backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 76 comment(s) - last by rburnham.. on Feb 5 at 9:52 AM


Mount Redoubt, a large volcano in Alaska, shown here erupting in 1989, is expected to erupt within days or weeks. Its ash could be very dangerous to air traffic to Anchorage, Alaska's most populous city, which the volcano neighbors  (Source: W. M. White/Alaska Volcano Observatory/USGS)
I can see that volcano from my house!

DailyTech recently reported on fears of a Yellowstone supervolcano.  While Yellowstone's ongoing geological activity is certainly worrisome, it pales in comparison to the long history of activity in Alaska, arguably North America's most seismically active site.

Alaska was already home to many active or recently active volcanoes, including Mount Veniaminof, Mount Gilbert, Mount Griggs and many more.  There are so many volcanoes that Alaska has considered using heat energy from smoldering volcanoes as an alternative energy power source.

However, the downside of having so many volcanoes is the potential for a major eruption.  Now a major volcano, Mount Redoubt, located a mere 100 miles southwest of Anchorage, the state's most populous city, appears on the verge of a major eruption.

In recent days, the Alaska Volcano Observatory has observed  a sharp increase in the Volcano's seismic activity, an important warning indicator that precedes most major eruptions.  Peter Cervelli describes, "The level of seismic activity increased markedly.  We don't have a crystal ball.  (But) we expect based on the past behavior of this volcano that this activity is going to culminate in an eruption."

The mountain is a relatively tall 10,197-foot peak.  Continuous volcanic tremors coupled with smaller quakes convinced the Observatory to raise the warning level this week.  The volcano last erupted in December 1989, and continued until April 1990.  Scientists say they expect an eruption "similar to or smaller than the one that occurred in 1989-90."

An eruption could spell trouble for Anchorage, whose airport is one of the busiest in the state.  According to Mr. Cervelli, volcanic ash can cause engine failure on jets.  He describes, "It's not the closest volcano to Anchorage.  (But) it has the potential to disrupt air traffic at Anchorage."

An eruption could trigger the release of toxic volcanic mudflows, or lahars, down the Drift River as the 1989/1990 one did.  It could also drop ash across much of Alaska.

The Alaska Volcano Observatory is aggressively monitoring the state of the beast with gas sensors and webcams.  They will continue to provide the public with updates of the potential eruption's progress.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Volcano gods unhappy
By omgwtf8888 on 1/29/2009 3:19:10 PM , Rating: 4
We need to quickly find out if the Volcano gods are happy or angry with the current Alaskan leader, Sarah Palin. Once we decide this, we can decide who gets thrown into the volcano to appease the gods, Palin? Pelosi? maybe that Katie Couric. Maybe we could sacrifice some of those corporate execs and their private planes.




RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By LostInLine on 1/29/2009 3:31:37 PM , Rating: 5
Volcano gods demand virgins, so maybe you could throw in Richard Branson.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Motoman on 1/29/2009 4:36:19 PM , Rating: 4
...I'd just like to take this moment to point out that I am not, repeat, NOT, going to make a joke about Palin's daughter in light of the virgin aspect noted above. That is all.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By mikefarinha on 1/29/2009 6:05:56 PM , Rating: 4
Good, it most likely wouldn't have been very funny in the first place.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By S3anister on 1/29/2009 7:40:30 PM , Rating: 4
Didn't your mother ever tell you "If you can't say anything nice, don't say it at all"?


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Spectator on 1/30/09, Rating: -1
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By FaceMaster on 1/30/2009 11:36:57 AM , Rating: 5
So THAT'S why nobody talks to me.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By vdewd on 2/2/2009 2:27:49 PM , Rating: 1
Moms in prison for armed robbery, I say throw palin in to appease the gods.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Ryanman on 1/30/2009 9:07:52 AM , Rating: 3
You see, I'm thinking Nancy Grace is GUILTY when it comes to all of the world's problems.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Motoman on 1/30/2009 12:39:33 PM , Rating: 2
Seconded.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Avitar on 2/3/2009 12:59:12 PM , Rating: 2
All in favor say HIKE!


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Chemical Chris on 1/29/09, Rating: -1
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Chemical Chris on 1/29/09, Rating: -1
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By AnnihilatorX on 1/30/09, Rating: -1
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Regs on 2/4/2009 1:26:11 PM , Rating: 2
You got rated down to a 1 at first because you used bad language =(.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By VaultDweller on 1/30/2009 7:56:52 AM , Rating: 5
I'm not sure if you got the joke.

I think Branson a pretty cool guy and a fine philanthropist, but one cannot create a business empire named Virgin and expect to avoid being the butt of some jokes.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By DeuceHalo on 1/30/2009 2:25:55 PM , Rating: 3
It's not every day one can see the words Virgin and butt used seriously in the same sentence. :)


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Mclendo06 on 1/29/2009 3:47:40 PM , Rating: 5
Truly, we should examine ourselves to determine what behavior on our part has provoked the volcano into this imminent eruption. Perhaps by being more tolerant of volcanistic beliefs in our culture, we can prevent future eruptions from endangering us.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By omnicronx on 1/29/2009 5:35:59 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
Truly, we should examine ourselves to determine what behavior on our part has provoked the volcano into this imminent eruption.
Perhaps it is angry because it did not receive any bailout cash?


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By rcc on 1/29/2009 7:45:58 PM , Rating: 5
It's angry because part of mankind is trying to take credit for it's global warming efforts.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By FITCamaro on 1/29/2009 9:34:32 PM , Rating: 5
Win.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By scrapsma54 on 1/29/2009 10:02:55 PM , Rating: 1
Gloabal Wurming ftw


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By rubyxc7 on 1/30/09, Rating: 0
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Spivonious on 1/30/2009 10:12:14 AM , Rating: 2
Give this man a 6.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Grabo on 1/30/09, Rating: 0
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By rcc on 1/30/2009 1:45:59 PM , Rating: 2
I have broad shoulders, if you want to blame me for what a volcano does a couple thousand miles away, so be it.

It does follow a long trend in todays society to find someone to blame. Truly peoplekind are rationalizing animals, not rational animals.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By arazok on 1/30/2009 3:11:22 PM , Rating: 3
And throwing all that money down a volcano would have had the same result on the economy.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By phxfreddy on 1/29/2009 3:56:22 PM , Rating: 1
The volcano Tanu is irritated that we are so stupid as to listen to the false god profit Al Gore.

( intentional spelling as I would say scoring 100 million dollars off a scam like global warming warrants title of "profit" not prophet )


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/29/09, Rating: -1
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By mikefarinha on 1/29/2009 6:12:56 PM , Rating: 3
Interesting...

I find it interesting at how casually and easy folks on the left talk about violence towards those they disagree with. While conservatives strongly disagree with liberals their casual references to violence against those they disagree with pales in comparison.

Heck just like at Clinton and Bush (and Obama). There has been so many postings on the internet and references in the media about violence against Bush. Conservatives bitterly despise Clinton and the policies he pushed but rarely wish any type of physical harm on him or his family.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By allometry on 1/29/2009 7:53:08 PM , Rating: 1
Couldn't have said it any better myself.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Etsp on 1/29/09, Rating: 0
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By masher2 (blog) on 1/29/2009 11:26:46 PM , Rating: 4
> "Well, Clinton didn't start any wars"

Clinton initiated more military actions than did Bush, in regions ranging from Afghanistan, Bosnia, Iraq, Serbia, and even a brief bombing run on Sudan.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By zombiexl on 1/30/2009 9:44:57 AM , Rating: 2
People forget how much the world hated us then. I would get private messages on IRC all the time from people outside the US saying things like clinton = hitler (or satan).

During the clinton administration, my buddy was over in germany and saw a group of people. He started walking towards the crowd to see what was up and it was a huge anti-american rally. Yes that happend under clinton..

Much of the world dislikes us, just like mnay people hate rich people.. you know, for no good reason.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By michael67 on 2/1/2009 2:02:16 AM , Rating: 1
Maybe Clinton wasn't popular, but Bush created a hole new level of being unpopular in the eyes of the world.

And i could say most of America's problems are because of always short term interests when it comes to foreign policy and only support groups as long as interest are the same and got dropped after they warned needed anymore
(Afghanistan upraise to USSR, Iraq groups that got abandoned after golf-war I, Golf-war II only for oil and people ware even better of under Saddam, operation AJAX, ect. ect.)

But whats the point conservatives here would say i just speak BS,only problem is, its not BS for the people that got screwed by old policies they sort of remember.

Obama has a change here for getting the USA in a better view in the eyes of the world.
1. he got voted mainly as a vote for change
2. he is black what will help in some parts of the world.

Only he needs to gravel a bit, if he can do that he has a change to make the world a lot saver.
Saying sorry to people instead of sending in the marines will help a lot.
(i would react different to some one i don't like, if he starts by saying hey sorry about the past but could we start over, even if the fault is at both sides, some one has to make the first move)


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By mars777 on 1/30/2009 10:50:34 AM , Rating: 2
The OP said "didn't *start* any wars".
From what i know in the ex Yugoslavia there was a war already and it was a massacre lead from Serbia to the other states wishing to become nations. Thats why Serbia and the serbian part of Bosnia was bombarded.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By djdjohnson on 1/30/2009 4:58:09 AM , Rating: 5
The economy was in bad shape when Clinton left office. Did you forget when the dot com bubble burst? Yep, under Clinton. Maybe Al Gore should have worked on the Internet a little longer.

Not that I think that Presidents have that much to do with the state of the economy.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By JonnyDough on 1/30/2009 10:43:11 PM , Rating: 2
How can anyone forget the TRADE DEAL WITH CHINA that Clinton passed. Dude, he freaking ruined our economy. He made it easy for corporations to outsource, and he made a deal with a country that has little belief in or understanding of intellectual property.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By djdjohnson on 1/30/2009 5:15:59 AM , Rating: 3
Pretty much everybody hated the job that Carter had done when he was voted out of office, both left and right. That's why an actor beat an incumbent in such a landslide (489 to 49 electoral votes). Carter had a hard time doing anything right. While he was in office inflation was out of control. Gasoline was scarce enough that you had to wait in line for hours to be rationed a small amount at outrageous prices. We had hostages in Iran that Carter was doing little about. Unemployment was pretty bad too. But I don't recall anyone threatening the President with bodily harm.

Point is that conservatives tend to be much more patient with people they disagree with than the far left are with their opponents. There was frustration with Carter, but not the rage that some feel for Bush.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Screwballl on 1/30/2009 12:06:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
There was frustration with Carter, but not the rage that some feel for Bush.


Exactly, when we have a president that does almost nothing (Carter), is much worse than the one who actually acts and does something (Bush Sr and Jr). At least the Bush's had the balls to do something, even if they were fed incorrect information. If Saddam tried invading Kuwait, that means at that time he had some sort of WMDs available. the 8 years of Clinton sitting back and doing nothing about it allowed Saddam enough time to sell/dispose of everything he had as our intelligence increased about the weapons.

Also people need to realize that the president cannot say "send the military to X" without approval from Congress. Congress relies on the same information and intelligence that the president does. People may be/have been angry at Bush but they really need to be angry at the entire line ranging from the CIA/FBI feeding incorrect intel, Congress for approving military action, Bush advisers and on down the line. Unfortunately because the president is the figurehead with only small number of powers, none of which he had power to do alone during his administration.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Black69ta on 1/30/2009 7:28:56 PM , Rating: 2
Slightly incorrect, Congress is the only branch with the power to declare "war". The president does have command of the Military and the power to instigate military action. but afterward there is only a certain amount of time that the president must inform congress and get permission to stay. but it would be rare for congress to pull troops out. and kill confidence in the President.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/29/2009 9:26:00 PM , Rating: 1
Nope.... I was not talking about violence... as in man made violence upon each other... as you state in your comment... I was talking about the uncontrollable force of nature aka volcano eruption. That none of us can hide from. Like what happened to Pompeii when Mt. Vesuvius blew it's top.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By ekv on 1/29/2009 11:42:32 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It would be a wonderful sight to see if this volcano would go all Pompeii (Mt. Vesuvius) on Palin , just her & only her, before 2012.

You could go to work for the New York Times with a retraction like that.

Or perhaps you're doing your Obama impression, "No, that's just not true. What I said was ..." Uhuh. I know what you said. And now I know you're not man enough to back it up. Not that you said anything that could be backed up. Right?


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/30/09, Rating: 0
RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By zombiexl on 1/30/2009 9:39:56 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Just like there are many Americans out there who believe that since President Obama has a Muslim name because of his father, that he is Muslim too. Even though the evidence proves otherwise.


Evidence clearly shows he was muslim for at least a few years. Otherwise he would not have been able to attend school in indonesia at the time.

But I see where you're going.. Just like some people though bush caused Katrina. Or how some people blamed Bush for the dot com bust becuase he had already been elected when it happend. Or maybe how some people thought it was OK for a president to commit purgery because "hey it was only a blowjob".


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/30/2009 9:51:40 AM , Rating: 2
A few years when he was a child (how old was he), not when he was an adult. So choices that were made for him by his father, mother or whom ever & etc., not his choice. Like it was not my choice to go to church when I was younger, I was forced to go by my parents when I was a kid. I hated going to church and still do, so do not go now my choice since I am an adult. So things from his past when he was a child that were forced upon him by his father or whom ever should not be held against him now.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By zombiexl on 1/30/2009 10:08:52 AM , Rating: 1
He was 10. Back then, he coulndt have attended school unless he was muslim and a citizen of indonesia. Which brings up other issues that I wont get into right now.

The point is that he was a Muslim, being taught in a western hating school for like 4 years before returning to Hawaii to live with his mothers parents.

Personally I dont care about his religion. I was just posting a fact. I'm more concerned with his clearly socialist agenda.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/30/2009 10:24:38 AM , Rating: 2
Ok.. that is true. But after that exposure to the Muslim faith and the teaches at that western hating school in Indonesia, when he became an adult he chose to stay in the US, he chose to stay Christian, he chose to run for political office & etc. He decided on many things that had no bases on his childhood, his father, his Muslim name (he could have legally changed it, but did not), & etc. As we all do, when we become adults or start making decisions for ourselves in teenage years during life situations.

He is not a wolf in sheep's skin, trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Not like what other past Presidents have done, but I am not going to get into that right now.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By zombiexl on 1/30/2009 11:54:50 AM , Rating: 2
Actually he did change his name to Barry Soetoro while living in Indonesia.

And for the record his name is african in basis, not muslim.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By DeuceHalo on 1/30/2009 2:17:30 PM , Rating: 2
Gotta love DailyTech - where just about any article can be turned into a political discussion. :)


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Jim28 on 2/3/2009 1:27:21 PM , Rating: 2
And you know this how?
Maybe because he sent tingling sensations down your leg?

You can prove this how?


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By ekv on 1/30/2009 5:40:49 PM , Rating: 2
ok, so what are you backing up? Your first entry suggested violoence "on Palin." Your second entry said you weren't suggesting violence. Which is it? One or the other.

Who told you Palin is a religious zealot/fanatic? Was it MTV? or perhaps MoveOn.org? Daily Kos? or perhaps your teacher in Junior High School? Palin has stated her beliefs up front and stood by them. Rationally. Unlike any other politician I've seen for quite some time (unfortunately). Now because you disagree with her you want ... want what? the "uncontrollable force of nature" to take her out? or perhaps that is your unconscious, uncontrollable nature that wants to do it personally?

Because of your irrational, opinionated fear that potentially she will be elected to higher office in 2012, then it's ok to discuss real violence against her?

At this point, I don't think you're qualified to say what we Americans do or do not need. [Since when do we need more violence, or lies]. I'm thinking that perhaps you are the religious fanatic. Yes, liberalism qualifies as a religion. Try reading "Godless: The Church of Liberalism" by Ann Coulter. Or perhaps you're a misogynist, and you fear her as well?


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By mikefarinha on 1/30/2009 1:29:54 AM , Rating: 2
I didn't specify man made violence and didn't intend to.

The point is you wish physical harm on someone you don't even know. Quite sad.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By bmheiar on 1/30/2009 9:08:24 AM , Rating: 2
LMAO... and you can not tell me that you think she does not believe in harming someone else (aka physical violence, death, war over different religious beliefs, & etc.), because of them having a different religion, belief system, moral values & etc., than her (religious intolerance) after her comment during the election in an interview, that her son is a "holy warrior" because he is serving in the US military.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By superflex on 1/30/2009 11:02:30 AM , Rating: 2
Did your momma drop you on your head or did that just happen from your backpeddling? Dude, you wished harm upon her which is wrong. Admit it without going into a diatribe about Bush, the Iraq war or whatever else put you panties in a wad.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Targon on 1/30/2009 7:58:48 AM , Rating: 1
It is a basic concept that most liberals feel that freedom to do what they want is worth fighting for, while the social conservatives tend to want to force their moral/religious beliefs on everyone, no matter if it violates the freedoms of those people.

So, when a conservative tries to force their religious/moral views on others, they will be met with anger. Now, conservatives ARE better at keeping thoughts of violence toward liberals quiet when in mixed/questionable company, so it isn't that there is a lack of wishing for harm to come to certain people, it is just them being quiet about it.

Remember, those who go to church regularly(most conservatives) are taught more about doing what is considered right in their community than many liberals. This means not talking in front of the people they are gossiping about and such.

There is a big difference between disagreeing with someone and someone who is trying to force their beliefs on others and those others not finding that acceptable. If a law were in the works by liberals that would force all unwed mothers to have an abortion, how much desire would there be for the politician(s) behind such a law to come to harm?

The problem isn't with the morals of the conservatives, it is the attempt to push those morals on the rest of society, even when it goes against the will of those people.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By zombiexl on 1/30/2009 9:57:06 AM , Rating: 2
I dont agree with that at all.. I'm conservative and I could give 2 $hits less what you do as long as it causes me and my family no harm and costs us no money..

for example: I personally dont agree with abortion, but I could care less if someone has one if its not my child.

No one is trying to push religion on you. Morals are morals. It all can be summed up with the golden rule, i assume you know that already.

But as for the facts.. This country was founded on freedom of religion (amoung other things), not freedom from religion. The facts clearly show that the founders were followers or christ (not sure of their exact religion). Our laws are based pretty closely on the 10 commandments (which covers murder, theft, etc) and more loosly (as i said above) the golden rule..

Liberals are the ones trying to put sex education in the gradeschools. Including teaching about homosexuality. I'm sorry but that is FORCING something on someone, who most likely isny mentally ready to be taught that. This is just one example, if you'd like more i'll be more than glad to post additional examples.


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By Etsp on 1/29/2009 4:20:50 PM , Rating: 2
I say we play it safe and toss them all in...


RE: Volcano gods unhappy
By RoberTx on 1/31/2009 2:43:15 AM , Rating: 2
Or we could make fun of punks like you.


Extra Extra Read all about it!
By emoser96 on 1/29/2009 3:33:41 PM , Rating: 2
Volcano set to erupt as a result of Catrastrophic Global Climate Change! See news at 5 to find out what you can do to save our environment!

I can't wait to see Al Gore's next interview/blong/whatever entry.




By emoser96 on 1/29/2009 3:34:59 PM , Rating: 2
oh that's cool. If only I knew how to automatically double post all the time....


RE: Extra Extra Read all about it!
By DigitalFreak on 1/29/2009 4:28:29 PM , Rating: 2
Since Mick posted this, I figured "global warming" would figure into it somehow.


By superflex on 1/29/2009 5:13:06 PM , Rating: 2
I'm suprised he didn't blame Bush.

Jason knows volcanism like Obama knows (insert jab here)


By MrPickins on 1/29/2009 6:05:57 PM , Rating: 5
I hope the volcano bought carbon credits to offset its impact.


Ol big ears
By blowfish on 1/29/2009 11:21:19 PM , Rating: 3
The strangest thing for me is how Palin was ever in a beauty pageant - she's just fugly.




RE: Ol big ears
By MrPoletski on 1/30/2009 4:59:24 AM , Rating: 3
I'd do her.

look at it this way, she can't squawk her god awful ignorant tosh when her mouth is full.


RE: Ol big ears
By plowak on 1/30/2009 6:42:35 AM , Rating: 3
This is very a democratic forum - I can see that it's open to those of any IQ.


RE: Ol big ears
By superflex on 1/30/2009 11:13:19 AM , Rating: 2
Ol big ears is the socialist retard in the oval office.


RE: Ol big ears
By rburnham on 2/5/2009 9:52:02 AM , Rating: 2
Palin isn't too shabby to look at.


Sensational Headlines
By napalmjack on 1/29/2009 4:06:03 PM , Rating: 5
quote:
Major Alaska Volcano Set to Blow Next Week


Come on, Jason. You polish your words as such to imply that the volcano was on a timer, and the timer is going to run out precisely (sometime) next week. Then, in the article, you say that it shows signs similar to activity recorded before the last blow. That's not certainty; just a probability. Here's another way you could have worded it: "Major Alaskan Volcano Could Blow Next Week."

quote:
DailyTech recently reported on fears of a Yellowstone supervolcano. While Yellowstone's ongoing geological activity is certainly worrisome, it pales in comparison to the long history of activity in Alaska, arguably North America's most seismically active site.


I just don't see how a freaking supervolcano, maybe the greatest geological threat to this planet, let alone this hemisphere, can 'pale' in comparison to anything. Sure, maybe Alaska doesn't get an abundance of attention, but in this case, there's a reason.

Otherwise, great article.




RE: Sensational Headlines
By MrPoletski on 1/30/2009 5:01:24 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I just don't see how a freaking supervolcano...


We should go and gouge a giant 'S' in the side of it, put a triangle round it too.


Webcast
By Nirach on 1/30/2009 7:23:57 AM , Rating: 3
An important question that seems to be missing so far:

Can we watch the webcams that're currently pointed at it?




By PAPutzback on 1/29/2009 3:13:56 PM , Rating: 2
I don't like natural disasters but I do like watching Hurricans forming and try to out guess the meteorologists on where these things are headed and how severe they will get.




Its In Code
By FredEx on 1/31/2009 1:04:03 AM , Rating: 1
I think the title of the story is in code, especially since there is a pic of the HOT Alaskan, Palin, up there.

Alaskan Volcano to Blow!

Yeah, in my dreams!




Pele
By Grumpy1 on 1/29/09, Rating: 0
Extra Extra Read all about it!
By emoser96 on 1/29/09, Rating: 0
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini














botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki