backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 30 comment(s) - last by RyuDeshi.. on Aug 9 at 12:00 AM

Micron's new SSDs to offer blistering read speeds of 250MB/sec

The solid state drive (SSD) market is looking quite healthy these days. It seems as though every few weeks we are presented with faster and cheaper drives that aim to push the technology on a broader audience.

Super Talent and OCZ have been working the "value" angle with their respective MX and Core Series SSDs. Both product lines have read speeds ranging from 120MB/sec to 140MB/sec and write speeds ranging from 60MB/sec to 90MB/sec. OCZ's core lineup is also relatively "affordable" with prices of $169, $259, and $479 respectively for the 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB models.

Micron is now ratcheting up the performance envelope a little more with its new multi-level cell (MLC) RealSSD C200 SSDs. The SSDs will be available in capacities up to 256GB (2.5" form factor) and 128GB (1.8" form factor). All models will feature a SATA II interface.

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the new SSDs, however, is their performance. Micron says that the RealSSD C200 SSDs will have read speeds of a whopping 250MB/sec and write speeds of 100MB/sec.

"With our C200 products, we are providing a balanced price to performance solution specifically designed for notebook applications by utilizing MLC NAND technology and highly optimized NAND management algorithms," said Dean Klein, VP of memory system development at Micron.

Unfortunately, pricing is not yet available for Micron's new RealSSD C200 SSDs. Micron does, however, state that the drives will reach mass production during the fourth quarter of 2008.

It appears that companies like Super Talent, OCZ, and Micron have no problems cranking out SSDs with impressive performance figures at competitive price points (at least for the former two offerings). SanDisk, on the other hand, is still having problems getting its SSD operations into gear.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nice to see the advancement of technology
By psychobriggsy on 8/5/2008 11:42:38 AM , Rating: 3
I can't wait for the SSD market to mature, it's still in the expensive but fast improving stage.
I wonder if SATAII will be fast enough ultimately!

Give it three years and we might have 1TB SSDs at 1GB/s. Dunno if they'll be cheap by then however :(




RE: Nice to see the advancement of technology
By Doormat on 8/5/2008 11:52:02 AM , Rating: 2
IIRC, there are future specs for SATA - "SATA 6Gb/s" is the name. It should handle 600MB/s, which would be fine by me if I can ever get a SSD to read and write that fast. It probably wont be done until 2009 but I dont think we'll need it until then anyways.


By therealnickdanger on 8/5/2008 12:28:42 PM , Rating: 3
It's funny, but I've been following SSDs since before you could even purchase a 512MB flash card for your camera. Just do a search or two on RAM-based SSDs. Sure, they need continuous power to store data, and they are extremely expensive, but they are and have been in use for quite a long time now. Fibre-Channel connects, symmetric read/write speeds, insane bandwidth... These flash based SSDs are just the smallest of beginnings of where the industry has yet to go.


RE: Nice to see the advancement of technology
By Spuke on 8/5/2008 12:42:15 PM , Rating: 3
All I need is for the 128GB to come down into the $150 range and I'm all over it. Maybe next year.


By StevoLincolnite on 8/5/2008 7:32:22 PM , Rating: 3
I'm already dating mine.


RE: Nice to see the advancement of technology
By walk2k on 8/5/2008 12:54:37 PM , Rating: 1
The 64GB is $279 so expect 256MB to be well over $1100.

Sequential speed is nice but in reality that's not typical desktop computer usage. I.e. booting Windows is reading thousands of tiny files.


By DeepBlue1975 on 8/5/2008 1:21:59 PM , Rating: 3
That's irrelevant.
With a really low access time, maximum STR becomes plausible to be attained in every usage scenario.
You just need to make "clusters" big enough to be into the range of the optimal transfer block sizes.

In an HDD, maximum STR happens only in a small portion of the disc, and in normal usage is not fully realizable because the drive heads have to travel back and forth looking for the damn physical sector wasting precious milliseconds, specially more so in fragmented drives (but windows forces almost every app to look for lots of small files to run, ie dlls, swap file operations, data files related to the executable, configuration files, read data from the registry and so on, so that even if you have your drive perfectly defragmented, this will happen anyway).

In an SSD you have no heads to move, no need to guess which cylinder's data you're going to read, no need to wait for the rotational latency which also eats up several milliseconds... You just look for a cell in a grid like pattern, access it, and retrieve the data. It's all electronics, nothing mechanical, and that's why the access time of these puppies is in the range of tenths of milliseconds instead of several full milliseconds.
And this access times are yet slow for memory devices, there's vast room for improvement, specially comparing flash ram to dram access times.


Maybe a stupid question but...
By judasmachine on 8/5/2008 4:55:28 PM , Rating: 2
why don't they make these in desktop size? are they going to only be marketed to notebook owners, and leave the rest of us to use some bracket or something?




RE: Maybe a stupid question but...
By WasabiX on 8/5/2008 5:35:51 PM , Rating: 3
Doesn't mean you can't use them in your desktop. Right now I'm using Enhance Tech's Quadra Q14 http://www.enhance-tech.com/products/multidrive/q1... which lets me fit upto 4 2.5" SAS or SATA II drives in one 5 1/4 bay. Currently I've got 15k SAS drives in it but don't see why this type of solution would't work fine with the SSD's.


By Clauzii on 8/6/2008 7:21:30 AM , Rating: 2
Looks like a nice solution. BUT - a fan at 9500 RPM :O How much noise does it actually make?


By martinrichards23 on 8/6/2008 6:03:14 AM , Rating: 2
I'm sure they could put it in a bigger box, but what advantage would there be?


RE: Maybe a stupid question but...
By Clauzii on 8/6/2008 7:18:25 AM , Rating: 2
Personally I look forward to get that fridge sized box out of the way. You don't like small, silent computers?


RE: Maybe a stupid question but...
By Silver2k7 on 8/6/2008 12:21:30 PM , Rating: 2
I like small computers if you can still cram atleast 5 HDD's in there.. if a small SSD had the same storage space as a 3.5" HDD then it would be fine.. but what's the price of a 2.5" or smaller 1.5TB SSD, I bet they don't exist, and wont exist at a cheap price for a few years yet..


By Silver2k7 on 8/6/2008 12:23:05 PM , Rating: 2
by cheap I mean affoardable wich would be say $300


Is this right?
By bharatwaja on 8/5/2008 11:43:55 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
The SSDs will be available in capacities up to 256MB (2.5" form factor) and 128GB (1.8" form factor).


Is it not 256 GB??




RE: Is this right?
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 8/5/2008 12:14:03 PM , Rating: 2
It has been corrected, thanks.


RE: Is this right?
By Denithor on 8/5/2008 12:15:15 PM , Rating: 2
...you mean, like in the photo beside the article?

Yes, 256GB not 256MB. Someone's fingers got a bit ahead of the brain this morning.


RE: Is this right?
By RyuDeshi on 8/9/2008 12:00:01 AM , Rating: 2
I have noticed this is a common typo in SSD articles, haha. Happens almost every time.


By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 8/5/2008 12:21:21 PM , Rating: 2
3% of energy goes to power data centers. Imagine if that tap were turned off. Demand goes down, supply goes up, prices go down. So the consumer energy market wins. Now if those early enterprise adopters could ramp it up.




RE: The real benefit is in the enterprise market
By Lightnix on 8/5/08, Rating: 0
RE: The real benefit is in the enterprise market
By Suomynona on 8/5/2008 1:10:27 PM , Rating: 1
I think he was referring to energy savings from switching from hard disks to more efficient SSDs...


RE: The real benefit is in the enterprise market
By MDE on 8/5/2008 4:04:31 PM , Rating: 2
Hasn't it been shown that SSDs don't actually save much power, if any at all, over traditional HDDs?


By Khato on 8/5/2008 4:49:23 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Hasn't it been shown that SSDs don't actually save much power, if any at all, over traditional HDDs?


Against traditional 2.5 inch laptop drives? Sure, because the current SSD's are dead pathetic implementations of the technology. They still beat out against any desktop/server drive, but that's beside the point.

Anyway, I have no clue if the Intel/Micro flash partnership applies to the SSD controller/implementation as well, but here's an interesting presentation from the spring IDF. I'm quite hopeful that we'll hear more in two weeks at the fall IDF. https://intel.wingateweb.com/SHchina/published/MAS...


But but..
By BruceLeet on 8/5/2008 2:26:37 PM , Rating: 2
SanDisk said Vista is no good for SSDs =(




RE: But but..
By kensiko on 8/5/2008 3:56:22 PM , Rating: 2
Micron SLC SSD will be good for Vista, that's for sure !


RE: But but..
By shabby on 8/5/2008 6:34:09 PM , Rating: 2
Well of course sandisk said that, their ssd's are the slowest. So yes, sandisks ssd's are no good for vista... or anything else.


Now only if
By dickeywang on 8/6/2008 8:51:18 AM , Rating: 2
The price could come down to $1/GB, maybe as soon as in the next 12 months?




RE: Now only if
By Silver2k7 on 8/6/2008 12:30:27 PM , Rating: 2
if it does its still 6 times more expensive than a 1TB HDD at 170$

170/1024 = 0.166
1/0.166 = 6.024


Salivates.........
By siberus on 8/5/2008 11:40:29 AM , Rating: 2
I hope this fits into my budget :o




amazing
By tastyratz on 8/5/2008 12:07:21 PM , Rating: 2
I cant WAIT to see pricing on this.




"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki