backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 212 comment(s) - last by SaySomeThingOr.. on Sep 20 at 9:34 PM

Microsoft has lost its appeal in a long-standing case in European courts against the software giant.

Today Microsoft lost its antitrust appeal when the European Court of First Instance ruled to uphold European Commission's ruling against Microsoft.  Microsoft is now expected to have to pay a massive $690 million (€497 million) in fines.

The European Commission accused Microsoft of using underhanded tactics to freeze out its competitors in the media player and server software markets.  In 2004, Microsoft was ordered by EU antitrust commissions to make its media player software compatible with other company's products and to desist in its practice of locking other companies out of its software.

In July DailyTech reported that the EU did not feel Microsoft had complied with the 2004 ruling.  Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes went on the record to state,
"Microsoft has still not put an end to its illegal conduct. I have no alternative but to levy penalty payments for this continued noncompliance."

The fine was initially $375.4 million, but Microsoft refused to comply and instead took the case to court.  Because of this the fine was nearly doubled to $690 million.

Microsoft was also ordered to pay 80% of the Commission's legal expenses.  The Commission has to pay a smaller undisclosed amount of Microsoft's legal expenses.

However, the court criticized the Commission's recommendation of employing a full-time, all-access independent monitoring trustee.  The trustee would be able to visit Microsoft premise, have full access to source code and be able to interview Microsoft employees.  The court felt that this provision was not reasonable, but it only went as far as to criticize it on the record.

Microsoft politely stated in a press release today that it appreciated the court's decision and the work the court put into it. With regard to the monitoring trustee issue
Brad Smith, Microsoft senior vice president and general counsel said, "We appreciate the court’s judgment on the trustee issue and the monitoring mechanism, an issue where the court agreed with us, and yet I would be the first to acknowledge that I don’t think anyone would say that is the most important part of this case or this decision."

Smith seemed somewhat reserved in the press release; which concluded as, "So, we look forward to continued efforts to implement and comply with today’s decision, we welcome the opportunity for continued discussion to adhere to our duties with the European Commission, and we look forward to hopefully continuing to move technology forward to create more jobs on this continent."

Microsoft said it is not currently sure what its next legal steps will be in trying to comply with EU competition law.  This ruling marks one of the largest against Microsoft and is a major victory for the EU's Competition Commission.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Is Apple being sued as well?
By phatboye on 9/17/2007 10:35:23 AM , Rating: 5
Does the EU commission have a similar case against Apple?? Their software locks out competitors products as well.




RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/17/2007 10:42:50 AM , Rating: 2
No, because Apple isn't worth much and isn't seen as "A Big Scary Monopoly" oh noes!?!!?

Apple builds a closed system that locks its OS to their hardware and can get away with it. Microsoft builds in extra features to an OS you can load on almost any hardware and is slapped with lawsuits for "competing against other companies".

Just because the EU considers Microsoft a monopoly they apply "special rules" that have no other purpose than to attempt to destroy a business for being "too successful". The EU is socialism at its finest, thats why the most successful corporations on earth don't thrive in socialism environments, they prefer Capitalism or Free Market systems (They are damn near the same thing but the Economics guys would shoot me for the minor differences ;) )


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Maskarat on 9/17/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/17/07, Rating: -1
RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Maskarat on 9/17/2007 11:06:36 AM , Rating: 5
So we agree, Socialism is not neccessarily a bad thing. :)

Sure .. in the current scenario .. have 10 different OS's .. not cooperating with each other .. that would be HELL!! But ever notice how openess between the open source OS's helps them to comunicate between each other? Ever notice how for example gcc runs on all different *NIX flavours? Or ever notice how NFS is supported on all *NIX platforms?

Also the EU did not ask Microsoft to not to ask for royalties!! It asked them to open up their protocols. IBM, Sun, Redhat .. these are companies that to some extent invest and reap back from the open source pool. Are they too stifling innovation?


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By thebrown13 on 9/17/2007 12:29:48 PM , Rating: 1
Only 5 years back? I think that's understating it.

Microsoft has helped all of us a great deal, and this is how we repay them. And the world wonders why there are no true heroes.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By cochy on 9/17/2007 2:05:50 PM , Rating: 3
lol there are no true heroes because we live in a capitalist society. By it's very nature you must be selfish as an entity to excel in this environment. Heroes would be by definition selfless. As you can see they are more or less incompatible with each other. That being said, no system is perfect.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Ringold on 9/17/2007 9:50:56 PM , Rating: 1
At least under capitalism, someone taking a huge risk with minimal chance of government intervention should it pay off huge you have a chance of someone rolling the dice in a way that also happens to be hugely socially beneficial. In fact, capitalism by extension is the belief that the common good is best advanced when all members maximize their personal utility.

Socialism, on the other hand, produces no extra heroes either; zero incentive. Why bother when government can take care of everything?


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By NT78stonewobble on 9/18/2007 3:05:52 AM , Rating: 1
I don't get this one.

So nobodys earning any money in socialist europe?

And did you just magically read the mind of all 6 billion people in the world and found that motivation = $$$.

Becaus that is a sad outlook for humanity.


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/18/2007 7:12:43 AM , Rating: 1
Several countries in europe, people are dieing with less money than they were born with, so yes they are losing money. In europe there is no real motivation to work because the government will take care of you with the social programs. In the U.S. social programs will only get you so far but you will still end up on the street if you don't maintain a steady job.

quote:
And did you just magically read the mind of all 6 billion people in the world and found that motivation = $$$.

You bet, money makes the world go 'round and if you think it doesn't your kidding yourself.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Ringold on 9/18/2007 12:46:06 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
Becaus that is a sad outlook for humanity.


Sorry the world isn't Disney Land :P


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By dever on 9/18/2007 6:49:12 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
found that motivation = $$$. Becaus that is a sad outlook for humanity.
Money is not evil... it can't be, it's not even an entity. It is simply a metric. Money is only a tool that allows us to quantify.

You can be motivated to do good for other people, but the only universally useful metric we currently have to measure that good is money. The amount of money people freely pay you for your service or product is a good indication of the amount of "good" your product or service does for those people -- it's value to them.

If that metric is artificially manipulated, it becomes less valuable, and less good is done.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/17/2007 2:41:24 PM , Rating: 1
Yes it was more than 5 years, I believe it has been since the dawn of mainframe's that this has been an issue but that was before even my time in this field. Still, case in point, these guys have no idea how easy and structured computing has become under Microsoft.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By phusg on 9/17/2007 3:23:53 PM , Rating: 2
I don't buy in to this whole 5 years back argument. I think you're attributing too much of the natural progress in computing to Microsoft being the dominant software company. At the time Microsoft became popular with Windows, I believe IBM had a competing O/S 2 Warp or some such. And if it hadn't of been that, it would have been something else. Humanity and technology were ready for a revolution in computing and the accompanying software.


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/18/2007 7:15:17 AM , Rating: 3
Microsoft was one of the leading development houses behind OS/2, when Microsoft decided to roll with Windows it stopped work on OS/2 and that pretty much killed it. You forget that IBM had contracted Microsoft to build its operating systems.


RE: Is Apple being sued as well?
By tuteja1986 on 9/19/2007 12:34:14 AM , Rating: 2
I have been following this case for a long time. All i can say is that 1st EU court were right then later on in the case went totally crazy where EU court just wanted Microsoft to suffer even after all the changes and stuff were done. Microsoft has done alot but EU now look like they are in it for the money instead of actually trying to slove the problem.

I really don't see Microsoft can make the EU court happy.