backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 7 comment(s) - last by Seemonkeyscanf.. on Jul 1 at 2:31 PM


Buzz Aldrin  (Source: Platon)
NOAA launches new satellite into orbit; NASA Mars rovers continue their work on Red Planet; and a legendary astronaut speaks out

A new weather satellite blasted into orbit from Cape Canaveral over the weekend where it must now pass six months of testing before it officially begins service.  

The Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES), which will be named GOES 14 after it enters its scheduled orbit, will float in orbit around 22,000 miles above the Earth's surface providing hurricane and tornado tracking among other general weather functions.  Specifically, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) owns and uses the GOES 14 satellite, which is part of a $499 million mission.

Despite operating well beyond their scheduled mission, the NASA Spirit and Opportunity Mars rovers continue to carry out missions commanded by NASA.  Spirit is currently stuck on a rock or piece of Martian debris, which could finally bring the rover to an end.  Opportunity, however, continues to move freely around the planet's surface, though faces other mechanical issues.

Rover operators from the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory are unsure if they'll be able to help the rovers survive another Martian winter, but will obviously attempt to do so.  Despite the looming threat of either rover permanently breaking down at any moment, mission managers have a laundry list of possible missions and locations each rover can explore if functioning normally.

NASA legend Buzz Aldrin, the second person to ever walk on the moon, believes the U.S. space agency should focus more on heading to Mars, rather than going back to the moon.  Aldrin said the current race to get back to the moon -- spearheaded by NASA, China, Russia, and JAXA -- is nothing but a "glorified rehash of what we did 40 years ago."

Instead of returning to the moon in 2020 and setting up a possible lunar research post, Aldrin suggest it should be used simply as a staging area for a mission to the Martian moon Phobos.  Even though he's one of the most recognized astronauts ever, NASA has little reason to listen to his suggestions -- it's unknown if the U.S. space agency will even acknowledge his comments, especially since he doesn't respect the agency's current ambitions to return to the moon.

The full letter/editorial Aldrin wrote can be found on the Popular Mechanics web site.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Agreed 100%
By Brandon Hill (blog) on 7/1/2009 9:31:03 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
Aldrin said the current race to get back to the moon -- spearheaded by NASA, China, Russia, and JAXA -- is nothing but a "glorified rehash of what we did 40 years ago."


Aldrin is just stating what many of us here have been saying for quite some time. Aldrin is alright in my book -- in fact, I believe he punched some dude in the face for telling him that the moon landing was a hoax a few years ago. That's my kind of guy :)




RE: Agreed 100%
By Boze on 7/1/2009 9:48:57 AM , Rating: 2
Hear, hear. I couldn't agree more with Aldrin. The moon is great and all, but I'd like to see a human leave this solar system before I end up dead in the next 40 to 70 years (hopefully I live that long).

We always talk about all the amazing advances that have occurred over the past 100 years, and I won't deny that humanity has truly come a long way, but I can't help but feel as though I'm not alone when I look at NASA's past history and think to myself, "We aren't we on Mars again??"

We managed to go from Earth to the Moon in just a few years, but 40 years later we can't skip on to the next planet in our solar system? I can't be the only person who finds this ridiculous...


RE: Agreed 100%
By JediJeb on 7/1/2009 2:20:19 PM , Rating: 2
We launch from close to the equator to take advantage of the angular momentum to help us accelerate to orbital speeds, so the angular momentum from the moon should be an even bigger boost in going to Mars and beyond. That and setting up a facility to make it easier to build the spacecraft needed to get there would be the only reasons I could see for us stopping at the moon before Mars.

I wonder if the competition between the US and the Soviet Union had been longer and stronger, would we with the speed of advancements during the height of the space race, have been able to achieve what Arthur C. Clark invisioned in 2001? I fear our advancements will become even slower as I see the Spirit of Adventure and Exploration being replaced with the Spirit of Fun and Entertainment among the average population. I agree totally with Buzz on this one, but sadly it seems even NASA has been bitten by the remake bug just like Hollywood.


RE: Agreed 100%
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 7/1/2009 2:31:00 PM , Rating: 2
that or we'd be dead. Competition between the US and Soviet Union was a good thing with the space program but a bad thing when it comes to weapons.


RE: Agreed 100%
By Seemonkeyscanfly on 7/1/2009 2:28:07 PM , Rating: 2
We lost the experienced people... Like riding a bike you can be very good as a kid, then hang up your bike for 40 years and pick it back up... you'd be able to ride but you'd be relearning some skills. Best to hit moon first then Mars. However, I would be planning the Mars mission for just a year or two after the moon.

P.S. No you will not live for 40 or 70 more years you have 3 years 5 months, and 22 days left. Please enjoy. 12/2012 is coming fast. :P


By Chudilo on 7/1/2009 9:52:57 AM , Rating: 3
The main reason for getting back to the moon is scientists' new-found interest in the Helium 3 isotope that is believed to be abundant on the moon's upper crust. Helium 3 isotope makes nuclear fusion feasible as the reaction can be controlled by more conventional means.




I agree with Buzz
By Screwballl on 7/1/2009 9:53:56 AM , Rating: 2
I would have to agree with Buzz Aldrin... our next trip should be Mars, and at most setup some sort of lunar colony as a stop over. Start launching living quarters in batches to Mars.
I would love to see a man on Mars in my lifetime (I am 31).




"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook

DailyTech Poll
Which web browser do you use on your primary personal machine? 






44 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki