backtop


Print 68 comment(s) - last by Spuke.. on Jul 15 at 4:35 PM


  (Source: Autoblog)
There's a new cat in town

Jaguar continues its return to high-performance form started with the 2008 Jaguar XF.  The company just revealed the 2010 Jaguar XJ, a worthy successor to the original XJ.

The car features an attractive front, with a wider upright grill, which Jaguar's chief designer Ian Callum calls a "very deliberate statement".  The chrome "leaper" hood ornament is also available.  The front end draws inspiration from the 2007 C-XF concept.

The side features a widening tapered chrome surround (the chrome above the window glass), considered a slightly controversial or edgy design.  The fender vents are minimal and unobtrusive.  The car comes standard with a panoramic moonroof, rounding of its attractive design.

The car is extremely aerodynamic, with a 0.29 drag coefficient -- just shy of the Toyota Prius' industry leading 0.26 (and arguably in a much more attractive package).  The car uses aluminum to reduce its weight to at least 300 lbs lighter than competitive offerings -- the BMW 7 Series, Mercedes-Benz S-Class and Audi A8.  The aluminum is very environmentally friendly as 50 percent comes from recycled stock and the car itself is 85 percent recyclable.

The interior features a gorgeous cockpit with an increased number of leather, wood and trim options (including eight veneers, carbon fiber or piano black).  The gauge cluster is a massive 12.3-inch TFT screen, and many functions are controlled by an improved touchscreen setup.  The car is loaded with perhaps the best manufacturer-installed audio system on the market, with a 1200-watt, 20-speaker, Bowers & Wilkens 7.1 channel surround system.  The car does voice commands with ease.

The car also features pre-charged braking, a blind-spot monitoring system, and adaptive cornering headlamps (Xenons are standard).

Turning to the performance, the car comes with six-speed paddle-shift automatic gearbox.  The rear differential is electronically governed and the car also comes with three-mode JaguarDrive Control with Normal, Dynamic and Winter detents, which maps the throttle and shift to the electronic differential, stability control thresholds, suspension firmness (coil springs up front, air out back) and even seatbelt tightness.  The car also features Jaguar's Adaptive Dynamics system.

The vehicle features a 5.0-liter direct-injected AJ-III V8.  Three variants are available, two of which feature forced induction.  A base natural aspirated mill engine produces 385 horsepower @ 6,500 rpm and 380 pound-feet @ 3,500 rpm.  A medium-level supercharged variant produces 470 horsepower @ 6,000-6,500 rpm and 424 lb-ft (between 2,500-5,000 rpm).  These engines represent a 28 and 18 percent performance gain over the 2009 model.

The top engine is a 510 horsepower SuperSport monster that delivers 6,000-6,500 rpm and 461 lb-ft of torque from 2,500-5,500.  Europeans get a twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 option as well.  The top model can do 0 to 60 in 4.7 seconds, reportedly. 

The MSRP for the base engine model is $72,500 USD.  The Supercharged edition comes in at $87,500 USD and the SuperSport is $112,500 USD.  Extended wheel-base versions (XJL) are available for $79,500, $90,500, and $115,500 USD respectively.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Arguably
By fishbits on 7/10/2009 2:52:51 PM , Rating: 5
"The car is extremely aerodynamic, with a 0.29 drag coefficient -- just shy of the Toyota Prius' industry leading 0.26 (and arguably in a much more attractive package)."

Thank you, Jason, for stating in public that it's "arguable" that the XJ looks much better than a Prius. It's good to get huge laughs from a tech site, whether that was the intention or not. Even as subjective as appearances can be, I'm pretty confident you're alone in considering this an unsettled matter.

Now I'm off to cast the tie-breaking vote in the "Am I Hot or Not" poll of Madeleine Albright vs Megan Fox.




RE: Arguably
By jay401 on 7/10/2009 3:16:45 PM , Rating: 3
Hey go easy - he's practicing his wording of opinion for the next religion or global warming post he writes.


RE: Arguably
By SleepyGreg on 7/10/2009 3:48:46 PM , Rating: 3
He'd probably get Toyotas lawyers on the phone if he omitted the word "arguably"


RE: Arguably
By Jedi2155 on 7/10/09, Rating: -1
RE: Arguably
By nuarbnellaffej on 7/10/2009 10:25:04 PM , Rating: 1
Ya... that's just you...


RE: Arguably
By Jedi2155 on 7/11/2009 2:06:54 PM , Rating: 2
I knew I would get downrated, I just wanted people know that there ARE people out there who prefer the looks of a Prius. So mean zealots in this world who are anti-Prius looks.


RE: Arguably
By stryfe on 7/12/2009 1:36:35 AM , Rating: 5
Afterall, someone has to marry the ugly girls


RE: Arguably
By Jedi2155 on 7/12/2009 3:38:23 AM , Rating: 2
I know quite of a few girls who find Priuses to be cute...the only problem is that finding a car cute is not the same as sex appeal of a jag...


RE: Arguably
By callmeroy on 7/13/2009 10:50:55 AM , Rating: 3
The prius represents my anger in the fuel efficiency craze of today --- sure put out "green" cars but make them hideous looking so you pay the hidden "never want to get laid ever again tax" from any young attractive woman that sees you driving one . ;)

On a more serious note --- make a "cool" looking car that is huge on fuel savings, THEN rant and rave about it. Rant and raving about a car that is hideous looking...makes me lose my attention right away...I don't care if it gets 100 mpg.


RE: Arguably
By Spookster on 7/12/2009 3:25:02 PM , Rating: 2
That's what beer goggles are for.


RE: Arguably
By Chemical Chris on 7/14/2009 11:05:39 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Afterall, someone has to marry the ugly girls

Yup, they just gotta pay, is all ;)

ChemC


RE: Arguably
By AEvangel on 7/14/2009 5:29:42 PM , Rating: 3
Ugly Stupid Girl, I mean the idea that a Prius is a green car is laughable at best. If you really want to do something good for the environment buy a used car and keep it running.

Then you can take the money you saved and donate to improve mass transit in you area. This in effect will do more for the environment by recycling and old car and the tax write off for your donation will far exceed the one you get from the government for owning one of those Hybrid idiot mobiles.


RE: Arguably
By Moishe on 7/10/2009 4:27:50 PM , Rating: 4
Hey now... Albright is a hottie, if you like that sort of thing. ;) She is a great comparison to the looks of the Prius though.


RE: Arguably
By BZDTemp on 7/10/2009 4:49:28 PM , Rating: 5
It is just to bad 0.26 is NOT industry leading!

0.26 is nice but there is a Lexus doing 0.25 and the new Merc E-class coupe is 0.24. Industry leading would be the EV-1 with 0.19 but some fools in a now bankrupt car company killed it.

DailyTech please do some fact checking instead of spreading misinformation.


RE: Arguably
By Boze on 7/10/2009 6:46:09 PM , Rating: 5
This is the DailyTech Ethics Policy:

quote:
DailyTech enforces a strict ethics policy for staff and contributors that if violated results in severe consequences and immediate termination of contract for the offender. The ethics policy prevents external forces from influencing the website’s content and keeps articles unbiased and accurate.


Sure coulda fooled me on the unbiased and accurate part. Sounds like someone at DailyTech isn't paying enough attention to their writers.


RE: Arguably
By crystal clear on 7/11/2009 12:10:43 AM , Rating: 3
Its a copy & paste job with some modifications/editing from some promotional material put out for publicity purposes.

This from my earlier comments obviously rated down-

Bloggers are NOT journalist (professional & trained), they are techies in this case trying to put their writing skills (whatever they maybe high,medium,low) to use, to get themselves some recognition (it doesnt earn them a living).

Most of the time its copy & paste techniques put to use at its best.


DailyTech is Not a tech news site, rather a collection of techies ,so called bloggers trying to write like journalist.

Obviously you have a highly abused/misused rating system for comments rather than for articles


RE: Arguably
By Garreye on 7/11/09, Rating: -1
RE: Arguably
By crystal clear on 7/11/2009 11:57:12 AM , Rating: 1
Hey I dont need somebody to tell me what/how/where I should read my tech news,the very fact I do read & compare a news item from various sites/sources gives me a better insight into the subject matter.

I have been on D.T. for a very longtime even before you as a matter of fact.

Just any reputed tech site covers tech news from a wide variety of fields & not only D.T. all of them present tech news from all over in one single place,
but in general most article are NOT a Copy & Paste job with some modifications/editing.

I will not tell you what to do, visit one site or ten thats your problem.

quote:
but who else would you want to write about tech news, someone who went to school for journalism and know shit all about technology?


Oh really ! thats what happens when you depend on one site for your reading,you are not aware whats going on outside D.T.

Did you know one has to research the contents of the article & give a corrrect analysis on the subject matter ?

I am sure you have NOT attended a launch of product event or other tech events, to see the quality of writers/Eds etc around,so its quite natural for you respond this way.

Constructive criticism is the way to make D.T. writers to improve their performance & I make it very crystal clear .


RE: Arguably
By MrPoletski on 7/14/2009 6:19:09 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Constructive criticism is the way to make D.T. writers to improve their performance & I make it very crystal clear .


Actually, that was emboldened black..


RE: Arguably
By lycium on 7/11/2009 6:00:49 AM , Rating: 2
I've written several letters to DT about how they shouldn't let Jason Mick continue to embarrass himself on their very public platform - entirely ignored.

They have no editor (at least not one who edits), so whoever's in charge probably just plays golf all day or something...


RE: Arguably
By JohnnyCNote on 7/11/2009 2:51:40 PM , Rating: 3
Daily Tech's only concern is to generate more Google click-through revenue. Everything else is at best a distant secondary consideration . . .


RE: Arguably
By Spuke on 7/10/2009 8:38:01 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
but some fools in a now bankrupt car company killed it.
They're not in bankruptcy anymore. Didn't you hear, they're the "new" GM now.


RE: Arguably
By mmcdonalataocdotgov on 7/13/09, Rating: 0
RE: Arguably
By someguy123 on 7/10/2009 5:26:30 PM , Rating: 2
indeed. i don't understand how this is in the news section. there is also an article by jason about windows 7 ultimate, which essentially had no news whatsoever and just decided to tell people that they really didn't "need" the extra features.

someone pointed out that some of these "news stories" were originally in the blog section.....which is where they should've stayed.


RE: Arguably
By Choppedliver on 7/10/2009 6:59:14 PM , Rating: 4
At least this puts the notion that "High MPG cars like he Prius and Insight MUST look the same to get low coefficents of drag"

Point being, If a car can look this good and get remotely close to a Prius or Insight in coefficient of drag, then a high MPG car does NOT HAVE TO BE SO $%^&* UGLY!!!!!!


RE: Arguably
By Choppedliver on 7/10/2009 7:00:04 PM , Rating: 3
Should have read "puts to rest the notion..."


RE: Arguably
By MozeeToby on 7/13/2009 3:34:10 PM , Rating: 2
You do realize that not all of the $100,000 price tag comes from the cost of materials right? A big chunk of it is engineering R&D, including plenty of expensive time in the wind tunnel.


RE: Arguably
By nunya on 7/10/09, Rating: 0
RE: Arguably
By TA152H on 7/13/2009 12:21:58 AM , Rating: 2
Appearances are subjective, not absolute, so he's quite correct in saying arguably. Can you imagine what you would say if he didn't, and was actually wrong like you are?

Personally, I find the Jaguar ugly, with an overstated and obnoxious grill, and severe rear overhang. The headlights do nothing for me, either. Not that the Prius is anything less than hideous, so I'd pick the Jag over it, but, still, the Jaguar is not going to be beautiful to everyone, and there will be people that prefer the appearance of the Prius. That's going to be the case with any two cars.

Now stop being a dork and looking for a fight. If you fight with him when he's technically correct, you'd surely get him worse if he were not.


tata bought a bargain
By Bubbacub on 7/10/2009 3:53:58 PM , Rating: 2
ratan tata got a good deal for jag/land rover. jaguar have been pissing money away for years under ford - within a year or two them making buyable cars again (the xk and recently the gorgeous xf) they sell everything to tata at a loss. i cant blame ford for trying to get cash in tough times but this should work out as a good move from tata provided they can weather this recession.




RE: tata bought a bargain
By Pneumothorax on 7/10/2009 6:16:30 PM , Rating: 2
Yup it's sad as I believe Jaguar designed these cars with Ford money. Money that Ford will never get back. Hopefully they've exorcised the British Car reliability demons.


RE: tata bought a bargain
By xsilver on 7/10/2009 9:47:47 PM , Rating: 1
probably - but thats when the indian demons come knocking on your door...


RE: tata bought a bargain
By crystal clear on 7/11/2009 12:48:23 AM , Rating: 2
Tata will manufacture all the parts in India to cut cost (manufacturing cost are very low in India) & have them assembled in the U.K.

Keeping the R&D + design in the U.K.

They have the capacities/facilities to assemble cars in India also exclusively for the India/China & Asia markets

Tata got a good deal not only from Ford but from the govt in the U.K for saving jobs & from the govt in India for creating jobs.

As for the recession the Tatas have plenty of resources to weather out the recession.

The great recession hit the USA/UK/EU/Japan very hard but the effects on India & China were minor.

India/China are huge markets with the ever increasing & emerging rich & ultra rich groups of people having the money to afford them such cars.

Tata is the leading car manufacturer & seller in India today,they started a decade or two ago with Tata trucks & cars with Mercedes technology manufactured/assembled in India.

I travel a lot to India so can see the total control they have on the Indian markets.


RE: tata bought a bargain
By crystal clear on 7/11/2009 1:08:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Keeping the R&D + design in the U.K.


Read this-

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/07/10/jaguar_eca...


RE: tata bought a bargain
By jithvk on 7/13/2009 12:53:25 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I travel a lot to India so can see the total control they have on the Indian markets.


Maruthi-Suzuki is the leading car manufacturer in India. It have 54% share of the Indian car market. One out of every two cars sold in India is a Maruthi-Suzuki.


hmm
By mfed3 on 7/10/2009 2:14:33 PM , Rating: 3
hmm 1 of these that seats 2 or 4 cars for everyone in the family




RE: hmm
By PrinceGaz on 7/10/2009 2:25:57 PM , Rating: 1
Looking at the photos, it has four doors so I suspect it seats at least four (though the back seats may be a bit limited in legroom).


RE: hmm
By h0kiez on 7/10/2009 2:40:58 PM , Rating: 3
I seriously doubt any of the seats are even remotely limited in legroom.


RE: hmm
By Fireshade on 7/14/2009 9:05:37 AM , Rating: 2
There's enough legroom in the back seats: they even come with airplane-style tables that can be stowed away :)

http://jaguar.tagworldwide.com/xj/100/xj100_en_US....


Fuel economy?
By Moishe on 7/10/2009 3:22:49 PM , Rating: 2
Not that it's highly important in a car like this, but one of the specs that I always look for is the MPG ratings. Considering the aluminum and weight that may have an effect on MPG, I'd like to know how it compares to the other cars (7-series, MB-S, & A8)

Jaguar 2010 XJ - 24MPG (gas, non-supercharged) (Jaguar.com)
BMW 2009 7 series - 17MPG (8cyl) (Edmunds.com)
MB 2009 S-Class - 17MPG (8cyl) (Edmunds.com)
Audi 2009 A8 - 18MPG (8cyl) (Edmunds.com)




RE: Fuel economy?
By Sazar on 7/10/2009 5:50:08 PM , Rating: 2
You are comparing the base model :)

The higher-end, Super-charged 8 cylinder will be the real comparison but, due to the weight savings, I think Autoblog figured it would still do better than the competition.

Personally I think the car looks awesome, a hell of a lot nicer than the Porsche Panamera and right up there with the A8.


RE: Fuel economy?
By Spuke on 7/10/2009 8:42:06 PM , Rating: 2
This new XJ is stunning in the pics and I haven't even see one in person yet. Click on the interior pic, wow!


Nice, my car is officially cool again!
By Crazyeyeskillah on 7/10/2009 3:45:21 PM , Rating: 2
The back end of this car looks like my 97 acura cl, does that mean i'm back in business?

http://www.theautochannel.com/media/photos/acura/1...




RE: Nice, my car is officially cool again!
By SleepyGreg on 7/10/2009 3:54:17 PM , Rating: 2
By Fireshade on 7/14/2009 9:10:59 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry, but NOT "extremely" aerodynamic
By tygrus on 7/10/2009 8:21:42 PM , Rating: 2
I don't consider the car "extremely" aerodynamic, though it may be "excellent" for it's size. 0.29 cd compared with 0.26 cd is a big difference. There are now several production cars that do better. Just check out the "Automobile drag coefficient" Wiki page for a few examples. The Hummer H2 is atrocious at 0.57 cd, 2009 Mercedes E-class coupe has a 0.25 cd.




RE: Sorry, but NOT "extremely" aerodynamic
By 91TTZ on 7/15/2009 11:42:53 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
I don't consider the car "extremely" aerodynamic, though it may be "excellent" for it's size. 0.29 cd compared with 0.26 cd is a big difference


Coefficient of drag has nothing to do with size. It's an unrelated concept.


By Spuke on 7/15/2009 4:35:11 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Coefficient of drag has nothing to do with size. It's an unrelated concept.
Very true. My Pontiac Solstice has a CD of .43.


XJ220
By Silver2k7 on 7/12/2009 5:36:39 AM , Rating: 2
They should look back to the XJ220 that was a sexy looking car.. blows this design right out of the water.




RE: XJ220
By Silver2k7 on 7/12/2009 5:37:35 AM , Rating: 2
RE: XJ220
By BZDTemp on 7/13/2009 6:17:21 AM , Rating: 2
Have you seen a XJ220 in real life?

The XJ220 is a boat and I do not mean that in a good way. It is huge and silly. Cars like the XJ15 and the F1 are how super cars should be while the XJ220 is a huge let down.


I get a Bently / Aston Martin Vibe
By Shig on 7/10/2009 2:07:09 PM , Rating: 2
Who doesn't like Bently or Aston Martin though :)




By waffle911 on 7/10/2009 5:59:07 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not seeing that so much... Especially the Bentley vibe. Aston Martin, maybe. Bentleys are very traditional, very classically styled proper English saloon cars (even if they are technically owned by the Germans), much like the last generation XJ, which I will sorely miss once this new one hits the streets. Sure it may be based on very old styling, but it's a timeless, classic form that can never go out of style for those with good taste... the good taste that says the last great BMW 7 series to roll out of Bavaria was the E38, the last one free of the terrible hand of that Chris Bangle (thank God he's recently retired). The XJ was the very last of the stodgy old-timers amongst the "reasonably-priced" high-luxury large sedans/limousines. I wish it didn't have to end like this. This and the XF both look like some Japanese or Korean mish-mash of "lifted" styling cues gone awry. The XF looks decently nice, but it really is rather boring. The new XJ, though...just...blegh. Just because hydro-forming is a newly available manufacturing process that allows for never-before-possible mass-manufactured designs is no reason to go testing the new boundaries. Too much design freedom is definitely worse than not enough design freedom. It's just too bad that now all the luxury brands have followed Chris Bangle off of a cliff of bad taste. It's a shame that now the only pretty car in the big cat's lineup is the XK. I want something timeless and elegant, not some generic hydro-formed "modern art" sculpture that's trying too hard to be an icon.


By tpurves on 7/10/2009 8:42:03 PM , Rating: 2
Why even come to work in the morning, why not just give the PR writers at Jaguar editorial access so they can just post their thoughts and press releases directly to the sight. It's not like the 5 or 10 extra words you edited in to their PR copy added that much to the story.




By dark matter on 7/11/2009 4:15:50 AM , Rating: 2
Why not shout your mum in from the next room to do it instead, i'm sure you feel she can do a better job.

Hate to break this to you but I don't believe this car was designed for people who watch High School Musical. Have you not considered something more realistic?


Nice Article
By mikeyD95125 on 7/11/2009 3:48:05 AM , Rating: 2
Did he just copy this out of a Jaguar press release? Jeese I would have paid him $500 to write an article like this for my company.




RE: Nice Article
By SleepyGreg on 7/11/2009 7:04:26 AM , Rating: 2
I think the article gets in under the guise of the car being "tech loaded". But then you could argue just about every car is tech loaded these days.


Wow....
By Cheesew1z69 on 7/10/2009 2:03:37 PM , Rating: 1
What a sexy beast!




RE: Wow....
By SamBest on 7/10/2009 2:15:11 PM , Rating: 2
is that new TaTa in town?


By corduroygt on 7/10/2009 3:37:59 PM , Rating: 2
The Jag is nice except for the back, which belongs to the same family as the town car and the MKZ...




Generic
By gfredsen on 7/10/2009 8:38:12 PM , Rating: 2
I am more let down by the generic color schemes all of these new cars have, interior and exterior. My first Jag was Old English White with red leather interior. Try to find that now.
I want to add that the oil puddled beneath it, on the carport concrete, was Pennzoil Black.




Looks
By Gazz on 7/10/2009 11:14:40 PM , Rating: 2
Nice article beautiful car but I dont like the tail lights and a Jag isn't a Jag without the leeping figerine on the front still very lushious
Gazz




Front end of a Volvo
By blowfish on 7/10/2009 11:20:03 PM , Rating: 2
The front end styling looks like an S70 to me, not really a Jag




Bored
By parge on 7/11/2009 2:55:08 PM , Rating: 2
Man I'm so bored of people with nothing better to do than try and correct every single DT articles flaws. Bitching and whining, and then adding a sarcastic sentence at the end. Same old same old.




Ian Callum is clearly PAST it
By lemonadesoda on 7/11/2009 4:58:03 PM , Rating: 2
Some designers live on their notoriety, and not on the quality of their current work or current ability or competence. Clearly the case here. After all sharp knives blunt over time.

There is nothing exciting or original in this car design. It is a hotchpotch of designs stolen from other "premium brands". Everyone can see something familiar: be it jag, bentley, maybach, volvo, aston, mercedes... but actually there is probably more "mondeo" in it than anyone would care to admit.

It is hoping to gain attention and prospective customers through design association: trying to be a little bit of something that somebody might like or dream of, rather than being brave, inventive, new.

This new Jag is a "trifle"; a mix of yesterdays desserts with custard. Shame on Mr Callum. Or maybe this is the best he can do? Perhaps this car will be sold with a free pair of slippers.




Panty dropper
By guy007 on 7/11/2009 8:24:03 PM , Rating: 2
Wow the S-type I have was quite they panty dropper in it's youth. This looks like it will do something similar.

Seriously though, when you compare the price to play - $72k -for a pretty fully loaded (navi, heated/cooled seats), camera's for parking and fast (0-60 5.2 sec) base model to the competition this care is a steal (for those who can afford to play at these prices). Considering that this was designed while under ford management, I think they should have kept jag around a while longer. It looks like it make succeed. Regardless, Im glad Jaguars back.




Hmmm
By Mumrik on 7/11/2009 9:03:19 PM , Rating: 2
Looks American.




Lightweight?
By Roffles on 7/12/2009 3:56:45 AM , Rating: 2
300 fewer pounds doesn't make a car "lightweight" when we are talking about obese cars in the 2 ton range. Don't expect any dramatic impact on handling, acceleration or fuel economy. The Jag gets a car length advantage over the competition on a 0-60 sprint...then they all crash and die when they hit a corner at that same speed. One of these days they'll start "teching out" compacts with the same features but with a better power to weight ratio and I'll be standing there waiting with my checkbook.




"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki