backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 18 comment(s) - last by masher2.. on Aug 7 at 8:15 AM

Environmentally friendly computers are in vogue, but no one is really pushing the envelope

Several months ago, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers began accepting approvals for IEEE 1680, also known as "Standard for Environmental Assessment of Personal Computer Products." 

IEEE 1680 evaluates the environmental sanity of computer products based on eight categories: materials selection, environmentally sensitive materials, design for end of life, end-of-life management, energy conservation, product longevity and life-cycle extension, packaging, and corporate performance. Computer products are then compiled into a database called the Electronic Product Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT) where the public can evaluate how each product rates on a 25-point scale of eco-friendliness.  IEEE 1680 consists of 23 required stipulations, and 25 optional stipulations.  In order to be IEEE 1680 certified, all 23 of the required stipulations must be met, after which the manufacturer can earn a Silver certification if 50% of the optional stipulations are met, or a Gold certification if 75% of the optional requirements are met.

Since then, more than 60 technology-related manufacturers have adopted some level of IEEE 1680.  The required criterion are very straight-forward: the product must declare its weight, the amount of recycled material (0% still gets you certified, just so long as its declared). Criterion 4.4.2.1 requires "Upgradeable with common tools" and 4.4.1.1 requires "Availability of additional three year warranty or service agreement."  Unfortunately, all of the really big envelope-pushing requirements are optional.  The elimination of intentionally added cadmium, hexavalent chromium, lead and mercury are not required to get EPEAT certification.  Furthermore, if manufacturers have enough optional points in such envelop-pushing criteria as  "4.4.3.1  Availability of replacement parts," the manufacturer can earn a silver award on relatively modest, perhaps not even environmentally-intentional, specifications.  

All Dell computers automatically get an extra two (out of twenty-five) on the EPEAT scale after the company announced its free PC recycling program. Any company merely complying with RoHS and the EU mandatory battery recycling program can earn a whopping 6 points out of the optional twenty-five. To add insult to injury, at the time of publication, not a single PC product meets the required 19 optional points to receive a gold EPEAT certification.

That being said, IEEE 1680 still is important for the US.  For the most part, the US has no directives like the European RoHS, which restricts the use of lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium, PBB and PBDE in electronics.

New laws in California are already in the works to mandate things like mobile phone recycling. Nokia is researching prototype phones which are self destructible. When not in use anymore, the phones can be taken back to a factory and heated by lasers. The polymers in the phones react to the heat and break apart, making it easier for the factory to recycle individual parts. Every year, millions of working electronic devices that are simply obsolete or old end up at garbage sites. Analysts say Nokia is taking the right first steps and other companies should follow.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

what?
By Homerboy on 8/4/2006 1:48:39 PM , Rating: 2
if those are the requirements, its nearly pointless. A meaningless label. I'll look forward to version 2.0




RE: what?
By Christopher1 on 8/5/2006 1:28:48 AM , Rating: 1
It is really meaningless so far. Really, EVERYTHING in a computer nowadays can be recycled, and recycled at an economical cost.

The metals in the motherboard can be recycled, the case can be recycled, the drives can be recycled. It's just a matter of finding someone with enough energy and foresight to realize "Hey, we're running out of these metals with our throwaway culture! We've got to start recycling more stuff."


RE: what?
By masher2 (blog) on 8/5/2006 11:14:52 AM , Rating: 2
> "Hey, we're running out of these metals with our throwaway culture..."

There is far more of most metals in the Earth's crust than man could ever use in a hundred thousand years. And that assumes we were actually "consuming" the metals, which we of course cannot do. Metal in a landfill is still metal. If we don't recycle it, nature will for us eventually.


RE: what?
By creathir on 8/5/2006 2:01:32 PM , Rating: 2
That is what all of these goofballs fail to remember... As stated by the Law of the conservation of matter, the total quantity of matter in the universe remains constant. Sure matter changes from one form to another, but it not destroyed, nor created. We can develop processes to turn spent matter into forms we cannot use (fuel from a liquid state into a gaseous state in an automobile) but the matter is still there...
- Creathir


RE: what?
By GreenBoy on 8/7/2006 8:08:13 AM , Rating: 2
Meaningless label? The companies can't even get the top tier and you think it's meaningless? They supposed to design a standard that no one can meet? Is that your definition of meaningful?


"the new Black" ?
By Xenoid on 8/5/2006 5:41:47 AM , Rating: 2
The saying goes, "Black is always in style". However, the opposite is true of IEEE 1680 as I gathered from the article, so why the direct contradiction?

Also, why is it so hard to recycle electronics? It's not much harder than seperating cardboard and paper and garbage, yet it gets made a huge deal about. Just require a seperate pile for electronics.




RE: "the new Black" ?
By shadowzz on 8/5/2006 5:44:47 AM , Rating: 2
It would be great if our government took that approach. I'm a little dissapointed that this is all thats being done -- I would really like to see the US adopt something like ROHS.


RE: "the new Black" ?
By masher2 (blog) on 8/5/2006 11:09:48 AM , Rating: 2
> "why is it so hard to recycle electronics? It's not much harder than seperating cardboard "

Cardboard is wood pulp. One homogenous material.

"Electronics" are a vast array of differerent metals, plastics, silicates, and other materials.


RE: "the new Black" ?
By Xenoid on 8/5/2006 11:34:00 AM , Rating: 2
But if you melt it all down it becomes a delicious stew. They can feed it to the unfortunate masses of Africa. Because then they'd be caring and sharing and whatnot.

Sarcasm if you weren't sure.


Quick question
By MrPickins on 8/4/2006 3:03:59 PM , Rating: 2
Is haxavalent chromium the same as hexavalent chromium?
I searhed google, but can't seem to find a straight answer.

If so, that's some bad stuff. (see "Erin Brockovich")




RE: Quick question
By KristopherKubicki (blog) on 8/4/2006 3:19:32 PM , Rating: 3
Sorry, that was a typo. It's hexavalent chromium.


RE: Quick question
By masher2 (blog) on 8/7/2006 8:15:49 AM , Rating: 2
> "Is haxavalent chromium the same as hexavalent chromium? If so, that's some bad stuff..."

Yep-- almost as bad as most of the chemicals found under your kitchen sink.


EPEAT?
By Lord Evermore on 8/7/2006 3:01:12 AM , Rating: 2
Is EPEAT supposed to be some subliminal reference to biodegrading, and they worked backwards to come up with something for the letters to stand for?




RE: EPEAT?
By GreenBoy on 8/7/2006 8:07:27 AM , Rating: 2
Press materials say its the Electronics Products Environmental Assessment Tool (EPEAT). Looks like they stole it from a similar effort, the Environmental Paper Assessment Tool (EPAT).


IEEE1680
By adam92682 on 8/5/2006 3:22:27 AM , Rating: 3
When I first saw the article i was expecting to see something on a new interface to replace IEEE1394




By Diesel Donkey on 8/4/2006 6:45:11 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
When not in use anymore, the phones can be taken back to a factory and heated by lasers. The polymers in the phones react to the heat and break apart


According to the linked publication from the self-destructing phone article it's not the polymers in the phones that react to the heating. Rather, it is a Shape Memory Alloy that pops things apart--as far as I know from my Materials class this is an alloy whose structure is deformed while cold, but springs back into shape when heated above a certain temperature that allows for a solid state phase change.




By GreenBoy on 8/7/2006 8:06:04 AM , Rating: 2
Seems bizarre to blame the standard for being too weak and then complaining that there are no gold-rated computers. Seems to me that the standard is strong, it's the companies that haven't caught up.

How come the companies haven't registered more of their computers? What happened to all of those companies that were advertising that they have green computers? Some of them haven't registered *any* EPEAT products.




Ya Know....
By anass on 8/7/06, Rating: 0
"Let's face it, we're not changing the world. We're building a product that helps people buy more crap - and watch porn." -- Seagate CEO Bill Watkins

DailyTech Poll
Do you use copy/paste on your smartphone? 




17 Comments












botimage
Copyright 2010 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki