backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by mostyle.. on Oct 25 at 5:05 AM


Mark Zuckerberg is now a proud member of a "Boy Love" group, thanks to Facebook pranksters. A new feature on the social network allows you to add friends to groups of arbitrary titles without their permission. Users are adding people to groups with suggestions of illegality -- such as terrorism, pedophelia, narcotics, or hate groups. Facebook apparently still thinks this feature is a good idea.  (Source: Facebook)

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook
Mark is now a proud member of NAMBLA

Any avid fan of South Park should be able to recall NAMBLA -- the North American Man/Boy Love Association -- which Cartman gets duped into joining.  The group actually exists in the real world, and has generated much controversy over the limits of free speech for its promotion of pedophilia, a illegal act in virtually all nations.

But NAMBLA is now in the spotlight for quite a different reason.  Pranksters have used Facebook's new features to create a NAMBLA group and have been adding their friends and coworkers to it.  The first high profile target to be hit was 
TechCrunch editor Michael Arrington.

But Mr. Arrington sought revenge, adding his friend to the group as well.  And that friend was none other than Facebook-founder Mark Zuckerberg, 26, who is now officially a member of the "Boy Love" group.

According to Sophos' security expert Chester Wisniewski, these aren't isolated incidents.  One of Mr. Wisniewski was added to a group "What about all the good things Hitler did?"

The problems arise from a new feature that allows users to tag friends in special titled circles dubbed "groups" (not to be confused with the former non-taggable Facebook groups).  Facebook intended users to create things like "family" or "college buds", but the feature has been largely used for pranks and malicious purposes thus far.

The world's largest social network has not rolled the feature out to all its users.  Under the implementation any friend can add you to an arbitrarily titled group, though you get a notification and can leave the group at any time.  There is no way to block friends from adding you to groups currently.

Mr. Wisniewski blasted Facebook's lack of discretion, pointing out that given the government's increasing surveillance of Facebook friends adding each other to groups with suggestions of illegal activities like terrorism could create real-world legal woes for the victims of their prank.

Facebook thus far has defended the feature.  A company spokeswoman writes 
PC Magazine,commenting, "We made the decision to allow Group members to add others to the Group in order to make the product simple, and because it resembles something we all understand: adding one of your contacts to an e-mail thread. Similarly to the controls in place for photo tagging, you can remove yourself from a Group at anytime. If you remove yourself from a Group, you can't be added back by a member."

The site has long been criticized for its handling of user privacy, but Mark Zuckerberg insists that users don't care about privacy as much anymore.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Higher resolution spy tools
By willis888 on 10/9/2010 10:11:38 AM , Rating: 5
"There is no way to block friends from adding you to groups"

I just deleted my facebook account. I'm pretty sure that will work.

I guess there were not enough people volunteering enough personal information about themselves to make the site a truly lucrative product to sell to law enforcement and telemarketers. Facebook now wants watchers watching watchers, all tagging their neighbor's activities that those people themselves have chosen to keep private.




RE: Higher resolution spy tools
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 10/9/2010 8:15:00 PM , Rating: 2
Privacy on the internet? What have you been smoking?


RE: Higher resolution spy tools
By IdBuRnS on 10/12/2010 9:43:01 AM , Rating: 2
Privacy on the internet seems to work for all the anonymous d-bags online who do nothing but troll videogame forums and make online play miserable for the rest of us.


RE: Higher resolution spy tools
By kattanna on 10/11/2010 11:47:40 AM , Rating: 2
whats funny is the other day i watched an interview on the colbert report with the guy who made the facebook movie.

the guy doesnt have a facebook account and stated that socializing on face book is as equal as reality tv shows are to reality.

made me laugh.


RE: Higher resolution spy tools
By mostyle on 10/25/2010 5:05:25 AM , Rating: 2
Now that's a beautiful statement.


Made my day.
By chagrinnin on 10/8/2010 5:53:08 PM , Rating: 5
Hilarious. Mark's one of the boy members, right? "Dumb fvck."




RE: Made my day.
By Chocobollz on 10/12/2010 5:04:40 AM , Rating: 2
Damn you ZvckerBorg! LOL


Take a look at that face.
By troysavary on 10/9/2010 7:58:14 AM , Rating: 4
Doesn't Mark look like a boy-lover anyway?




RE: Take a look at that face.
By Belard on 10/13/2010 5:58:45 PM , Rating: 2
Could be worse.... what if he was part of the Rent-A-Boy group?


You're Securing it wrong!
By jbwhite99 on 10/8/2010 6:15:37 PM , Rating: 2
"Mark Zuckerberg insists that users don't care about privacy as much anymore.". Explain to me why I logged on to your site and it says that someone may have compromised my ID earlier today (someone in Brazil, no less).

Mark, stop loving boys or men or Hitler or whatever, and fix security, or you can expect less ad revenue from me (actually, that is zero, thanks to Adblock).




Accident?
By Donallen on 10/18/2010 8:28:23 PM , Rating: 2
I just can't believe that Facebook, with their vast resources, make these privacy blunders on accident. Surely something as innocent as allowing a group owner the ability to add unbeknown friends to groups isn't just an effort to increase visibility of those groups and enhance ad-space value? Don. http://www.viewcaster.net/




"Hate groups"
By bill4 on 10/8/10, Rating: -1
RE: "Hate groups"
By bill4 on 10/8/10, Rating: -1
RE: "Hate groups"
By Howard on 10/14/2010 2:08:28 AM , Rating: 2
I don't even understand why he's calling NAMBLA a right-wing group.


RE: "Hate groups"
By espaghetti on 10/16/2010 1:06:44 AM , Rating: 2
"Users are adding people to groups with suggestions of illegality -- such as terrorism, pedophelia, narcotics, or hate groups."

Is this why you are blowing up on Mick?

Are you upset that Mick is doing a story on a "love" group and not a hate group?

Damn, I had to read the whole article twice to find the word hate. He doesn't even bring up a right wing group.

We know he's probably a liberal democrat...we get it...and got over it.

Still read the damn articles, because...well this one was funny.


"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber

















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki