backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 36 comment(s) - last by maverick85wd.. on Jan 28 at 7:05 PM

Blames human error in commissioned 2005 study

In a humbling admission of error, the MPAA revealed that a crucial statistic used in its campaign against file sharing was overstated by almost three times: college-campus movie downloading cut into the organization’s domestic revenues by only 15 percent, as opposed to its previous statement of 44 percent.

The erroneous figure comes from a 2005 study that the MPAA commissioned from business consulting firm LEK. The MPAA called the slip-up an “isolated error” in LEK’s process, attributable to a mistake made during the study’s data entry – which was only uncovered during a review while compiling the study’s 2007 update.

An official statement was posted (PDF) to the MPAA’s website on Tuesday: “We take this error very seriously, and have taken strong and immediate action to both investigate the root cause of this problem as well as to substantiate the accuracy of the latest report,” wrote MPAA exec Seth Oster. “Additionally, the MPAA will retain a third party to validate LEK’s updated numbers.”

The updated figure of 15 percent reduces the MPAA’s claimed losses from over half a billion dollars – a number that MPAA Chairman Dan Glickman used in testimony before congress – to slightly less than a quarter billion.

The admission comes as a relief to the MPAA’s critics, many of whom expressed doubt over the study’s lofty claims of numbers so high that, according to the Wall Street Journal, even studio executives had second thoughts about releasing.

Unfortunately, the admission also means that the MPAA’s overstated figures mislead its lobbying targets, which includes congress, presidential candidates, and university IT staffs. It’s even possible that a number of bills – some of which are still floating through congress – were influenced by the incorrect information. So far, the MPAA has said nothing of how far it will go to make its corrections known; instead it seems unfazed, noting that “the latest data confirms that college campuses are still faced with a significant problem.”

Mark Luker, vice president of the nonprofit advocacy group EDUCAUSE, thinks that the MPAA’s adjusted figures are still too high as they don’t properly account for the 80 percent of college students who live off-campus. With that factor under consideration, says Luker, a more accurate figure might hover somewhere around 3 percent.

“The 44 percent figure was used to show that if college campuses could somehow solve this problem on this campus, then it would make a tremendous difference in the business of the motion picture industry,” said Luker. With the MPAA’s admission, the true numbers prove that “any solution on campus will have only a small impact on the industry itself.”



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

The MPAA overstated
By Orthogonal on 1/24/2008 9:41:59 AM , Rating: 3
I think you got your *AA's mixed up.




RE: The MPAA overstated
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 1/24/2008 9:57:41 AM , Rating: 3
The RIAA would never admit it made a mistake. The MPAA looks like they are willing to, even if they deflect the blame.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By napalmjack on 1/24/2008 11:29:20 AM , Rating: 5
Absolutely right. The RIAA makes the MPAA look like the United Way.

However, the MPAA is a truly despicable group, especially in their ratings(read fascist censorship) board.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By mmntech on 1/24/2008 1:10:55 PM , Rating: 5
Reminds me of that scene in "The Aviator" where Hughs is arguing with the MPAA over "mammaries" in his movie. I'm surprised they let that scene slip buy them
The current state of the entertainment industry also reminds me of 1984, where machines pump out soulless music and movies for the prol class.

I've always suspected that the piracy rates are grossly overstated. Even their updated quarter billion in losses is probably still too much.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By napalmjack on 1/24/2008 3:18:51 PM , Rating: 5
Yeah, that's a good example right there. If you want a real close look at how they operate today, take a look at the movie This Film Is Not Yet Rated.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By MikeO on 1/25/2008 9:19:45 AM , Rating: 4
quote:
I've always suspected that the piracy rates are grossly overstated.


Of course they are and will propably always be, because the likes of RIAA and MPAA start from the assumption that everything that has ever been pirated would otherwise been bought, which of course is absolute bullsh*t.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By Hydrofirex on 1/25/2008 8:06:03 PM , Rating: 2
Bingo!

Supply and Demand: I will take many more things for free than I would pay for. I would absolutely always go see movies I'm into at the theater. It just offers an experience that you just can't get sitting at home on the couch. Even if you have a high-end set up there is something to the communal experience of cinema in my opinion. The same goes for music.

HfX


RE: The MPAA overstated
By maverick85wd on 1/28/2008 7:05:21 PM , Rating: 2
I will definitely agree that music is not even comparable when it comes to a live performance vs. a recorded track. Seeing a good show will often make someone who did not appreciate the recorded work become a fan. IMO, the music industry should make as much or more money from the concerts than they do on records. I can't help but think over-charging for media that's easily accrued for free electronically is just a bad marketing decision that encourages piracy, which then causes them to attack their own customers (yet another smooth move). But hey, that's just me. I have also been boycotting CD purchases since I read this: http://www.dailytech.com/RIAA+CD+Ripping+is+Unauth...

I also agree that the movie experience is excellent, but if you have a 70"+ projection screen that handles 1080p (or even a really nice 50"+ PLasma/LCD), a BD player, a good (think Denon or Harmon Kardon, not Sony or Toshiba) surround system that is properly set up, and everything has been calibrated together correctly, I would have to say that the home theater is actually a better experience... but if you have that kind of set up you also aren't interested in pirating even a good quality movie.

I would also add that, while the RIAA is much worse as an organization, they are also easier to deal with. They make such outrageous statements that no one takes them seriously. The MPAA, on the other hand, at least tries to save face when it makes a huge "mistake" and so looks less greed-driven. Which one is more dangerous?


RE: The MPAA overstated
By onwisconsin on 1/24/2008 11:29:35 AM , Rating: 4
RE: The MPAA overstated
By eye smite on 1/24/2008 2:09:52 PM , Rating: 2
Well with AA at the end, we know they all go to alcoholics anonymous every week.


RE: The MPAA overstated
By darkfoon on 1/24/08, Rating: -1
RE: The MPAA overstated
By eye smite on 1/24/2008 4:18:54 PM , Rating: 1
I'm sorry, would calling them catamites with greed stamped at the top of their drivers licenses make you feel better?


RE: The MPAA overstated
By Spuke on 1/24/08, Rating: -1
RE: The MPAA overstated
By scrapsma54 on 1/26/2008 6:27:13 PM , Rating: 2
MPAA and RIAA is pretty damn lame.


Pure Greatness
By edpsx on 1/24/2008 9:41:54 AM , Rating: 5
That picture had me rolling after I read the title LMAO!!




RE: Pure Greatness
By Polynikes on 1/24/2008 9:54:37 AM , Rating: 2
I got a chuckle out of that, too. :)


RE: Pure Greatness
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 1/24/2008 9:55:20 AM , Rating: 2
Yes, I think this thumbnail might be the best one yet.


RE: Pure Greatness
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 1/24/2008 9:56:35 AM , Rating: 2
**People in elevator holding their noses**

"It was meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee."


RE: Pure Greatness
By Bioniccrackmonk on 1/24/2008 10:09:19 AM , Rating: 2
Was it good for you?

I've had better <covers mouth ASAP>


RE: Pure Greatness
By Azzr34l on 1/24/2008 12:40:20 PM , Rating: 2
Hands down winner of "Best Thumbnail Ever"! Perfection.


RE: Pure Greatness