backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 91 comment(s) - last by Targon.. on Aug 24 at 6:58 AM


Intel's "Tick-Tock" long-term roadmap.  (Source: HKEPC)

Intel "Penryn" plans  (Source: HKEPC)
There's more to Intel's next-generation processor family than the 45nm process node

Intel plans to unleash its Penryn family processors next quarter, shortly after AMD releases Barcelona. Penryn is the umbrella for all 45nm Core 2 micro architecture products, including quad-core Xeon Harpertown, quad-core Core 2 Yorkfield and dual-core Xeon, Core 2 Wolfdale processors.

On the surface, Penryn looks like die shrink of last year’s Conroe micro architecture, but Intel sought additional tweaks to the micro architecture to achieve greater performance at the same clock speeds as Conroe processors.

Intel improves existing Wide Dynamic Execution, Advanced Smart Cache, Advanced Digital Media Boost and Intelligent Power Capability, technologies that previously made its debut with Conroe and Merom.

Penryn enhances Wide Dynamic Execution technology with a fast radix-16 divider and improved Virtualization technology. With a fast radix-16 divider, the processor can process 4-bits per cycle instead of the 2-bits per cycle of Conroe – doubling the divide instruction capabilities. Intel VT technology receives enhancements that reduce virtual machine transition latencies by 25-to-75%.

Intel Advanced Smart Cache technology receives additional enhancements, besides the increased L2 cache. Penryn-based quad and dual-core processors will have up to 12MB and 6MB L2 cache, respectively. Intel reduces cache latency in addition to the larger sizes. Penryn features a 24-way associative cache, an upgrade from Conroe’s 16-way associative cache.

New to the Advanced Digital Media Boost technology is the inclusion of a new Intel SSE4 instruction set. SSE4 introduces 47 new instructions to improve performance of video accelerators, graphics building blocks and streaming load. Intel claims a 2x performance gain in video acceleration tasks. There are 14 new instructions for video accelerator performance enhancement. Intel improves compiler auto-vectorization performance with 32 new instructions.

Intel expects SSE4 optimizations to deliver performance improvements in video authoring, imagine, graphics, video search, off-chip accelerators, gaming and physics applications. Also new to Advanced Digital Media Boost is the Super Shuffle Engine. Intel’s Super Shuffle Engine allows for shuffling unpacking, packing, align concatenated sources, wide shifts, insertion and extraction, and setup for horizontal arithmetic functions. Intel claims a “2x faster SSE shuffle instruction execution,” according to briefing documents.

Mobile Penryn processors receive enhanced power saving technologies. New to the mobile Penryn is a deep power down state. In the deep power down state, the processor lowers the core voltage, more so than in the C4 state, and turns off the L1 and L2 caches. Intel claims significant power savings in idle modes for extended battery life with the new power state.

For servers and workstations, Intel has designed Harpertown with additional headroom for the front-side bus. Intel plans to debut Penryn-based Xeon DP, MP and UP processors with 1333 MHz front-side bus, but the architecture has headroom for up to 1600 MHz front-side bus. Penryn-based quad and dual-core Xeons will have three thermal envelopes. Quad-core Harpertown Xeons will have 50, 80 and 120-watt TDP ratings while dual-core Wolfdale Xeons have 40, 65 and 80-watt ratings.

Desktop Core 2 and Core 2 Extreme processors have less thermal bins. Quad-core Yorkfield models have 95 and 130-watt TDPs while dual-core Wolfdale models have a single 65-watt TDP. Intel hasn’t set thermal ratings for its mobile Penryn processors yet.

Penryn follows Intel’s plans of alternating between new fabrication processes and a completely new core within two years. Intel previously released its 65nm fabrication process with the last of its Netburst Pentium D and Xeon DP processors, with Conroe, a new architecture, following months after. Once again, Penryn is a die shrink of Conroe set to debut Intel’s 45nm fabrication process.

Following Penryn is a new Nehalem architecture, based on 45nm with Intel’s new QuickPath technology, formerly known as common-system interface. Nehalem is set for a 2008 introduction, beginning with the Xeon family for servers and workstations. Intel plans to shrink Nehalem to 32nm with the Westmere core. Following Westmere is Sandy Bridge, a new micro architecture based on 32nm.

Expect Intel to debut Penryn later this year with the Xeon family.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By DannyH246 on 8/6/2007 6:12:40 AM , Rating: 2
That great innovator Intel has announced improvements to its next chip...

More cache, faster cache, better cache, SSE4.

They have really broken the mould this time!! This is so unlike them to provide such major innovation. We love you Intel!!




RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By DeepThought86 on 8/6/2007 6:28:45 AM , Rating: 1
Too much coffee??


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By LogicallyGenius on 8/6/07, Rating: 0
RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By 2ManyOptions on 8/6/07, Rating: 0
RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By Targon on 8/24/2007 5:39:11 AM , Rating: 2
Is DDR3 performance really that much faster than DDR2 at this point? How expensive is DDR3 memory at this point? In a server, do you really want to trust a new memory technology?

AMD will release a DDR3 capable processor when it makes sense(aka, when the market moves to DDR3, not when everyone still uses DDR2).

In addition to this, when AMD makes the move to DDR3 support, the processors will also support DDR2 memory, which means they can work in existing motherboards. With Intel, you will be forced to buy a new motherboard for ANY new CPU core design, even if it uses the same socket.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By leexgx on 8/6/2007 5:01:33 PM , Rating: 2
why cant i rate users any more ? (i know i posted now) but i cant rate any one any more as i could before


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By emboss on 8/6/2007 9:30:26 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah, I can't rate posts any more either. I've also noticed that the "Oops!" errors when posting stopped at about the same time, so I'm thinking a bug introduced in a code update?


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By bobdelt on 8/6/2007 6:47:12 AM , Rating: 2
Couldn't have said it better myself. Intel is a great innovator; they do have the best processors on the market.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By Gherking on 8/6/2007 7:56:01 AM , Rating: 4
I'm a little worried... back in the Pentium 1-3 days, Intel had their cake and were eating it with high prices.

I feel like AMD's increased presence was the reason for the shining development of Core 2.

If AMD stay competitive with Barcelona, it can only be good news for us. We are at a good place in the delicate CPU market/economy.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By retrospooty on 8/6/2007 10:37:02 AM , Rating: 1
"I feel like AMD's increased presence was the reason for the shining development of Core 2."

Absolutely... If not for AMD, Intel would still be pushing the P4 netburst on us. We would probably be paying $1000 for a P4 single core P4@ 3.0 ghz at this point.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By zsdersw on 8/6/2007 11:17:34 AM , Rating: 5
If not for Intel, AMD would still be pushing 90nm A64's at insane prices, too.


By theapparition on 8/6/2007 11:22:50 AM , Rating: 4
People also forget that without innovation, there is no reason to upgrade, so demand goes down. When demand is down, prices go down. Simple economics.

So as much as everyone would like to think of a single processor company charging 10K per processor, that's not going to happen.


By Oregonian2 on 8/6/2007 1:24:47 PM , Rating: 2
Note also that Intel changed "administrations" a few years ago and this may have had an influence in Intel's stronger motivation as well. New administration started with layoffs I recall...


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By PaxtonFettel on 8/6/2007 6:48:03 AM , Rating: 2
Erm, this refresh was never touted as a revolution, silly. It is simply a die shrink with a few improvements, so of course it's going to be more of an evolutionary step. The next really interesting thing from Intel, I'm sure in most peoples books, will be Nehalem and QuickPath. It will be good to see the ancient FSB finally ditched for something that makes more sense in terms of modern computing, also seeing how it stands up to hypertransport should be interesting too.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By FITCamaro on 8/6/07, Rating: -1
RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By PaxtonFettel on 8/6/2007 7:11:05 AM , Rating: 1
I meant 'from Intel' as in Intels take on an IMC. I am aware that AMD were pretty much the pioneers in terms of IMC use, which is why I said it will be interesting to see how Intels version stands up to AMDs well established system.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 8/6/2007 10:08:05 AM , Rating: 1
I seem to recall a different company coming up with an integrated memory controller before AMD, I keep thinking IBM but I might be wrong. Can't find much information about IMC.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By PaxtonFettel on 8/6/2007 10:48:32 AM , Rating: 2
I wouldn't be at all surprised if someone else had come up with it before AMD. Anyone with a little foresight could have seen the impending limitations of FSB even before AMDs IMC came around. However, they were still the first to bring it to the mass market.


RE: Shock!!! Intel Improvements
By theapparition on 8/6/2007 11:20:47 AM , Rating: 5
Intel was the first x86 compatible chip with IMC, introduced in early 90's. It never really caught on, I guess they were too ahead of their time. So for all who think AMD was the pioneer, your dead wrong.

It's time to get off this IMC vs. FSB rant on both fanboy sides. AMD chose that direction to compete with Intel during a major redesign of their chip. Everyone has short memeories, it was only until the last days of prescott did AMD then have a convincing performance advantage.
Intel, however, didn't have the need at the time for a IMC, and thier business strategy was such that they didn't want it. Intel has a much bigger market than AMD, and more diversified. A separate MC, in the northbridge, provided platform flexibility, something AMD has been clamoring for. AMD was also not nearly the chipset manufacturer as intel was. It's not that intel was stupid. It was purely business. Last I checked, Intel was making money, AMD was not.

The FSB allowed intel to get dual cores faster (yes, pieced together rather than native). It also allowed them to have higher yeilds, and price chips cheaper. There is no question that AMD's approach is more future proof and superior, however, even with the superior theoretical advantage, the intel's still managed to be competitive, and over the last year, vastly superior to anything AMD has offered.

Under server applications, AMD's have been shown to have better capabilities, but for workstations and desktops/laptops, Cores are king, despite "inferior" architecture. So if you run a server farm, get Opteron, otherwise, your best served by Core. When AMD actally releases official benchmarks of their Stars processors, that may change.

Skip the stupid rants on which is better, we all know its Intel right now. Skip the arguments over innovation, both companies have contributed to the processors we have now.