backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by fic2.. on Sep 24 at 1:31 PM

Special interests are making sure they’re heard about wireless’ final frontier

With the deadline fast approaching, special interests, carriers, and ISPs -- both incumbent and prospective -- are scrambling to influence details over the FCC’s high-stakes 700 MHz wireless auction, which is currently slated for the end of January 2008.
 
A report recently issued by the Center for Public Integrity takes a hard look over the lobbyists’ filed ex parte presentations, which are required at the end of each meeting with FCC officials. Of more than 5,000 ex parte filings covering a broad range of topics, more than 600 pertained to the 700 MHz auction – far more than any other topic.
 
The meetings start slowly, with just under 20 ex parte presentations filed in January. By April there were more than 100 filings, indicating that there were at least three meetings with officials per day in that month. In June, meetings peaked at 180, before settling down a bit to 150 meetings in July, which was the last month that the analysis tracks. These numbers roughly correlate with the FCC’s decisionmaking: lobbyists’ pressure peaked shortly before FCC Chairman Kevin Martin signaled his intent to attach a controversial open-access clause in early July, and continued through the month as Martin’s rules were codified by a commission vote on the 31st.
 
Google, who is relatively new to the political game, showed a strong presence with 19 total meetings with the FCC, including 11 with commissioners. However, Google’s efforts were eclipsed by Frontline Wireless’ 70 meetings and the wireless carrier’s lobbying firm, CTIA 43 meetings.
 
The 700 MHz spectrum is considered to be one of the last frontiers in the wireless space, as the spectrum will be soon opened up as analog television stations move over to digital broadcasting. The spectrum’s value comes in its penetrability: unlike the open-access 2.4ghz range or the range used by cell phone networks, the 700 MHz spectrum is far more capable of penetrating walls and other obstacles.

With the FCC describing the spectrum as “beachfront property,” its auction may fetch well over its $4.6 billion reserve, with some forecasters are predicting numbers as high as $30 billion.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Billions...
By mcnabney on 9/22/2007 4:54:27 PM , Rating: 1
This spectrum, if sold without burden or restriction, will net billions for the government. Probably enough to pay for a whole month of war in Iraq.




RE: Billions...
By fk49 on 9/22/2007 5:27:18 PM , Rating: 4
Or pay off a whole lot of politicians.

Oh wait they're already doing that..


RE: Billions...
By Samus on 9/22/07, Rating: 0
RE: Billions...
By Ringold on 9/22/2007 9:10:22 PM , Rating: 3
The US government is still the best bet in the world of bonds, so must not be too desperate.

And what, Iraq is the only measuring stick worth using? Simply because it's flame-bait for the left-wing?

That auction wouldn't pay for even a single month of operation for the Social Security program, either -- around 3 weeks. It might pay for a single month of welfare spending on the best well-off "impoverished" in the history of the world, depending on what you lump in to the category of "welfare". It might also cover roughly a month of Medicare as well.

Iraq is about 7% of the federal budget according to an anti-war activist site. It's also considered, for whatever odd reason, in a seperate bill with no impact on other spending considerations -- beyond whatever political games Democrats play behind the scenes to try to wreck it, anyway, but nothing we can do about that. That of a budget which for 2007 totals a cool $2,735,000,000,000 , according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Can't we find some other horse to flog? I understand the liberal anal fixation on Iraq, but, seriously, it's a drop in the federal bucket; welfare queens are sucking more out of our pockets than Iraq ever will.


RE: Billions...
By smitty3268 on 9/22/2007 9:24:28 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
I understand the liberal anal fixation on Iraq, but, seriously, it's a drop in the federal bucket; welfare queens are sucking more out of our pockets than Iraq ever will.

I'm not sure I buy that, but more to the point who cares about how much it costs. We should be more worried about people's lives than money.

quote:
The US government is still the best bet in the world of bonds, so must not be too desperate.

Maybe for now, but the US dollar was just overtaken by the Canadian dollar. Canada, for God's sake! So not everything is going peachy.


RE: Billions...
By lompocus on 9/22/2007 11:40:30 PM , Rating: 1
Ah yes, the lives we are saving.

example: Your goddamn life, through many acts of war, to preserve our lifestyle and through proxy, yours.

It wasn't overtaken by the canadian dollar. I have a checker thing right here as a widget for vista that tracks day by day by hour by minute changes and the Canadian dollar is still low.

If you've checked, its the EURO that is going UP, through massive artificial inflation of its value.

I ask you this: Why do things still cost a shitload more in canadian, European, and English monentary forms? Why does a 8800 cost 270 bucks over here int eh US, but in Australia it is still the equivilant of 400, for the 320 version?


RE: Billions...
By smitty3268 on 9/23/2007 12:41:59 AM , Rating: 2
What I said about saving lives wasn't meant to be an argument for or against the war - I'm sure the people arguing on both sides think they would end up saving lives. I just meant that although we're spending vast sums of money in Iraq, it's still only money and we have tons of the stuff. Determining whether a war is necessary based only on monetary issues seems wrong to me.

Hmm, the latest exchange rate seems to be 1.00 US = 1.0007 to 1.0012 Can depending on the source, so I guess it hasn't technically been overtaken, but they're virtually identical and the trend is clear so it probably won't be long.

Yes, the Euro is going up, but the dollar is definitely going down - or I guess you could argue it is staying even and every other country on earth has their currency going up. Semantics. It's what usually happens when you have enormous deficits.


RE: Billions...
By SiliconAddict on 9/23/07, Rating: -1
RE: Billions...
By rdeegvainl on 9/23/07, Rating: 0
RE: Billions...
By rdeegvainl on 9/23/2007 6:39:22 AM , Rating: 3
oh and this got way off course, the article is about a 700, not iraq or the bush administration, so if you would like you can ignore my post, cause this is the wrong place for it.


RE: Billions...
By StevoLincolnite on 9/23/2007 5:33:50 PM , Rating: 2
Yes the 8800 320mb version is: 418 bucks.
And for a fairly low price the 8800 Ultra 768mb is going for a tiny 990 bucks.
Ever thought the Aussies may have a higher income?
Or maybe lower demand? thus prices get increased.
Or maybe... our welfare system is better? (Seriously it is, if you end up homeless in Australia, something is wrong!)
For Instance if I was to order the same card from the US its not going to cost me "270 bucks" it still works out I will be paying about the same.


RE: Billions...
By retrospooty on 9/23/2007 9:16:15 PM , Rating: 1
"And what, Iraq is the only measuring stick worth using? Simply because it's flame-bait for the left-wing?

That auction wouldn't pay for even a single month of operation for the Social Security program, either -- around 3 weeks. It might pay for a single month of welfare spending on the best well-off "impoverished" in the history of the world, depending on what you lump in to the category of "welfare". It might also cover roughly a month of Medicare as well.
"

The point you are missing is that social security and welfare, and many orther programs have a purpose... Yes, they are not run as efficient as they should, but it beats 10's of millions starving old people in the streets begging for money. The war in Iraq is a failed fantasy of our fearless leader, a leader who fails to recognize he made a huge mistake and refuses to do anything about it. Just let more soldiers die, and hide behind the old "support the troops" slogan.

f-ing BS in every way.


RE: Billions...
By TwistyKat on 9/24/2007 11:14:20 AM , Rating: 2
Great post - couldn't agree more.

It's unfortunate that there are still people in this country who actually believe the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq is a good thing.


RE: Billions...
By fic2 on 9/24/2007 1:31:58 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Can't we find some other horse to flog? I understand the liberal anal fixation on Iraq, but, seriously, it's a drop in the federal bucket; welfare queens are sucking more out of our pockets than Iraq ever will.


According to wikipedia welfare is 4% of the federal budget. Interesting that you don't mention it was a liberal president who brought about reform of the welfare system. Also, how under a liberal president the U.S. deficient went down, but under a "conservative" president with a "conservative" legislature big government has grown to huge government and the "conservatives" are spending like druken sailors.

Apologies to all sailors drunken or otherwise for comparing them to politicians.


What does this all mean?
By TonyB on 9/22/2007 7:45:42 PM , Rating: 2
so what does having the spectrum be free to lease wholesale and open access mean to me as a consumer?

and what does Verizon and AT&T have to benefit from going against it?

I already unlocked my phone so im puzzled why its even an issue.




RE: What does this all mean?
By gerf on 9/22/2007 11:00:00 PM , Rating: 2
If Verizon and AT&T can grab the entire new spectrum without having to lease it or anything, they could keep any kind of new competition from driving down prices and profits. Without competition, they charge more. You might unlock your phone, but they've locked down the towers.

More open access to the spectrum would mean cheaper better services to the consumer, but lower profits for Verizon/AT&T and their shareholders.

Google is serving their own ends as well. They don't want to keep paying high prices to deliver the content they now provide: search, email, maps, video... If they are able to buy some of the spectrum, they could use it to finally bring to fruition their plan to be a huge ISP. After all, they've been buying unused fiber cables for cheap, and are planning to be involved in a new Pacific cable.

So, no matter what we do, a company will benefit. Only, some will benefit more than others depending on the FCC.

Kinda a lot of power for a non-elected group, huh?


hah
By amdsupport on 9/22/2007 8:12:32 PM , Rating: 2
This 700Mhz auction is like a big game console launch for big companies...maybe they will start shooting each other over it soon.




RE: hah
By JonnyDough on 9/23/07, Rating: -1
RE: hah
By winterspan on 9/23/2007 9:17:55 PM , Rating: 2
oh, not another radio-waves-give-me-constipation person.
The 700 mhz spectrum has been "invading" your house for 60+ years now. If you have a problem with it I suggest you move deep into the Northwest Territories in Canada and build a Faraday cage 30 feet under the ice tundra. lol.


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il