backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 68 comment(s) - last by Carter642.. on May 8 at 10:53 PM


An artist rendering of how the MARS system is designed to work.  (Source: Magenn Power)

The MARS system is fully built and undergoing testing, on the road to commercial deployment.  (Source: Magenn CEO Pierre Rivard)
It's a blimp, It's a dirigible!

While interest in solar power is picking up, another technology is also gaining a lot of attention.  The chief problems with wind power are consistency and strength of the winds.  Some areas simply do not get strong winds regularly and even areas that do can go days without experiencing strong winds.  One solution is to build turbines at higher altitudes land areas.

Another decidedly more novel idea is to ditch the ground altogether and attach windmills to airships or kites.  Makani Power is already receiving funding from Google to float kites into the jet stream in an attempt to harness its power.  Now another company is looking to deploy a massive tethered blimp, which will continuous turn in the wind, generating power.  While such a device may sound like fodder for a science fiction novel, it's precisely what Magenn Power is looking to market.  The Canadian startup is looking to take wind power to the air in a big way.

The culmination of its work is the Magenn Air Rotor System (MARS) prototype.  This massive helium filled blimp looks like a giant sausage with "riverboat blades" as Pierre Rivard CEO of Magenn Power states.  The airship is ground tethered, and the blades catch the wind, turning it on a horizontal axis and generating power.

Magenn Power is currently testing the finished prototype at the TCOM flight-test facility in North Carolina.  The center, “the Mecca of big airships" according to Rivard, has seen little use since World War II.  But it's the only facility large enough to conduct an indoor test of the massive MARS prototype.

The company aims to deploy its finished products at a height of around 600 to 1,000 feet, significantly increasing the amount of wind it receives.  Magenn claims a fully commercialized version will produce anywhere from 10 kW to several megawatts, depending on the model.

Rivard says, Magenn's design is making history.  He states, "This is a world’s first, there has never been a rotating airship test done before."

A seasoned veteran of the fuel cell industry, Rivard left fuel-cell developer Hydrogenics to join Magenn in August, excited by the company's big dreams.  And he can't contain his enthusiasm for the device.  As the MARS prototype inflates, he enthuses, "As I talk to you, this whole envelope in the past 20 minutes has formed.  It’s almost totally formed now, like the birth of a new child."

While Rivard revels in seeing his work in action, he also has been hard at work raising funding for the startup.  Last year he secured $5M USD in funding from California-based Quercus Trust.  The Quercus Trust is an alternative energy investment firm founded by mathematician-turned-philanthropist David Gelbaum.  It invested heavily in other promising startups, including solar-hydrogen producer Nanoptek and algae-to-biofuel LiveFuels.

This year Rivard and Magenn hope to secure even larger funding, in preparation for commercialization.  After testing at TCOM, they look to showcase the prototype in an outdoor test, which they hope will raise $12M USD in funding.  Rivard states, "We would like to bring in customers and investors who have already expressed an interest in seeing it."

After the initial demo, Magenn plans to offer four more unique demos.  One will be an industrial site, such as a mine, and the blimp will replace the power generation of the diesel used in the plant.  Other sites will be a Caribbean island, a farm and a national park.

Rivard's initial system will be pricier than traditional wind turbines, but should produce more power.  He states, "With a conventional turbine, you typically have a utilization ratio of 20 to 25 percent, but with us, because we go higher, you have more constant and stronger winds, so the utilization ratio is more like 50 percent."


Comments     Threshold


BAM!
By TimberJon on 5/6/08, Rating: 0
RE: BAM!
By spluurfg on 5/6/2008 11:40:48 AM , Rating: 1
2-3 rounds from a light AA gun fired at a nuclear power plant or oil refinery would probably do a lot of damage too. Plus people might die.


RE: BAM!
By masher2 (blog) on 5/6/2008 11:51:06 AM , Rating: 3
Actually, tests have been done of a fully-loaded fighter jet impacting at 600+ mph the concrete containment structure of a reactor. No significant damage was noted.
A light AA gun wouldn't even scratch the surface.

In any case, the real barrier to such wind-based solutions isn't their fragility. It's the tremendously high per-kWh cost of energy generated with such approaches. Furthermore, I rather doubt this will ever scale up to the multi-megawatt range...the weight of a feeder cable capable of carrying that much amperage would, I think be prohibitive in itself.


RE: BAM!
By spluurfg on 5/6/2008 1:59:07 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
In any case, the real barrier to such wind-based solutions isn't their fragility.


That was my point... that economics should be the main consideration, not succeptibility to anti aircraft fire


RE: BAM!
By afkrotch on 5/6/2008 3:04:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Actually, tests have been done of a fully-loaded fighter jet impacting at 600+ mph the concrete containment structure of a reactor. No significant damage was noted.
A light AA gun wouldn't even scratch the surface.


You mean a fighter jet slamming into an untethered concrete block at around 450 mph.

I still don't see a light AA doing much of anything to a reactor, but it sure would put a dent into a regular power station. That or drive a semi through a photovoltaic power station, but I don't think the US Airforce would like it too much if you decided to drive through their's at Nellis.


RE: BAM!
By KillerNoodle on 5/7/2008 1:09:11 AM , Rating: 2
New Tech will allow it to scale.

Also depending on how the power is actually transmitted the wires might not need to be extremely thick. They will just need to make the output a very high voltage. Doing so will reduce the loss due to resistance and the current in the wire.


RE: BAM!
By spluurfg on 5/8/2008 4:28:10 AM , Rating: 2
Well I think the idea is probably not to scale these to large outputs individually, but create a farm of them -- akin to floating windmill farms.


RE: BAM!
By Integral9 on 5/6/2008 1:39:20 PM , Rating: 5
Not as many people out there in the country with light AA guns as there are people out there in the country with high powered hunting riffles. And 1000 ft is well within their range. 1 bullet may not take it down. But a platoon of hillbillies and a few cases of beer will.


RE: BAM!
By jlips6 on 5/6/2008 5:26:35 PM , Rating: 2
platoon of hillbillies. That made my day


interesting
By kattanna on 5/6/2008 11:51:09 AM , Rating: 5
i also wonder if they have thought about possibly adding cell phone service to them. at 600 to 1000 feet up, they would provide excellent coverage for an area, even if remote.




RE: interesting
By OxBow on 5/6/2008 12:17:17 PM , Rating: 2
That would be cool. As floating antenae for Cell phones, WiMax service, etc. these could do double or triple duty. Especially if they were deployed into rural areas not well served with this in the first place.


RE: interesting
By afkrotch on 5/6/2008 3:07:51 PM , Rating: 2
Also adding weight to them and possibly negating it's power generating abilities. But that's less power being used on other cell phone towers.


RE: interesting
By teflon billy on 5/7/2008 7:17:40 AM , Rating: 2
Would solve broadband access problems on some of the islands Off the coast of British Columbia. My dad has been working with providers to get towers up to cover the island he lives on but the island is to mountainous. But fly a few of these along the island and put the signal through them and your in business. Well hopefully. It sounds like a really good idea. I would only worry about helium leak. What would it cost for maintaining something like this?


Bad news for the environment
By BBeltrami on 5/6/2008 12:25:51 PM , Rating: 4
This is horrible. No one is even giving the slightest thought to how spreading a bunch of these things around could impact our planet by infecting our skies. The jet stream and natural wind patterns should not have to brook man's interference! What about the Precautionary Principle? What about the butterfly effect? Can't anyone see we're destroying everything?!

Damn you! OH, Damn you all to hell!!!1!!




RE: Bad news for the environment
By AlvinCool on 5/6/2008 12:32:57 PM , Rating: 2
HEY lets put flashing LED signs on them and they would be self powered. And we could change them through the WIFI interface!


RE: Bad news for the environment
By Spuke on 5/6/2008 5:11:23 PM , Rating: 1
I would have it rotate "Bad Muthafucka" in several different languages.


By snownpaint on 5/6/2008 6:23:01 PM , Rating: 2
You could have it fly over the Super bowl, and cover it with Ads.. That would raise funds for it..

How about smaller ones that could be flown at expos. It would to draw attention and generate little bit of electricity, which could be used to light up the inside during the night.. Of course cover that with Ads as well. We're in America, right?


RE: Bad news for the environment
By MRwizard on 5/8/2008 12:13:12 AM , Rating: 2
I will have to agree with you, yet disagree at the same time. This process of harnessing electricity is clean. something that i will vote for instead of burning fossil fuels or such


By LeviBeckerson (blog) on 5/6/2008 10:12:13 PM , Rating: 2
in the hail of anti-aircraft and conventional firearms fire, but what happens when a bad storm rolls through? Would they pull the balloons down with the tethers? I imagine light storms probably wouldn't be a problem, but you get hail, heavy electrical activity (probably some lightning rod system for that, hell, capture it and use it), very high winds...




Uhh....
By FITCamaro on 5/6/08, Rating: -1
RE: Uhh....
By FITCamaro on 5/6/2008 10:59:19 AM , Rating: 3
Sorry. Also, I'm not opposed to wind power, just while this seems like a good idea, I have questions about its feasibility. I mean where are you gonna put these things? And if you think our power grid is vulnerable now, how vulnerable is it gonna be when anyone with a high power rifle can take aim and shoot at our giant balloon power plants?