backtop


Print 33 comment(s) - last by chagrinnin.. on Nov 24 at 4:50 PM


  (Source: mit.edu)
Invention utilizes multi-bounce reflection and hidden geometry.

Using ultra-fast imaging and "echoes of light," researchers have developed an innovative camera that takes pictures outside of traditional line of sight.

Short bursts of light that reflect off of different objects is key for researchers at MIT.  They've named the process "Femto-Photography.  It exploits the finite speed of light and it is part of what they call the "femtosecond transient imaging system." 

Applying a femtosecond laser, short pulses of light bounce around off of one object and on to another before reflecting back onto the original object where it is then captured by the camera.  The bursts of light last for one quadrillionth of a second.  Algorithms then reconstruct what is hidden.

According to MIT Professor Ramesh Raskar, the camera creates a "3D time-image" of the unseen image, by continuously gathering light and computing the time and distance that each pixel has traveled.

"It’s like having x-ray vision without the x-rays," Raskar said. "We’re going around the problem rather than going through it."

The research is still in the early stages of development but potential applications could include search and rescue, medical imaging, industrial building inspection and traffic collision prevention. 

"You could generate a map before you go into a dangerous place like a building fire, or a robotic car could use the system to compute the path it should take around a corner before it takes it." 

The researchers foresee a portable imaging system available within the next two years.

MIT's Femtosecond Transient Imaging Report (PDF) by Ahmed Kirmani offers more project information.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Traffic
By Jeremy87 on 11/21/2010 9:03:19 PM , Rating: 2
May not work well in traffic. If every vehicle uses this, they will just interfere with each other.




RE: Traffic
By Alexstarfire on 11/22/2010 3:23:48 AM , Rating: 2
Well, they are talking about one quadrillionth of a second according to the article. IDK about the algorithms they use, but if they can do this I don't think some interference is going to matter.

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you are saying though.


RE: Traffic
By Jeremy87 on 11/22/2010 6:19:48 AM , Rating: 2
Well the speed of light is limited, it's going to take a lot more time than a quintillionth of a second for the signals to return. In the meantime, there's a great chance that another car will send out its own signal.


RE: Traffic
By Reclaimer77 on 11/22/2010 9:07:02 AM , Rating: 4
I don't think you have any idea what you are talking about.


RE: Traffic
By Jeremy87 on 11/22/2010 1:01:57 PM , Rating: 2
Let's say that it can detect stuff from 100m away to be safe, ignoring that different surfaces and angles will behave differently. This light has been travelling for a 1.5 millionth of a second.
To keep the data updated, you need to do this at least once every second. If there are 20 cars within range, there's a 0.02% chance that they will interfere, every second, for every area with a 100m radius.


RE: Traffic
By nafhan on 11/22/2010 2:16:30 PM , Rating: 2
Your second explanation makes sense to me. Something like time hopping spread spectrum could come close to eliminating interference. Since it's listening for it's own signal, it could easily use random (rather than fixed) time intervals at which to send out and "listen" for the laser pulses. This would make it very unlikely for multiple pulses from different, nearby sources to overlap.


RE: Traffic
By Jeremy87 on 11/22/2010 2:22:32 PM , Rating: 2
Unlikely for each case yes, but with hundreds of millions of cars out there in the world, the signals are very likely to overlap in at least a few places at every instant.
But with the randomized intervals, maybe it can detect a single false reading among a number of correct ones.


RE: Traffic
By nafhan on 11/22/2010 4:02:06 PM , Rating: 2
I think the key thing would be not using this as the only sensor for the vehicle, and avoiding multiple false readings in a row.


RE: Traffic
By Reclaimer77 on 11/22/2010 2:37:24 PM , Rating: 2
I don't think you could possibly know enough about the system to make such a statement or hypothesis. That's why I said I don't think you know what you're talking about. We don't even know, if in fact, "interference" is possible or that they haven't already eliminated it.

Or the system might not work at all in the automobile application area, rendering this moot. We just don't know.


RE: Traffic
By Jeremy87 on 11/22/2010 2:43:38 PM , Rating: 3
Well it's a lot more fun to speculate how it might work than just sit back and wait a few years for it to actually happen.


RE: Traffic
By nafhan on 11/22/2010 10:04:32 AM , Rating: 2
They might be able to encode some kind of identifier code in the laser pulse or have several possible frequencies of light to decrease the chance of interference.


RE: Traffic
By ekv on 11/22/2010 2:02:27 PM , Rating: 2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunable_laser

Typically, various color dye's have been used. That may not work in this situation (and usually only yields limited operational frequencies). But there are other techniques. [Or ought I say "newer" techniques].

With RADAR and cellphones, there is also frequency hopping, which may apply here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency-hopping_spr...

However! Thimk. If your 'femto' receiver, for wont of a better term, is picking up signal or "interference", i.e. light, from around the corner, well isn't that what you were trying to accomplish all along?

If somehow the scene doesn't make sense then your processor picks a frequency not in use and throws out some pulses, shedding light on the situation. Clever stuff. MIT, no wonder.

Note: it's not how fast your laser is, but how fast you can process the laser into rendering an image. If it takes, o, say (some random number), 19 minutes, to render a scene I don't think you want to be driving around relying on this thing.


RE: Traffic
By nafhan on 11/22/2010 3:58:15 PM , Rating: 2
I think some sort of spread spectrum tech would probably be used. Time hopping may be ideal, as I mentioned above, since femtosecond laser pulses would already be confined to a very narrow time domain, and cheaper non-tunable lasers could be used.
Processing in the microsecond range would probably be adequate, and available processing power will likely go up by several orders of magnitude by the time something like this gets deployed.


RE: Traffic
By wookie1 on 11/22/2010 1:01:07 PM , Rating: 2
The bigger problem is that you may know where the other cars are now, but you don't know what actions they may be about to take (sudden turns or lane changes, for example). All of the cars would need to be controlled by some other system still, which would negate the use of the camera since the other system must know about all the other cars already.


RE: Traffic
By nafhan on 11/22/2010 1:40:05 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
you may know where the other cars are now, but you don't know what actions they may be about to take (sudden turns or lane changes, for example).
That's how driving works now, with humans in control. In any system with human controlled cars in the mix, computer controlled vehicles will have to handle unanticipated, crazy, or illegal situations.


Unmentioned potential.
By priusone on 11/21/2010 10:35:52 PM , Rating: 3
How in the world did the military not get mentioned in the list of potential applications. I don't know about all of you, but its military applications were the first thing to come to mind after reading the bloody headlines.

Sure, kicking in doors and fragging a militant hideout may be all fun and games, but in a combat role focused on "hearts and minds", this camera system has some serious potential, especially if this could be mounted to a vehicle and used from a somewhat safe distance.

Imagine how cool it would be if Al-Jazeer said that there were women and children in the building, only to have the DOD show a 3D view of the insides. "Out of curiosity, which one of these AK-47 toting freedom fighters was a child?" That would just make my day. And for that matter, women or children, if you are holding a weapon, the fact that you were brainwashed doesn't mean you get to live. Plus, if there are woman and children in the building, then tactics can change to address the issue.

Yeah, seeing around corners can have lots of potential, but lets get Darpa involved. To quote General George Patton: "The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his."




RE: Unmentioned potential.
By R3T4rd on 11/22/2010 3:42:21 AM , Rating: 5
The Millitary does. I remember seeing a demo of this technology on a site somewhere. They call it "Wallhacking"......now I remember, its from some Counter Strike web. This site apparently show's the tactics to fight Terrorists.


RE: Unmentioned potential.
By Aku on 11/22/2010 12:43:20 PM , Rating: 2
ahh... ok.... Hmmm.... you sir are the coolest person I'll meet today. :D


RE: Unmentioned potential.
By Beno on 11/22/2010 5:39:11 AM , Rating: 2
they already have toys like this.


RE: Unmentioned potential.
By priusone on 11/22/2010 7:27:30 PM , Rating: 2
You say that they already have toys like that; perhaps, but the average Joe doesn't. Just as every company in my unit had a Javelin system, we used it mainly for it's thermal capabilities, it would be neat to have at least one of these systems in each company.

You see, when sh!t hits the fan, do you simply hide behind your rig and wait forever for the higher ups to get this sort of tool in place, or do you bust out with the portable system, send the data back to the Forward Operating Base, wait for the go ahead, and send some scum straight to hell?


Batman
By excrucio on 11/21/2010 6:34:40 PM , Rating: 1
Batman anyone?




RE: Batman
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/21/2010 9:59:28 PM , Rating: 4
These guys are slick, but they have nothing on Batman. He is a genius without equal!


RE: Batman
By Reclaimer77 on 11/22/2010 9:03:23 AM , Rating: 2
What about the Green Hornet? He was rich and could finance cool crime fighting technology too!!!

But I agree. Something about Batman IS way cooler lol.


RE: Batman
By Kurz on 11/22/2010 9:10:22 AM , Rating: 2
It takes a certain type of crazy to dress up in a bat suit and fight crime.


RE: Batman
By Reclaimer77 on 11/22/2010 9:18:37 AM , Rating: 2
Well yeah I mean, if my parents were blown away.... Hey, who knows lol.


Upskirt...
By chagrinnin on 11/21/2010 6:40:28 PM , Rating: 2
just got more hits. >.<




RE: Upskirt...
By Adul on 11/21/2010 7:31:01 PM , Rating: 2
lol, that is one way to put it. But what kind of image quality are we talking about here.


RE: Upskirt...
By chagrinnin on 11/24/2010 4:50:03 PM , Rating: 2
I'm going to go with "Fuzzy" images. :P


By FaceMaster on 11/21/2010 6:58:10 PM , Rating: 5
...so it's like vision, then.




the eyes have it!
By pro5 on 11/21/2010 10:24:16 PM , Rating: 5
Lo and behold our future Robot overlord's eyes. Humanity just keeps hitting more nails in it's coffin. ;)




Sounds like ray tracing
By KIAman on 11/22/2010 12:56:25 PM , Rating: 2
Also, the article never mentions the conditions of the environment. What if the surfaces are absorbant? Does it count for irregularities?




RE: Sounds like ray tracing
By cjohnson2136 on 11/22/2010 1:02:22 PM , Rating: 2
Well I think considering it is still in its early stages of development they are working all of that out right now. I am sure we will hear more about this as more information from MIT is released


Prison anyone?
By deeznuts on 11/22/2010 2:16:04 PM , Rating: 2
so technology has finally caught up with innmates who have been seeing around a corner for years with a little mirror!




"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki