 Ireland is considering adopting a China-like web filter.
The luck of the Irish is not with the internet, it seems
In
the U.S. and foreign countries, many internet service providers
(ISPs) filter out a select handful of material; child pornography
sites are one frequently blocked example. However, copyright
protection organizations and governments are pushing
worldwide to adopt broader filtering to protect citizens
against everything from filesharing sites to cybercrime and
terrorism.
In Ireland, a group called Digital Rights Ireland
has used a freedom of information (FOI) request to obtained select
passages from government emails detailing government
plans to enact a nation-wide web filter. The
Department of Justice has previously refused the public access to the
key documents.
In one email government officials chat with
mobile service provider Vodafone about "introduction of internet
filtering in Ireland". And another email is titled "re
proposed introduction of blocking technology". Other
emails discuss international use of blocking and proposed European
legislation.
An email on the filtering was forwarded to
Department of Justice in charge of casino gaming regulation,
indicating the country might use the filter to try to ban web
gambling (another "amoral" activity, which is currently
banned in the U.S. as well).
Proponents of filtering say its
essential for modern nations to filter out objectionable or amoral
content. However, its opponents say that it is far too blunt a
tool and often damages legitimate businesses. Describes TJ
McIntyre, a barrister, UCD law lecturer and chairman of Digital
Rights Ireland, "Blocking involves censorship taken on no legal
basis. There is no judge, no jury and no right to be heard if you are
blocked. The chances are it also will be used in unaccountable
ways by unaccountable organizations."
Ireland is hardly
alone in wanting to filter the internet. There's pending
French and Australian legislation to roll out a nation-wide
filters. In China web filters have long
been a standard. And in the U.S. some members of Congress
have advocated using a nation-wide ISP-implemented filter to remove
infringed copyrighted content.
Ireland is hardly a progressive
voice when it comes to censorship. The nation recently
enacted a
law prohibiting "blasphemy" (offensive religious
remarks or content). The law is based on the Irish
constitution, which allows free speech, but prohibits speech on any
"blasphemous, seditious, or indecent matter". Under
the new law, individuals found guilty of violations can be fined up
to €25,000 ($33,835 USD). And it gives authorities the power
to stage raids on publishers: the courts may now issue a warrant
authorizing the police to enter, using ‘reasonable force’,
premises where they have grounds for believing there are copies of
‘blasphemous statements’
"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini
|
Most Popular ArticlesReport: Apple to Debut iPad 3 During First Week of March February 10, 2012, 9:36 AM Nikon Announces 36.3MP D800, D800E D-SLRs February 7, 2012, 10:11 AM Quick Note: Acura Unveils Production Version of ILX Hybrid Sedan February 8, 2012, 9:10 AM Google's Motorola Mobility Purchase Approval Expected Next Week February 9, 2012, 3:02 PM AMD Concedes Die-Shrink Race to Intel, Considers ARM Cores February 6, 2012, 11:45 AM
|