Sources: The Verge , 
quote: Women (generally) also make terrible engineers.
quote: They need to use their head instead of getting one between their legs to progress their careers.
quote: Agree 100%.
quote: Josephine Cochrane invented the first mechanical dishwasher, and her company, the Garis-Cochran Manufacturing Company, would later became part of KitchenAid and then Whirlpool.
quote: As I said, it's just one more thing you display ignorance on, you're quite a mess of a human being.
quote: You need to step off and learn to ID when people are just having a laugh FFS. You're totally clueless on a wide variety of issues, this one is no exception. You seem to automatically go into attack mode and insult everyone on platitudes without really reading AND comprehending what you are replying to. For someone that keeps posting how incredibly smart they are , you are kind of a dumbass.
quote: These are not qualities the gender has in abundance. *puts on flame proof suit of truth*
quote: able to say things cause our wives aren't there to smack us for it.
quote: Someone needs to examine the judge and her ties to Apple. She is trying to suppress evidence that Samsung didn't copy. Something very fishy about that.
quote: The thing is I can understand people who argue that it's OK for companies like Samsung to copy Apple products and designs, at least that is an intellectually honest position, wrong, but honest.
quote: I think deep in their hearts they know that on a level playing field Apple's products can win, and win surprisingly easy, which is why the Apple fans are so much less worked up by all the legal drama.
quote: Apple's patent is bs
quote: I suppose it does come from the world of grown ups so it might challenge a few people.
quote: Samsung failed to submit evidence by the court set submission process, it is ruled inadmissible, Samsung leaks that evidence to the press after the court declares it inadmissible, Samsung gets a telling off by the Judge.
quote: It's also perfectly legitimate for Judge Koh to rule the evidence as irrelevant.
quote: All you have on your side is common sense
quote: Do you have any capacity to reason at all?
quote: Packaging trade dress claims a rectangular box with minimal metallic silver lettering and a large front-viewpicture of the product prominently on the top surface of the box;
quote: Hardware and software trade dress claims a rectangular product shape with all four corners uniformly rounded; the front surface of the product dominated by a screen surface with black borders;
quote: a metallic surround framing the perimeter of the top surface; a display of a grid of colorful square icons with uniformly rounded corners; and a bottom row of square icons (the "Springboard") set off from the other icons and that do not change as the other pages of the user interface are viewed.
quote: You can see how vague and worthless apple's claims are.
quote: I'm livid.
quote: Honestly, no one gives 2 shits what you are.
quote: unless there is some wierd apple favoritism going on.
quote: The SGH-F700 is a mobile phone manufactured by Samsung. A Korean design patent for this black, rectangular, round-cornered phone was filed by Samsung in December 2006 prior to the release of the image of the iPhone  but after the release of the HTC TyTn which it resembles with it's rectangular design and slide out keyboard.
quote: The SGH-F700 is a mobile phone manufactured by Samsung. A Korean design patent for this black, rectangular, round-cornered phone was filed by Samsung in December 2006 prior to the release of the image of the iPhone but after the release of the HTC TyTn which it resembles with it's rectangular design and slide out keyboard.
quote: seriously, you think Apple Design, prototyped, and Manufactured the iPhone in 9 days in January of 2007 ????
quote: the reason Samsung filed in December, was because they were a supplier to Apple and they saw Apple's iphone for an entire year during 2006, while Apple gave them the specs so Samsung could manufacture the parts Apple wanted....the patent will not be valid, because Apple can show the prototypes that Samsung saw, prototypes from 2005.... hello???? also Apple had been working on the idea of the iPad and iphone since about 2002-2004, which is also filed with the court....
quote: for 5 years before, Samsung created kludge flip phones with small screens and lots of buttons, then suddenly after Apple gives them design plans for the iphone, Samsung is producing F700's cobled together and finally shown in feb 2007....
quote: the reason the judge threw out this "so called evidence" is because Samsung had two years to fake this evidence, yet didn't fake it and didn't actually present it until the last second? why? because they are now desperate, with no trail of actual design... no emails to show people talking about it's design...
quote: in fact Samsung destroyed emails that proved them talking about Apple's design.... a move the Jury will find out as a Judge will tell them that Samsung purposely destroyed evidence that showed what really happened....
quote: hello???? any of those Samsung apologist awake with that? do people really hide from the truth that much?
quote: -------- I have not heard this claim (that Apple showed its prototypes to Samsung. Do you have a source? -------really, you don't know that Samsung was/is a supplier of some of the MAIN COMPONENTS for the iphone? a source would be, use google and do a simple search.... and show us what you find there... now when you make MAIN COMPONENTS for a device, did you think that Apple just waved it's arms around to show Samsung how and what to build? are you really going to argue that?
quote: Tipping its hat to a fellow Korean manufacturer, Samsung notes that in 2006, nearly a year before the iPhone appeared, LG Electronics (066570) announced the round-cornered LG Chocolate, with “virtually all of the [design] features Apple claims” to have patented. In December 2006, before Apple released images of the iPhone, Samsung itself filed a design patent in Korea for a similar rectangular phone called the F700. Smartphone and tablet-computer design was “naturally evolving” in the direction Apple claims it has exclusive rights to use, according to Samsung.
quote: what in the world did you think the Android article was debunking if not the Business week story....again, Samsung did not "show" the F700 in "early 2006", it didn't SHOW IT AT ALL in 2006, it showed it in Feb of 2007...... aFTER the iphone, see the android article that actually has the video proof that it was not introduced in 2006....geez man, what type of person repeats the lie even after knowing it is a lie?Samsung also didn't design the F700 in Early 2006, it got it's "F700" idea from the iphone prototypes that Apple showed them, so that Samsung could make parts for the original iPhone....unless you believe, (which can be proved untrue by the real evidence chain) that apple design, prototyped, and built/manufactured the iphone in 9 days in Jan of 2007, then anyone in their right mind knows what happend, and if you do believe Apple did it in 9 days, then you have some serious issues with a very light head....
quote: In December 2006, before Apple released images of the iPhone, Samsung itself filed a design patent in Korea for a similar rectangular phone called the F700.
quote: Prior art (also known as state of the art, which also has other meanings, or background art), in most systems of patent law, constitutes all information that has been made available to the public in any form before a given date that might be relevant to a patent's claims of originality.