backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 28 comment(s) - last by MERKJONES.. on May 17 at 3:58 PM

MySpace awarded record $234 million judgement against spammers

It doesn’t really matter who you are, where you live, or how much money you make, anyone who has an email account and uses the internet has had to deal with spam. The U.S. government enacted legislation to help curb unsolicited bulk email and have both fined and imprisoned spammers when caught.

MySpace won a landmark judgment today against Sanford Wallace and his partner, Walter Rines. A federal judge handed down a $234 million judgment to the pair after they failed to show up for a court hearing.

So prolific a spammer was Wallace that he was dubbed Spamford and Spam King due to the company he headed up in the 1990’s that is reported to have sent as many as 30 million junk emails on a daily basis.

MySpace filed suit against Wallace and Rines after it found that the pair used false accounts and accounts accessed by stealing passwords to send 735,925 unsolicited emails to MySpace users posing as friends. Each of the unsolicited messages can have a fine of $3 when conducted knowingly and willfully.

When the users clicked on the links in the messages sent from the pair, users were taken to websites where Wallace and Rines made money selling ring tones, goods or simply from the web traffic to the links.

MySpace chief security officer Hemanshu Nigam told the AP, “MySpace has zero tolerance for those who attempt to act illegally on our site. We remain committed to punishing those who violate the law and try to harm our members."

No one really expects MySpace to collect on the massive judgment levied against the pair of spammers. However, MySpace hopes that the landmark judgment will help to deter other spammers from harassing MySpace members.

John Levine of the anti-spam advocacy group Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email is quoted by the AP saying, "The giant judgments are all defaults, which means they don't necessarily even know how to find the spammer."

DailyTech first reported the MySpace suit against Wallace and Rines in January of 2007.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Prison!
By sporr on 5/14/2008 1:45:59 PM , Rating: 3
I think they should be sent to prison. Anyone else agree?




RE: Prison!
By CSMR on 5/14/2008 2:02:09 PM , Rating: 1
If that is the max. I think capital punishment would be better for this sort of crime than the usual murder as spammers act more rationally and are likelier to be deterred.


RE: Prison!
By walk2k on 5/14/08, Rating: -1
RE: Prison!
By PitViper007 on 5/14/2008 2:51:39 PM , Rating: 5
OK...Spam hasn't physically hurt me or anyone I know. However it has hurt the bottom line at my company. Just as an example, my old email server was running at 95%-100% CPU utilization on a constant basis. We hired out spam filtering and we saw an immediate drop to around 15%-20% utilization. We pay good money to have our email filtered of the roughly 200,000 pieces of spam sent to us each and every day for about 300 users. You try going through that much email each day and see how much work you actually get done. So no it hasn't HURT anyone, but it does COST a lot in lost productivity, services required to filter, etc.


RE: Prison!
By MERKJONES on 5/17/2008 3:58:59 PM , Rating: 2
Prison for sending emails? Did they actually steal anyone's Credit Card nubers or other such items that could actually be a detriment to one's well being? If no, then why send them to jail? Community service would be much better than putting them in an already over-crowded and corrupt judicial system of corrections. Seriously contemplate that before you jump to sending them off to prison. With that said, would you put skateboarding little kids in Prison for tearing up property? Or homeless people for "loitering"? What about the kid that sneaks a beer from pops? All of these are minor things, they all come with fines. Since they won't pay the fines, make them give back to the community... not sit in prison.

Who did they hurt? Seriously... the kids that clicked the links and bought the ringtones or whatever was on the other end? Did that hurt them to a point where they won't recover off a $1.99 Midi rendition of Justin Timberlake? Doubtful. The kids / adults / teens that clicked those links - even AFTER reading the warning per MyScrape - deserve what they got. Simply see the msg, and delete it. How hard is that?


RE: Prison!
By Samus on 5/14/2008 7:06:06 PM , Rating: 3
I would just deprive them of electronic freedoms. Ban them from touching any computer ever again. Violation would result in a moot prison time where they can meet Bubba for a few months. They won't touch a computer ever again.


RE: Prison!
By ImSpartacus on 5/16/2008 6:04:27 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, you don't need prison time for this kind of crime. Take away his access to a computer/internet. The guy can't do that much bad, right? As long as he's not spamming, he can function and live. I don't see a spammer as a threat to the public.


RE: Prison!
By MrBlastman on 5/14/2008 2:49:31 PM , Rating: 5
Prison yes, but better they should serve hard labor as well.

Their responsibility?

Chief letter sealing officers of the state. They shall personally oversee and conduct all letter-sealing operations with a single spindly, yet protruding object from their mouth, otherwise known as their toungues.

No deviation from the policy is allowed - all letters must be personally inspected and sealed before mailing is done. No other instrument but their tongues is allowed to provide liquid to seal the envelopes.


RE: Prison!
By Scorpion on 5/14/2008 6:03:45 PM , Rating: 2
Community Service and fines for sure. Someone else mentioned that our prisons are already so overcrowded we can't keep violent criminals in. If that weren't the case, yeah I'd recommend a few months in jail. But these people caused a public nusance. I have seen people personally affected by spam, adware, etc, to a degree that it has cost them a lot of time and money. Yes it would be great if everyone was as astute at using computers as most of us here are, although, even as knowledgeable as I am, I've had the random virus slip through (virtumonde) and have inadvertently clicked on a stupid spam link. People make mistakes, but we shouldn't have to put up with our Inboxes being full of annoying junk. Spam filters are a top down fix to the problem, but we need to attack it from the bottom up as well, which is deterring spammers from setting up their networks.


RE: Prison!
By xsilver on 5/14/2008 9:01:54 PM , Rating: 2
i love it!
no need for prison time, just community service of sealing those letters. Their exact sentence is the exact number of spam they sent.

Have fun trying to hand seal 30 million letters a day.


RE: Prison!
By Etern205 on 5/14/2008 3:40:08 PM , Rating: 3
Prison?!
Prison is like give timeout to a toddler.

What they need is to be thrown into a endless pit.


RE: Prison!
By bodar on 5/14/2008 7:07:43 PM , Rating: 2
You should get right on finding us an endless pit then. Maybe you could dig one if none currently exist. ;)


RE: Prison!
By fuser197 on 5/14/2008 4:50:22 PM , Rating: 2
Nah, a public caning would probably be enough.


RE: Prison!
By Smartless on 5/14/2008 5:56:39 PM , Rating: 2
Gee it's almost like the worst slime in the world goes:

1)Spammers
2)Lawyers
3)R Kelly's (pedophilers)
4)Terrorists
5)Pop stars with cars.


RE: Prison!
By fic2 on 5/14/2008 7:35:37 PM , Rating: 2
You left out RIAA/MPAA - maybe a 2A) in your list.


RE: Prison!
By Smartless on 5/14/2008 8:20:38 PM , Rating: 2
Thanks. Actually I'll forgot Paparazzi as 2) and RIAA/MPAA as 3)


RE: Prison!
By xsilver on 5/14/2008 9:05:31 PM , Rating: 2
paparazzi? what? are you britney in disguise?

paparazzi are just hired to do a job. Its easy to put them out of business, just dont buy those trashy magazines.
Guess what? people cant stop themselves.

Paparazzi only chase down the most notable targets because they know the pictures will sell (and they're pretty sure the target is going to do something stupid)


RE: Prison!
By HeelyJoe on 5/14/2008 11:08:08 PM , Rating: 3
Contract killers are just hired to do a job.


RE: Prison!
By xsilver on 5/14/2008 11:54:29 PM , Rating: 3
by your analogy, the general public are hiring the hitmen.

I also like how you correlate murder with photography. Thats a new one to me


RE: Prison!
By Trisagion on 5/15/2008 3:52:23 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I also like how you correlate murder with photography. Thats a new one to me


Yeah, the similarities end after 'Point, Aim, Shoot!'


RE: Prison!
By ranger203 on 5/15/2008 5:56:45 AM , Rating: 2
Fine & Prison, I agree. I think they shoulld be sent to Prison, not long, I mean they didn't kill anybody. Just long enought do get an butt pounding from a prison inmate with a beer can sized hoohoo, and then it should be video taped and posted on myspace videos...