backtop


Print 22 comment(s) - last by ghost101.. on Apr 14 at 9:40 PM

MI5 looks forward to higher-tech future by cutting aging agents unfamiliar with social networking

The British Intelligence and Security Committee confirmed its MI5 agency is now replacing older staff members who are not tech savvy enough to stay in the British security agency.

"I think some of the staff perhaps aren't quite the ones that we will want for the future," said Jonathan Evans, MI5 Director General, in a statement in front of the committee.  

Both voluntary and compulsory redundancies will take place in the future, with a few dozen MI5 employees expected to be cut.

There is a concern that aging employees will be unable to keep up with terrorists who are using the internet to coordinate their activities.  Furthermore, cyber terrorism is becoming a more serious threat to western nations, with Britain hoping to be as best prepared for possible cyber attacks.

London will be the official host of the 2012 Summer Olympic Games and security experts are concerned such high-profile events will make the country a potential terror target -- if not a traditional terrorist attack, then a cyber terror attack is possible experts warn.

Even though similar things have been done to reduce the number of computer-illiterate people in companies and governments, some security analysts are surprised MI5 is being singled out.  Experts also note that many in the agency have computer skills, and it wouldn’t be a stretch to properly train them in the evolving Web 2.0 world.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Q Branch?
By ltcommanderdata on 4/12/2010 10:49:46 PM , Rating: 2
Might explain why Q and Q Branch are no longer assisting 007.




RE: Q Branch?
By B3an on 4/12/2010 11:04:29 PM , Rating: 2
But Q was all about tech and gadgets. He knew about the stuff better than anyone.


RE: Q Branch?
By xplice on 4/13/10, Rating: 0
RE: Q Branch?
By Vagisil on 4/13/2010 8:35:09 AM , Rating: 3
John Cleese was a stand in and not a very good one.


RE: Q Branch?
By geddarkstorm on 4/13/2010 3:00:31 PM , Rating: 2
But could he tweet? Could he?! Probably not, thus he must be... terminated.

"@BondGirl417 Being lowered into vat of crocodiles. Man, villain is mean!"


RE: Q Branch?
By MadMan007 on 4/13/2010 2:23:20 AM , Rating: 1
Q QQ'd when that happened.


RE: Q Branch?
By Omega215D on 4/13/2010 4:04:06 AM , Rating: 5
Bond: Do you expect me to talk?

Villain: No Mr. Bond I expect you to tweet.


Networking/Social sites
By Sethanus on 4/13/2010 12:41:19 AM , Rating: 2
This should be interesting if it spreads to other agencies. Especially concidering that redundacies will remove alot of the more experienced/non computer literite ppl at MI5.

I think what the guy above said was right, better that they should get training then to get new ppl in, because they are not only getting rid of older ppl without computer skills but also those who have years of law enforcement and intelligence knowledge - something that is harder to come by then being computer savy.




RE: Networking/Social sites
By Murloc on 4/13/10, Rating: -1
RE: Networking/Social sites
By Vagisil on 4/13/2010 8:49:46 AM , Rating: 2
The old ones are rarely used to new age threats, That's not what we need these days. A new age requires a new agency one that isn't so secretive and is able to co-ordinate with other agencies thus preventing attacks.

MI5 is there for internal security and have dropped the ball several times allowing us to be attacked at least once, I say if they're unable to keep up they should be removed.


RE: Networking/Social sites
By rocky12345 on 4/13/2010 10:29:23 AM , Rating: 5
HELLO!!! it's called training. Anyone can be taught witht eh way computers & devices have been put into our lives I am surprised that they never started training their staff like 15 years ago makes very little sense that now they go well thanks for the 20 years service here is a nice watch no go away. These people will have a lot of experience & it seems redundant that they just hire new younger people with no experience for the job itself but oh boy they sure can surf facebook & phone text good. These new workers will all need to be trained for their jobs so why not keep the older workers & train them instead for more advanced computer usage.


RE: Networking/Social sites
By Lerianis on 4/13/2010 2:13:37 PM , Rating: 3
Your post needs a little editing, but I quite agree. You can teach a 70 year old about social networking and other things..... this is more about getting rid of people who are at the top of the pay scale so that they can save money, because they are old.


RE: Networking/Social sites
By Vagisil on 4/13/2010 3:43:07 PM , Rating: 2
You can't teach and old dog new tricks, It isn't just a matter of 'Social Networking' they will need to understand the technology behind it and how to get the information they need. Just because an astronaut could fly on a space shuttle at 70 does that mean they should?

Take a look at the new requirements for joining MI5 and you'll see it'll take years a piece to train the old ones.


Fail Bond-atics
By Hieyeck on 4/13/2010 8:37:58 AM , Rating: 2
All these Bond comments, and this is about MI5, not MI6.

That's likening NSA to CIA - heresey!




RE: Fail Bond-atics
By Krotchrot on 4/13/2010 9:05:22 AM , Rating: 2
No, it's more like FBI to CIA.


RE: Fail Bond-atics
By Yawgm0th on 4/13/2010 10:35:45 AM , Rating: 2
No, it's not. MI5 has a similar mandate to NSA, while MI6 has one more like the CIA. There's overlap, of course, just as there is with FBI/CIA/NSA.


RE: Fail Bond-atics
By karielash on 4/14/2010 12:11:50 AM , Rating: 2

Your talking bollocks.

NSA ~ GCHQ
FBI ~ MI5
CIA ~ MI6


RE: Fail Bond-atics
By ghost101 on 4/14/2010 9:40:42 PM , Rating: 2
The problem occurs when you say FBI = MI5. They are very different. The FBI does a lot more than MI5 does (roles which are taken by the regular police force instead).


Must've hired
By FITCamaro on 4/12/2010 10:09:09 PM , Rating: 5
Stan and Cartman. I mean they were able to track down the terrorists who hid a snuke up Hillary Clinton's sniz after all.




RE: Must've hired
By Aloonatic on 4/13/2010 5:55:38 AM , Rating: 4
Stan's not going to let himself get sucked into Facebook dude.


Idiotic
By excelsium on 4/13/2010 8:32:05 AM , Rating: 3
If the headline of the article is to be believed then this is just plain idiotic, wasting decades of experience for the sake of something that is not really important to the job, why do secret agents and alike need to be on Facebook? makes no sense. If it was important they should train said employees rather than just fire them, how uncivilized can you get.




Hmmm.....
By Amiga500 on 4/13/2010 3:16:59 AM , Rating: 2
Too many relics of the Cold War lying around.

Now as long as the Russians don't lose a secret weapon, codenamed GoldenEye...




"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki