backtop


Print 16 comment(s) - last by Omega215D.. on Feb 12 at 3:21 AM


Myspace just changed CEOs again amid struggles. From left to right are the now-former CEO Owen van Natta and the new CEOs, Mike Jones and Jason Hirschborn.  (Source: A Second Opinion)
MySpace continues to flounder as it tries to figure out how to stay fresh and earn a profit

MySpace arguably was the first social network giant.  The site launched a year before Facebook and took off much faster, becoming the top social network in the U.S. in 2006.  For a couple years, MySpace was among the online world's hottest topics and that was music to the ears of Rupert Murdoch, whose added the site to his News Corp empire in 2005, acquiring it for $580M USD.

The last couple years, though, haven't been pretty for the site.  Facebook, which was relatively unknown as of a few years ago, continued to aggressively grow and last January became the world's largest social network, leaving MySpace eating dust.  Meanwhile, MySpace struggled with how to leverage its still substantial user base into income.

Last year Murdoch made some cuts, replacing MySpace co-founder Chris DeWolfe with Owen Van Natta, former CEO of Facebook.  Now, as the company's struggles continue, Murdoch has again tried to wipe the slate clean, replacing Van Natta with two co-presidents, Mike Jones and Jason Hirschhorn.

Little is certain for the once prized property.  While the site is secretive about its users numbers and their level of activity, it's estimated to have far less than Facebook's roughly 400 million users, and worse yet its users are estimated to be less active than Facebook's.

MySpace is still sitting on a lucrative $300M USD advertising contract with Google.  However, that contract expires this year and observers says that the company will be unlikely to renew the deal and will have to accept a lower figure.  In its quarterly earnings, News Corp reported that MySpace's advertising and search revenue was down and that it was taking longer than expected to reach its targets.

Still, the site's new presidents are trying to stay optimistic.  States News Corp Digital Media CEO Jon Miller, "Owen took on an incredible challenge in working to refocus and revitalize MySpace, and the business has shown very positive signs recently as a result of his dedicated work. However, in talking to Owen about his priorities both personally and professionally going forward, we both agreed that it was best for him to step down at this time. I want to thank Owen for all of his efforts."

MySpace does still have some key strengths.  Notably its music offerings are much more refined than Facebook's.  And millions of users still rely on it as their primary social network.

One thing's clear, though -- MySpace's fate rests on outsiders who may be less than familiar with the company.  Jones, Hirschhorn, and Van Natta were all brought onboard the site in April 2009 by News Corp.  That much fresh blood can be a very good thing for a struggling firm -- or a very bad one.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

You mean they're not bankrupt yet?
By Iaiken on 2/11/2010 9:54:44 AM , Rating: 5
Good riddance to a bad website...




By bissimo on 2/11/2010 10:16:45 AM , Rating: 3
Reminds me of AOL/Timer/Warner/Turner. A big media conglomerate tries to make some money by buying a hugely popular site, only to ruin it by not innovating and filling it with more ads than any sane person could stand.


RE: You mean they're not bankrupt yet?
By rburnham on 2/11/2010 10:34:24 AM , Rating: 1
I still have a MySpace account just for tracking a few celebrities, but since most of them have fan pages on Facebook, I think it's time to shut down the MySpace account. I am sure I can track down Tera Patrick elsewhere.


RE: You mean they're not bankrupt yet?
By amanojaku on 2/11/2010 6:26:32 PM , Rating: 4
Gonna join the other stalkers fapping in the bushes outside her bedroom window? :-)


By Samus on 2/12/2010 1:08:17 AM , Rating: 2
The AOL ref. is appropriate. Because like AOL, Myspace (and Facebook) are a momentary hit. Let's face it, they're both terrible, riddled with Ad's, Spam, a quality issues, something that eventually plagued AOL into what it is.

I canceled my accounts years ago just for those reasons. There are other low-key social networking sites, and if Google gets slick, they might successfully steal the entire community with currently-beta myOrkut.

Unfortunately I think it is doomed just from the name alone.


RE: You mean they're not bankrupt yet?
By Mitch101 on 2/11/2010 1:32:38 PM , Rating: 2
Facebook is pretty crappy itself but agree better than MySpace.

New lipstick on the Facebook pig doesn't solve the problems it has.


RE: You mean they're not bankrupt yet?
By ClownPuncher on 2/11/2010 1:53:35 PM , Rating: 3
If you rednecks don't stop putting lipstick on pigs, I'm calling the cops.


By Mitch101 on 2/11/2010 1:59:56 PM , Rating: 2
Somtimes she likes to be Pretty!


By Omega215D on 2/12/2010 3:21:47 AM , Rating: 2
Cletus: Duly noted.


Going down!
By rburnham on 2/11/2010 10:33:22 AM , Rating: 2
In other news, the Titanic just got a new captain.




RE: Going down!
By Regs on 2/11/2010 12:52:47 PM , Rating: 2
lol.

Myspace went from being completely open to being completely closed. I remember when I first joined there 6 years ago and a day later I had 500 people I didn't know on my friends list. Though a year later you got spammed and botted.

Their solution? Make everything more private like Facebook. That was a horrible idea. Now they're a half-arsed port of Facebook.


RE: Going down!
By monomer on 2/11/2010 2:54:38 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, it's gotten two new Captains.

I'm guessing Rupert just wants as many people around to lay the blame on when his businesses hit rock bottom.


Myspace isn't that bad
By xxsk8er101xx on 2/11/2010 11:27:22 AM , Rating: 2
I stopped using myspace because it was really slow all the time. Now facebook is becoming very slow. I also don't like the new facebook page - it's counter intuitive.




RE: Myspace isn't that bad
By Smartless on 2/11/2010 1:28:45 PM , Rating: 4
I agree. You know you have a good product when they can
1) dumb down security
2) make it harder to use
3) basically make no upgrades to service

And still do well. Ah yes I'll let everyone else come up with their own analogies.


By KingOfOldSkool on 2/11/2010 11:35:53 AM , Rating: 2
It will hit a point to where social media sites literally change with each fashion season.. as there will always be something new that is considered en vogue. I agree that Facebook is on the same track that MySpace is currently on.. as they are becoming every bit as bloated.




By MScrip on 2/12/2010 1:33:09 AM , Rating: 2
MySpace and Facebook were both popular at relatively the same time. Myspace was the first hit with the public... and Facebook was hot on college campuses. Then Facebook opened up to everyone... and now it's got 400 million members. (I'm not really counting Friendster... as it never reached the status of the other two sites)

Both sites started when social networking was new... but one site eventually won. The only way Facebook will be beaten is if *another* site comes along to steal its thunder.

Is there another site that's already around? Or are there any new sites on the horizon?

It wasn't hard for Facebook and Myspace to grow in a relatively untapped market... but, now it will take a miracle to unseat Facebook from the top spot.

You can argue that it happened once before with the jump from Friendster to Myspace... but the jump from Myspace to Facebook was monumental.

You'd practically have to start from the ground up to build a new site... and go up against Facebook's 400 million members. That's gonna be hard.

You say people jump from site-to-site like its the flavor of the month... but it's really only happened once. Most people on Facebook now never had another social networking account anywhere else before.

Whatever is supposed to be the next Facebook better hop on it soon... Facebook will have half a billion people shortly... that's 500,000 people a day.


"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki