backtop


Print 8 comment(s) - last by GuinnessKMF.. on Feb 9 at 8:01 PM

Bill is an updated version of a 2009 legislation

The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology has approved bill H.R.3834, better known as the Advancing America’s Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act of 2012. The bill overhauls federal policies for funding research and development in the growing network and information technology field. This is an updated version of similar legislation that was passed by the committee back in 2009.
 
The committee passed the bill by a voice vote. The bipartisan bill was introduced by Chairman Ralph Hall (R-TX); Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX); Research and Science Education Subcommittee Chairman Mo Brooks (R-AL); Ranking Member Daniel Lipinski (D-IL); along with Reps. Judy Biggert (R-IL) and Ben Ray Luján (D-NM). The bill reauthorizes the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Act called NITRD.
 
“I would like to point out that our efforts on this bill have been a true illustration of the bipartisan work for which this Committee and this Congress is capable,” said Chairman Hall. 
 
The act covers policies for funding research and development investments for unclassified networking, computing, software, cyber security, and other related information technology. The technology covered could range anywhere from smartphones to cloud computing and anywhere in between. We can also be sure a lot of investment will also be made in cyber-security with hacking an all-time high.
 
“These investments are necessary not only to help maintain world leadership in science and engineering and strengthen U.S. competitiveness, but also to grow the economy through the creation of networking and information technology jobs and enhance national security,” Chairman Brooks said.  “I applaud the Committee’s approval of this important bipartisan legislation.”
 
Technology developed under the new bill will also look into ways of minimizing and preventing disruptions to the critical infrastructure around the country such as the power grid and communications systems. There is a growing fear that hackers could infiltrate utility such as the electrical grid and cause damage that could lead to widespread outages and other problems inside America.
 
Rep. Biggert added, “The NITRD program provides critical support for some of the most promising research on the high-end computing horizon. American scientists are using these computing technologies to accelerate the pace of research on everything from new energy sources to new medicines.  I applaud Chairman Hall for his bipartisan work on this proposal, which will reauthorize and strengthen the NITRD program for the 21st century.”

Sources: The Hill, Science.house.gov



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Network infrastructure ..
By GuinnessKMF on 2/8/2012 11:45:34 PM , Rating: 2
We need better network infrastructure and we need to make sure it's not all in the hands of a monopoly. The market monopolies that were intended to prevent companies from not taking the risk of running copper and having to share it are in serious need of an overhaul.

I think the biggest improvement we could make would be to not mess with local governments when they attempt to create low cost high speed networks. It sickens me when I hear that a town government is trying to roll out a high speed connection for all of its citizens and it's blocked by Warner/Comcast.




RE: Network infrastructure ..
By monstergroup on 2/9/2012 2:42:28 AM , Rating: 3
quote:
The market monopolies that were intended to prevent companies from not taking the risk of running copper and having to share it are in serious need of an overhaul.


I have no idea what you're saying here.

quote:
I think the biggest improvement we could make would be to not mess with local governments when they attempt to create low cost high speed networks. It sickens me when I hear that a town government is trying to roll out a high speed connection for all of its citizens and it's blocked by Warner/Comcast.


I agree here.


RE: Network infrastructure ..
By LRonaldHubbs on 2/9/2012 6:14:58 AM , Rating: 2
I think this is what they meant:
quote:
The localized market monopolies were allowed so that companies which took the financial risk of running copper and would not have to share their infrastructure with other companies. The present system/regulations are in serious need of an overhaul.


RE: Network infrastructure ..
By LRonaldHubbs on 2/9/2012 6:15:46 AM , Rating: 2
Oops, ignore the 'and'.


RE: Network infrastructure ..
By quiksilvr on 2/9/2012 8:56:57 AM , Rating: 2
Dailytech really needs to switch over to Disqus. Editing is much simpler.


By GuinnessKMF on 2/9/2012 8:01:20 PM , Rating: 2
The inability to edit posts is ridiculous, especially for a tech site.

What I'm referring to (and forgive me if I'm off a little bit, I'm going off memory here) is the way the current cable monopolies operate. They are given markets and subsidies to roll out copper infrastructure, they take the "risk" of installing the infrastructure and therefore have a claim on the market. This was intended as a way to ensure that the infrastructure was actually created (so that a company wouldn't say "this town isn't worth building in, because it'll cost too much, and if someone else comes in there will be no profits").

In reality they didn't take much of a risk and the government ended up paying for a lot of the infrastructure, and there is very little incentive for them to improve the quality of the service or reduce prices without any serious competition.

I'm having a little bit of a hard time finding a specific article on how this all works and would love to be corrected on any misunderstandings I might have. All I know for sure is that the services have no improved and costs have not gone down as they should as the technology improves.


By tastyratz on 2/9/2012 8:08:48 AM , Rating: 3
smart phone "clouds" are not really something I think should be in the focus of government spending since the private sector is already so competitively investing, but this should really much more focus on critical infrastructures inter connectivity and security. Our power grid should be smart and connected enough for better awareness, and airgapped enough from the outside world to prevent hackers from taking it down. In the event we go to war with a technologically advanced country we could lose such critical pieces to the countries operation.




I would like to point out..
By kattanna on 2/9/2012 11:46:28 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
“I would like to point out that our efforts on this bill have been a true illustration of the bipartisan work for which this Committee and this Congress is capable,”


I would like to point out that probably the only reason for it was since it covers technology, even if someone in congress could be bothered to read the bill, they had no idea what it was talking about so voted for it because it involved spending money




“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads














botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki