backtop


Print 19 comment(s) - last by atomandroid.. on Sep 26 at 7:03 PM

Process is a modern take on an ancient glass making process

3D printing is an interesting technology which allows engineers and designers to get a 3D object from a digital design that can be viewed in the real world. Artists also use 3D printing to make art that is designed digitally.

A team of engineers and artists working at the University of Washington's Solheim Rapid Manufacturing Laboratory has developed a new method of using conventional 3D printers to create glass objects. A 3D printer typically uses a layer of powder that is activated by an ink jet printer that sprays a binding material at the exact location it is needed. The reaction binder adheres to the powdered and creates the object.

The problem with making glass parts in this method is that the reaction binder doesn't quickly absorb into the glass powder and the 3D objects printed in the glass medium end up with a gelatinous consistency.

Professor Mark Ganter said, "It became clear that if we could get a material into powder form at about 20 microns we could print just about anything."

Getting the powdered particles to the 20-micron size wasn't the only challenge; the team had to rework the binding agent as well. The team adjusted the ratio of powder to liquid and devised a way to make solid glass parts from the powdered glass.

"Using our normal process to print objects produced gelatin-like parts when we used glass powders," said mechanical engineering graduate student Grant Marchelli, who led the experimentation. "We had to reformulate our approach for both powder and binder."

The glass that is produced using the new method is heated to a set temperature to turn it into a solid. However, the researchers point out that the molecules of the glass remain in a disordered state so the glass is technically a super-cooled liquid rather than a true solid.

The team also says that the process is very similar to something that artists used in the past going back to ancient Egyptian times called pate de verre that was used to create glassware. The ancient technique used a glass powder mixed with a binding material like egg white or enamel.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Isn't...
By MrBlastman on 9/25/2009 11:59:06 AM , Rating: 2
Glass typically, at least with windows, in a "contested" supercooled liquid form to begin with? I realize that this is a dispute that has not yet, at least been settled in everyone's mind, but I did get a little bit of a chuckle when the developer at this company mentioned in the article said that the printed objects are supercooled glass liquids.




RE: Isn't...
By Spivonious on 9/25/2009 12:11:17 PM , Rating: 2
If you turned glass into a solid, wouldn't it become the sand it's made from?


RE: Isn't...
By MrBlastman on 9/25/2009 12:18:07 PM , Rating: 2
Affirmative. I'm trying to point out the humor in this whole "debate" that is going on everywhere and still going on as far as I can tell.


RE: Isn't...
By fake01 on 9/25/2009 11:07:05 PM , Rating: 2
I thought glass was a solid :S


RE: Isn't...
By check on 9/25/09, Rating: -1
RE: Isn't...
By jimhsu on 9/25/2009 12:22:53 PM , Rating: 2
Glass is technically a supercooled fluid, but it's viscosity is so high that it will take something like a trillion times the age of the universe for a "flow" to be detected at room temperature. So in practical terms, it isn't.

---

Writing in the American Journal of Physics, physicist Edgar D. Zanotto states "...the predicted relaxation time for GeO2 at room temperature is 1032 years. Hence, the relaxation period (characteristic flow time) of cathedral glasses would be even longer."[24] (1032 years is much longer than the estimated age of the Universe.)


RE: Isn't...
By jimhsu on 9/25/2009 12:24:13 PM , Rating: 3
10^32, not 1032, btw.


RE: Isn't...
By Motoman on 9/25/2009 1:02:58 PM , Rating: 1
Ummm...then why is it that if you take a pane of glass from a window in a really old house (think 100-year old farm house or something) you can visibly see that the bottom is thicker than the top...at the time of manufacture, the thickness was uniform...?


RE: Isn't...
By emboss on 9/25/2009 1:35:04 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
at the time of manufacture, the thickness was uniform


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Behavior_of_ant...


RE: Isn't...
By MrPickins on 9/25/2009 1:35:27 PM , Rating: 2
But at the time of manufacture, the glass was not uniform.

Old methods of making glass panes left one side slightly thicker than the other.

Usually, the thicker side was installed at the bottom, but I've seen several old windows where the top is thicker than the bottom.

Glass flowing by a measurable amount is an urban legend.

Here's more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Behavior_of_ant...


RE: Isn't...
By Motoman on 9/25/2009 6:36:05 PM , Rating: 4
Hmmm...in that case I have a bone to pick with my high school chemistry teacher, who categorically told us in class that glass could be considered a "highly viscous liquid" because of this phenomenon.

My public education has failed me.


RE: Isn't...
By JKflipflop98 on 9/25/2009 8:53:28 PM , Rating: 1
Actually, the windows in my parents 175 year old farmhouse are wavy. Certain types of old glass do flow over a long period of time.


RE: Isn't...
By Flail on 9/25/2009 10:29:20 PM , Rating: 2
RE: Isn't...
By Spivonious on 9/25/2009 1:03:41 PM , Rating: 2
More like a hundred years or so. Ever been in an old house with original windows? You can see the flow in the glass.


RE: Isn't...
By BladeVenom on 9/25/2009 1:42:20 PM , Rating: 2
The glass wasn't even to begin with. They find old glass objects that are thousands of years old, which look the same as the day they were made. If glass flowed fast enough to observe the effect in just a 100 years, the really old pieces would be puddles by now. If the glass in old houses is thicker at the bottom, thats because window builders used the thicker end as the base.


RE: Isn't...
By Iaiken on 9/25/2009 1:53:22 PM , Rating: 2
You're making the false assumption that the glass was uniform at the time of installation. Quite the contrary, prior to the advent of float glass, it was almost impossible to have any piece of glass with a completely uniform thickness.

One only need recognize the observed cases where the glass is thicker at the top, or to either side. Or perhaps cases where antique glass shelving has not deformed despite being under significantly greater gravitational loads.

I am sorry, but that glass was already like that when they installed it...


RE: Isn't...
By atomandroid on 9/26/2009 7:03:56 PM , Rating: 2
Glass is an AMORPHOUS SOLID - lacking any long-range repeated crystalline structure. This does not make it a liquid.

Many people will say that glass flows with gravity, taking the shape of its "container" over hundreds of years, but this is not true.


so what?
By amagriva on 9/26/2009 1:24:26 PM , Rating: 2
Ehi! What's the problem?
Every hundred years I'll turn my windiws upside down..
VoilĂ !




RE: so what?
By Camikazi on 9/26/2009 2:21:45 PM , Rating: 2
That's what I do! Can't believe no one thought of that, o well.


"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki