backtop


Print 20 comment(s) - last by CollegeTechGuy.. on Apr 6 at 10:53 AM

Some believe that an agreement could be announced today

According to sources, Sun and IBM are in talks for a merger that would reportedly have IBM spending $6 billion to acquire Sun. The purchase makes sense for IBM given that the company has the cash reserves and the purchase would increase its global portion of the sever market and give more customers access to its profitable software programs.

Sun has been reorganizing itself, which resulted in layoffs and a change to its internal structure that saw the top sales people handle only the top customers. The timing of the purchase rumor and the reorganization and layoffs at Sun is interesting and some see the two as related.

However, analyst Charles King from Pund-IT told eWeek, "That's possible [that the restructuring and the acquisition are connected], but I would say that if an acquisition does go through, there will be a major reorganization of the sales groups anyway. But I would expect that making a change as major as this had to have started months before any kind of acquisition was being considered."

Bloomberg reports that the Sun and IBM deal is rumored to be negotiating at $9 to $10 per share for Sun. However, sources close to the negotiations say that no agreement has been reached yet. Some believed that the deal could be announced today.

Buying Sun would give IBM 43% of the global server market and boost software business reports Bloomberg.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not too bad
By TheNuts on 4/3/2009 1:26:22 PM , Rating: 4
$9-$10 a share for an almost unlimited supply of energy doesn't seem to bad to me.




RE: Not too bad
By dragonbif on 4/3/2009 1:45:03 PM , Rating: 1
Now Now the sun will not last forever, they say that in 1 million or billion years it will pop. I do think that they will get their moneys worth before that happens ;) By the way who do you buy the sun from?????


RE: Not too bad
By Moishe on 4/3/2009 2:40:24 PM , Rating: 3
I hear that the PSC (Polish Space Command) has a manned mission planned for 2013 that will send two men to the sun to claim it for Poland.


RE: Not too bad
By Mitch101 on 4/3/2009 3:09:14 PM , Rating: 5
To combat the heat of the sun they planned on landing at night. :P


RE: Not too bad
By yomamafor1 on 4/3/2009 10:40:13 PM , Rating: 3
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a winner!


RE: Not too bad
By bkaz on 4/4/2009 6:40:16 AM , Rating: 2
6 imo


RE: Not too bad
By Spookster on 4/4/2009 2:41:50 AM , Rating: 3
And they installed screen doors to help keep the craft cool and not allow the space bugs to get in.


RE: Not too bad
By TA152H on 4/3/2009 2:53:51 PM , Rating: 3
In about a billion years, the Sun will be too hot for life to exist on Earth, at least most life. It won't explode until much later than that.

There are ways of moving the Earth further way from the Sun as it gets hotter, of course, and in a billion years, if we're still around, I'm guessing we won't have too much trouble doing it.

For people who have a really long view of investments, now might be the time to start looking at Martian real estate. Sooner or later someone's going to figure out how to give Mars a magnetic field (nuke the core until it likes it?), and with the Sun warming up, there's no way to go but up.

And if you think the Pluto/Planet debate is bad now, just wait until people live there. Although, the tides caused by Charon must be crazy.


RE: Not too bad
By CollegeTechGuy on 4/6/2009 10:53:57 AM , Rating: 2
Our Sun will never explode. It doesn't have enough mass to ever go Super-Nova. Maybe if Jupiter crashed into the Sun, it might have enough mass to blow up, but it will simply fizzle out.


RE: Not too bad
By bryanW1995 on 4/3/2009 4:03:01 PM , Rating: 1
that deserves a 6!!

having said that, the sun is not an almost unlimited supply of energy. It is virtually guaranteed to disappear in 10-15 billion years...


IBM Java...
By Ammohunt on 4/3/2009 2:20:13 PM , Rating: 1
Just another company IBM can screw up with their antique business model. Too bad HP is sucking hind tit they used to be a major competitor in the Unix arena. For all the Unix vendors free tip; LOWER YOUR PRICES! otherwise SA's such as my self will replace you with x86_64 Linux.




RE: IBM Java...
By croc on 4/3/2009 5:18:51 PM , Rating: 2
Try to run a large Oracle DB or a large SAP system on x86 systems, then look at the $ / transaction... I think you'd quickly move back to a RISC based system. Besides, have you priced a Sun T2+ lately?


RE: IBM Java...
By Ammohunt on 4/3/2009 6:12:15 PM , Rating: 1
Hmmm still hanging on to the Unix big iron myth? RISC is not the performane powerhouse it used to be and frankly is getting long in the tooth. The next generation of i7 dell servers scale to upto 32 cores with 100GB+ of ram in a 4U foot print. in 2U you can get 16 core with 100GB+ you can buy these in multiples cheaper than single IBM servers with less cores.

We currently run our Oracle Data warehouse on a 4x16 64-bit RHEL5 system with average cpu utilization of 1%. Its all a matter of having the know how on how to build these systems. Unfortunatly SUN would be my last choice for a Big iron Unix Oracle soultion.


RE: IBM Java...
By yomamafor1 on 4/3/2009 10:42:35 PM , Rating: 2
Just curious, if your company decide to migrate to Nehalem-EP servers, will you guys enable SMT (HyperThreading) and Turbo mode?


Next they buy AMD
By HrilL on 4/3/2009 1:00:09 PM , Rating: 2
And then they'll have an even larger market share of the server CPU market.




RE: Next they buy AMD
By BruceLeet on 4/3/2009 4:33:25 PM , Rating: 2
If they don't move marketshare in the next 5 years I can see that happening.


By Ytsejamer1 on 4/3/2009 5:06:03 PM , Rating: 2
We've been using Sun x64 servers in our mostly MS shop for a couple years now. They are fantastic...well put together, cost half of what the hp and IBM server pieces cost, and are much more flexible with the configuration options.

We were also looking at the new 7410 storage system...it kicks major tail performance-wise and of course the price is substantially lower than Netapp or EMC. As soon as we get ready to pull the trigger, they go and whore themselves out...to IBM. What we think is really valuable is their dtrace analytics to tell us what files are being used, what app his hammering the storage system, system status, etc.

Awful news in my opinion when this happens... *sigh*




What happens to Sun's open source?
By taber on 4/3/2009 6:42:51 PM , Rating: 2
Not that it's been entirely profitable the last few years, but I wonder what this'll mean to all the open source Sun has under its belt. Off the top of my head I can think of Java, Netbeans, MySQL, VirtualBox and OpenSolaris. All of them pretty good products.

I just hope if IBM buys them up they don't screw that up.




Good or Bad?
By Zingam on 4/4/2009 6:47:14 AM , Rating: 2
Don't you think that that company consolidation and buy outs are a bad thing?
What I mean is that if 1-2 companies remain there will be no competition in the end. They will hold all the patents and the technology will be so expensive and advanced that it will be impossible for any new start-ups to appear.
Well, it's not like: "Let's make shoes" and you buy some machines and materials and you start making shoes and with some luck and good management you can become a big shoe manufacturer in no time and that's because shoe making hasn't much changed since prehistoric times.




Tape storage
By bkslopper on 4/4/2009 7:24:12 AM , Rating: 2
Where I work, we use ALOT of tape storage. In a nutshell, anything tape-related made by IBM has a tendency to fail. All our StorageTek machines give us less headaches. They also have better customer sevice. Sun bought StorageTek a few years back, and it'll sad day when I have to call IBM for all our calls. They are clueless and expensive.




"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer




Latest Headlines
2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 10, 2012, 5:50 PM
2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 9, 2012, 11:54 AM
2/8/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 8, 2012, 1:11 PM
2/7/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 7, 2012, 12:23 PM










botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki