backtop


Print 16 comment(s) - last by jimbojimbo.. on Jun 4 at 4:16 PM

But will consumers want to use them?

Imagine ditching smartphone passwords and using tattoos (and even pills) for identification instead. 

Motorola is looking to do this with its future devices, and has even started testing the tattoos and pills. 

Motorola's tattoos have already been developed by MC10, a Massachusetts-based engineering firm. They are placed on the smartphone owner's skin using a rubber stamp, and contain flexible electronic circuits.

Instead of punching in passwords, users just place their smartphones close to their tattoos for verification.

Dennis Woodside, Motorola’s chief executive, showed off the tattoo technology at the 11th All Things D conference (D11).


Motorola is looking to use pills as password replacements as well. They're called Proteus Digital Health pills, and they've already been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 

Users would take a pill by mouth, and the pill would create an individual signal that would be picked up by their smartphone. The computer chip within the pill would be powered by a battery using the user’s stomach acid.

The pill could be taken daily for up to a month.

According to Woodside, the tattoos and pills work, but they won't be sold anytime soon. 

While the idea of using tattoos and pills as verification is interesting, it may be too uncomfortable for everyday use. For instance, people may not want to have a visible tattoo on their arms at all times, or may not want to worry about forgetting to take it off and on. 

As for the pill, consumers may think it's too weird to have signals transmitted from their stomachs. It's also a nuisance to remember to take a pill each day in order to access their phone. 

However, Regina Dugan, Motorola's senior vice president of advance research (who demonstrated the tattoo at D11), said there are great benefits to the tattoos and pills. 

“Authentication is irritating," said Dugan. "In fact its so irritating only about half the people do it, despite the fact there is a lot of information about you on your smartphone, which makes you far more prone to identity theft.

“Having the boldness to think differently about problems that everybody has every day is really important for Motorola now.”

Motorola has certainly been trying to make a comeback after taking a hard fall recently. Google acquired Motorola Mobility in 2011 for $12.5 billion USD, but it has proved to be a bit of a nuisance for Google -- it only made  $1.02 billion for the first quarter of 2013, down from $1.51 billion in the fourth quarter. It also reported an operating loss of  $271 million.

Aside from that, Google announced an additional 10 percent reduction in the Motorola workforcethis past March (about 1,600 employees) after already cutting 20 percent last summer. That cut affected about 4,000 employees. 

Motorola Mobility has also had some other issues lately, such as an antitrust complaint from the European Union for seeking injunctions to block Apple's use of certain patents. Motorola was slapped with this complaint earlier this month. 

However, Motorola is making new moves in the mobile marketplace with its upcoming U.S.-made Moto X smartphone. It will be built in a Texas facility that plans to have 2,000 new employees by August, and its edge will be its ultra-low power sensors that are better at managing and conserving power than Apple and Samsung's devices.

Source: The Telegraph



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should . . .
By Rike on 6/3/2013 1:04:25 AM , Rating: 4
We all ready have lots of markers: finger print, eye color pattern, heck even a tongue print is unique. Just do a quick eye scan and you're done. Why would I want to do something like get a tattoo or swallow a microchip to access my phone? If most people won't use even a 4 digit pass code to enact some super basic security on their phones, what makes anyone think people will get a tattoo or swallow a microchip once a month? That's one crazy little rabbit hole to jump down.




By Old_Fogie_Late_Bloomer on 6/3/2013 11:09:05 AM , Rating: 2
The one thing I miss going from the Atrix 4G to my Note 2 is the fingerprint reader. I would love to be able to unlock my encrypted phone by, say, fingerprint plus four- or five-digit pin, rather than having to key in a strong password.


By TSS on 6/3/2013 12:51:19 PM , Rating: 2
Well to be fair many of those people either take pills daily or have tatoos already. In the american market anyway.

You tell me what sounds more crazy in the modern age of stupid: Having an image to identify you with at all times, or having to remember a code at all times to identify you with?


By Reclaimer77 on 6/3/2013 4:23:33 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah I'm a big believer in biometric security, but these methods are just flawed and not preferable imo. But passwords and usernames are just too exploitable in a variety of ways.

And seriously, a tattoo? Really?? F'ing stupid!


By Motoman on 6/4/2013 11:24:58 AM , Rating: 2
These things they're talking about aren't even biometrics...they're NFC or maybe RFID or something like that.

The tattoo isn't really a tattoo...it's a sticker with an NFC/RFID kind of thing in it. Big whoop.

You could accomplish the same thing less intrusively with a keyfob, or a pen you carried around...or whatever. Obviously the point of swallowing/sticking it on your body is so that you don't lose it.

But imagine going to the bathroom and then realizing your phone doesn't work anymore, because you just flushed your authentication device down the toilet.

You are correct in that a real biometric reading would be vastly preferable to these kinds of ridiculous contraptions. Buttloads of laptops are already in the wild with fingerprint readers - how hard would it be to put one of those on a phone?

On the flipside, unless you're carrying around state secrets on your cellphone, I would imagine that traditional security measures (like a simple password) are just fine. After all, if someone physically gets your phone, they can always rip it apart and read the memory anyway.


RF tag
By blue_urban_sky on 6/3/2013 7:18:36 AM , Rating: 2
My cats been chipped so why can't I be? seems fairly straight forward, been around for years, probably needs security built in but I don't need to remember to take my password with food then.




RE: RF tag
By rountad on 6/3/2013 3:33:48 PM , Rating: 2
Next, a visit in the pet carrier to the vet for neutering!


RE: RF tag
By Motoman on 6/4/2013 11:27:52 AM , Rating: 2
Because then you'd be walking around broadcasting your identity.

Not a whole lot of need to come up with conspiracy theories there.


1984
By GulWestfale on 6/3/2013 7:13:06 AM , Rating: 3
it's getting worse every day... now google (and apple, and facebook, and MS, and...) won't only know who is doing what and where at all times of the day, now they are actually planning to brand you, like cattle. wtf?




RE: 1984
By jimbojimbo on 6/4/2013 4:14:48 PM , Rating: 2
It's not a real tattoo, dummy. Read the damn article.


Great...
By inighthawki on 6/3/2013 12:31:33 AM , Rating: 2
So now all the immature people you know can access your phone and everything on it by grabbing hold of it at some point and "pretending" to bump into you.




RE: Great...
By Tarwin on 6/3/2013 11:21:31 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, but I think people would notice that the person keeps bumping into you constantly while holding your phone or one that looked remarkably similar. While a thief wouldn't stick around really so he'd get at most one authentication out of you (unless he stole your "tattoo".

Remember, I doubt that this is meant for just unlocking your phone but replacing all passwords you would use on it, email, purchase verification, banking, etc.


Seems fine
By Tarwin on 6/3/2013 11:16:33 AM , Rating: 2
I think the tattoo's fine as if you'll notice it's not really a tattoos but rather a sticker. You could personalise the design and all. The pill thing seejs more for higher security scenarios since they could not swipe it (while I'm guessing that the sticker on the other hand could be. Plus the5 said the pill can be taken daily for up to a month, implying that it shouldn't be taken longer.

But doesn't this make the tattoo basically a higher tech NFC sticker?




what about...
By Phoenix7 on 6/4/2013 1:47:31 PM , Rating: 2
Why not fingerprint or retinal scan?




Watch band
By jimbojimbo on 6/4/2013 4:16:23 PM , Rating: 2
I'd like to stick the tattoo on the inside of my watch band. I'm always wearing my watch and my phone is almost always in my left hand with my watch. Some idiot would ask "What if you forget your watch?" Like everything, idiot, it would be another option to unlock your phone so you can still type your code.




That's a bit of an inconvience
By BRB29 on 6/3/13, Rating: 0
"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Did You Partake in "Black Friday/Thursday"?
Did You Partake in "Black Friday/Thursday"? 





0 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki