backtop

Print E-mail del.icio.us 37 comment(s) - last by Hoser McMoose.. on Mar 22 at 4:22 PM
Manatee County's two plug-in hybrid buses to cost $450k USD

Hybrid automobile are slowly starting to gain acceptance and traction in the U.S. auto market and it now looks as though the Manatee County School District in Florida is going hybrid-crazy as well -- on a much larger scale. The school system is welcoming two plug-in hybrid school buses, Wouk and Limpio, into the 250-vehicle fleet.

Manatee County school buses travel over one million miles per year, so the stop-and-go nature of bus travel should be an opportune test for a hybrid bus. "Two years from now, we'll be standing here telling you how much we saved," said district vehicle maintenance supervisor Don Ross.

The two buses, which are manufactured by IC Corporation and Enova Systems Inc., will be tested for the next two years against two control buses which will run the same route. Detailed comparisons will be made between the four buses including acceleration/deceleration and fuel economy.

Wouk and Limpio, which are powered by a conventional diesel V8 internal combustion engine (ICE) and an 80 kW electric motor are expected to improve fuel efficiency by as much as 100% while reducing greenhouse emissions by up to 90%.

Manatee County's first foray into hybrid technology won't come cheap. Wouk and Limpio will cost $225,000 USD each.

Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Solar
By Harkonnen on 3/21/2007 1:07:49 AM , Rating: 2
They should put a bunch of solar panels on the roof. Since there is so much room. Could definitely improve the mileage even more.

All we need now is solar panels with like 50-60% efficiency :P




RE: Solar
By GhandiInstinct on 3/21/2007 1:49:58 AM , Rating: 2
Why don't ALL vehicle types have that, we all drive during sun light, why not save a little at least?

How much would they cost? A hybrid with solar panels, it's just connecting the battery.

A few small steps towards a giant leap of efficiency.


RE: Solar
By Hare on 3/21/2007 4:28:33 AM , Rating: 2
Because the cost of the panel is very high and the panels are very inefficient. A small panel wouldn't really help but it sure would cost a lot.

"A 1 m2 high-performance solar panel produces 200 watts of power under full sunlight but costs $2000"


RE: Solar
By Calin on 3/21/2007 12:11:15 PM , Rating: 2
Small solar panels are used on cars to compensate for the parasitic loads (alarm system, car radio, ...) in case the car is not started for a long time. I've heard Mercedes use them on some of their cars


RE: Solar
By Oregonian2 on 3/21/2007 1:46:16 PM , Rating: 2
Perhaps a Mercedes hybrid bus has one too. :-)


RE: Solar
By RogueSpear on 3/21/2007 1:02:33 PM , Rating: 2
I would think that if produced in enough quantity the cost would eventually come down.

I think that my schedule is fairly typical - my car is parked outside from about 7:30am until around 4 or 5pm Monday through Friday while I am in my office. Obviously not everyday is picture perfect sunny, 8 or so hours isn't all day long, and the roof of my car isn't exactly huge but I would think that it would make a difference.

I've seen things on the web where people basically "hack" their Prius by hooking up solar panels they have mounted at home. It's not quite the same as solar panels mounted on the vehicle itself, but if you're parked outside at home enough I suppose it could make a difference.


RE: Solar
By masher2 (blog) on 3/21/2007 1:36:07 PM , Rating: 1
Produce gold chains in quantity and they'll still be expensive. Because gold is rare...and so are the materials used to make high-efficiency solar panels. Until we get a technology breakthrough, their cost isn't going to drop substantially just from economies of scale. Solar panels also add parasitic weight and, if made flat for maximum efficiency, additional wind resistance. Both of which reduce vehicle efficiency.

Finally, if your vehicle is parked all day, it'd be far more efficient to just plug it in there, rather than carting around a massive solar panel whereever you go.


RE: Solar
By RogueSpear on 3/21/2007 6:41:28 PM , Rating: 2
Well if you want a gold chain, you have no choice but to use gold. Nothing says that solar panel all must use the same material. And in fact not all of them do. So do you think that every single kind of solar panel that are in production use very rare materials? I'm actually asking this seriously because I don't know - not trying to be a smartass.

If indeed this is the case I don't think that they will always require expensive material. I don't write down all of the details of what I read or clip out articles, but I've read plent of them discussing up and coming technologies. Technologies that have a realistic chance of coming to market in the near future.

http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/stor...


RE: Solar
By doctor sam adams on 3/21/2007 1:49:40 PM , Rating: 2
If the 200W figure is accurate, then across an 8 hour day at peak absorption you would get:

200 x 8 = 1600 watt-hours = 1.6 kilowatt-hours

That's enough energy to run 1.6 kilowatts of power for one hour. Let's say you can store that energy and use it all up in one second in a perfectly efficient manner:

1.6 kilowatt-hours x 3600 sec/hr = 5760 kilowatt-seconds = 5760 kilojoules

One horsepower is 768 watts. Assuming your engine is a moderately sized 175 horsepower engine, it has a power output of:

175 x 768 = 134.4 kilowatts = 134.4 kilojoules per second

Assuming that the engine output this power at 100% efficiency, your daily solar power collection would run the engine for about 42 seconds. However, realistically speaking, a car engine actually delivers around 10% of the energy it consumes, so that would be closer to 5 seconds of power.

Still a difference, but small. Now ponder how the oil managed to store up all that energy in the first place!


RE: Solar
By RogueSpear on 3/21/2007 6:34:09 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not going to argue with your math equations, but some of your assumptions are a little off - my Prius, a vehicle with rechargeable batteries that can be used toward moving the vehicle, does not put out 175hp.


RE: Solar
By Hoser McMoose on 3/22/2007 3:24:37 PM , Rating: 2
200W from a 1m^2 solar panel is a pretty ambitious amount! That's about the maximum I would expect from a current solar panel in mid-day sun, middle of summer and located in between the tropics. In real-world use in the U.S. you should probably expect more on the order of 100W/m^2 during daylight hours when average out throughout the year.

Now, quick off the top of my head estimate would put the roof of a bus at around 10m^2 (roughly 2m x 5m). That gives us 1KW worth of solar panel during daylight hours, or during an 8-hour school day we've got 8KWh worth of power. The buses have an 80KW electric drive system, so we're looking at about 6 minutes worth of charge for their electric motors per day. Not exactly going to get the thing very far (especially since it still needs the V8 engine in addition to the electric drive), and probably simply not worth the cost.


RE: Solar
By Mitch101 on 3/21/2007 10:04:50 AM , Rating: 2
I read somewhere there was a recent major breakthrough that could get solar cells way up on efficiency. Was announced about a month ago at most. Trying to find it but coming up empty.


RE: Solar
By Calin on 3/21/2007 12:13:51 PM , Rating: 2
Some more time ago, I've heard of some 40% efficiency - using a small active element, which is lighted through a refraction net. The refraction net will send away the infrared (which is not used by the active element) and add only the visible light on the cell.
However, this would need to be oriented perpendicular to the sun for best effects.


RE: Solar
By Hoser McMoose on 3/22/2007 3:33:09 PM , Rating: 2
The most efficient photovoltaic cell demonstrated in a lab was just over 40% efficient. This was just demoed a few months ago and it was a decently large jump over the previous record. Unfortunately it also used exotic materials that would make the implementation about 100 times as expensive as current (already not cheap) cells.

We aren't likely to get better then 25% efficiencies in anything at all economical for the next 15 years.


RE: Solar
By Hoser McMoose on 3/22/2007 4:22:02 PM , Rating: 2
The most efficient photovoltaic cell demonstrated in a lab was just over 40% efficient. This was just demoed a few months ago and it was a decently large jump over the previous record. Unfortunately it also used exotic materials that would make the implementation about 100 times as expensive as current (already not cheap) cells.

We aren't likely to get better then 25% efficiencies in anything at all economical for the next 15 years.


Cool
By Hyperlite on 3/20/2007 10:04:42 PM , Rating: 3
I've often wondered why more public transit hasn't converted to hybrids. oh, and LMAO at the article pic. =D




RE: Cool
By Fenixgoon on 3/20/2007 10:25:25 PM , Rating: 2
i didn't even notice that till i read your post.. that pic is money!


RE: Cool
By amdsupport on 3/20/2007 11:20:33 PM , Rating: 2
they do find some great photos to go with the articles, lol


RE: Cool
By RU482 on 3/21/2007 12:45:25 AM , Rating: 2
Hmm, from 2001 to 2003, I worked on the Hybrid Project that GM had for their buses. Last time I talked to the guys that were still working there, they said it was rolling out pretty well. Search for Allison Electric Drives EP40 and EP50.

For the 2002 LA Auto show, I helped put together a Silverado with a scaled down version of the buses 280HP electric transmission and a Duramax Diesel. It was a very kick a$$ project to work on. I think that their is a version of this drivetrain soon to be produced for these trucks as well.


RE: Cool
By Andrevas on 3/21/2007 5:52:41 AM , Rating: 2
Seattle has a large hybrid bus fleet and has for awhile now.


RE: Cool
By PrinceGaz on 3/21/2007 7:46:11 AM , Rating: 2
Here in Newcastle, NE England, there are a fleet of ten hybrid buses in regular service. Rather than using a conventional diesel powered internal combustion engine, they use a diesel powered turbine which gives much lower emissions and higher efficiency. They look pretty neat too, assuming you like bright yellow.

http://www.transport2000.org.uk/goodpractice/maint...

Okay so they weren't cheap at £250,000 each (approximately US$30,000,000 at current exchange rates ;) but you get what you pay for I suppose.