Print 19 comment(s) - last by amagriva.. on Dec 28 at 5:21 AM

The recent discoveries come from a pristine site in southern China's Yunnan province.  (Source: University of Bristol)

A mid-Triassic ichthyosaur, a predatory aquatic reptile, was among the 20,000 fossils recovered by the recent dig.  (Source: University of Bristol)

The saurichthys was another fearsome sea predator identified.  (Source: University of Bristol)

Newly evolved sea urchins (left) and horseshoe crabs (right) looked much like their modern counterparts do today.  (Source: University of Bristol)
Collection of 20,000 fossils reveal that life almost recovered within 10 million years

A vast body of paleontological evidence points to the Permian-Triassic period transition, which occurred approximately 250 million years ago, was the largest extinction event in history, surpassing even the extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous period.  The extinction event is the only known extinction event to feature a mass extinction of typically hard insects.  And the extinction in total encompassed 96% of all marine species, 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species, 57% of all families, and 83% of all genera.

Mike Benton, professor of vertebrate palaeontology in the School of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol, and a team of researchers at the Chengdu Geological Center in China have published a study from the middle Triassic (235 mya) that reveals how evolution allowed for a surprisingly quick biotic recovery and yielded new kinds of species (like the dinosaurs and early mammals).

Describes Professor Benton in a university news release, "The Luoping site dates from the Middle Triassic and contains one of the most diverse marine fossil records in the world.  It has yielded 20,000 fossils of fishes, reptiles, shellfish, shrimps and other seabed creatures. We can tell that we're looking at a fully recovered ecosystem because of the diversity of predators, most notably fish and reptiles. It's a much greater diversity than what we see in the Early Triassic -- and it's close to pre-extinction levels."

The study is one of the most important works to come out about the extinction event since a 2000 study which used uranium/lead ratios of zircons from rock sequences near Meishan, Changxing, Zhejiang Province, China (located in Western China) to definitively show when the event occurred -- approximately 251.4 ±0.03 mya (with elevated extinction rates for some time thereafter).

The scientific community has been desperate to discover more about the causes and impact of this world changing event.  Among the key questions is how the Earth's climate changed and what kind of disaster struck to cause the extinction.  Some speculate that volcanism contributed to the extinction, with geological evidence pointing to the Siberian Traps eruption which covered 2,000,000 square kilometers (772,204.3 sq mi) in lava.  Others point to a meteor impact, anoxia (lack of atmospheric oxygen), and/or hydrogen sulfide emissions from deep sea bacteria as play a role in the extinction.

While the debate about the event's causes continues, another critical question is how life evolved in response to the event.  That's where the new study really shines.

The new study uses fossil evidence extracted from a site in the Luoping in Yunnan Province, a souther Chinese province.  The site was in pristine condition and thus yielded an incredible amount of intact fossils, which allowed paleontologists to identify various specimens and begin analyzing the period's biodiversity.

The study unveils early versions of a number of infamous marine predators, including members of the bony fish genus Saurichthys (similar to today's sturgeon), the ichthyosaur genus Mixosaurus (which played a role similar to today's dolphins), the sauropterygian genus Nothosaurus (an ancestor to the larger plesiosaurs).

But the wealth of fossil evidence covers far more than these iconic predators.  It also showcases a variety of lower lifeforms, including the crustaceans, fishes and bivalves that the predators thrived upon.  Many of these creatures appear to have evolved key new features, not present in their Permian-survivor ancestors.

What is clear from the study, published in the journal 
Proceedings of the Royal Society B, is that the ever-flexible genome was able to allow diversity to rebound to pre-extinction levels in only 10 million years.  Previously it was far less certain exactly how quickly that recovery occurred.

States Professor Benton, "The fossils at Luoping have told us a lot about the recovery and development of marine ecosystems after the end-Permian mass extinction.  There's still more to be discovered there, and we hope to get an even better picture of how life reasserted itself after the most catastrophic global event in the history of our planet."

Professor Shixue Hu of the Chengdu Group cheered the discovery, stating that it will offer many decades to come of fruitful research.  He comments, "It has taken us three years to excavate the site, and we moved tonnes of rock. Now, with thousands of amazing fossils, we have plenty of work for the next ten years!"

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

life finds a way
By kattanna on 12/23/2010 1:29:25 PM , Rating: 5
what i always find interesting is just how more and more we are finding just how resilient life can be.

RE: life finds a way
By illuvatar81 on 12/23/2010 2:50:40 PM , Rating: 1
Rather unlike random chance and change.

RE: life finds a way
By RivuxGamma on 12/23/2010 6:16:02 PM , Rating: 3
Today must be opposite day

RE: life finds a way
By Targon on 12/23/2010 10:37:17 PM , Rating: 2
When you are looking at ten million years, random chance, mutations, and the slower evolution from natural selection can win out.

Random chance means that live could just as easily have died out rather than thrived, and what we have today is just one possible outcome.

RE: life finds a way
By PrinceGaz on 12/24/2010 11:59:45 AM , Rating: 5
That would be true if evolution was only going in one direction at a time, but it actually goes in numerous quite different directions simultaneously, meaning many (most?) do indeed die out whilst others thrive.

It would take something truly cataclysmic to cause every species to be unable to adapt and to die out completely.

Give an example?
By Iketh on 12/24/2010 12:46:31 AM , Rating: 1
Many of these creatures appear to have evolved key new features, not present in their Permian-survivor ancestors.

This is the closest the article came to explaining the headline. Can we get a specific example to prove the claim? I came away empty after reading this.

RE: Give an example?
By zixin on 12/24/2010 2:20:40 PM , Rating: 3
This is a blog site. You want detail, go google it.

By jrcaptain on 12/23/2010 6:52:46 PM , Rating: 3
I'm pretty sure it's a sturgeon and not a surgeon. Might want to fix...

By zippyzoo on 12/23/10, Rating: -1
RE: Fossil
By RugMuch on 12/23/2010 12:55:36 PM , Rating: 1
D) Don't forget Jason Mick needs the comment points so he writes these stories and then taps on the shoulder of the Ken Ham following.

RE: Fossil
By Denigrate on 12/23/2010 1:24:23 PM , Rating: 1
Most of these are pulled from AP stories. Nearly amounts to plagiarism.

RE: Fossil
By adiposity on 12/23/2010 2:27:07 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Fossil
By morphologia on 12/23/2010 3:15:32 PM , Rating: 5
Sorry...could you try to be a little more ignorant? You're just shy of a world record.

Every news agency in the world forwards other agencies' stories. It's called dissemination of information, in the world of grown-ups. Sources are cited and often a thematic take on the story is done, appropriate to the target market of the site.

It's about as plagiaristic as your average commentard parroting back their fellow whiners' comments, most of which amount to the truly revolutionary concept of "why is this news?" To which one can only reply: "Why do you care?"

RE: Fossil
By MartyLK on 12/23/2010 4:52:09 PM , Rating: 4
Thank you! Such relief, reading a proper response to something.

RE: Fossil
By Denigrate on 12/24/2010 8:20:36 AM , Rating: 1
I take it you two are journalism grads? It's one thing to use an AP story, it's another to regurgitate it and pretend you've "blogged" about it. Of course, I suppose that's "journalism" these days.

Sad really that this site has become an extension of Yahoo News. Very little original thought goes into the "stories" here these days.

Recovered within 10 million years
By YashBudini on 12/23/10, Rating: -1
By DanNeely on 12/23/2010 5:30:50 PM , Rating: 4
Did you mean 9,996,000 years, 99,996,000 years, or 9,999,600 years?

Either way I don't think any evangelicals are claiming the Earth is about 241m or about 151m years old.

Your botched trolling scores -2 Internets.

RE: Recovered within 10 million years
By FITCamaro on 12/23/10, Rating: 0
By amagriva on 12/28/2010 5:21:02 AM , Rating: 1
So maybe you've got a GTO?
You do "frequent" other macho-muscle man? That's not so gay...

"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki