backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 19 comment(s) - last by cx500tc.. on Sep 7 at 4:53 PM

The job cuts are being made in Intel's latest effort to try and boost profits and efficiency

Reports have been published about the possibility of Intel cutting around 10,000 of its employees.  As expected, the company today announced that it will be laying off 10,500 jobs, which is around 10 percent of its work force. Intel hopes it can save around $5 billion over the next two years -- and the job eliminations are a critical part of the company's restructuring. Almost 5,000 of the affected jobs have already been eliminated.

Intel is hoping to turn around sinking profits while trying to raise efficiency in its battle to take back market share from AMD. Intel Chief Executive Paul Otellini said “These actions, while difficult, are essential to Intel becoming a more agile and efficient company, not just for this year or the next, but for years to come.”

Most of the job cuts by the Santa Clara-based company will impact the management, marketing and information technology departments, according to Intel. Manufacturing, design and other departments will suffer job cuts sometime in 2007. Intel expects severance costs to total around $200 million. This is going to be the largest number of job cuts by Intel in 21 years.  Even though the loss of 10,500 jobs is bad, analysts expected numbers in the 15,000 range.

This is the biggest Silicon Valley restructuring since Sun Microsystems announced that it would cut 5,000 jobs in May.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By SakuraChan on 9/6/06, Rating: 0
RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By tuteja1986 on 9/6/2006 1:39:42 AM , Rating: 2
i dought they will have a hard time finding a job with some company because they will have Intel Work experience under their resume


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By SakuraChan on 9/6/06, Rating: 0
By Niv KA on 9/6/2006 5:58:58 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
They could work with ATI , NVIDIA & SONY except for AMD of course :Dhehe...that's a big no no


You haven't been following the news have you?

AMD bought ATi, so if AMD is a no so is ATi


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By Ulfhednar on 9/6/2006 6:01:01 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
They could work with ATI, NVIDIA & SONY except for AMD of course :Dhehe...that's a big no no
You're joking, right? A lot of the people who just got laid-off from Intel probably already have their AMD recruitment package in the mail.

When you're #1 in your industry, competitors will be all too welcoming to people you let go.


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By peldor on 9/6/2006 7:08:05 AM , Rating: 2
Provided they don't have binding non-compete agreements.


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By Targon on 9/6/2006 8:05:01 AM , Rating: 2
Those non-compete agreements are not considered valid in many places because they force people to be unemployed.

When it comes to chip design, then yea, there may be issues, but most of the job cuts are in less sensitive areas.


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By rushfan2006 on 9/6/2006 8:58:15 AM , Rating: 2
You guys beat me too it with the NCD/NCA...

And to the person that said they are considered valid because of how they lose thier jobs....I've yet to see an agreement of that type (and I've been bound to many NCDs myself) have a clause in it that states such a thing. It would make no difference how they are let go. In fact it could be argued that being let go in this manner actually INCREASES the value (to Intel) of the NCD...because most employees would not be looking at their former employer with warm and fuzzy feelings after something like this.

Bottom line there is NOTHING automatically assumed..its whatever the language in the contract states that's how the courts would enforce it.


By rushfan2006 on 9/6/2006 8:59:15 AM , Rating: 2
* should have read "NOT" considered valid.....


RE: V__V lets pray for these poor guys
By Master Kenobi (blog) on 9/6/2006 8:59:42 AM , Rating: 2
Most of the job cuts are Middle level Management (BS Red Tape Zone) and Marketing (They have nearly 2x as many Marketing employees as other IT companies, so no loss to dump dead weight).

I'm sure AMD is just dying to hire some of these laid off Marketing guys, since well nothing personal guys but AMD's marketing sucks, practically nonexistent, so this might help them out in the long run.


By Connoisseur on 9/6/2006 10:19:51 AM , Rating: 2
Correction. AMD has bad TV marketing. If you're in NYC, AMD Billboards and posters are all over the place.


By retrospooty on 9/7/2006 10:13:01 AM , Rating: 2
"When you're #1 in your industry, competitors will be all too welcoming to people you let go."

Yes, but when a company does a layoff, especially when its the first major layoff in a while, they tend to trim the fat, and chop the most problematic/least productive employees (per managerial descisions). Its not like they are going to lay off thier "best and brightest". They will layoff the lower end.


poor guys
By almrow on 9/5/2006 11:03:13 PM , Rating: 2
poor employees, now they have no work =(




RE: poor guys
By xFlankerx on 9/5/2006 11:29:29 PM , Rating: 2
Indeed. One can look at it as Intel becoming a new company, and getting itself back on track in the microprocessor business, but we should also stop to think about the people who don't have those decent-paying jobs anymore; some of them have families.


RE: poor guys
By TwistyKat on 9/6/2006 7:03:46 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
One can look at it as Intel becoming a new company, and getting itself back on track in the microprocessor business,


When they start saying, "...lean & mean..." in any future RIF announcements you know they are really in trouble. That would be time to sell Intel...and probably buy AMD.


RE: poor guys
By Targon on 9/6/2006 8:01:40 AM , Rating: 2
Of course, no one seemed to care back in 2001 when a lot more tech jobs were lost out in the SF bay area. At the time people thought it was acceptable for some reason.



Hmm..?
By lopri on 9/5/2006 10:16:50 PM , Rating: 2
Isn't this an old news?




RE: Hmm..?
By mendocinosummit on 9/5/2006 10:37:27 PM , Rating: 2
No, now it is official. Before it was all speculation.


Itanium
By cx500tc on 9/7/2006 4:53:33 PM , Rating: 2
Didn't Intel invest/lost more then 5 billions in the Itanium?





"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




14 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki