backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 157 comment(s) - last by rudy.. on Nov 28 at 6:17 PM


A step by step diagram of the production process from crop waste to fuel.  (Source: Bruce Logan and Shaoan Cheng, Penn State)

Penn State's Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC) in action. The cell is shown with a power source used to jump-start hydrogen production in the bacteria. Bacteria grow in the anode chamber, forming a biofilm on graphite granules, while hydrogen gas is released at the cathode and bubbles up and into the tube on top of the reactor.  (Source: Bruce Logan and Shaoan Cheng, Penn State)
Hydrogen fuel may soon be nearly as plentiful and cheap due to record setting efficiency

Hydrogen is the optimal fuel in terms of the cleanliness of its burn reaction.  It burns cleanly; producing only water, unlike carbon based fossil fuels which also produce CO2 and other hydrocarbon derivatives.  However, hydrogen has suffered from two key problems; one problem is storage; the other problem is production.

Traditional production of hydrogen via electrolysis (applying an electrical current to water) is not very efficient as you are expending energy to apply the electricity.  It also requires the use of fossil fuels or some other alternative energy structure to produce this power for the production infrastructure.

However, research Bruce Logan and his colleagues at Penn State aim to toss traditional production out the window and revolutionize the way hydrogen is produced.  Their approach -- let special bacteria break down plant matter and byproducts producing hydrogen -- with almost no human produced the necessary power. The process is highly efficient and could be easily scalable to mass production.

The researchers had previously had good success with their waste water cell that used these bacteria process organic waste.   Now the researchers, funded by a National Science Foundation grant, have made modifications to their cell design which improve the living conditions for the bacteria, and they add a small jolt of electricity at the start of the process to excite them (note this is a trivial energy expense when compared to electrolysis). 

The end result is that their microbes are churning out hydrogen at record efficiency.  They call their new cell the Microbial Electrolysis Cell (MEC).

"We achieved the highest hydrogen yields ever obtained with this approach from different sources of organic matter, such as yields of 91percent using vinegar (acetic acid) and 68 percent using cellulose," said Logan.

Wait... the cell is using crops right, didn't DailyTech just run a piece pointing out the downsides of ethanol and biofuel production?  Well the key thing to notice here and why this technology is so promising is that it has 68 percent efficiency in releasing hydrogen from cellulose.  This means that the process can run on waste materials, including, but not limited to -- crop husks and stalks, lawn waste, field grass, and tree clippings and waste.  Traditional ethanol production requires either hydrocarbons from fossil fuels or the fermentation of sugary plants.  This necessitates sugary crops such as corn or sugarcane to be grown solely for fuel, not for human use.  Bacteria-produced ethanol and enzymatic produced ethanol are both being researched, but they have been very costly, and have relatively low efficiencies.

Logan and his team found that with certain configurations nearly all the hydrogen in the source material could be converted into hydrogen gas.  He foresees this allowing for the process to be adopted on a large scale for easy hydrogen production. 

Even with the initial electrical jolt, energy lost to processing the hydrogen and other inputs, the overall efficiency of the system is 80 percent in the vinegar driven system.  This is far better than any existing process for ethanol generation.  It also handily beats electrolysis generation, being between three to ten times more efficient

"We can do that by using the bacteria to efficiently extract energy from the organic matter," said Logan.

Logan and lead author Shaoan Cheng have published their findings in the November 12, 2007 online version of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Science Foundation is ecstatic about Logan's work and the successes of Logan's team. 

"Bruce Logan is a clear leader in this area of research on sustainable energy," Bruce Hamilton, NSF director of the environmental sustainability program at NSF and the officer overseeing Logan's research grant said. "Advances in sustainable energy capabilities are of paramount importance to our nation's security and economic well-being. We have been supporting his cutting-edge research on microbial fuel cells for a number of years and it is wonderful to see the outstanding results that he continues to produce."

The promise of this technology is that it takes a time immemorial human waste -- crop waste -- and turns it into fuel that could one day power our vehicles.  Better yet it does it in a clean way, producing only water upon burn.

With advances in hydrogen storage technology, for example solid state storage, this will make producing and distributing fuel to power next generation hydrogen cars, such as Honda's FCX Clarity fuel cell vehicle, an easy process.   Perhaps the solution to mankind's energy woes and our salvation from dwindling fossil fuel supplies will come in the form of the oldest living organisms on earth -- bacteria.

Logan is also working with the National Science Foundation to use his waste water cells to produce fuel from human sewage, treating the sewage water in the process.  Bruce Logan, Hong Liu and Stephen Grot have been featured as Popular Mechanics Breakthrough Award recipients.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Lawns
By AlvinCool on 11/15/2007 10:31:24 AM , Rating: 3
So in theory I may one day be able to load my fuel cell with cut grass off my yard, put in my bacteria, jolt it with my battery then wait for X amount of time and I can just drive off the hydrogen produced. When the bacteria exhausts the grass clippings I redo the process. If this takes off I'm investing in lawn mower bagging systems! I assume this will also, in theory, work for a home.




RE: Lawns
By drebo on 11/15/2007 10:53:06 AM , Rating: 5
I think this is more for large-scale commercial production of hydrogen than a "Mr. Fusion-like" car-based system.


RE: Lawns
By AlvinCool on 11/15/2007 11:06:48 AM , Rating: 5
Looking at the picture I see a hydrogen producing cell about the size of a small can. While this may be, in theory, for large scale production of hydrogen but that doesn't mean that excellent potential for small scale production won't exist. The process is a simple one, nothing complex here. But lets say it's not enough to power a car, it may be enough to power the lights in my house even if it's not enough to air condition and heat the house. Over time thats a ton of savings off lawn clippings I'm throwing out. It would be great if I could just power my lawn mower with the hydrogen from my lawn clippings, since mowers are one of the least effecient motors. So I disagree, I think it's quite possible that people could one day use their own grass clippings to power part of our daily world.


RE: Lawns
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/15/2007 11:40:23 AM , Rating: 4
More than likely the government would start collecting yard waste, especially grass clippings and dumping them at the local "conversion plant" and do it there where economies of scale can help to offset equipment and maintenance costs. Rather than dumping the yard waste at the compost pile.


RE: Lawns
By therealnickdanger on 11/15/2007 11:56:43 AM , Rating: 1
... all the while charging you to collect your waste and then continuously raising the taxes on Hydrogen fuel. Gotta love the gov'!


RE: Lawns
By clovell on 11/15/2007 12:16:36 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know about you guys, but I'm in the suburbs of Chicago, and they already charge extra for yard waste disposal. You have to use special paper bags and buy tags and a separate truck picks them up.


RE: Lawns
By bupkus on 11/15/07, Rating: 0
RE: Lawns
By 3kliksphilip on 11/16/2007 11:53:52 AM , Rating: 2
In England unleaded petrol is over £1 per litre (2.0701 U.S. dollars), or $7.84 per gallon according to Google's convertion system. Other types are £1.05 or more per litre. The psychological barrier has been breached! THERE IS NO ESCAPE.

What are the prices in America? I hear everybody moan about how much it is in England compared to everybody else... I'd be interested to gather some figures from elsewhere.


RE: Lawns
By Mr Perfect on 11/16/2007 12:26:27 PM , Rating: 2
This morning it was $2.85 for a gallon of regular unleaded. I don't really pay attention to the higher test fuels, but I think each step up the fuel ladder is another ten cents a gallon.


RE: Lawns
By NullSubroutine on 11/16/2007 1:22:15 PM , Rating: 2
It is lower but the US is bigger and drivers typically drive more and longer distances (because everything is spread out geographically).


RE: Lawns
By elmoruy on 11/16/2007 1:52:56 PM , Rating: 2
Just for the record Gas in South America:

Chile: $1,28/liter ~$4.8 per Gallon

Venezuela: $0,037/liter ~$0.14 per Gallon


RE: Lawns
By Shark Tek on 11/28/2007 5:40:05 AM , Rating: 2
Damn you, Chavez !!!

Can I throw a hose to Venezuela and fill up my tank?

I live in a small island on the north (Puerto Rico), isn't that far. :P


RE: Lawns
By rcc on 11/16/2007 2:06:08 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
or $7.84 per gallon according to Google's convertion system


Did you convert just pounds to dollars, or did you remember to convert from Imperial gallons to US gallons as well? This was a problem when I lived there many moons ago, perhaps not if you go direct from liters to US gallons.


RE: Lawns
By 3kliksphilip on 11/16/2007 4:49:51 PM , Rating: 2
Argh... what's the point in having the same term with different amounts? Stupid world... How much would it be according to your calculations? I converted pounds into dollars then divided the amount by gallons from litres (About 0.28 or something). Ignore my methods, I tend to botch them together until I get the correct answer. Works in Physics.


RE: Lawns
By rcc on 11/16/2007 7:02:22 PM , Rating: 2
1 Imperial gallon = ~1.2 US gallons

I'm sure there is a good reason for this. Damned if I know what it is. : )


RE: Lawns
By bldckstark on 11/21/2007 2:59:27 PM , Rating: 2
1 US gallon = 3.7854 liters
3.7854 liters at 1GBP per liter = 3.7854 GBP/US gallon
1GBP = 2.0513USD = 7.765 USD per gallon

Gasoline costs 61.4% more in GB than the US.

How much tax is applied to petrol in GB?


RE: Lawns
By bldckstark on 11/21/2007 3:02:33 PM , Rating: 2
Federal tax on gas in the US = $0.184/gallon
Federal tax on gas in GB is $1.11 per gallon (converted)