backtop


Print 18 comment(s) - last by somerset.. on Feb 8 at 12:08 PM


The Kodak EasyShare 5300

Set to retail for just under $200

100 years for $9.99
Kodak's new ink is not only half the price, but lasts over six times longer

Inkjet hardware has always been priced very attractively. In fact, retailers often give away inkjet printers for free as part of a hardware or software bundle, hoping to make money back on sales of replacement ink cartridges. While the printer itself is cheap, the ink that fuels its output is disproportionately expensive. Eastman Kodak Company today entered the consumer inkjet industry with a new product line and hopes to change all that.

 “After today, the inkjet market will never be the same,” said Antonio M. Perez, chairman and chief executive officer, Eastman Kodak Company. “We are changing the rules in this industry to ensure that consumers can affordably print what they want, when they want, easily and at the high level of Kodak quality they’ve come to expect.”

According to company statements, the new Kodak Easyshare All-in-One Printers will use pigment-based inks that will save consumers up to 50 percent on everything they print.

 “For years, the high price of inkjet cartridges has kept consumers from freely using their printers,” said Perez. “With affordable premium inks, families can now create crisp documents and KODAK lab-quality photos at home.”

Kodak’s pigment-based ink, priced at $9.99 for a cartridge of black ink and $14.99 for a five-ink color cartridge, is said to print the same number of pages at half the cost of other consumer inkjet printers. Printers supporting the new ink technology will retail between $149.99 and $299.99 starting in March at Best Buy.

Those who prefer printing photos at home would also want to know that the new ink is projected to create prints that will stay true for 100 years—a considerable bump up from the average life span of today’s prints at 15 years.

“Our new system gives consumers the freedom to print documents and photos frequently, easily and affordably with exceptional quality that lasts a lifetime under typical home display conditions,” Perez said.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

drivers
By Myrandex on 2/6/2007 9:16:27 PM , Rating: 2
They will get my money if I see some good driver development. Vista x64 will be the selling point to me, and some x64 Linux drivers would be icing on the cake (even if basic functionality).
Jason




RE: drivers
By rippleyaliens on 2/6/2007 10:06:48 PM , Rating: 2
ok, now this is finally some good news. After years of getting ganked by the printers. It had up to now, been cheaper to almost buy a new printer vs buying the replacement ink. Now with these prices, and if they are close 60-70% same page per cartridge, well you can count me in.
I am one of those old farts that use a laser printer for text, and swap to the inkjet for color based stuff. Hastle when printing proposals, or stuff with text+pictures.
I am in on this.
Tired of also buying a new inkjet printer every 2months as well, because finding the ink becomes even more mission impossible.


RE: drivers
By somerset on 2/8/2007 12:08:29 PM , Rating: 2
I dunno about that... Ink is easy to find. Its expesive as hell, and thus EVERYONE sells it. You can even get it as Costco LOL


RE: drivers
By ncage on 2/6/2007 11:58:47 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
They will get my money if I see some good driver development. Vista x64 will be the selling point to me, and some x64 Linux drivers would be icing on the cake (even if basic functionality).


Good luck on that one. This printer is most likely a software based printer. The same things that fight against linux every day will fight against this one. Think about it. Should a company spend the time/money (developer cost) in adding something that would provide very little revenue generation to the company? I mean how much more sales do you think they would garnish if they make this thing linux compatible? Since this thing is most likely software based; how much developer time would be required to do this (probably a lot). Its likely the company could even lose money if they do this. Since these companies never release enough specs for individual linux developers to write their on drivers (intellectual rights issues) then linux drivers will never available. So you got the chicken/egg senario here. Same things happens with applications. Why should quicken spend the time to write its applications for linux when they would probably lose money? Why should adobe do the same thing for Photoshop? So your stuck with this: because software is not available people don't want to move to linux and because not enough people use linux then software companies don't see it profitable to rewrite their application for it along with other issues such as linux is a lot harder for the lame user to use especially when something goes wrong. Linux has a tough uphill battle on the desktop arena; eventhough, we will all agree it has made huge strides in the server space.


RE: drivers
By Ringold on 2/7/2007 3:57:35 PM , Rating: 2
Not to mention, even if they do release closed-source drivers for Linux, half of them will whine about it not being open-source (what, so the gentoo crowd can have the sheer joy of compiling their printer drivers?)

~4% linux market share + half ungrateful consumers = more resources available for my Vista drivers (thank you, lexmark, for already having some)


RE: drivers
By Samus on 2/7/2007 1:57:09 PM , Rating: 2
I couldn't agree more. HP printers in particular have unneccessarily bloated drivers. Seriously, 20-30 minutes to install sometimes, often failing the first install run forcing another attempt. I don't recommend any HP printers to any of my clients, not because they're unreliable or expensive, but because the cost of deployment is astronomically higher than, for example, Canon, who's drivers are generally in the 5-15mb range.


FYI:
By Souka on 2/6/2007 5:14:57 PM , Rating: 5
What is the difference between standard dye-based ink and pigmented ink?

http://www.oddparts.com/ink/faq19.htm




RE: FYI:
By Souka on 2/6/2007 5:21:22 PM , Rating: 2
oh yeah... I have a Canon Pixma IP4000. Apparently it uses pigmented ink for text-black, and dye-based based ink for the photo colors of CMYK. (5 cart printer)...

I have some 8x10" pics framed in a fairly bright room...no direct sunlight however, and after years they still look like a regular photo...

cheers!


What!?!
By CascadingDarkness on 2/6/2007 7:47:05 PM , Rating: 2
If all this hype is true I'd have to agree with "After today, the inkjet market will never be the same." I don't think I'm the only consumer sick of cheap, but poor quality printers, and being asked to bend over and grab my ankles when it comes to buying ink.




RE: What!?!
By vtohthree on 2/6/2007 10:44:53 PM , Rating: 3
"Kodak’s pigment-based ink, priced at $9.99 for a cartridge of black ink and $14.99 for a five-ink color cartridge,"


It's much of the same, has no one else noticed?!?! One Cartridge for color!! You run out of one color, you are forced by default to buy a whole new cartridge.

Granted, I haven't seen the size of their 5-in-1 Color cartridge tank yet, but I'm assuming it's pretty tiny. It may save you more money when comparing it to an HP printer. But I think Canon already "revolutionized" the industry with cheaper ink compared to competitors...though they are changing from their roots with their led carts..


RE: What!?!
By Zoomer on 2/7/2007 7:47:10 PM , Rating: 2
I read that its supposed to have five times the amount of ink in the cart. And it achieved its low cost by not integrating a printhead on the cart. (What's new)

And oh, they plan to have two lines of these cart and all of their future printers are going to use these two carts. For ever. ;)


100 Years
By kibets on 2/6/2007 7:19:41 PM , Rating: 2
100, 1000, 100,000 - doesn't matter to me as I'll be dead!

I'm glad to see the company was able to reinvent itself unlike poor rival Polaroid who now sells cheap imported MP3 players. I will go out of my way to get one of these new Kodak printers.




RE: 100 Years
By Oregonian2 on 2/6/2007 7:51:28 PM , Rating: 2
The Polaroid company was sold off and is now owned by a company that looks like one of those that buys "hulks" and milks it for they can before they toss out the remains (maybe not, but seems that way, they seem to be a banking/assets sort of company, not one with synergistic products (or products at all)).


Have yu tried this?
By bongsi21 on 2/7/2007 3:56:11 AM , Rating: 2
I happen to own a uniqe printer from HP having a model name: HP 900 Inkjet Printer. It consist of 2 ink cartridges one black and one color. Costing around $9.00 for the black and $10.00 for the cartridge. The printer itself cost at around $100.00 I've been using this printer for 5 months already and since then i haven't bought a single cartraige from Hp. I've been using the included cartridge from the manufacture box itself. Does anyone ever tried of this printer? It's way too cool to miss out.....
Hp is claiming that you can save 250% of ink cost of this printer and i believe it's very effective.




RE: Have yu tried this?
By Blackraven on 2/8/2007 6:54:07 AM , Rating: 2
The HP 900 printer is only available in the Philippines.

This is not an international product and that's why no one else knows about it.



typo?
By kevinkreiser on 2/6/2007 6:02:29 PM , Rating: 2
did anyone else notice the priter cartrige packaging? it has german, except the word for black in german is spelled "schwarz" not "scjwarz." i know the j and h keys are right beside eachother, but i think it's ironic to have typos in promo pics for something that's supposed to have "kodak quality" priting. i just thought that was kind of funny.




I'll Support this!
By VIAN on 2/7/2007 12:04:07 PM , Rating: 2
This is more fair than to keep paying through the nose beyond the savings of the printer.




It's About Time
By KingstonU on 2/6/2007 7:33:15 PM , Rating: 1
My mom is going to be happy to hear about this. Cheap printing that lasts a long time!




"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Latest Headlines
2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 10, 2012, 5:50 PM
2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 9, 2012, 11:54 AM
2/8/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 8, 2012, 1:11 PM
2/7/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 7, 2012, 12:23 PM










botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki