backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 187 comment(s) - last by Clauzii.. on Nov 26 at 6:57 PM


  (Source: Apple)

  (Source: Apple)
But Apple is afraid some new hacks will threaten its closed box policies.

Between Friday and Tuesday, 2 million copies of Apple's new OS Leopard were sold.  The release of Leopard, also known as Mac OS X 10.5, was covered by DailyTech earlier this month.

Analysts estimate that 200,000 of the Leopard sales were on Mac systems that came pre-installed with it.  This would indicate a very strong sales weekend for Apple in the Mac department as well.

After a torrid quarter which showed earnings risings 67 percent and sales of 2.16 million Macs, many analysts believe that Leopard may chase up some even higher Mac sales figures.

With Apple currently the 3rd largest home computer seller, and with second place Dell struggling with unsavory financial disclosures, the sky may be the limit for Apple and its new OS.

J.P. Gownder, principal analyst with Forrester Research, feels Apple faithful may be helping to spread the good word about the OS.

"Consumers typically don't understand or know why they should care about an operating system," he says, "But in the Apple ecosystem, there are lots of evangelists that play a large role in proselytizing for Apple."

Apple may face a more difficult battle climbing its way higher in market share, though.  Technology research firm Gartner Inc. stated that Apple appeared to have an 8 percent market share in the last quarter.  Gaining much more may be much tougher.

Many analysts expect weaker sales next quarter.  Apple has thrived in the summer months, traditionally, on back to school specials.  Last Christmas its sales were weaker than expected, with only 1.6 million Macs shipping in the Q4 2006.

Gene Munster, of Piper Jaffray argues though that the strong sales of Leopard should relieve any fears, as it shows that Apple's user base is eager to update their OS--and is willing to do so frequently.  He stated, "These numbers show the Mac user base is growing.  It also shows that it is an unusually active user base."

Leopard features software tools Quick Look and Time Machine, as well as the inclusion of Boot Camp to allows Microsoft OS support for gaming functionality (though Mac may soon be getting serious gaming capabilities of its own).

Leopard is so popular it has even come under hack attack--hackers have successfully unlocked the platform to run on non-Mac PCs. 

The move follows in the spirit of Jailbreakme.com, which as reported by DailyTech exploits a safari TIFF vulnerability to unbrick iPhones and iPod Touches and allow them to install third party applications.  Apple does not want to permit such applications until 2008 and will try to brick iDevices that do so. 

Likewise Apple is less than happy about its beloved Leopard being let free to run on non-Mac PCs.  Apple has had a strict policy against "clone" PCs -- PCs run an Apple OS on non-Apple hardware.  Under Gil Amelio's leadership in the 90s clone PCs were temporarily allowed, but upon the return of Steve Jobs as CEO, clones were promptly re-banned.

The wild popularity of Apple's products, both hardware and software, has led to a massive knowledgeable fan base that pick apart and unlock its programs to enjoy greater freedoms.  Apple has played a cat-and-mouse game with these hackers, but its efforts are mostly in vain, and only serve to stir up some short lived controversy, until the next unlock is found.  Some even speculate wildly that CEO Steve Jobs secretly wants hacks, but can't officially endorse them.

Will Apple torrid Leopard sales continue.  Will it one day open its platform to non-proprietary hardware.  How many Leopard copies will soon be running unlocked on PCs?  Will this help Leopard gain ground on Vista?  Only time will tell, but for now Apple can be pleased by the ferocity of Leopard's sales.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Vista's 2million mark
By howtochooseausername on 11/1/2007 11:55:14 AM , Rating: 5
Anyone know when Vista reached the 2mill mark?




RE: Vista's 2million mark
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/1/2007 12:06:41 PM , Rating: 5
Dunno. They were at 20 million at the end of the first month however.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By howtochooseausername on 11/1/2007 1:24:28 PM , Rating: 2
Could anyone confirm if that number included XP licenses with Vista upgrade vouchers?


By Master Kenobi (blog) on 11/1/2007 1:26:49 PM , Rating: 2
It didn't, however it would include people who redeemed those vouchers.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By XToneX on 11/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: Vista's 2million mark
By munim on 11/1/2007 12:21:15 PM , Rating: 5
No, they didn't. Then again, they did force it down Mac users.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By rcc on 11/1/2007 12:55:59 PM , Rating: 3
No, only Mac buyers.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By darkpaw on 11/1/2007 1:42:51 PM , Rating: 2
And anyone that wanted to keep using bootcamp.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By ninjit on 11/1/2007 10:44:48 PM , Rating: 2
I'm still using Windows through Bootcamp.

What they did when the disabled the beta, was prevent the creation of any NEW bootcamp partitions, but existing ones still work fine.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By theapparition on 11/1/2007 12:26:05 PM , Rating: 5
No, but they force it on all new sales of their own Apple hardware. Apple is the number 3 computer manufacturer now, behind Dell, so it's not like David and Goliath. You can also still buy any Dell with XP installed.

So, not sure what your getting at or what your trying to argue???

quote:
did I say that out loud?

Better people to think you're a fool, then to open your mouth and remove all doubt..........


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By XToneX on 11/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: Vista's 2million mark
By creathir on 11/1/2007 1:08:33 PM , Rating: 5
From day 1 Dell offered XP on their Optiplex line of computers. (MOST home users would not WANT a dated operating system... only those concerned about compatibility with certain software/hardware would care...)

- Creathir


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By Screwballl on 11/1/07, Rating: -1
RE: Vista's 2million mark
By michal1980 on 11/1/2007 2:42:39 PM , Rating: 4
vista is not anywhere near Windows ME... unless your brain dead.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By XToneX on 11/1/07, Rating: 0
RE: Vista's 2million mark
By SavagePotato on 11/1/2007 6:53:25 PM , Rating: 2
I love how the anti Vista trolls just think that an os that has almost 100 million units sold is somehow just going to get canceled or something and everyone is going to go back to XP.

Wake up and smell the billions of dollars in revenue. Vista is selling phenomenally well. For those that have actually used the OS on a properly installed system, It is proving to be a very nice product as well.

Each and every day that goes by the asinine bashing posts sound more and more stupid the more people realize first hand that Vista is a quality OS.

Whether you like change or not it happens. Most importantly it is happening like it or not. XP more specifically 32 bit computing in general does not have the legs to hold out more than another year or two at most. The ram limit of 3 gigs is about to get blown away, and hard.


RE: Vista's 2million mark
By Screwballl on 11/2/07, Rating: 0
RE: Vista's 2million mark
By MonkeyPaw on 11/2/2007 3:19:56 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
a troll posts to get a strong negative reaction, I am far from that but you seem to be just your own description.


lol Read your own post:

quote:
Welcome to Windows ME version 2 (aka Vista)

and of course Vienna is planned for 2009 so theres another OS to shove down unsuspecting user's throats


Tell me that doesn't sound like flame bait. You don't even use caps or punctuation, a la troll. Your sources are even abused. Saying that "79.9% of businesss machines do not match Microsoft's recommended requirements for premium-ready PCs to be upgraded to Vista" doesn't make the statement MS's fault. My office PC is 3 years old and has 256mb of RAM--barely enough for XP. However, the cheapest, most basic new PC can run Vista. RAM is now very very cheap, and that's the only ususual thing Vista really needs over XP.

Don't get me wrong, by no means do I think MS is perfect. However, I don't see how Apple's system is any better, considering they charge $129 for what is basically a glorified service pack.