backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 46 comment(s) - last by nugundam93.. on Oct 6 at 4:40 AM

NASA has been forced to delay the shuttle Atlantis launch due to a failure aboard Hubble

A "significant anomaly" aboard the Hubble Space Telescope has forced NASA to delay the shuttle Atlantis launch until at least February 2009 NASA officials said at the start of the week.  Atlantis was launching to Hubble to help repair it for the final time, and the mission was scheduled to launch in two weeks, but NASA must now test a spare computer that could help solve the issue.

The crew members of shuttle Atlantis were supposed to conduct five scheduled space walks during the 11-day mission aboard the aging space telescope.

The shuttle Endeavour mission, which would have been on standby in case of an emergency aboard Hubble, could be moved up two days to Nov. 14, shuttle programmers said.  Due to the high risk of the mission, in which the astronauts are in the wrong orbit to go to the International Space Station (ISS), some space observers said the Hubble repair simply isn't worth the risk.

Hubble is now unable to format or store any data collected from its instruments, and can no longer transmit the information to researchers on Earth.  The problem lies in the Science Instrument Command and Data Handling (SIC&DH) Unit, which is responsible for the Science Data Formatter aboard the Hubble.

Hubble operators expect to use a backup channel to help bring the telescope back into service sometime this weekend, or early next week.  But since switching over will leave the telescope without a backup, the astronauts aboard Atlantis are expected to fully replace the failed unit.

"If we just switch over to Side B of the Science Data Formatter, we would be left with a system that has several single-point failures, and that would be a risk to the mission for the long duration," a NASA official said.

Researchers are still unsure what caused the problem, but guess long-term space radiation could have damaged the instrument, which operates at a high temperature.

Each month the Hubble repair mission is delayed costs NASA around $10 million.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Satellite Tech support
By iheartzoloft on 9/30/2008 5:38:03 PM , Rating: 3
Houston, ill be needing a laptop lots of coffee and a really really long patch cable to upload my init 6 command.




RE: Satellite Tech support
By austinag on 9/30/2008 5:44:04 PM , Rating: 5
They won't admit it, but I'd bet they are staring at a blue screen of death.


RE: Satellite Tech support
By iheartzoloft on 9/30/2008 5:48:57 PM , Rating: 3
Too bad they did not opt for the extended warranty, could have had a tech sent out in 3 or 4 days for onsite motherboard replacement. Who said warranties were useless?


RE: Satellite Tech support
By 4wardtristan on 10/1/2008 2:09:32 AM , Rating: 2
not if its through asus!

(i have had shocking exp. with asus server warranty)


RE: Satellite Tech support
By Mitch101 on 9/30/2008 5:50:16 PM , Rating: 2
Yup its time to upgrade to 2000, 2003, 2007, XP or Vista. That will take care of that Blue Screen Windows ME issues they are having.


RE: Satellite Tech support
By Souka on 9/30/2008 5:59:11 PM , Rating: 2
don't think so... it's running on a 486 processor...

"http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/12/27/hubble_tel..." article from 1999


RE: Satellite Tech support
By MAIA on 9/30/2008 7:59:54 PM , Rating: 2
Funniest part is that some people think NASA uses windows in this kind of stuff.

They probably do with other kind of work! Like when producing spreadsheets or letters ...


RE: Satellite Tech support
By Mitch101 on 10/1/2008 10:57:33 AM , Rating: 3
My comments were just to rebut how moronic it is to make a blue screen comment today.

It is funny some people think windows is installed on these kind of things. I tried to focus and this paper clip popped up "I see your having trouble focusing"


RE: Satellite Tech support
By mindless1 on 10/1/2008 6:51:07 PM , Rating: 1
Which is worse, making a joke about bluescreens or calling people morons on the internet?


RE: Satellite Tech support
By DeepBlue1975 on 10/3/2008 8:30:02 AM , Rating: 3
Seeing a blue screen coming off a moron's face?


RE: Satellite Tech support
By PrinceGaz on 10/2/2008 3:21:49 PM , Rating: 2
Even though it is below the stated minimum requirements for Windows 2000, it can be installed and run successfully on a system with a 486 processor. You probably wouldn't want to though, unless you have a DX2/66 or better still a DX4/100.

XP won't install however because it does a hardware check during the install. I wouldn't be surprised if XP could run on a 486, assuming you find a way to bypass that hardware check.


RE: Satellite Tech support
By cheetah2k on 9/30/2008 10:07:45 PM , Rating: 2
Are you insane?? Vista!???

The Side A Formatter with Windows ME probably needed a security update, but as MS isnt supporting Windows 98 anymore, it got hacked by the Chinese and crashed! hehe

^.^


RE: Satellite Tech support
By Fnoob on 9/30/2008 11:05:33 PM , Rating: 4
Nah, prolly just need to reload drivers.

We need a whole shuttle mission just so someone can go up there and click 'next' and 'finish'.


I wonder.....
By DPigs on 9/30/2008 5:38:26 PM , Rating: 5
Did they try unplugging it and then plugging it back in???




RE: I wonder.....
By kiwik on 9/30/08, Rating: 0
RE: I wonder.....
By therealnickdanger on 9/30/2008 6:46:04 PM , Rating: 5
Doesn't mean it won't work...


RE: I wonder.....
By MAIA on 9/30/2008 8:01:53 PM , Rating: 2
Call the space elevator !!!


Side B?
By c4v3man on 9/30/2008 6:33:49 PM , Rating: 2
Usually when my cassette tapes stop working on Side A, Side B stops working too... They must have some new-fangled tech up there...

On a more serious note, what is side B being used for right now anyways? I would assume they have alot of redundant systems onboard, and I would assume that side B is the backup for side A... If the satellite's not working right now, why worry about single-points of failure anyways? How could it get worse than it is right now?




RE: Side B?
By hellokeith on 9/30/2008 6:39:20 PM , Rating: 2
I listened to the teleconference yesterday. Goddard estimates Hubble will be back up and running 100% on side B within 2 weeks.

Actually, it's good this unit failed now with the likelihood that it will get replaced (albeit with a short mission delay). Imagine if it had failed after this last servicing mission. All kinds of finger pointing and unkindliness would be coming out of congress.


RE: Side B?
By EODetroit on 10/1/2008 11:03:41 AM , Rating: 2
I agree completely. Far from being poorly timed, this failure, if it was going to happen sometime no matter what, is far better to have happened now than later.


RE: Side B?
By MAIA on 9/30/2008 8:03:33 PM , Rating: 2
They use vinyls, not cassettes .


RE: Side B?
By nugundam93 on 10/6/2008 4:40:14 AM , Rating: 2
but not with undies? LOL!

back on topic, i would have assumed they'd have more backup systems than a side B but oh well, hubble designer i am not. :)