backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 13 comment(s) - last by Murloc.. on Nov 7 at 11:11 AM


Craters on Mercury  (Source: NASA)
MESSENGER successfully captures images of Mercury; a piece of space junk impacts Earth; and NASA prepared to call an end to a Mars mission

The NASA Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry and Ranging (MESSENGER) space probe successfully completed a flyby of Mercury, helping astronomers learn more about the innermost planet of the solar system.

"When combined with data from our first flyby and from Mariner 10 (three passes in 1974 and 1975), our latest coverage means that we have now seen about 95 percent of the planet," said a researcher who is involved with the project.  "The region of Mercury's surface that we viewed at close range for the first time this month is bigger than the land area of South America."

More than 1,200 images of Mercury's surface were captured during the flyby, with researchers especially curious about craters and volcanoes.

A piece of space junk from the International Space Station (ISS) splashed harmlessly into the South Pacific Ocean between Australia and New Zealand last night.  The refrigerator-sized tank of ammonia coolant was disposed of an astronaut during a spacewalk in July 2007.

NASA and the U.S. Space Surveillance Network tracked the 1,400-lb. tank once it was determined it would likely impact Earth -- saying that it had "a very low likelihood" of causing any damage once it hit Earth.  There is growing concern about the amount of space junk floating around Earth, as space observers are worried about possible impact with space shuttles or satellites launched from Earth.

Even though NASA briefly regained contact with the Phoenix Mars spacecraft last week, mission managers admit that the lander's mission on the Red Planet is likely doomed.  Less sunlight and a swirling dust storm crippled Phoenix last week, with all of its systems shutting down.

"The communication reinforced a diagnosis that the spacecraft is in a precautionary mode triggered by low energy," a NASA statement read.  "Mission engineers are assessing the lander's condition and steps necessary for returning to science operations."

Phoenix landed on Mars in May, and was originally expected to have a three-month mission, but it was able to operate longer than expected.  The lander helped collect soil and ice bits for analysis, but severe temperature swings helped cripple it for the last time.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RTG?
By therealnickdanger on 11/4/2008 8:23:09 AM , Rating: 2
I thought our martian landers used RTGs for power...? Hmm, they probably should have.




RE: RTG?
By marvdmartian on 11/4/2008 10:10:35 AM , Rating: 2
Remember, these are the same multi-million (billion?) dollar rovers that no one thought to include the following possibilities on:
1. the ability to sense a dust storm and cause the rover to go into hibernation with the solar panels in a stored (or at least, perhaps, upside down?) position, which would prevent the buildup of dust on said panels
2. the addition of a wiper system that could knock the majority of dust off the solar panels, thus negating the effect of the dust blocking the sunlight from hitting that panel
-OR-
3. the simple addition of making a solar panel that can shake the dust off after the storm. Think of a dog shaking water off itself, you'll get the idea.

Honestly, how much would it cost to add any (or all) of those capabilities to these machines? My guess would be "not much". I think the problem is that these machines are built by engineers, and they're simply too smart to add KISS (keep is simple, stupid!) systems to their creations!


RE: RTG?
By RabidDog on 11/4/2008 12:08:03 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Phoenix Mars spacecraft

This is not a rover. This is the stationary lander near the North Pole of Mars.


RE: RTG?
By gcouriel on 11/4/2008 12:17:05 PM , Rating: 2
it's not just cost. calculate the cost, the time of development, the amount of energy used and the weight added to the object, and you can see that although it may be simple to say "put a wiper on it", it's definitely easier said than done!


RE: RTG?
By randomly on 11/4/2008 12:28:36 PM , Rating: 4
Don't be another Armchair wanna-be engineer.

Unfortunately you are speaking from ignorance. You are jumping to spurious conclusions with almost no knowledge, no experience, and no expertise.

All these factors were known during the design of the rovers but many trade offs and compromises had to be made due to the very low total weight that could be landed. The weight restrictions were a very dominant factor in the design (each rover only weighs about 185Kg). Weigh, reliability, and other restrictions drove the design.

Phoenix was also subject to low weight restrictions. Phoenix is not mobile, and it's experiments were expected to be completed within the planned 90 day mission, it's lasted longer than that.

The Mars Science Laboratory is RTG powered but it weighs 5 times more than the Spirit/Opportunity rovers. A completely different landing system (Sky crane) needs to be used since it is too heavy for the airbag approach used on the Spirit and Opportunity rovers.

NASA is full of smart people, they don't make obvious mistakes that armchair engineers can point out. They make other mistakes.

It's tiresome to hear people denouncing others after the fact when they don't even have a clue as to what the engineering and budget constraints were for the original design. It's all just some knee-jerk reaction to proclaim your superiority in some way.

Next time you think somebody made a bad judgment, better find out WHY they made that call rather than just say it was a mistake.


RE: RTG?
By Suntan on 11/4/2008 1:13:41 PM , Rating: 2
Agreed,if I had a nickle for everytime I have heard a comment from some know nothing yokle start out with something like, "Well my water heater at home doesn't have..."

Too many people think they know what is an obvious solution to this or that. They are too ignorant to even be aware of all the ramifications.

By the way, the design life was 3 months. The mission was a success.

As for the "rovers" that this dink incorrectly talked about, their mission life was also 3 months, and they're still going.

-Suntan


RE: RTG?
By ted61 on 11/4/2008 2:36:11 PM , Rating: 2
I was on jury duty with a programmer from NASA. He told me it is realativly easy to get atro-physics PHD's to analyze data but very hard to get the PHD's to set the parameters to get the data. It is astounding how much we take for granted when we are critical of others.


RE: RTG?
By aapocketz on 11/4/2008 6:43:16 PM , Rating: 2
The Viking lander primary power supply was the AEC SNAP-19 RTG. They were also used on the Pioneer program. That was back in the 70's, not sure what they use now.


RE: RTG?
By Mclendo06 on 11/4/2008 4:18:05 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I think the problem is that these machines are built by engineers, and they're simply too smart to add KISS (keep is simple, stupid!) systems to their creations!

The above statement pretty much speaks for itself. Adding systems never adds simplicity.

a few holes:
quote:
1. the ability to sense a dust storm and cause the rover to go into hibernation with the solar panels in a stored (or at least, perhaps, upside down?) position, which would prevent the buildup of dust on said panels

Covering the panels puts the spacecraft into a non fail-safe configuration. If the mechanism to reopen/uncover the panels jams, the battery backup fails, or the magical dust storm sensor (which is using energy while the panels are down) doesn't determine when the storm ends, the spacecraft is finished, and those are just the failure modes I could think of off the top of my head.

quote:
2. the addition of a wiper system that could knock the majority of dust off the solar panels, thus negating the effect of the dust blocking the sunlight from hitting that panel

Such a system would likely scratch the panel, reducing the already anemic power they produce. Plus the wipers add weight and complexity to the panel unfolding process.

quote:
3. the simple addition of making a solar panel that can shake the dust off after the storm. Think of a dog shaking water off itself, you'll get the idea.

Ah, Biomimetics! Actuators for the whole panel which could exert sufficient force to thoroughly shake them would be heavy and require a large amount of energy themselves at a time when the panels energy output was reduced.


RE: RTG?
By Tsuwamono on 11/4/2008 8:08:30 PM , Rating: 2
I dont understand how JUST A WIPER and a motor would add that much complexity... I can wire one up for a car that weighs no more then 1.5 pounds. given you need better materials so double the weight and your at 3 pounds. Thats not that bad. I think he had a valid point about the Wiper. the others i dont really agree with but Mocking him isnt really helping.


International System of Units
By kontorotsui on 11/5/2008 2:46:08 AM , Rating: 2
Can I point out that a worldwide science oriented Dailytech should always use International System of Units?
The only countries in the World still without SI are Liberia, Myanmar and the United States: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_...




RE: International System of Units
By Murloc on 11/7/2008 11:11:23 AM , Rating: 2
That's 100% true.
I'm swiss and I just can't understand how much 1 lb is.
I think there are many international readers here, it would be worth it.
The SI is a standard and it should be so everywhere, if US don't want to adopt it that's ok, but I suggest you do that as the internet is international.


Mafia
By dice1111 on 11/4/2008 9:29:43 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
The refrigerator-sized tank of ammonia coolant was disposed of an astronaut during a spacewalk in July 2007.


Ummm.. evidence of the space mafia at work?
"Give me my bacteria study results! Don't make me tie you to the coolant tank and push you back down to earth..."




"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser











botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki