backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 42 comment(s) - last by oTAL.. on Dec 3 at 1:17 PM

Apple has a next-gen iPhone, and the price point is in the hands of Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs

Apple Inc.'s iPhone is selling like hotcakes, or more aptly perhaps like Nintendo Wiis, and racked up impressive sales of a million units a mere 74 days after its release on June 29th of this year.  The iPhone, TIME magazine's Invention of the Year, has helped Apple see its fastest quarterly growth in history -- and it has done all of this while operating on the EDGE network, which users have complained at times is painfully slow, in comparison to its brawnier 3G brethren.

Now Apple seems to be determined to give the public what they want, for once, and is looking to release a 3G iPhone late next year.

AT&T Inc. Chief Executive Officer Randall Stephenson has confirmed early reports, breaking the news that a 3G iPhone at a meeting of the Churchill Club in Santa Clara, California.  He stated firmly that the phone will be released next year, when prompted for the time frame. 

The pricing is up in the air currently, and the man with the power in his hand to dictate the price is none other than Apple Inc. CEO Steve Jobs, according to Stephenson.  He said, "[Jobs] will dictate what the price of the phone is."

Jobs announced his recent intentions of selling 10 million iPhones worldwide in 2008, which would give the iPhone a modest 1% foothold in the highly competitive mobile phone market.  Such sales would make the iPhone one of top smart phones.  Sales through September totaled 1.5 million.  Particularly telling should be the unreleased sales figures for November, including those over the weekend of "Black Friday" which traditionally sees frenzied electronics sales.  Worldwide sales will also factor heavily into the iPhones success in 2008, as the iPhone is being released in Britain, France and Germany already.

The benefits of 3G are blatantly obvious.  One of the device's biggest draws is its implementation of a full feature web-browser, and its ability to remotely connect to popular music service iTunes and download the newest songs.  However, both of these activities are highly dependent on network speed, and more speed certainly points to a better overall user experience.

The key obstacle Apple must overcome in releasing the 3G phone in 2008 is battery life.  Apple might be getting some more knocks from Greenpeace, as the 3G chip is a power-hungry little beast, which Jobs has described as a "real power hog", at a news conference in London.  Steve Jobs had even gone as far in September to say that battery life would be too steep an obstacle to the adoption of a faster network.  Now Apple seems to have reversed course and committed to beating this challenge.

Apple has stated that the battery life for the 3G enabled version will be expected to be at least 5 hours, still down from the current 8 hour EDGE network battery life.

Despite criticism for its locking policies, which have even lead to class action suits, Stephenson laughed off Verizon's recent campaign to open its network to any phone or software maker meeting its expectations, stating, "We are probably one of the most open networks in the world, not just the U.S." 

Perhaps AT&T is truly striving for such an objective, but coming from a network that until recently suspended its users right to free speech, it will likely strike many as a rather a comical statement for AT&T to brag of its openness.  Additionally the pressure is mounting on Apple and AT&T to offer the iPhone unlocked in the U.S. as only Britain the U.S. will sell locked iPhones (French and German law mandates unlocking).  It certainly seems as if U.S. and British customers are getting the short end of the stick, and some speculate that a small underground industry selling imported iPhones from France and Germany may emerge.

Nonetheless, despite Apple and AT&T's idiosyncrasies, many consumers will be thrilled to know that the 3G iPhone is coming in 2008, will have a decent battery life, and is not just another wishful rumor.  If Apple and AT&T make their policy giving their customers what they want they just might continue their torrid pace of iPhone sales and ambitious sales objectives.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Why not use load balancing?
By FITCamaro on 11/29/2007 10:51:46 AM , Rating: 5
Why not just throttle the 3G chip? If you're doing something like browsing the web, slow the speed of the 3G chip down which would result in slower speeds but longer battery life. But I think people are ok with a web page taking an extra second or two to load. But if you're downloading a video clip, then crank the speed up to get it faster? Or don't. Heck let the user (oh god no!) decide how fast they want it to operate. Just like Windows. Have max battery, balanced, and performance options for the 3G features.

I'm just saying the 3G chip doesn't have to run at full speed anytime someone is using it.




RE: Why not use load balancing?
By NicePants42 on 11/29/2007 11:00:49 AM , Rating: 5
Nah, all Apple needs to do is put a glossy white car battery in a glossy white fanny-pack and sell it. They could use a proprietary power transformer and plug so that it only works with the iPhone, and they could call it the iPack and sell it for $100 worth of Apple store credit.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By RandallMoore on 11/29/2007 11:50:28 AM , Rating: 3
HAHAHA! That about sums up my opinion of Apple. The company logo should be: "We are so much better than everyone else, so you should spend all of your income on our WAY overpriced shiny crap"

PS - All of your paycheck are belong to Apple.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By FITCamaro on 11/29/2007 12:22:06 PM , Rating: 4
A logo is an image you associate with an organization or company.

And that's too long to be a slogan. ;)


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By clovell on 11/29/2007 3:08:16 PM , Rating: 2
lol - someone set him up the bomb.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By erikejw on 11/29/2007 4:53:22 PM , Rating: 2
This is great.

I heard from there PR woman in charge that this model will include the added feature of iBricking even without an image update.

She says if it iBricks it is just to buy a new phone, everything to increase earnings. :))


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By oTAL (blog) on 12/3/2007 1:17:56 PM , Rating: 2
It could still be their declaration of principles.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By Rav3n on 11/29/2007 7:58:11 PM , Rating: 3
Does that mean there will also be a Pro model that is brushed aluminum with a polished back, scratches easily, and attracts fingerprints?


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/29/2007 11:01:06 AM , Rating: 2
The excuse Apple used that the iPhone didn't use 3G because of battery life concerns was just a lame copout. Treo's, Blackberries and other WinMobile phones have had it for years using older, less efficient chips than what are available now.

Anyhow, an iPhone with 3G sounds good. If they can only add an external battery so you can spaw it out on the go, and add enterprise email support its a winner.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/29/2007 11:02:36 AM , Rating: 3
swap it out... damn dxsleyia


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By InsaneGain on 11/29/07, Rating: 0
RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/29/2007 11:49:57 AM , Rating: 2
Yes really. Sammy has some implementation issues that should be addressed. I worked for Palm for the past 5 years... I know a lil something about smartphones.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By tayhimself on 11/29/2007 1:06:42 PM , Rating: 2
We all know how well palm are doing in the smartphone space don't we </sarcasm>


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/29/2007 4:08:31 PM , Rating: 2
LOL - true, but this helps prove my point... Palm stopped innovating several years ago, and still they can do 3g speeds without battery issues.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By InsaneGain on 11/30/07, Rating: 0
RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/30/2007 6:37:23 PM , Rating: 2
LOL - ya, I'll get right on that :)


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By AntiV6 on 11/30/2007 5:03:35 PM , Rating: 2
My 755p had terrible battery life. I should know, surfing the web killed mine in less than an hour...


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By retrospooty on 11/30/2007 6:36:08 PM , Rating: 2
Mine is great... My guess is you have a bad battery. all the more reason to have a swappable battery. If that were an iPhone, you'd have to send it in for repair.


RE: Why not use load balancing?
By grampaw on 11/29/2007 11:52:20 AM