!... Oh, so you say I don't have to worry about since I have digital cable?


Your Dad is worried about having the antenna that he doesn't have (since he uses cable) being shut off?


who pays for this?
By jmunjr on 10/16/2007 2:49:24 PM , Rating: 2
Wo what I want to know is who is paying for this? There better not have been 1 cent of taxpayer money going into this HUGE expense..




RE: who pays for this?
By zombiexl on 10/16/2007 3:04:15 PM , Rating: 2
DOnt know specifically where this money comes from.. but this bothers me.

quote:
Consumer education efforts by industry, advocacy groups and government entities now total more than $900 million USD according to Gutierrez


I believe government entities get all their money from tax dollars.


RE: who pays for this?
By Oregonian2 on 10/16/2007 3:19:08 PM , Rating: 2
And fees (albeit a form of taxes).


Hmm
By Polynikes on 10/16/2007 12:43:49 PM , Rating: 2
Considering how few people this is likely to effect, I can't possibly understand why it's gonna take $700 million to get the message out there that analog is going bye-bye.




RE: Hmm
By kinnoch on 10/16/2007 1:57:22 PM , Rating: 2
the volunteers are expensive!


DTV is Profoundly Unfriendly
By paulpod on 10/16/2007 4:51:55 PM , Rating: 2
As an engineer and "techie" living in LA I've been using DTV since the beginning. But it has taken every ounce of my engineering instincts to get it working.

Just dealing with the myriad of aspect ratio mismatches between the signal being broadcast and the display is beyond the average person's technical abilities to manage.

Most PBS broadcasts on my cable now come in the following form on a 4:3 TV: 16:9 letterboxed with 4:3 windowboxed into that with 16:9 material letterboxed into the 4:3 windowbox. The actual broadcast ends up being a tiny slit of material surrounded by black. The belief that "free" converter boxes are going to have enough zoom modes to handle this and that viewers will even know they exist is misguided.

Other things seem minor but when multipled to millions of elderly and uninformed there is a disaster in the making. For example, to tune NBC on a normal TV you simply press "4" (the same number you see in all their ID screens). To tune it on a digital TV receiving cable QAM I have to type "108.1"-- 5 KEY PRESSES!!!

Then there is the matter of multiple tuners. How do people with a VCR hooked to a dual-tuner PIP TV deal with this. That is three converter boxes and several extra dollars a month extra when using cable.

Here are ther things people overlook in this massive change:

- The percentage of PVR users will go way up as people see that they need boxes anyway. The class of viewer who watch commercials will be reduced and the ability of advertisers to reach large numbers of people at one time will be gone forever.

- When broadcast TV is turned off, it is the end of broadcast TV. (Period.) And that means the end of any TV that is mandated to serve the public good. (NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN will finalize their transitions to being niche-market, Fox "News" clones, spewing government and corporate propaganda. Hopefully they will not pander for viewers, like Fox does, by rallying the country into an "ethnic cleansing" of Mexicans that will be as self-destructive as it was for Germany with Poles/Jews in the 1930's.)




By theapparition on 10/17/2007 8:20:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
For example, to tune NBC on a normal TV you simply press "4" (the same number you see in all their ID screens). To tune it on a digital TV receiving cable QAM I have to type "108.1"-- 5 KEY PRESSES!!!

When the original analog stations get shut off, the new DTV signals will move to the same frequency now allocated to the old ones. So, channel 4, for OTA broadcasts, will always still remain channel 4.
If your going through QAM, then that's up to your cable operator to set the channel, so take the gripe up with them.

quote:
Then there is the matter of multiple tuners. How do people with a VCR hooked to a dual-tuner PIP TV deal with this. That is three converter boxes and several extra dollars a month extra when using cable.

I only count 2 cable box tuners required, and still don't see the need. Many cable boxes are coming with 2 tuners in them, so no need for TV PIP features.

quote:
When broadcast TV is turned off, it is the end of broadcast TV. (Period.) And that means the end of any TV that is mandated to serve the public good.

What? Broadcast TV is not getting shut off, only changing their signal. And what broadcast channel is mandated to serve public good? (PBS exception) TV stations are a business to make money, period.

quote:
by rallying the country into an "ethnic cleansing" of Mexicans that will be as self-destructive as it was for Germany with Poles/Jews in the 1930's.)

Now whose been watching too much liberal news. I am in favor of accounting for every person in this country, and illegals must make steps to become legal, or get deported. That includes anyone from any nationality, if the majority happen to be Mexican, than so be it.


Tie
By Cullinaire on 10/16/2007 3:21:33 PM , Rating: 3
The guy on the right has an awesome tie.

It will help the message succeed.




"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki