backtop


Print 9 comment(s) - last by dude.. on Jun 19 at 11:20 PM

Atlantis goes under repairs while in space; explosives help demolition of old towers; and a mother picks up interesting signals on a baby monitor

NASA flight engineers repaired the Atlantis heat shield during a spacewalk that occurred on Friday.  Astronauts used staples to hold down the thermal blanket which ripped loose from an engine pod during the shuttle's launch.    

Maintenance was done until ground engineers were satisfied the repairs would help the shuttle return back to Earth safely.  Since the shuttle Columbia disaster, NASA has been meticulous to check and double-check the mechanical integrity of the shuttle.

The NASA Mission Control Center cleared the shuttle to land at Cape Canaveral on Thursday.  However, officials are thinking about keeping the shuttle docked at the ISS an extra day because of Russian computer failure.  The failed computers, which appear to be operational again, control orientation and oxygen production on the ISS.

More than 122 pounds of explosives helped topple two mobile service towers located at the Space Launch Complex 36 at Cape Canaveral, FL.  The towers were removed due to corrosion which could have led to a safety hazard for workers.

As an aside from the typical news published in DailyTech's International Space Updates -- a Chicago area mother's baby monitor has been receiving a black-and-white video feed from space.  Natalie Meilinger has had the feed since last Sunday evening -- and said she is "addicted to it" and keeps "waiting to see what's next."

While the feed is not coming directly from the shuttle, it is available to anyone with access to the NASA web site -- this situation is not something that happens often, according to Brandi Dean, NASA Spokesperson.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

What?
By UppityMatt on 6/18/2007 8:14:34 AM , Rating: 1
Who had the bright idea to let the Russians make anything computer related. Dont get me wrong the Russians have invented and are known for many things... but computers arent really their forte.




RE: What?
By Moishe on 6/18/2007 9:09:26 AM , Rating: 2
We could say similar things about almost anything.... but the very question assumes there is someone in control who "let" something happen. I'm glad there is freedom to do things that most people would deem foolish.


RE: What?
By masher2 (blog) on 6/18/2007 10:21:34 AM , Rating: 3
This was a failure in a Russian module. Each module of the ISS is built by a specific nation. The Russian-built segments are designed and assembled under their control obviously.


RE: What?
By oTAL on 6/18/2007 11:09:18 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Who had the bright idea to let the Russians make anything computer related.


I have one word for you: Kaspersky!


RE: What?
By Ringold on 6/18/2007 1:31:44 PM , Rating: 2
Not as good as NOD, but until I discovered NOD, Kaspersky is was.

They also make some very, very robust light aircraft, and unfortunately just dont seem to have the political or financial means to market, produce, and export them better than they do. :\

Oh, and Buran was sweet, until the whole lack of money thing..


RE: What?
By Martin Blank on 6/18/2007 11:19:41 AM , Rating: 3
Russia has far more experience in space stations than the US does. While the US made it to the moon, had Spacelab up for a little while, and kept the shuttle program running, Russia has kept a fairly regular manned station presence on one platform or another since 1974. They've had computers up there the whole time.

Incidentally, the computers involved here were built by Germans and run Russian software.


RE: What?
By kattanna on 6/18/2007 12:54:36 PM , Rating: 6
quote:
Incidentally, the computers involved here were built by Germans and run Russian software.


correct, they were built by

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6763173....

quote:
The ISS's primary computers, which are located in the Russian command module Zvezda, were supplied by EADS Astrium Space Transportation in Bremen, Germany, under contract to the European Space Agency.


the cause of the failure is an interesting one

quote:
The US space agency (Nasa) and Russian engineers believe the most likely cause of the crash was a change in the electrically charged plasma field the station flies through as it orbits 350km (220 miles) above Earth.

The theory is that the plasma field shifted when the station's shape changed with the addition of the new truss segment.

"As the station gets bigger, this potential will continue to grow," Nasa's space station programme manager Mike Suffredini told reporters.


RE: What?
By dude on 6/19/2007 11:20:09 PM , Rating: 2
I don't know about space computers and components, but ones for the military are heavily shielded. Because of my recycling background, I've seen many military computers and other parts built with heavily shielded boards, chassis, and the boards are coated in a usually bluish see-through lacquer?

I would only assume that ones fit for the rugged space applications would be at least as well, or better, shielded, because of radiation and other damaging waves in space.


RE: What?
By JoeBanana on 6/18/2007 1:53:38 PM , Rating: 2
Actually the errors are common on space station computers. Some time ago I heard that computers in US part of the station are having a problem. Usually computers just reboot or change some tasks, parameters and then run fine. But this russian and US were more serious because they were out for a while. Especially the russian was becoming critical.


"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer











botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki