Print 13 comment(s) - last by lachbus.. on Feb 16 at 4:36 PM

Chevy Volt

Nissan LEAF

Lithium  (Source: Kent Chemistry)
Prospectors are discovering new lithium deposits as the industry races towards electric vehicles

Demand for lithium is currently at an all time high, as today lithium batteries power the majority of mobile electronics.  Lithium is also widely used in various pharmaceuticals and fusion experiments.  Soon lithium demand will leap even higher, though, with electric vehicles using large amounts of lithium in their battery packs.

With lithium, there are two main concerns -- cost and availability.  Turning first to the second concern, availability, in 2007 it was estimated (PDF) that there were 35 million tons of extractable lithium worldwide.  That's impressive considering it's three times the known deposits in 1976.  Recently discovered deposits in Australia, Serbia, Argentina and the United States helped bump up the number.

It's likely that the number of known deposits has risen since 2007.  In Mexico a small company claims to have found a new deposit that holds at least 800,000 extractable tons.  Still,production is lagging behind discoveries, partly because of big investors' desire to stick with proven sources, such as those in Argentina and Chile.

Toyota Motor Company's sister company in January entered a contract with Australia's Orocobre Ltd to carry out a $80-110M USD project in Argentina's Olaroz lithium rich salt lake.  Keith Evans, one of the world's leading lithium experts, comments, "It seems generally accepted that reserves and resources will be adequate, but it's easy for junior exploration companies to raise money on the strength of the lithium buzz. Exploration activity has exploded. They all hope to find sources that can be competitive, (but) Chile and Argentina have sufficient reserves for billions of years."  

It takes about a third of a pound of lithium to deliver a kWh in a battery pack.  Current packs for plug-in electric vehicles with gasoline generators like the 2011 Chevy Volt have about 16 kWh, while pure-electrics like the 2011 Nissan Leaf EV have battery packs of 24 kWh or more.  That means that just one million tons of lithium could produce 395 million Volts or 250 million Leafs.  And with 35 million tons, the primary problem now appears not to be getting enough lithium, but rather getting it fast enough.

In 2009 Soquimich (SQM) and U.S.-based Rockwood extracted 20,000 tons of lithium from Chile's Salar de Atacama, the largest salt flat in the nation.  The lake is considered perhaps the best lithium deposit in the world.  Despite that, the production yield is still quite low.  

In Argentina Canada's Lithium One and FMC Corp (the world's largest producer) are vying for control of resources on Argentina's big lake Salar del Hombre Muerto.  In total, the resources currently known by SQM, FMC and Rockwood encompass 8 million tons of lithium, though production remains a scant fraction of that.

Ultimately, the disparity between resources and production should yield for some expansion.   Unfortunately, though, it's not necessarily that simple.  While simple supply and demand would mandate that if there's demand for a resource it will be harvested, lithium harvest is no simple matter.  It takes an expenditure of millions of dollars of high tech refining equipment, as well as a suitable transportation network.  Until more major parties step up to the plate with such big capital investments, prices for electric vehicles, medication, and portable electronics will likely remain relatively high.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

lithium mining
By bdot on 2/12/2010 2:23:32 PM , Rating: 5
So for the Econuts mining is cool if its for their battery cars?

RE: lithium mining
By Danger D on 2/12/2010 3:29:40 PM , Rating: 3
Don't you know? As long as nothing comes from the tailpipe, you can burp as much pollution as you want from power plants! Localized pollution doesn't count! Neither does mining!

RE: lithium mining
By Chemical Chris on 2/12/2010 4:25:07 PM , Rating: 3
Nothings is OK for the the eco-terrorists, not until they have us living as a hunter-gatherer society with absolutely no technology (certainly no farming, maybe no simple tools either, save what can be made with rocks), and even then they would complain that we eat too much and our farts produce excessive greenhouse gases.
Ecoterrorists suck, and do nothing but harm the world.
We need productive, useful, goals; to try and make things better.
Eco-terrorists have an annnoying habit of biting off their nose to spite their face.


RE: lithium mining
By mmatis on 2/12/2010 9:38:32 PM , Rating: 5
Not quite correct as written. Should be:

"Eco-terrorists have an annnoying habit of biting off YOUR nose to spite their face."

RE: lithium mining
By quiksilvr on 2/13/2010 8:57:40 PM , Rating: 2
It is when the material you are mining for powers engines with over 80% efficiency instead of engines with 20-30% efficiency.

I understand what you're saying, but it is inevitable. EVs are coming.

RE: lithium mining
By Solandri on 2/14/2010 2:11:32 PM , Rating: 2
To be comparable, the efficiency comparison must be from source fuel to end use. It has to take into account the efficiency of the power station generating the electricity used in an EV. So it's more like 40% vs. 25%.

1/3 pound
By titanmiller on 2/12/2010 8:27:27 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not chemist, but I find it hard to believe that a mere 1/3 lb of lithium can make a battery with 1kwh of capacity. This would mean that the Volt's entire battery only contains 5 1/3 lb of lithium (4.4 liters volume).

I very well could be wrong, maybe the lithium itself only composes a small percentage of the battery.

Does anyone have insight into this? I am interested to hear an answer.

RE: 1/3 pound
By Howard on 2/13/2010 3:07:49 AM , Rating: 3
Try Wikipedia. It's free.

RE: 1/3 pound
By lachbus on 2/16/2010 4:36:45 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, in fact that is an obvious mistake in this article. The author should have checked his numbers - if you look in Wikipedia for example for 'Lithium-ion battery', you'll find the specific energy density of '150 to 220 W·h/kg (540 to 720 kJ/kg)'.
So, you need ideally 11-13 pounds per KWh, not 0.3. Just off by a factor of 35...
I'm a little surprised noone else picked up on this.
I guess you'll need about 200 pounds of lithium per car using these numbers.


Appreciation for Mick's article
By ArynBergman on 2/12/2010 4:26:38 PM , Rating: 1
Jason, I like your articles. I come from the engineering world where everybody always sounds like they know what they are talking about. Your article give me all kinds of starting points to dig in and do my own research regarding energy efficiency and climate change. Developing a smart grid and distributing energy via electricity will rely heavily on our ability to cost effectively store that energy. Lithium deposits will play a role in that. Thanks.

By Smartless on 2/12/2010 7:41:25 PM , Rating: 5
Lol you must be new here. At this site its popular to hate Apple, Eco-nuts, and Jason Mick. But I like it because you learn a lot from the author as well as the posters. As a fellow dweller in the engineering world our biggest issue is seeing another perspective since engineers are famous for looking at someone else's plans and saying "Who's the idiot that designed this?"
Getting back to the topic though, the supply of Lithium is a commodity not just for batteries but for medicine, industrial lubricants, etc. Until this article, I'd thought earlier there would be problem since most of it came from one place, Bolivia. Honestly, I agree that storing of electricity will be important to our future, but Lithium is still a finite resource (without a recycling plan in place) so I hope this leads to other solutions.

Maybe I'm hyper-sensitive,
By wompirebat on 2/12/2010 2:20:03 PM , Rating: 2
or just an intollerant anarcho-cap jerk, but is Mick a member of the Chicago Climate Exchange?
Granted, this is a little more relevant than the tigers...
Maybe I'm reading too much into it.

Lithium availability
By liman on 2/16/2010 11:04:28 AM , Rating: 2
Obviously you are not business oriented or you would understand supply/demand. There is currently an oversupply situation for lithium because the major producers already installed extra capacity in anticipation of the demand increase - which has yet to happen. Capacities for extracting and producing lithium are sitting idle. Until the demand actually starts increasing, there is no need for current producers to increase their production rates, or production capacities.

"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki