backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 17 comment(s) - last by Reclaimer77.. on Dec 3 at 12:56 PM

The two firms will produce SSDs using SAS and FC interfaces

Companies in the storage industry are ramping up SSD production and are continually unveiling new, and higher performing SSDs for enterprise and consumer use.

Intel and Hitachi announced that the two firms are teaming up to produce enterprise-grade SSDs that will use Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) and Fibre Channel (FC) interfaces. The two firms expect the first products produced under the agreement to be available in 2010.

The new generation of drives will use Intel NAND and will be sold exclusively under the Hitachi brand. The drives will be used in environments where extremely high IOPS performance and power efficiency is needed.

Intel will provide the raw materials and SSD technologies while Hitachi provides expertise in drive firmware, reliability, qualification, and system integration. Intel will continue to build and market its own SSD products, like the X25 and X18 SSDs.

Randy Wilhelm of the Intel NAND solutions group said in a statement, "The new solid-state drives for the enterprise include a number of architectural breakthroughs and improve performance and energy usage models that will change enterprise computing. Intel and Hitachi GST share a common objective in delivering SAS/FC products based on solid-state technology that will help enterprise customers meet the skyrocketing demands for performance while reducing space, power and cooling costs."

Hitachi maintains that it will continue to build and offer traditional HDDs to customers and consumers. Hitachi's VP of Strategic Business Operations Shinjiro Iwata said in a statement, "We understand the needs of today’s enterprise customers and are committed to delivering breakthrough products that increase their data center performance and reduce total cost of ownership. By expanding our product line-up to include both traditional enterprise hard drives and new SSDs, Hitachi GST will continue to provide customers with a proven set of products tailored to meet the high-performance, high-reliability requirements of today’s data center."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

it's time...
By kontorotsui on 12/2/2008 1:03:04 PM , Rating: 5
Start playing the Imperial March.

Begun, the SSD War has.




RE: it's time...
By GeorgeH on 12/2/2008 1:30:51 PM , Rating: 5
Methinks

“Help me, Intel-San Controller. You’re my only hope.” - Hitachi

would be more appropriate.


RE: it's time...
By quiksilvr on 12/2/2008 9:03:41 PM , Rating: 2
Lucas made me hate Star Wars...how sad is that? :(


RE: it's time...
By pxavierperez on 12/3/2008 8:46:01 AM , Rating: 2
True, true. Lucas should've gotten someone else to direct the last trilogy.


RE: it's time...
By Reclaimer77 on 12/3/2008 12:56:20 PM , Rating: 2
Last one ??

No, I can forgive that. What I can't forgive Lucas for is going back and editing a CHEESY Greedo shoots first still shot. And then adding a scene with a digital Jaba the Hut in the first movie..

Sigh... something inside me died when I saw that.

HAN SHOT FIRST ! HE FUC$$#% DID !!!!


RE: it's time...
By Aloonatic on 12/3/2008 7:30:11 AM , Rating: 2
The early episodes with Jmicron Binks in have ruined the SSD Wars for me.

Let me know when he's gone.


RE: it's time...
By therealnickdanger on 12/2/2008 1:38:51 PM , Rating: 2
I wonder if this will also lead to Hitachi rebranding Intel SSDs as their own for the consumer market. I haven't heard much from Hitachi regarding SSD R&D in recent years and they have an excellent reputation to uphold in the mobile storage sector.


RE: it's time...
By noxipoo on 12/2/2008 3:31:25 PM , Rating: 2
could be the case, Kingston says they are partners with Intel in developing their SSDs and it's just the Intel parts with a Kingston sticker. Even the OS says it's Intel.


RE: it's time...
By Clauzii on 12/2/08, Rating: 0
RE: it's time...
By Clauzii on 12/2/2008 5:23:22 PM , Rating: 2
Hmm, guess a danish joke don't work here..

In danish 'brick' would mean braincells, and since SSDs are bricks..

Well, no problem.


SAN Storage
By cenobite9 on 12/2/2008 1:24:57 PM , Rating: 2
If they can get the capacity up to at least 512GB per drive then this could be useful in fibre channel based SANs.




RE: SAN Storage
By aapocketz on 12/2/2008 1:37:20 PM , Rating: 2
it would be nice to choose from SSDs as SAS/Fibre Channel options but there may be issues with write cycles and wear, performance and power usage in a carrier grade environment (ATCA?) with a typical server application usage (databases, etc). I could see some serious benefit of these in military use though (ruggedized mobile computing). We will have to see the specs when these are eventually available.


RE: SAN Storage
By semo on 12/2/2008 6:00:22 PM , Rating: 2
they'll be fine. i'm sure they'll use SLC flash for their Enterprise SSDs which has much higher erase/program cycles then the already adequate intel MLC parts.

.5 gb parts (in 3.5" enclosures) are no problemo if you overlook the cost.


RE: SAN Storage
By subhajit on 12/3/2008 3:36:32 AM , Rating: 2
The biggest difference as far as reliability is concerned would be not loosing data.
Even when a SSD fails basically all the data is still there and it would be possible to read them back. It is the write operation that will fail first.
Also what I realized while reading the AT article that it would be possible for the SSD firmware to calculate when it is going to fail. So the SSD failures are different from HDD failures.


RE: SAN Storage
By PandaBear on 12/2/2008 11:17:48 PM , Rating: 2
I wouldn't be surprised if these drive have components that are replaceable or upgradable (NAND card).


$$$
By Shig on 12/2/2008 2:29:17 PM , Rating: 2
Cha-Ching for Intel!




By fteoath64 on 12/3/2008 2:38:33 AM , Rating: 2
My worry is, this move is going to DELAY the price decline of consumer level SSD which the market is waiting patiently for. The prices for Enterprise level disk are sky high and no consumer would pay such prices for such small density of storage space, no matter what speed it gives.

I think consumer size of 160GB or 250GB would be the ideal size for the SSD with different power/speed ratings and varying prices. It would be really really nice if a SSD can be built with 2 interfaces (one end with mini-sata, one end with 40pin PATA interface). Increasing the cost by $20 for a dual interface SSD would be very acceptable!.




"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein














botimage
Copyright 2009 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki