backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by archangel2021.. on Dec 27 at 4:34 AM

Micron loses 91 cents per diluted share, twice analysts prediction

NAND and DRAM makers are among the hardest hit in the technology sector with the slowing global economy. These manufacturers were already hurting due to an oversupply that had driven prices down across the market at times leading to sales price being more than the cost of production.

The largest DRAM and NAND maker in the U.S., Micron, announced this week that it had posted its eighth consecutive quarterly loss. The memory company posted a net loss of $706 million amounting to 91 cents per diluted share.

Analysts expected a loss, but according to a poll by Bloomberg, the average loss was expected to be in the area of 45 cents per share. Micron posted roughly twice the loss expected by many analysts. Micron pointed out that the loss included a $369 million write-down of memory chip products.

The company reports that sales of its memory products fell 4% from the previous quarter due to significant decreased in market selling prices. Average selling prices for Micron DRAM fell 34% while average prices for its NAND product fell 24%.

Micron CEO Steve Appleton talked about the global oversupply of NAND and DRAM in a conference call according to CNET News saying, "Most of the (memory chip) companies have announced (production cuts) in the neighborhood of 20 percent, 30 percent." Appleton says that how fast the production comes back online will depend on demand in the first half of 2009.

As hard hit as the NAND and DRAM manufacturers are, the builders of equipment that is used to produce NAND and DRAM may be worse off in 2009 than the actual makers of the product. CNET News reports that some of these equipment makers expect to see no business at all in certain sectors in 2009.

It is probably safe to assume that Micron will be forced to make further cutbacks moving into 2009. The company cut 15% of its workforce in October. Oddly, a few days after Micron cut its workforce; it spent $400 million to buy a stake in a DRAM fab.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

They did what?
By jonmcc33 on 12/24/2008 1:12:02 PM , Rating: 1
Wait, they let go of 15% of their work force and then days later put $400 million towards some fab? Who are the idiot executives making decisions for that company?




RE: They did what?
By Etsp on 12/24/2008 4:24:57 PM , Rating: 2
"Hmmm, the current cost of labor is too high, and we seem to have more employees than what would be most efficient. Also, if we do not continue to build new fabs, our company would remain stagnant and fall behind our competitors in terms of technological capabilities, thus damning our company to the low end, low margin , large transistor market, significantly cutting our revenue potential." Think that sums it up?


RE: They did what?
By stevty2889 on 12/24/2008 5:56:08 PM , Rating: 2
They laid of people who were working at a 200mm fab(which was not cost effective at all, working on NAND product from the joint venture with Intel. The fabs they "bought" are 300mm, part of a joint venture with Nanya for DRAM, which they get capacity for a small fraction of the cost that building a new fab would cost.


RE: They did what?
By etherreal on 12/25/2008 2:07:31 AM , Rating: 2
It was the absolute right decision to make. Micron is in the prime position to start buying up capacity cheap. When the market turns around, Micron will be one of the major players (still). The same cannot be said for Qimonda, Nanya, and many others.


RE: They did what?
By spluurfg on 12/26/2008 5:57:12 AM , Rating: 2
All depends on who learned their lessons from 01 and held a lot of cash on their balance sheets. Those who did will do well, and those who didn't will suffer.


RE: They did what?
By etherreal on 12/26/2008 10:52:38 PM , Rating: 2
According to the earnings reports, Micron still has over $1 Billion in cash and short term investments...I would put them in the "survival" category.


While I am loving RAM prices right now...
By Motoman on 12/24/2008 2:04:08 PM , Rating: 3
...it can't go on forever. There will be some serious attrition and/or consolidation, and then at some point RAM will rise to profitable pricing again.

In the meantime...keep selling 2Gb of DDR2 RAM at $20 or less and I'll keep buying it!




By Xenoterranos on 12/24/2008 3:47:29 PM , Rating: 2
This will probably happen at first when DDR3 becomes more mainstream. At least, I think they're hoping it will!


By neothe0ne on 12/24/2008 4:44:28 PM , Rating: 2
Don't you mean 4 gb of DDR2 ram?


By Clauzii on 12/25/2008 11:34:18 PM , Rating: 2
But man would I love to have some kind of riser cards like in the old days of 72 pin SIMM's and very costly memory limits.

Well, if it weren't for the comparably low maximum of today's normal OS's and 2-4 (most mb's) memory slots, most people would be able to buy, say, 16 GB and up for their PC/MAC/Linux etc. machines - but can't since Microsoft and hardware is the limit.

Limits of like max. 16GB in normal XP/Vista versions while at the same time memory module sizes goes up, combined with Vista's much bigger memory resource needs have made a memory market almost gasping for air since it is easy to fill the normal 2-4 memory connectors on a motherboard to the max.

My suggestion is that it's absolutely time for Microsoft to wholly remove or at least heighten the memory limits beyond 'any normal amount' AND for the motherboard makers to either include the ole'style 8 RAM sockets again or make riser cards of some kind. Until that happens, machines will 'starve' and the memory industry will likely go towards some kind of 'overproduction'.


By pugster on 12/26/2008 12:36:34 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, I just brought some 4gbs 2x2gb pc2-6400 memory for $10 after rebate. I thought that Micron is doing 'okay' because they are actually selling memory. Taiwan's memory companies are almost gone at this point and they are looking for a bailout. Looks like Hynix and Samsung are the only companies doing okay at this point.


I sure hope
By rudolphna on 12/24/2008 1:11:33 PM , Rating: 2
Micron doesnt go out of buisnes.. They make the absolute best DRAM chips out there.




RE: I sure hope
By Felofasofa on 12/24/2008 8:53:09 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They make the absolute best DRAM chips out there.
The failure rate of Crucials has gone ballistic in the last 12 months, contradicting your assertion somewhat.


RE: I sure hope
By rudolphna on 12/24/2008 10:50:46 PM , Rating: 2
I enjoyed that little joke, "ballistic". Haha.


Rooting for AMD!
By DallasTexas on 12/24/08, Rating: 0
RE: Rooting for AMD!
By Bateluer on 12/24/2008 3:34:38 PM , Rating: 5
Enjoy paying 600 dollars for a midrange Intel CPU, 300 for an under performing celeron branded chip, and 999 for a high end, and 1499 for an extreme edition, again. You may not be old enough to remember when Intel was dominant with no competition from AMD, Cyrix, Via, etc. It wasn't until AMD launched their K6-2s that we started seeing real competition again, and not until the original K7 Athlons launched that there was equal competition.


By jiteo on 12/24/2008 2:38:11 PM , Rating: 2
Surely you mean *less* than the cost of production...




By semo on 12/24/2008 2:59:14 PM , Rating: 2
i hope memory companies don't start going under but they deserve it after the price fixing scam. prices /gb stayed the same for years back then. the penalties they incurred meant nothing to consumers but now we're getting payback.


By Murloc on 12/24/2008 5:38:46 PM , Rating: 2
leading to sales price being more than the cost of production.

What's wroung about this?`

reread the news before posting them, U-




By Acanthus on 12/25/2008 6:20:45 AM , Rating: 2
And you get your asses fined by the SEC.

You dont do so well after you straighten out the prices.

I fail to feel bad for any of these guys.

Micron, Samsung, Nanya, Infineon, NEC, Hynix... all of them are suffering after colluding to rip off the consumer.




backwards ?
By archangel2021 on 12/27/2008 4:34:05 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
had driven prices down across the market at times leading to sales price being more than the cost of production.


Isn't that what any company aims for ? I think you meant " sale price being less than the cost of production "




"Mac OS X is like living in a farmhouse in the country with no locks, and Windows is living in a house with bars on the windows in the bad part of town." -- Charlie Miller

Related Articles
Micron Sheds 15% of Workforce
October 10, 2008, 11:01 AM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki