backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 183 comment(s) - last by killerb255.. on Apr 23 at 3:59 PM

Someone posted an ad saying all his possessions were free for the taking

What started as a Craigslist hoax ended with a Jacksonville, Oregon man losing almost all of his worldly possessions.

The ad appeared Saturday afternoon, stating that Robert Salisbury found himself suddenly forced to leave the area due to undisclosed circumstances, and that all his belongings were free for the taking.

Salisbury, an independent contractor, was unaware of the ad until he received the call from a concerned citizen. While driving home, Salisbury says he noticed several cars filled with his belongings, including a truck filled with his contracting equipment, which included work ladders, a lawn mower, and a weed eater. “I informed them I was the owner, but they refused to give the stuff back,” said Salisbury. “They showed me the Craigslist printout and told me they had the right to do what they did.”

After arriving at home, Salisbury found approximately 30 people rummaging through his home, including his front porch and his barn.

Salisbury says the trespassers, who showed him a copy of the ad and ignored his requests to stop, brushed him off. “They honestly thought that because it appeared on the Internet it was true," he said. “It boggles the mind.”

Michelle Easley, the woman that originally warned Salisbury of the ad, says she came to his house to claim his horse, which the ad described as abandoned by the sheriff’s department and free for the taking. “I can't stand to see a horse suffer so I drove out there and got her,” said Easley, “[but] the horse didn't look abandoned. She is in good shape for being 32 years old.”

Easley said the situation seemed odd, so she left a note on Salisbury’s door. However, after noticing a second ad appear on Craigslist, she said she decided to call him to confirm the ad’s legitimacy – and that’s when she learned it was a hoax.

“I feel bad because I was a part of it,” said Easley. “It felt right to call the police.”

The hoax has once again called into question Craigslist’s policy of anonymity towards its posters, which many feel is overly permissive. Craigscrimelist, which monitors the classified service for crime and fraud, said that hoaxes such as the one Salisbury fell victim to are likely to continue “as long as craigslist keeps their (sic) anonymity policy the way it is.”

Salisbury says he’s given a handful of license plate numbers to the police, and that he will accept items returned to him without any questions. Meanwhile, detectives are working with Craigslist’s legal team to determine who exactly was behind the prank.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

WOW
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 3/26/2008 8:28:42 AM , Rating: 5
That is just gut-wrenching. I can't even imagine the rage that would be going though me if I were to return home and see regular citizens carting off my stuff from MY HOUSE. I'd probably start going postal on them.

However, how did these people get in? Did he not lock his doors? Did they just break in and take the stuff?




RE: WOW
By Marvlarv on 3/26/08, Rating: 0
RE: WOW
By Ryanman on 3/26/08, Rating: 0
RE: WOW
By m1ldslide1 on 3/26/2008 3:06:30 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
by Ryanman on March 26, 2008 at 2:43 PM

this whole article is a prime example of why everyone should have a gun. Kthx.


So that it could be stolen as part of the looting and then used in a violent crime? If you actually read the article you'd have seen that he wasn't at home, which is precisely why this was able to happen.


RE: WOW
By Ryanman on 4/10/2008 3:34:43 PM , Rating: 2
I was joking : /


RE: WOW
By Ammohunt on 3/26/2008 6:26:58 PM , Rating: 2
Exactly, but you are talking about Oregon i doubt they have a make my day law there. Hell the State doesn't even trust you to pump your own gas(who the hell would live in place like that)


RE: WOW
By kenji4life on 3/27/2008 3:08:51 AM , Rating: 5
The law isn't that you can't pump your own gas, imbecile.

We don't have to pump our own gas because Oregon still has attendants to do it.

FYI, at my card lock station I pump my own gas. Most Oregonians are happy that they can relax in the car while someone else sucks down the fumes. It creates jobs which the oil companies can certainly afford, and frankly I think all states should bring attendants back. Service in this country has gone by the wayside, and it's especially noticeable if you've ever filled up in Japan, or bought tires from a place like Les Schwab (yeah that's Oregon too).

As for the guns, the smarter of us keep ours in a safe, preferably bolted to the floor from the inside. None of my guns will be used in crimes. If I were to come home to a bunch of people cleaning my stuff out, you better believe my first stop is the gun safe, where I will find extra motivation for uninvited guests to leave. Though nobody would be shot, a 12 gauge in the face is a good reason to put down the stolen goods and leave.

P.S.

Oregon doesn't want any of you anyways, so stay out.


RE: WOW
By kenji4life on 3/27/2008 3:16:01 AM , Rating: 4
p.p.s. For clarification, there is a law that owners of gas stations cannot permit untrained people to pump gas, which basically requires them to employ attendants.

That means that it is technically illegal for you to pump your own gas at some stations, but it does not mean that it's 'outright illegal to pump your own gas'

Oh, and I'm starting to rethink use of my gun, because if someone was walking out with something precious like my beer, I just might have to shoot them and use them for fertilizer... Keep Oregon Green!


RE: WOW
By mindless1 on 3/29/2008 3:25:13 PM , Rating: 1
So you've backtracked, admitted to being too lazy to fuel a vehicle you have no trouble burning the fuel away in, and can't figure out how to simply pump gas without sucking fumes. Pat yourself on the back for calling someone else an imbecile!


RE: WOW
By dluther on 4/1/2008 1:31:19 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
p.p.s. For clarification, there is a law that owners of gas stations cannot permit untrained people to pump gas, which basically requires them to employ attendants.


I think you must have a very myopic world view if you can equate "cannot permit untrained people to pump gas" with "must employ attendants". The legal resolution to this argument is that the required training is clearly printed on the pumps themselves.


RE: WOW
By MrBlastman on 4/1/2008 3:56:24 PM , Rating: 2
Have you ever been to New Jersey?

Try pumping your own gas there - you'll get ticketed. It is against the law.

You must have an attendant do it for you.


RE: WOW
By S3anister on 3/29/2008 11:51:04 PM , Rating: 2
Living in Washington (Not D.C.) I've come to realize, that Oregon is the Canada of America. Honestly, it's hard to tell the difference when you're in either place.


RE: WOW
By Oregonian2 on 3/27/08, Rating: 0
RE: WOW
By mindless1 on 3/29/2008 3:31:27 PM , Rating: 3
Having every tank at every station attended does nothing to lower cost, you still have to pay employees to do it. Do you really think insurance rates are lower? Bet they're same or higher due to possible health consequences of constantly pumping gas. Tiny traces of fumes are no problem but continually being in them is a bit worse.

I think it's dumb that you think states should require something that can be optional. There are a heck of a lot of gas stations within 10 miles of here and there are no significant problems from people pumping their own. Maybe it makes you feel pampered, if you are willing to pay for that go right ahead but please spare us the nonsense trying to paint it as something else.


RE: WOW
By Oregonian2 on 4/1/2008 9:45:45 PM , Rating: 2
My comment about other states not requiring it was just a counter attack equally devoid of strength and thought as those thrown at Oregon. Just felt good throwing the mud back. Sorry if you took it seriously.

Whenever the issue has come to a voter's vote, which it has a number of times with each time self-serve being voted down, issues of cost come up. Have you read or seen all of the writeups on it when we have those votes? I have -- being one of those voters.

The impact on cost was minimal to non-existent even when gas was cheap (where now even if there is a difference, it'd be infinitesimal).

There usually is one guy handling 6~8 pumps. Guy probably makes something not much more than minimum wage I bet and is pumping maybe $40~50 for each of those 6~8 pumps. Imagine the percentage of dollar volume that his salary represents. A lot less than the money banks charge for using a charge card at the gas station. Should charge cards be outlawed from gas stations because they cost even more than the guy pumping your car? I think not for that too. As to insurance rates, that was an argument made during the last vote. I don't know personally how true that was.


RE: WOW
By icydesign on 3/30/2008 2:49:13 PM , Rating: 3
Living in Oregon has confused you. Gas pumps automatically shut off when you've filled your tank.


RE: WOW
By Oregonian2 on 4/1/2008 9:49:05 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, right. Washington state is maybe ten miles from me (I'm in metro Portland) and I visit relatives in California and Nevada. I've seen gas dribbling down cars and pools on the cement smelling the place up.

Wonder how that happened if the pump turns off and doesn't allow people to pull it out as much as possible and top it off with just the tip (as a guess on my part). I've seen/smelled it. You explain it to me.


RE: WOW
By killerb255 on 4/23/2008 3:59:19 PM , Rating: 2
In theory, yes, it's supposed to auto-shutoff. I'm not sure exactly how it works, but I think the hose or nozzle acts as a pressure sensor. Usually, when I fill up, I'll lock the trigger in place, go in the gas station, use the can, buy some stuff, come back out, and the pump automatically stops.

Granted some people do top off their tanks, but that's just asking for a spill.


RE: WOW
By 7Enigma on 3/26/2008 8:56:15 AM , Rating: 4
If this was me I would pick the lock of the guys house, open all the doors, THEN post the listing, wait until several people came, and THEN go to town taking stuff. Basically a safety in numbers theory.

To those "innocent" takers to the hoax before the owner came home I would hope they return the items. To those that refused when the owner arrived home, they are darn lucky it wasn't me.

Because like you I would slap them silly with the print out of the listing.

If they still refused, well it wouldn't be me calling the police on them....