ITC Delays Final Decision in Motorola Mobility, Microsoft Patent Case
July 2, 2012 11:40 AM
comment(s) - last by
The final ruling was supposed to take place August 23, but it looks like that is no longer the case
A panel from the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has postponed a final decision on the patent infringement case launched by
Google's Motorola Mobility unit against Microsoft
According to the ITC, the case will be sent back to the judge for reconsideration, which is expected to take months. The final ruling was supposed to take place August 23, but it looks like that is no longer the case.
Motorola Mobility, which is now a part of Google, filed patent complaints against Microsoft last year. Motorola fought against Microsoft's licensing demands for Android makers, which could have forced the company to pay Microsoft $15 or more for each Android gadget.
In April of this year,
ITC Administrative Law Judge David Shaw found both the 4GB and 250GB editions of the Xbox 360 infringe on four Motorola patents
related to H.264 codec.
However, he ruled that Microsoft hadn't infringed on a fifth patent. The patents were related to the wireless connection of the Xbox to the Internet and techniques for video compression to speed transmission.
One month later, the ITC judge recommended a
ban on the Xbox 360 gaming console
in the U.S. Motorola had asked that the Xbox 360 be banned from importation into the United States.
The idea of a ban was not well-received by many.
Eight U.S. Congressman
, for example, wrote a letter to the ITC last month saying that a ban on the gaming console could
threaten high-paying U.S. jobs as well as economic growth, since the Xbox 360 is one of the top gaming consoles in the U.S. at the moment.
In addition, the letter noted that an exclusion order could hurt third-party investments that provide products and services for the Xbox 360 and depend on its sales. Consumers
could stand to lose as well, since competition in the gaming industry could be stifled and lead to an increase in prices for game consoles and titles.
"For these reasons, we urge you to consider carefully the implications a negative ruling in this matter would have on our economy, consumers, industry and jobs in Washington State and throughout the country," said the letter.
There is currently no set date for the final decision in this case.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
7/3/2012 3:21:52 AM
That those same senators don't write letters when Apple fling IP suits around like Nick flings slime during the Kids's Choice Awards...
I sense a corruption in the force... either that, or they just somehow believe Apple's products are the only "American made" smartphones and everyone else doesn't employ Americans... oh wait.
Here's a novel concept... shut down the patent office and completely overhaul it. Oh wait, that requires effort... silly me.
7/3/2012 10:59:59 AM
The US patent system needs to change, but that starts in the US Legislature.
It's been the typical governmental happenings at the USPTO over the past 10 years or so:
1. The USPTO had their funds cut which caused them to get behind in their work. (It's common for agencies to create work slowdowns to gain their funding back since they can create lots of complaints to Congress due to the pain of a slowdown. I can't say if that was the case here but it's common.)
2. After enough people complained, Congress passed a law that the USPTO had to complete patent evaluations within a certain timeframe.
3. The USPTO decreased the amount of scrutiny it gave to each patent application because they were required, by penalty of law, to complete them in a specified timeframe.
Now, billions of dollars are being spent to attack, defend, buy and sell patents because they can be used as legal WMDs. Just think if all of this effort was spent on productive things.
How much longer?
7/9/2012 12:13:09 AM
Microsoft needs to learn a lesson. They need to quit bullying the industry with patents. Too long have they bullied the Linux community claiming infringement without properly explaining what was infringed on and where. They are just afraid the Linux community will build a work around. Cause they would if infringement had been found.
Please someone, Ram a judgment down Microsoft's throat. They shouldn't ever make more money on a device they didn't develop compared to a device they did.
"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins
U.S. Congressmen to ITC: "Step Off Microsoft"
June 13, 2012, 6:46 PM
ITC Judge Recommends U.S. Xbox 360 Ban
May 25, 2012, 11:06 AM
ITC Tells Motorola it Infringed on Microsoft Patent, Motorola Cheers Decision
December 21, 2011, 4:52 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information