backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 130 comment(s) - last by flipsu5.. on Aug 18 at 1:45 AM

Intel says Atom is doing very well in the marketplace

When Intel launched its tiny Atom processor, it intended for the small, low-cost CPU to find its way into many cheaper consumer electronic devices like the new class of netbooks, mobile phones, and Mobile Internet Devices (MIDs). Intel's Atom has found its way into a number of small, lower-cost devices so far since its launch including the Asus Eee PC, MSI Wind, and Acer Aspire One.

Intel is looking to the low-cost Atom processor to help it grow its business and profits in the face of a slowing trend in the PC market. According to Intel Chief Financial Officer Stacy Smith, the Atom CPU is doing very well. Reuters quotes Smith as saying in an interview, "Atom is off to a very, very rapid start, far exceeding our expectations when we started the year. It's the perfect recession product to have in the marketplace."

According to Intel, the Atom processor is well placed for the mobile market and emerging markets. The low-cost nature the processor makes it desirable as the CPU to be used in low-cost secondary computers or in low-cost systems aimed at children. Smith does maintain that Intel won't know the complete size of the market for the Atom processor for about six months. Smith also says that the Atom processor seems to be growing the market rather than cannibalizing existing PC sales.

The much lower price and lower performance of the Atom CPU compared to Intel's more common Core 2 processors has Intel saying that it is not worried that the Atom processor will cannibalize existing CPU sales, with the possible exception of low-end Celeron sales. However, Smith told Reuters that the Atom could cannibalize low-end Celeron sales and that he was all for that.

Smith said, "If it's [the Atom] cannibalizing from the Celeron part of the market, I'll take that any day." Reuters also reports that Smith maintains Intel would be able to meet its third-quarter predictions of $10 billion to $10.6 billion in overall revenue.

Intel has offered no insight into its profitability from the Atom processor, but Smith did say Intel is able to get 2,500 Atom processors per silicon wafer. According to Reuters that should mean Intel makes a healthy profit on its Atom processors. Intel is also looking at the embedded market is a serious marketplace for its Atom processor.

Smith says that interest among embedded customers for the Atom processor has been very strong. He does point out though that it could take years for Intel realize revenue for the embedded market because of longer design cycles. Intel does say that once the Atom has been designed into a car or cable box the processor would remain there for years.

Intel has been aggressively introducing new models in its Atom CPU line since the initial introduction. In April, Intel announced five new Atom models and more models are on the way.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hmm.
By Diosjenin on 8/13/2008 3:56:57 PM , Rating: 2
Wasn't it, oh, let's say July 22nd when this very site ran a piece explaining how "many of the industry's largest players are fearful that in undoing the tradition high-profit-margin, high power hardware model that the industry has operated on for years; they may be put out of business"?

That sure did seem to be the impression Intel and AMD and every notebook OEM out there were giving off. Now all of a sudden Atom is Intel's savior?

Did something special happen in the last three weeks that I was totally unaware of? What gives here?




RE: Hmm.
By masher2 (blog) on 8/13/2008 4:03:13 PM , Rating: 5
There's no dichotomy in the two statements. The high-power, high-profit industry is dying a slow death, and that does worry many players. So what can they do about it, other than push low-power chips like the Atom?

Such a strategy allows Intel to salvage as much as it can from the industry's evolution.


RE: Hmm.
By Pirks on 8/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Hmm.
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 8/13/2008 5:12:15 PM , Rating: 3
No worries, AMD lacks an Atom competitor.
High End. Intel Core 2 Series.
Mid Range. Intel Core 2 Series.
Low End. Intel Core 2 Series.
Sub-Notebook. Intel Atom Series.

Looks to me like AMD still needs to play catch up.


RE: Hmm.
By Mitch101 on 8/13/2008 5:56:17 PM , Rating: 5
There is still the Via Nano to take on Atom.

HTPC End - AMD Dual Core + 780G or 790GX Mobo


RE: Hmm.
By Chadder007 on 8/13/2008 6:48:12 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, but who has signed up to use the Nano yet?


RE: Hmm.
By TomZ on 8/13/2008 7:21:10 PM , Rating: 3
Good point. On the one hand, you have Intel, a company with large resources available for developing product, manufacturing product, and working for design wins.

On the other hand, you have VIA, which has really never been anything more than a niche player in the low end of the CPU market.

Even if the Nano was very superior technically (which it isn't), there are still a lot of reasons an OEM/ODM would prefer to go with Intel.


RE: Hmm.
By Mitch101 on 8/15/2008 2:54:52 PM , Rating: 2
The ATOM Splitter
Athlon 64 2000+
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Atom-Athlon-Ef...

Didn't see this coming either.


RE: Hmm.
By Pirks on 8/15/2008 10:22:17 PM , Rating: 2
Hahaha, I wonder if TomZ got a heart attack after reading this article and realizing who's gonna "wipe the floor" as he said :))) Reality is a dangerous thing, Tom, you better stop reading this thread NOW! Or else... ;))


RE: Hmm.
By Mitch101 on 8/16/2008 11:53:03 AM , Rating: 2
Cant call it a win yet. Lima isn't released yet and Dual Core Atoms arrive in September. But its good to see AMD isn't completely blind sided by this. One can only hope that this isn't another outlet for AMD cash bleeding. I suspect AMD's plan isn't to make money on the CPU's as much as it is to make the money on the chipsets.


RE: Hmm.
By flipsu5 on 8/18/2008 1:45:57 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
On the other hand, you have VIA, which has really never been anything more than a niche player in the low end of the CPU market.


Nano is actually positioned in between Atom and Celeron. Quite successfully I might add. HP has already placed the order.

It is true it is a niche player, but believe it or not, Atom will only fill a niche in the near future. It may even be an empty niche.

Intel probably didn't need to put up the Atom. Now it risks cannibalization from Nehalem at high end and Atom at low end. In past generations, it has only been high-end where cannibalization took place. The enthusiasts wait for the newer better product. Now there is added opportunity for abandonment of product lines, as non-enthusiasts wait for the cheapest possible product.


RE: Hmm.
By flipsu5 on 8/18/2008 1:30:05 AM , Rating: 2
HP


RE: Hmm.
By Pirks on 8/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Hmm.
By TomZ on 8/13/2008 6:15:21 PM , Rating: 3
Wake up! The E8500 consumes about 33W active and 3W idle, and probably blows the doors off your X2.


RE: Hmm.
By rudolphna on 8/13/2008 7:38:39 PM , Rating: 1
and yet its still marketed as a 65w CPU.. hmmmm.... makes me wonder, dont ya think maybe the "45 watt" AMD CPUs consume less than the E8500? :)


RE: Hmm.
By Pirks on 8/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Hmm.
By TomZ on 8/13/2008 8:29:10 PM , Rating: 1
You asked for an Intel chip less than 45W, and I provided one. Now you call me a fanboy. Get a life!

I don't give a rats @ss about the AMD side, since we know that right now Intel has (a) better overall performance across the board, and (b) better performance per watt across the board. This is shown in tons of articles and benchmarks across the 'net.

When/if AMD turns the tables again in the future, I'll be back with AMD, but only a fool would buy AMD right now and claim anything other than lowest cost.


RE: Hmm.
By Pirks on 8/13/08, Rating: -1
RE: Hmm.