backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 105 comment(s) - last by mmcdonalataocd.. on Aug 26 at 8:06 AM


Newly leaked spy shots show the new "Prius killer" five-door hatchback in action. Honda's new hybrid will debut next April with a sweet price tag and reported MPG of as much as 60 MPG.  (Source: KGP Photography/AutoBlogGreen.com)
Honda is cooking up a hot new hybrid ride with plenty of room and a sweet price tag of approximately $19,000

After becoming the first company to bring a hybrid to the U.S. masses, Honda learned a painful lesson in economics as it saw its pioneering Insight model fail to generate sales and fall to the more popular Toyota Prius.  Since that disappointment, Honda has bided its time and now it is ready to strike back.

Previous reports indicated that Honda might bring back the Insight in 2010.  In the meantime, it has been enjoying rejuvenated sales of its Civic Hybrid and is forging ahead with its fuel cell hybrid efforts with the 74 MPG-equivalent Clarity FCX concept, which has been deployed at last to a fortunate few testers in California.  Slowly leaking plans also indicated that Honda might deploy hybrid versions of the Fit and CR-Z sports coupe next year.

New announcements and inside sources from Honda have at last added some clarity to Honda's hybrid plans.  The five door hatchback, which had been previously been labeled the "new Insight" will indeed launch next year.  The CR-Z hybrid coupe will come in early 2010 and the new Honda Civic hybrid will come in late 2010.  Finally, in 2012 the Fit hybrid will finally arrive.

While the longer waits on the CR-Z and the Fit may disappoint some, the reports on the hatchback prices won't.  Early reports pegged it at around $22,000, but more recent inside sources report the price will be a much lower $19,000.  The vehicle is expected to be a strong performer, beating the Prius in fuel economy, getting 60 MPG on average according to the source.

The new vehicle is currently code named the "New Dedicated Hybrid Vehicle" or simply "small hybrid".  Its true name will be revealed at the 2008 Paris International Auto Show in October.  The inside sources say that the new model will not be an Insight, but will bear a new name.  Photos of near production test vehicles have been leaked and show a great deal of similarity to the Clarity FCX.  The final production version will be unveiled at the 2009 Detroit International Auto Show and the vehicle will launch on Earth Day, April 22, 2009.

Honda's latest sales strategy aims to sell 500,000 hybrids a year by 2010, which would equal 10 percent of its projected sales volume.  Honda aims to sell 200,000 of the new hatchback in Japan.  Dick Colliver, executive vice president in charge of sales and marketing for American Honda Motor Co added details on North American targets stating, "We're targeting sales of 100,000 units of this new vehicle in North America."

The new model seems well-positioned as the new Prius, launching in 2010 is expected to be priced even higher than previous models and will have more power, bigger size, and additional luxury features.  However, early reports indicate it may be unable to beat the Honda hatchback's fuel economy, despite the steeper sticker.

Low prices on the new Honda model are thanks in part to a cheaper improved hybrid platform.  The platform uses an affordable nickel metal hydride battery pack.  It also features a smaller, lighter version of the 1.3-liter IMA system found in the current Civic hybrid.  The new vehicle uses many common body parts with the non-hybrid Fit, also lowering costs.  It will be built in Honda's Suzuka plant in Japan, but production may be outsourced to China to lower costs.

Of the 200,000 yearly units Honda plans to produce, after the 100,000 for North American markets, 50,000 will be sold in Europe with the remainder sold in Asia and elsewhere.

Honda's CR-Z is now estimated to carry a slightly steeper price tag -- $25,000 -- while offering unspecified "sporty" performance.  Overall it can be noted that Honda's efforts, while extensive, fall short of Toyota's goal to build a million hybrids a year by 2012.

In the long term Honda is focusing on fuel cell technologies.  While the company realizes commercial applications remain distant, it sees them as the ultimate destination.  Said Mr. Colliver at a conference sponsored by the Center for Automotive Research in Traverse City, Michigan, "For the long term, we continue to see the development of fuel cell vehicles as the ultimate solution.  While this technology is more than a decade away from the mass market, we know it works because we've been advancing it in the real world with real customers.  We know directionally if we can develop the infrastructure to support that car and we can get the volume out of it, it's a true direction we can go for new fuel efficiency as well as reducing greenhouse gasses."

Honda's solutions will soon be going head to head with a new American competitor as well, the Chevy Volt, which is set to debut in 2010, offering a plug-in experience, albeit at a higher price tag.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Competition
By Narcofis on 8/19/2008 8:45:18 AM , Rating: 5
Competition is a good thing. This might be just like a prius but It will be priced lower. It will push Toyota to come up with better pricing or come up with a different solution.

Only my 2 sense.




RE: Competition
By mircea on 8/19/2008 9:18:12 AM , Rating: 2
How about an M3 for competition. :D You've all seen the Top Gear video about fuel eficienty http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8XDscWleKw&feature...

I know the price range is a bit steeper, but if you drive
around 40 mph you can recoup the money in a cuple of years and save the planet, and you still have the option of accelerating over 40 mph at any time if you so wish.


RE: Competition
By mdogs444 on 8/19/2008 9:25:01 AM , Rating: 4
Who in the hell would buy an M3 so they can drive 40mph for a year to recoup costs?

First, anyone buying a new M3, is not very concerned with the increase in costs of the vehicle - nor are they concerned with its fuel economy. Thats like saying I'm going to buy a Ford Mustang Cobra and drive MPH so i can save fuel.


RE: Competition
By FITCamaro on 8/19/2008 10:40:38 AM , Rating: 2
Nah you buy a Vette for horsepower and fuel economy.
400 hp and 30mpg highway. :)


RE: Competition
By 67STANG on 8/19/2008 11:51:35 AM , Rating: 4
It's actually 26 highway, not bad for 400hp... unless of course you drive a lot in the city, then you get a whopping 16mpg. For the same price, and almost the same city mileage, you could get a 500hp Mustang GT500.


RE: Competition
By nismotigerwvu on 8/19/2008 12:36:38 PM , Rating: 4
But sadly, the 500HP Mustang has proven itself to be signifcantly slower in every measurable test (0-60, top speed, quarter mile, 5-60, skidpad, lap times....ect ect). Not that your point isn't valid (Mustang lovers will still adore it) but simply clarifying some points. Personally, I'd be happy with an Evo or the new harder edeged STI, but that is simply a matter of taste. I'm foaming at the mouth here just thinking about a 60 MPG daily driver that won't break the bank and allow me to hold on to my 300ZX TT.


RE: Competition
By silversound on 8/19/2008 12:41:27 PM , Rating: 2
Try to compare BMW to Corvette or mustang? U gotta be kidding me, I will rather get a 335i coupe, up to 28mpg; look nice and girls dig it! Cmon, its just a domestic Ford or chevy..


RE: Competition
By theoflow on 8/19/2008 1:36:15 PM , Rating: 5
I think the point of the Top Gear test was to show that it is not the car that gets better gas mileage but the person behind the wheel. Clarkson is also very anti-prius, but that is because he can't deal with the people who drive them and what they represent. He isn't anti-hybrid though, since it seems that he enjoys the Lexus hybrids very much.

Anyone who buys a Vette or 335i can take comfort that they MIGHT get 25+ mpg, but only if they stay on the highway and go about speed limit. And we know people who buy those cars just don't do that. A bunch of my co-workers have the same mentality when they buy a hybrid for the gas mileage but really want to take advantage of the HOV lane.

I don't know why the Mustang came up in this conversation. That car is just awful in most of the trim levels.


RE: Competition
By FITCamaro on 8/19/2008 3:56:54 PM , Rating: 2
My dad's 02 Trans Am WS6 6-speed is rated at 27 mpg highway. It gets 27 mpg highway at 80mph. 10 mph or more faster than any highway or interstate speed limit I know of.

Have talked to plenty of 6-speed Vette owners who're getting 29, 30, 31, or 32 mpg on the highway at 70-80 mph.


RE: Competition
By Rob94hawk on 8/22/2008 9:45:56 PM , Rating: 2
My 1994 Pontiac LT1 Firehawk gets ~30mph, bright red, t-tops. All my girlfriends wanted to drive me in my car...er...drive my car.

BMW's are for people with low self esteem.


RE: Competition
By ummduh on 8/19/08, Rating: -1
RE: Competition
By Regs on 8/19/2008 11:12:41 PM , Rating: 2
What are the problems with the Mustang or Cobra? I'm not trying to rhetorical, just an honest question.

Too much weight, not enough traction, clunky transmission, too high off the ground? What's the rated horse power to the wheel compared to the vette? (Unlike horsepower from the crank which means nothing)

I imagine the handling wouldn't come close to a corvette either.


RE: Competition
By Samus on 8/20/2008 4:04:26 AM , Rating: 3
All these batteries for these hybrids leave a larger carbon footprint than my 18MPG Mustang will leave in 10 years.

Good job at 'going green' Honda. You should have ignored Toyota's foolish profits at the expense of the environment and nailed them with your diesel plans. I for one don't doubt you could make a remarkable diesel engine. You've never made an engine with a fault in my book.


RE: Competition
By Fnoob on 8/20/2008 8:49:03 AM , Rating: 2
[Honda]never made an engine with a fault in my book.

Ever had a mid 90's Accord with a V6?

Bad bad.


RE: Competition
By FITCamaro on 8/19/2008 3:58:50 PM , Rating: 2
I don't buy a car for girls to dig. I buy a car to have fun. I'd rather have a fast car than a pretty car. If I was fixing up a car I'd spend money on the engine long before I'd spend money on paint. I'd primer that b*tch until every planned performance mod has been done. Looks are secondary.


RE: Competition
By KCjoker on 8/19/2008 6:59:53 PM , Rating: 2
Rather have domestic myself, plus the Mustang is much cheaper. However of the 3 I'd easily go for the Vette.


RE: Competition
By FITCamaro on 8/19/2008 3:54:32 PM , Rating: 2
The guy at my office who's got a brand spanking new one with a 6 speed is getting 30. Many Chevy's get better than advertised mileage.

And having 500 hp means nothing if you can't keep it on the ground. The base Mustang GT can't keep its tires planted. What makes you think adding 200 hp helped the situation?