backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 31 comment(s) - last by elpresidente20.. on May 14 at 10:36 AM

The weather on Mercury -- or rather, in Mercury, may have some interesting effects.

Though it is the smallest of the official planets and, in fact, smaller than some of the larger moons in Earth's solar system, Mercury does have some notable features. For starters, thought to be composed of almost 70% metallic material, it is the densest solid planetary body in the solar system. Complementing the abundance of metal is an overly large core, weighing in at approximately 42% of the planet's entire volume. Earth's core, by comparison, accounts for only 17% of its volume. Mercury's core is expected to be mostly iron due to the sheer mass of the planet. Finally, Mercury is the only other terrestrial planet, aside from Earth, with a global magnetic field.

This small scorched ball of rock and iron has kept scientists boggled with its weak magnetic field since its discovery by the Mariner 10 probe in 1974. Mercury's magnetic field is a mere one percent as powerful as Earth's, while the planet itself is about five and a half percent as massive. Various scientific models have been at a loss to explain the low strength of the field, though observations of an orbital wobble pointed towards and active, liquid core as a likely culprit.

Researchers as the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have produced a model which was subsequently tested and found to have a high probability of explaining the magnetic field. To replicate conditions in Mercury's core, mixtures of iron and sulfur, in approximation of what scientists speculate actually exists in the planet's core, were heated to various temperatures and pressures. The samples were rapidly quenched to preserve the geological processes that may be taking place and then split and observed with a scanning electron microscope.

The study's lead author, graduate student Bin Chen explains "rapid quenching preserves the sample’s texture, which reveals the separation of the solid and liquid phases, and the sulfur content in each phase. Based on our experimental results, we can infer what is going on in Mercury’s core."

Almost fantastically, their evidence points at snow. As the super heated mixture of iron and sulfur rises towards the planet's crust, it cools. As it does, iron particles form cubic flakes that precipitate back towards the core, pushing more heated iron-sulfur mix towards the outside to cool. The researchers feel this iron "snow" serves to help power convection currents in the core, creating Mercury's weak magnetic field.

NASA's second space craft sent to Mercury, MESSENGER, arrived safely to the planet's vicinity on January 14th of this year and preformed a flyby, mapping approximately 30% of its surface. After another two flybys, planned for later this year and late 2009, the probe will see orbital insertion in March of 2011. Using the data from UI group's tests, scientists may have a better idea of what to have the craft look for as it continues to map the surface and collect data on the field itself.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

I wonder
By FITCamaro on 5/12/2008 10:19:52 AM , Rating: 3
If its possible to some day mine Mercury. If its high in metals, it would be a mining companies wet dream. The problem though is developing a structure on the surface that can survive the extreme heat on the surface when the structure is facing the sun.




RE: I wonder
By JasonMick (blog) on 5/12/2008 10:36:13 AM , Rating: 5
And it'd make an ideal place for a prison. On the day side, no one could be outside when the sun rose. Nobody could escape. Well almost nobody ;)


RE: I wonder
By DFranch on 5/12/2008 10:49:00 AM , Rating: 2
Wasn't that the plot to one of the Riddick movies?


RE: I wonder
By theapparition on 5/12/2008 10:49:33 AM , Rating: 5
quote:
Well almost nobody ;)

Chuck Norris?


RE: I wonder
By 16nm on 5/12/2008 11:52:38 AM , Rating: 4
He probably meant Macgyver. Macgyver could escape using a simple toothpick and piece of twine.


RE: I wonder
By FITCamaro on 5/12/08, Rating: 0
RE: I wonder
By MrBlastman on 5/12/2008 10:38:54 AM , Rating: 1
Given that the density of Mercury is greater than Earths, I would not be suprised at all if it was rich in metals. As to the type and number of metals available? I am not sure. Something tells me that Iron will be the leading element (which we have plenty of on Earth) but this is too obvious so I'd like to know what else is there.

However, the 59-day rotation and the 806-degree surface temperature will be highly prohibitive to any operations on the planet. Not to mention the close proximity of the sun.

Who knows what they'll come up with if they deem it worthwhile of our time. I envision us knocking it off orbit and perhaps extending it further from the Sun to make this possible (but the energy costs for this would be extreme).

Perhaps a better solution lies just outside of Earths orbit in the asteroid belt. It might be a bit easier to mine this area and to even begin to mess with Mercury but only centuries will tell what happens.


RE: I wonder
By EODetroit on 5/13/2008 10:18:13 AM , Rating: 2
I take it then Mercury isn't tidally locked to the sun? If it was locked you could just stay on the dark side.


RE: I wonder
By chsh1ca on 5/14/2008 7:49:54 AM , Rating: 2
Mercury has an incredibly long day (59 of our days).

http://www.crh.noaa.gov/fsd/astro/mercury.php


RE: I wonder
By markitect on 5/12/2008 10:42:51 AM , Rating: 2
I think a more viable idea would be a space based mining operation. Just have an orbital platform siphon molten metal off the top with an electromagnet and rail-gun it back to an orbit of its destination.


RE: I wonder
By TonyB on 5/12/2008 10:49:36 AM , Rating: 4
i doubt any serious investor would waste their time going through all the trouble to mine Iron from mercury when that stuff is already abundant on Earth. (and on the moon for that matter)

now if mercury's core consisted of Gold, platinum, palladium, silver, and crude oil then yes, lets go there.


RE: I wonder
By SkeeterLDR2004 on 5/12/2008 6:48:40 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps its core contains latinum.


RE: I wonder
By ViroMan on 5/13/2008 4:42:20 AM , Rating: 2
Perhaps the fact that the planet is hotter therefor smelting costs are considerably cheaper plus the fact that your a large distance from anyone who cares about human rights so you could probably treat your workers like slaves and no one would know/care.


RE: I wonder
By theapparition on 5/12/2008 10:52:47 AM , Rating: 2
Extream heat and cold, temperature variation goes from -180°C to 480°C.

Despite this, there is still strong evidence for ice (frozen liquid) since the sun never reaches some of the deep craters. Down in one of these craters would be the best shot for mining any sort of materials.


RE: I wonder
By PlasmaBomb on 5/12/2008 1:31:20 PM , Rating: 2
At -180°C it could be frozen carbon dioxide...


RE: I wonder
By theapparition on 5/13/2008 7:16:15 AM , Rating: 2
Point well taken. When I mentioned "frozen liquid", I meant to imply that the "ice" didn't have to be frozen water.


RE: I wonder
By ninjabob333 on 5/12/2008 11:26:14 AM , Rating: 2
This is where the mobile mining platforms come in. With the 59 day rotation, it would be relitively easy for a mobile facility to stay in the dark side of the planet.


RE: I wonder
By Schrag4 on 5/12/2008 11:53:02 AM , Rating: 2
I can see it now. Upon realizing that the mobile platform, which has broken down, will take a full 30 days to fix, half the crew stays to try and fix it in time to save their own lives, and the other half irrationally and futilely runs away from the direction that the sun will rise from.


RE: I wonder
By JediJeb on 5/12/2008 4:10:13 PM , Rating: 2
Lando Calrissian owned one of those in one of the Star Wars movies. It walked along the surface of the planet staying on the night side of the planet. When I read that I actually thought it would be something that might work on Mercury. Man that was years ago lol.


RE: I wonder
By Scabies on 5/12/2008 5:55:17 PM , Rating: 2
Book? Heir to the Empire?


RE: I wonder
By JustTom on 5/12/2008 11:57:36 AM , Rating: 3
There are a few problems with mining Mercury: temperature extremes; the gravity well of the Sun; and radiation. Not to mention it seems as if the predominant metal (70%) is iron of which there is hardly a shortage on Earth. Mining the asteroid belt is probably a much better idea.


RE: I wonder
By abzillah on 5/12/2008 2:42:52 PM , Rating: 3
How about they mine Uranus.

JK