backtop


Print 15 comment(s) - last by ender707.. on Dec 28 at 4:03 PM


  (Source: streetsblog.org)
Had the LAPD worked to keep these cameras functioning, it may have arrested several perpetrators by now

The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) recently admitted that many of downtown LA's surveillance cameras don't work because it doesn't know how to work or maintain them correctly.

The surveillance cameras, which were put in place in order to assist the LAPD in solving crimes, were purchased by local business groups and installed over the last few years. The LAPD was then supposed to monitor the cameras and the activity captured. 

However, the LAPD recently confessed that about three dozen downtown cameras were not maintained correctly, thus do not work. The police department was not trained on how to maintain the cameras, and it had a difficult time finding a vendor to take care of the cameras for the department.

Police officers who did try to monitor and maintain the cameras sometimes ended up breaking the devices because the system, which was placed in a closet-sized room, overheated.

As a result, many of the surveillance cameras have sat quietly, unable to capture any necessary footage. Some are even covered in bird droppings. Citizens and local business groups that have donated the cameras have expressed their disappointment in the LAPD.

"It is heartbreaking to see a network of cameras gifted to the LAPD sitting idle while perpetrators of violence get away with murder on our most dangerous streets," said Estela Lopez, executive director of the Central City East Assn., which gave 10 cameras to the LAPD in 2006 for $200,000. "Just when the demand on the missions and shelters is going up, we need to use every tool we can to keep violence from ripping this community apart."

The LAPD has recognized and admitted to its lack of maintenance of some of the 300 surveillance cameras placed around the city.

"We need to embrace technology, but it's important that when the department promises something to the public that they follow through," said Alan Skobin, Police Commissioner. "The department has fallen short in meeting expectations in maintenance and repair provisions."

While the LAPD has fixed some of the cameras, such as those in MacArthur Park, it recognizes that it should have taken better care of these devices over the years to aid in crime solving. For instance, a series of stabbings, such as one that killed a 53-year-old man, occurred in skid row where cameras had been placed. But the cameras have been inoperable, and the LAPD said it didn't have money to fix all of the cameras. No arrests have been made in regards to any of the stabbings.

Source: The Los Angeles Times



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

If you didn't know
By tastyratz on 12/27/2011 9:41:16 AM , Rating: 2
You know now. Mcarthur park is off limits but you can stab people freely in front of any other camera.

Finny though, you never hear of a *traffic* camera being down though do you? Police departments across the country seem to have no issue keeping all of THOSE cameras in tip top shape.




RE: If you didn't know
By AntiM on 12/27/2011 11:08:08 AM , Rating: 2
Plus, how are they ever going to brutalize people with so many cameras watching?


RE: If you didn't know
By Mint on 12/27/2011 2:21:22 PM , Rating: 2
If a traffic camera was down, why would they tell you? Most of their effectiveness is from being a deterrent.


RE: If you didn't know
By tastyratz on 12/27/2011 4:22:43 PM , Rating: 2
Regular comedian this guy, using words like traffic camera's and effectiveness in one sentence.
Traffic cameras generate revenue, not save lives.


RE: If you didn't know
By spread on 12/28/2011 1:51:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Traffic cameras generate revenue, not save lives.


They were never intended to save lives. If the police gave a damn about road safety they would pull over all those soccer moms texting on their phones while driving their mini school bus sized SUV with one child in the back.


RE: If you didn't know
By Mint on 12/28/2011 3:04:06 PM , Rating: 1
You know damn well that we'd have more people running lights and speeding if we didn't ticket them. Why do you think most people drive at 35 mph in 25 zones, or 70-75 on the highway?

That's how fast police let them drive, plain and simple. Without the deterrent of patrol cars or cameras, we'd have 10x as many assholes on the road thinking that they're too good to get in an accident and know better than what the sign tells them.


RE: If you didn't know
By tastyratz on 12/28/2011 4:02:46 PM , Rating: 2
No,
I think the 90 percentile rule dictacted by road and weather conditions control things like speed. People go 70-75 because it's SAFE to go 70-75 in the designated area for the vehicle they are driving, not because they have not all received a ticket yet. People generally go as fast as deemed safe. set the speed limit to 100 and I bet you will not see many people doing 100 on most public highways.

traffic cameras masquerade as safety enforcers, but in reality you can not see if that particular intersection has a camera until you are too close to stop safely. People end up slamming on their brakes with the fear of god once they spot one at speed for yellow lights, causing a sharp increase of rear end collisions. The people who run red lights resulting in an accident are generally just not paying attention. They drive through the light they just didn't see when doing their makeup or what have you.


B2B
By ender707 on 12/27/2011 3:23:10 PM , Rating: 2
"10 cameras to the LAPD in 2006 for $200,000"

Maybe I should reconsider looking in to a Business to Business sales job. I bet I could still make a good commission selling 10 cameras that break easily for half that price.




RE: B2B
By Reclaimer77 on 12/27/2011 7:41:52 PM , Rating: 2
Why do you think state budgets are so fucked? When it's not your money, you aren't motivated to spend it responsibly. Would you or I spend $200,000 on 10 cameras even if we were stinking rich? Hell no! But New York? Hey, it's not their money, fuck it, buy the cameras we'll just raise taxes on something later and the dumb shmucks that live here will keep voting the same people in office and city council.

And let's not even get into the Federal Government and it's contracts for a $10,000 hammer or toilet.


RE: B2B
By Zugzwang152 on 12/27/2011 9:21:32 PM , Rating: 2
The cost probably includes backend equipment (servers, storage, networking gear) and network connectivity required to support the 10 cameras.


RE: B2B
By dethrophes on 12/28/2011 6:25:27 AM , Rating: 3
Even just the camera case can easily cost $2000+, they include dehumidifier, heater, motorized swivel, tilt, rotate, zoom control, possibly even with IR spot and or wide beam lamps. Not to mention being made out of armored steel with armored glass. They need power installation and signal routing back to the control center. Then in the control center you need recording capacity for what 30 days in redundant format?
Long story even though $20000 per camera sounds crazy its not as crazy as it sounds.


RE: B2B
By spread on 12/28/2011 1:52:27 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Not to mention being made out of armored steel with armored glass.


Why? It's a camera.


RE: B2B
By ender707 on 12/28/2011 4:03:01 PM , Rating: 2
The cost may include those items, but it obviously did not include a warranty or maintenance plan.


Nonsense
By adiposity on 12/28/2011 12:35:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Police officers who did try to monitor and maintain the cameras sometimes ended up breaking the devices because the system, which was placed in a closet-sized room, overheated


I don't know where you get your info, but this paragraph is just plain nonsense.




By letmepicyou on 12/28/2011 1:02:36 PM , Rating: 2
One day, people will realize the police aren't under any legal obligation to provide any protection whatsoever.

http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/the-police-arent-le...

This is just one page, please don't take my word for ANYTHING. Do a little search. "Are police legally obligated to protect us?" is a great question to plug into google.

Best to climb up on a ladder at night and unbolt and smash those cameras and toss em in the dumpster. If you want to protect your business, it would be a lot cheaper to issue a side-arm to every employee and send them to a tactical shooting training course.

When seconds count, the police are only minutes away. If they show up at all.




"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki