backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 80 comment(s) - last by eye smite.. on Feb 15 at 2:45 AM

The European Union conducts more raids of Intel facilities to further arm itself in its fight against the chipmaker

More bad legal news came for the world's largest chipmaker, Intel, on Tuesday.  Intel's Munich offices were the target of another round of antitrust raids by the European Commission (EC).  These German raids were confirmed by a public announcement from Intel.

Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel, stated, "I can confirm that there has been a raid on our offices in Munich. As is our normal practice, we are cooperating with authorities."

Jonathan Todd, a spokesman for the Commission in Brussels also stated, "I can confirm that Commission officials have carried out unannounced inspections at the plants of a manufacturer of central processing units (CPUs)."

Todd cited that the raids were carried out to investigate alleged violations of rules against abuse of a dominant position and/or restrictive business practices.  Intel faces a hearing on March 11 and 12 over charges that it participated in price slashing, where it cut retail prices to below the cost of production and is accused of offering substantial rebates in a head-on effort to bulldoze its lagging competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, out of the market. 

The ruling in these hearings may depend somewhat on the analysis of evidence found over the course of the investigation.  However, evidence aside, Intel may face a significantly hostile atmosphere at the hearings, as the European Commission is currently very agressive following a heady $690M USD ruling against Microsoft.  With the EC looking to press more charges against Microsoft, investigating Apple, and charging Intel, it clearly is ready to take a hard stance on what it says are blatant abuses of the market system -- and it stands to gain a bit of financial bounty in doing so.  Chipmaker AMD has constantly complained about Intel's alleged abuses and has encouraged the European Union and other government bodies to aggressively investigate its rival.

If it is ruled by the European Commission that Intel broke antitrust laws, under European Union law, it could be fine Intel up to 10 percent of its global revenue.  Intel's total revenue for 2007 came in at above $40B USD, so such a fine could have a ceiling of around $4B.  The EC would be unlikely to pursue the maximum fine, though, and more likely Intel would receive a fine of around $500M USD to $1B USD, similar to the Microsoft judgement.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/2008 9:49:39 AM , Rating: 3
We're all enjoying the wonderful prices of processors at the moment, with improvements coming thick and fast but how long will it last for if AMD finds itself not able to compete at all.

If they aren't good enough then OK, they should be allowed to fall by the way side, but it wont mean that we are going to be the ones to profit, Intel will.

It's one of those tricky "victim of their own success" type situations on the face of it, and we're all happy with our cheap C2Ds so what's the harm?

I guess it's easy to get a little partisan and assume that it's the EC/EU coming to the aide of a European based business, but what if Intel have actually broken the law?

Anti-trust/monopoly/anti-competition laws exist for a reason after all.

Whether AMD are producing good CPUs or not is neither here nor there. This is about Intel's alleged illegal practices.




RE: Good times
By TomZ on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By TomZ on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Ringold on 2/13/2008 11:28:08 AM , Rating: 4
You're spending far more time attacking TomZ himself than you are attacking his logic. Your third mini-paragraph was the only thing coming close to a response.

At any rate, you also need to ponder what good would come of simply slapping a fine on Intel for actions taken, according to you, 5+ years ago. Consumers don't benefit, shareholders don't benefit, and unless the EC decides, in its infinite generosity, to give that fine to AMD then AMD doesn't benefit either. In fact, the only party that would benefit... would be the EC/EU. Then they can afford to put up another billboard up telling European's how fantastic the EU is.


RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Ringold on 2/13/2008 1:20:25 PM , Rating: 4
quote:
So you are saying that no one should be fined ever?


That's not what I said. If competition laws are meant to protect consumers, then they need to analyze what good would come of a fine. It wouldn't necessarily inhibit future behavior as, apparently, it has already stopped. It wouldn't help Intel's customers, it wouldn't help AMD -- unless they gave the money to AMD, which doesn't seem likely.

quote:
milk an American company based purely on what they themselves think has happened as if it were fact.


That seems to be what you're really pissed at more then anything. They currently appear to be a bunch of people who presently exercise the power simply because they know they can and want to prove to the rest of the world they're actually important. They know they've got an easy target with American companies that won't create much domestic backlash. When they crack down on some Euro-zone based company in a big way, or take an AK-47 to some of their rigid domestic markets (utilities, ag) I'll change my opinion.


RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Ringold on 2/13/2008 1:56:00 PM , Rating: 2
To the world, not to me. Possibly to themselves.

If you haven't seen anyone get a position of power and start flailing it about then I think you dont get out much. Needless to say, Golda Meir wouldn't have to admonish the EC with her famous "Don't be so humble, you're not that great."

If they desired to be humble public servants (like central bankers! -- shameless plug for economists) they'd toil in obscurity, not constantly make headlines.


RE: Good times
By eye smite on 2/15/2008 2:35:00 AM , Rating: 4
Just give it a rest man, now and on future articles. You're dealing with TomZ and his groupies and if you don't go with their popular opinions you get rated down. They'll argue with you that a dead horse is not dead, but merely in a transformational state of apathy and if you don't agree you get rated down. So save your energies for other things. This board of comments at times is proof that youth is wasted on the young.


RE: Good times
By TomZ on 2/13/08, Rating: 0
RE: Good times
By bhieb on 2/13/2008 11:33:51 AM , Rating: 2
They're not now but they may be...might....could possibly be someday somhow.

/sarcasm and puts back on foil hat.


RE: Good times
By jdun on 2/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/2008 11:42:13 AM , Rating: 2
I haven't said consumers are/aren't being/have been harmed. It is only you that has made such a bold statement as if it were fact.

Nor have I said if their products are crappy or not.

I'm saying that a competitive market is good for everyone as long as it is allowed to be competitive and when one company "allegedly" abuses it's position it should be looked at and that all investigations by the EU/EC are not necessarily just an attempt to milk a US company again as that is all they do?!

If anyone was to go by this site you would think that the EU/EC just have two offices. One for the persecution of Intel and another for the persecution of Microsoft.


RE: Good times
By bhieb on 2/13/2008 11:56:02 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
I haven't said consumers are/aren't being/have been harmed. It is only you that has made such a bold statement as if it were fact.

That is because it is FACT. Answer the question posed, how have faster cheaper processors harmed the consumer (not AMD the consumer). Now not in the future maybe, but as of right now how is a lower priced better performing chip harmful to the consumer.

Tom never said Intel for a fact did not do anything wrong, just that cutting prices to gain market share on a competitor should not be investigated. Now if you want to accuse them of shady OEM exclusive deals then that warrants a look.


RE: Good times
By Aloonatic on 2/13/2008 12:04:16 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Answer the question posed, how have faster cheaper processors harmed the consumer (not AMD the consumer)


I don't know, nor do you.

It is not fact.

Anyway, what do you mean by harm?

Do you meant processors should be twice as fast and half the price right now?

Who can say?

It's a silly argument???