backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 74 comment(s) - last by cheetah2k.. on Feb 26 at 2:04 AM

Alcatel-Lucent draws big buckets of blood in continuing legal battles with Microsoft

Microsoft must pay $1.52 billion for infringing on two Alcatel-Lucent patents involving MP3, a San Diego federal jury ruled today. This is the first of six patent lawsuits brought by Paris-based telecom equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent. Microsoft intends to “seek relief from the trial court, and if necessary appeal.”

The lawsuit contends that Microsoft violated Alcatel-Lucent’s patents with its use of MP3 technology used to play music on Windows Media Player. Microsoft’s argument is that it legally licensed MP3 technology from the Fraunhofer Institute for $16 million.

“We think this verdict is completely unsupported by the law or the facts,” said Tom Burt, a Microsoft deputy general counsel. “We believe that we properly licensed MP3 technology from its industry recognized licenser - Fraunhofer. The damages award seems particularly outrageous when you consider we paid Fraunhofer only $16 million to license this technology.”

 “We have made strong arguments supporting our view, and we are pleased with the court's decision,” said an Alcatel-Lucent spokeswoman.

This lawsuit stretches back to 2003, when Lucent filed 15 patent claims against Gateway and Dell. Microsoft later agreed to replace those defendants, saying it got involved because the patents were closely tied to its Windows operating system, reports Reuters.

MP3 isn’t the only technology that Alcatel-Lucent is suing Microsoft for patent infringement. In November 2006, Alcatel-Lucent filed a lawsuit against Microsoft for infringement of seven video technology patents, likely because of the Xbox 360.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Lame.
By thebrown13 on 2/22/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By Bluestealth on 2/22/2007 9:21:52 PM , Rating: 3
Why would you go from MP3 to WMA? instead of Ogg Vorbis etc.. most WMAs sound like crap it is only the most recent codec that even sounds good.


RE: Lame.
By thebrown13 on 2/22/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By sprockkets on 2/22/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By tuteja1986 on 2/22/2007 11:24:21 PM , Rating: 1
This is a joke right 1.52billion. Geese Zune market isn't even worth 1.52billion. They haven't even sold 1million zune for that matter which would make at most $250million dollars. If Microsoft pays this fine then i will be very horrified at the stupidity of patent law. I thought euro court were asking for too much from Microsoft but this fine goes way beyond anything imaginable.


RE: Lame.
By frobizzle on 2/23/07, Rating: -1
RE: Lame.
By the taxman on 2/23/2007 8:29:11 AM , Rating: 1
yeah lol but seriously why would you want to not play with mp3s anymore they are getting sued for making a program that runs them not the mp3s themself but i always have used mp3 i like it the most of the formats... and i doubt mac isnt guilty for this with itunes so is mac gonna get hit next


RE: Lame.
By TomZ on 2/23/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By miekedmr on 2/23/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By sprockkets on 2/23/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By bigboxes on 2/23/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lame.
By miekedmr on 2/23/2007 10:50:07 AM , Rating: 3
WMA may sound fine to you, but it's still a crappy codec. (maybe not in its latest version)

The fact is, 128kbps mp3 sounds fine to most people, because they don't listen that hard and they play it through crappy speakers anyways.


RE: Lame.
By thebrown13 on 2/23/2007 1:01:16 PM , Rating: 2
I produce music in my spare time and I consider myself an audiophile.

WMA is awesome.


RE: Lame.
By BladeVenom on 2/23/2007 5:25:24 PM , Rating: 3
Good for you in overcoming your deafness to produce music. It worked for Beethoven.


RE: Lame.
By ElJefe69 on 2/25/2007 2:09:37 AM , Rating: 1
pwnd :)

atrac is a hell of a lot better than mp3, wma, etc. yeah no one uses it besides the people who produce broadway shows and psychologists in research (me!)

mp3's at 256k or below sound TERRIBLE on a real system. wma sounds crappy on one as well. icky.


RE: Lame.
By nomagic on 2/22/07, Rating: -1
RE: Lame.
By neothe0ne on 2/22/2007 10:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
Any audiophile (such as myself) would say you're wrong. Give me ANY lossy WMA, and I can immediately differentiate it from an mp3 of the same song. WMA has a special echo that I can recognize instantly (it just so happens this same echo annoys me very greatly). LAME VBR-new is where it's at (and AAC 128kbps, but only iPod users would be able to use the format practically).


RE: Lame.
By masher2 (blog) on 2/22/2007 11:07:01 PM , Rating: 3
That's what they call it the placebo effect.


RE: Lame.
By tk109 on 2/23/07, Rating: -1
RE: Lame.
By sprockkets on 2/23/2007 11:15:59 AM , Rating: 2
If they used flac, they wouldn't have to waste time with licensing fees. Then again, allofmp3.com is da bomb with supporting every competant format and then some, even different forms of mp3, as I'm sure most people here know.