backtop


Print 20 comment(s) - last by amilas.. on Dec 8 at 5:47 PM


(Click to enlarge)

(Click to enlarge)
Could later versions replace datacenters?

Intel has repeatedly stated that it believes the future of computing lies in many-core CPUs. The company will be releasing its six-core Gulftown chip based on 32nm Westmere technology next year, and it is still working on its Larabee many-core GPU.

Several years ago, Intel showed off its 80-core Teraflops Research Chip. That chip was highly experimental, with only simple floating-point cores. Three years later, Intel has something much more advanced.

Intel calls its new 48-core IA32 processor a "single-chip cloud computer" (SCC) because of the way it resembles cloud datacenters, claiming that it "rethinks many of the approaches used in today's designs". The SCC consists of 24 "tiles", with two IA32 cores and a router per tile creating a mesh network with 256GB/s of bandwidth.

Each tile (2 cores) can run at its own independent frequency, and groupings of four tiles (8 cores) can each run at their own voltage. The SCC can run all 48 cores at one time over a range of 25W to 125W and is capable of selectively varying the voltage and frequency of the mesh network as well. The SCC also features four integrated memory controllers capable of addressing 64GB of DDR3 DRAM, and was built on Intel's current 45nm high-K metal gate process.

Cloud datacenters currently run most of the internet, and can use tens of thousands of computers connected by a physically cabled network. They are capable of distributing large datasets and working them in parallel. The SCC uses a similar approach, with all the parts integrated on a single 567mm2 chip, which is approximately the size of a postage stamp.

"With a chip like this, you could imagine a cloud datacenter of the future which will be an order of magnitude more energy efficient than what exists today, saving significant resources on space and power costs," said Justin Rattner, the head of Intel Labs and Intel's Chief Technology Officer. "Over time, I expect these advanced concepts to find their way into mainstream devices, just as advanced automotive technology such as electronic engine control, air bags and anti-lock braking eventually found their way into all cars".

Although the hardware is impressive, it is the software that will determine how well the SCC works. Creating software with just a couple of threads is difficult enough, but applications written for the SCC will have new capabilities like dynamically managing which cores are used for a given task at a given time. Related tasks can be executed on adjacent or nearby cores, and the SCC is capable of passing results from one core directly to the next in an assembly line. Voltage and clock speed can also be individually controlled through software. Intel says that parallel programming approaches used in cloud datacenter software have been applied when designing the SCC.

Researchers from Intel, HP, Yahoo, and several research institutions have been working on an open cloud-computing research testbed project named Open Cirrus, which has begun porting cloud applications to the SCC using Hadoop, a Java software framework which supports data-intensive, distributed applications.

Intel says that the long-term research goal is to "add incredible scaling features to future computers that spur entirely new software applications and human-machine interfaces". The company plans to work with several dozen industry and academic  research partners around the world next year by manufacturing and sharing 100 or more SCC chips for hands-on research in developing new software applications and programming models for future many-core processors.

"Microsoft is partnering with Intel to explore new hardware and software architectures supporting next-generation client plus cloud applications," said Dan Reed, Microsoft's Corporate Vice President of Extreme Computing.

"Our early research with the single chip cloud computer prototype has already identified many opportunities in intelligent resource management, system software design, programming models and tools, and future application scenarios."

The SCC was co-created by researchers working at Intel Labs locations in Bangalore (India), Braunschweig (Germany) and Hillsboro, Oregon research centers. More details on the chip's architecture are scheduled to be published in a paper at the International Solid State Circuits Conference in February.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By 91TTZ on 12/3/2009 10:56:56 AM , Rating: 4
If anything, datacenters will be filled with servers containing chips like this. It's extremely myopic to think that a fast new chip will obviate the need for datacenters. I remember them saying the same thing about the 486-50 when it came out. The clueless journalist said that going forward, it was unlikely that a home user would ever need a processor any faster.




By Insomniator on 12/3/2009 11:03:24 AM , Rating: 4
Yeah exactly, since we went virtual it seems like we have MORE physical servers somehow.

I think we just like playing with lots of toys, so no single chip or machine will ever replace everything.


By amanojaku on 12/3/2009 11:50:30 AM , Rating: 1
You're mixing two different concepts, capability vs. practicality. We've had single systems that did the work of many systems since the 60s. We called them mainframes. And yet the PC is the reigning champion, mostly because of cost, but partly because a single system that replaces everything must be completely redundant, which is complex.

Complex, expensive systems will always take a backseat when companies have to worry about spending. The use of multiple nodes is the only cost effective solution that provides redundancy. The IT mantra these days is scale wide (more of something), not deep (a faster something). Unless this CPU can survive failure of cores, and the host system can support online CPU insertion/removal, no organization is going to consolidate into one box.


By theapparition on 12/3/2009 12:28:58 PM , Rating: 5
Actually, Bill Gates never said that.

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Bill_Gates

See what happens with internet rumors.


By StevoLincolnite on 12/3/2009 2:30:53 PM , Rating: 2
Hmm, cheers for that! That's 2 things I have learned today! :P


By mlambert on 12/4/2009 12:27:02 AM , Rating: 1
You guys completely missed my 640k point. It was about using the word "never". Maybe I could've picked a better (factual) example, but the point is the same either way.


By Smilin on 12/4/2009 1:08:13 AM , Rating: 2
I think this thread got interesting with that 640k thing. It was quite a bore before.


By delphinus100 on 12/6/2009 2:14:59 AM , Rating: 2
I clearly remembering telling a then-coworker that I wanted to build myself a 486-66.

Him: "What do you need with that much power?"

Me: "I don't need it, I just...want it."

Of course 486 PCs of any speed, have mostly doorstop value now...

"No matter how much computer power human beings get, they figure out a way to use 105 percent of it."
- Steve Lisberger


By swaaye on 12/6/2009 4:08:30 PM , Rating: 2
Yea thanks to Flash.


Yet again another great quote....
By GGA1759 on 12/3/2009 6:13:44 PM , Rating: 4
This quote was at the bottom of the page when I viewed this story and seems to fit nicely even thought it's from a different manufacturer.

quote:
"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins




GHz
By eddieroolz on 12/3/2009 7:32:23 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Intel has repeatedly stated that it believes the future of computing lies in many-core CPUs.


Not a processor running at 10GHz by the end of the decade, eh? ;)




SQL Server Proc Licensing
By amilas on 12/8/2009 5:47:31 PM , Rating: 2
will officially be pwnt. I forsee core licensing in the future.




Yeah but...
By Leper Messiah on 12/3/09, Rating: -1
Tilera?
By phaxmohdem on 12/3/09, Rating: -1
RE: Tilera?
By theapparition on 12/3/2009 12:35:07 PM , Rating: 5
To be fair, Intel has previewed massivly multi-cored products for many years. To claim that they "stole" something as your post implies is misleading. I'm sure all developement was done in house.

However, I wouldn't want't to be an investor in Tilera after this announcement.


RE: Tilera?
By phaxmohdem on 12/3/2009 12:43:00 PM , Rating: 1
To be even fairer, I don't think Tilera is competing with Intel with this product anyway. They seem to be after the embedded market, not commodity servers/workstations.

I just couldn't help but notice the stunning similarity in how Intel is touting this architecture... from tiles, to internal networks with routers between tiles... it is darn near plagiarism from older Tilera Press releases and demos and product literature I've seen.


RE: Tilera?
By ogreslayer on 12/3/2009 3:50:42 PM , Rating: 3
I would assume that Intel released this chip's info to thumb a nose at Tilera. Its been awhile since Intel showed that 80-core part, and that wasn't very complex. Breaking out a more complex high-core chip makes sense to kinda say 'Yes, we can do it too now shut it'.

The Terascale chip had routers on it; which was mostly the point of the design. I don't know if they updated the page, but it also refers to tiles for that unit as well. http://techresearch.intel.com/articles/Tera-Scale/...


"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki