backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 23 comment(s) - last by Donkeyshins.. on Aug 3 at 4:06 PM


Take it from me, says Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, the public just doesn't understand (the Yahoo deal).  (Source: New York Times)
Microsoft says the government and public are like parents -- they just don't understand

The public is the same -- no matter the time or the place -- they just don't understand Microsoft says, that a Yahoo deal is what it takes.  Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer says that the mixed reaction that the new Microsoft-Yahoo partnership received proved that the public (and the government) just doesn't understand.

Lamented Mr. Ballmer at Microsoft's annual Financial Analyst Meeting at Microsoft headquarters in Redmond, Wash., "Taking questions over the last 18 months, including yesterday, and walking through the deal and watching the market reaction, nobody gets it.  I know some people were sort of frothy in the market. I was surprised by the market reaction."

Given the fact that Microsoft isn't paying Yahoo anything up front and the specifics of revenue sharing haven't been fully revealed it seems inevitable that people would be a little confused.  Further a lot of the deal's biggest implications -- Bing replacing Yahoo's backend and Yahoo deploying Microsoft's ad platform -- will likely never be directly seen or realized by most of the general public.  As Mr. Ballmer puts it the deal is "a little bit complicated."

He describes, "Nothing got bought, nothing got sold, but the partnership in and of itself creates economic value.  It creates an immediate opportunity for synergy."

However, one key risk is that the government might not understand either -- it's currently reviewing the deal for antitrust violations.  However, Mr. Ballmer preferred to eschew that potential pitfall instead focusing on the positive aspects of the deal.  He says it will give both companies the market share they need to be a serious player in the market.  Further, he says that Bing's already impressive search should become much better, thanks to larger volumes of traffic, which will allow Microsoft to tweak its algorithm.

Mr. Ballmer was surprised that Yahoo's stock took a beating.  Despite the fact that it is estimated to lose 12 percent of its search revenue, it will more than make up for that in cuts to its research and development costs and capital spending.  And it is estimated that the deal will draw in $500M USD in new revenue for Yahoo.

Interestingly an internal slide was accidentally posted to the online deck accompanying Mr. Ballmer's presentation.  The inadvertently leaked slide showed that Microsoft is shouldering much of the costs that Yahoo formerly carried -- including an estimated expenditure of $170M USD for search research and development.  The slide also featured the potentially embarrassing revelation that Microsoft expects to lose money on the deal for at least the first two years.

However, given that the deal will last ten years, it has plenty of time to show its potential -- if it gets regulatory approval.  Microsoft just hopes the public -- and the government -- will, some day soon, finally understand.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

hmmmm
By aguilpa1 on 8/3/2009 9:28:40 AM , Rating: 1
sounds like neither MS or Yahoo, know exactly what they are getting into either???




RE: hmmmm
By rudy on 8/3/2009 2:12:02 PM , Rating: 2
Interesting point M$ has been very good in the past of seeming to make a bad deal then come out on top, they have an excelent law team. Think about the feedback controller sony situation. Chances are M$ knows exactly what they are getting into the question is does Yahoo?


I'll bet,...
By chagrinnin on 8/2/2009 3:51:31 PM , Rating: 2
...someone forgot to bring the victim child.

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/153779/?sear...




By SiliconDoc on 8/2/2009 7:51:13 PM , Rating: 2
" Interestingly an internal slide was accidentally posted to the online deck accompanying Mr. Ballmer's presentation."
---
LOL
If you believe that was an accident, you should remove yourself from all serious thought.
I hope the slide propped up Yahoo sufficiently enough after it's stock tumble on the "non deal" deal that includes no money but is "financially beneficial" LOL - did Yahoo recover after the "accidentally embarrassing slide slipped to stage the market" - showing msft bearing the costs ?
I guess I'll have to check my portfolio...




Nice choice of pic
By Joshyouwaa on 8/3/2009 8:01:19 AM , Rating: 2
Parents just don't understand...




Gee Balmer,
By Freezebyte on 8/3/2009 10:13:14 AM , Rating: 2
Maybe its cause most of us don't give a flying fuck.




maybe...
By Gul Westfale on 8/2/09, Rating: 0
Same mess different day
By SunAngel on 8/1/09, Rating: -1
RE: Same mess different day
By SilthDraeth on 8/2/2009 12:20:36 AM , Rating: 2
Would that be Washington, Wyoming, or Wisconsin? Guessing Washington being Microsoft is based there.


RE: Same mess different day
By SunAngel on 8/2/09, Rating: 0
RE: Same mess different day
By chagrinnin on 8/2/2009 1:25:11 AM , Rating: 3
Maybe,...just maybe, since you were voted down from a two to a zero,(that's two people voting), two of Dailytech's readers attended UDub or Harvard. I'm just sayin',...:P


RE: Same mess different day
By 2bits on 8/2/2009 1:10:17 PM , Rating: 5
Post ratings are worthless. You can get a 5 for posting platitudes and cliches, and you can get a -1 for posting facts. It's just a popularity contest, but on a really trivial scale.

I'm not sure why anyone cares about post ratings.


RE: Same mess different day
By Belard on 8/2/2009 3:24:53 PM , Rating: 2
Because when a post is voted down, it becomes hidden.

But yeah, its a problem. Wimps will vote something down they don't agree with (and have nothing to say) or they work for the company that is being spoken about in a non positive light.

ie: Even while saying a NEG about Vista and giving a big thumbs up for Vista = a vote down.

Voting down should be for kids cursing, trolling, etc. Or someone posting some odd-ball stuff "The Sky is green".


RE: Same mess different day
By chagrinnin on 8/2/2009 3:48:54 PM , Rating: 1
uhm,...to unhide your comments,...set your threshold to -1.


10 years? Why?
By Mithan on 8/2/09, Rating: -1
RE: 10 years? Why?
By SunAngel on 8/2/2009 12:56:00 AM , Rating: 2
Where are they going? Lost Continent of Atlantis (Los Angeles)? Extinct civilization like the Mayas (Texas)? Please expand on your thoughts.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By CvP on 8/2/2009 1:43:35 AM , Rating: 2
2012...the world ends!


RE: 10 years? Why?
By justjc on 8/2/2009 3:12:22 AM , Rating: 2
Could be one should start contacting the X Price contestants to ask for an offer of a nice long space vacation from December 30th 2011 to 2013.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By Belard on 8/2/2009 4:03:17 PM , Rating: 3
... just like when it ended in 1992 and 2000.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By bodar on 8/2/2009 4:38:20 AM , Rating: 3
You are mistakenly thinking this tool actually HAS thoughts or even an imagination. Check his illustrious post history.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By troysavary on 8/2/2009 6:10:39 AM , Rating: 1
Well, the land isn't physically going anywhere (except maybe the west coast if the big one hits), but USA will not be recognizable as itself if Obama has his way and runs it into bankruptcy.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By Donkeyshins on 8/3/2009 4:06:07 PM , Rating: 2
Hey, sunshine...W already did that by spending like Imelda Marcos at Jimmy Choo's.


RE: 10 years? Why?
By chagrinnin on 8/2/2009 1:28:55 AM , Rating: 4
Dude!? Keep it down! We don't want everyone to know were moving!


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




16 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki