backtop


Print E-mail del.icio.us 147 comment(s) - last by ahodge.. on Jun 7 at 5:49 PM


Honda's 2.2-liter i-CTDi diesel engine

Reaction mechanism for the NOx catalytic converter
The next-generation U.S. market Accord will ditch its hybrid powertrain for a clean diesel

When it comes to building ultra-efficient cars for the U.S. auto market, most manufacturers are going in one of two directions. You have some that go the compact route with small 4-cylinder engines and those who choose hybrid technology which can be found in compact and mid-sized sedans.

A third alternative, diesel, has floundered for the past two decades in U.S. passenger cars. Volkswagen -- which in the past offered diesel versions of its Passat, New Beetle, Golf and Jetta in the U.S. -- has no diesel passenger cars for the 2007 model year due to tighter emissions regulations. In fact, the only new car available with a diesel engine in the United States is the Mercedes E320 BlueTec -- but that vehicle starts at a heart-stopping $51,550 USD.

Honda looks to change things, however, with its next generation Accord family sedan. Honda's Accord has been one of the best selling cars in the U.S. for the past 20 years. The Accord nameplate has been built around a reputation for excellent resale value, great build quality, top-notch reliability, and respectable fuel economy.

Honda first tried to further improve the Accord’s image for "greenness" and fuel economy with the Accord Hybrid. That vehicle used a 253HP 3.0 liter V6 engine paired with Honda's Integrated Motor Assist (IMA) hybrid system. Honda promised performance greater than that of a normal V6-powered Accord but with fuel economy closer to that of a 4-cylinder Accord. Honda's mileage claims never quite panned out with buyers of the vehicles and sales of the hybrid never really took off.

Honda sold just 439 of its mid-sized Accord Hybrids in May 2007 (hybrids represented roughly 1.4 percent of all Accord sales). In comparison, Toyota’s Prius (also classified as a mid-sized vehicle) and Camry Hybrid racked up sales of 24,009 units and 6,853 units respectively for May 2007.

This time around, however, Honda will use diesel power instead of hybrid technology for its Accord, which has been redesigned for the 2008 model year. According to the Japanese Nikkei newspaper, the new Accord will have the option of a new Tier 2 Bin 5 diesel engine for the 2009 model year. Honda showcased the engine back in September 2006 and promised that it be used in U.S. passenger cars within three years. Honda's 2.2-liter i-CTDi uses a revolutionary catalytic converter filled with ammonia to "detoxify" NOx produced by the engine and convert it to nitrogen.

Honda isn’t the only manufacturer working on Tier 2 Bin 5 diesel engines for the U.S. car market. Volkswagen will come off its 2007 diesel slump with a new TDI engine in 2008 and even performance-oriented Nissan is looking to get into the diesel game in 2010 with its Maxima.

Honda’s position in the American auto market, however, makes its introduction of diesel passenger sedans a huge turning point for diesel in America and could go a long way to changing American opinion on diesel-powered cars.



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

BioDiesel...
By daftrok on 6/4/2007 12:18:06 AM , Rating: 3
Diesel has finally reached the point in where it surpasses standard fuel in all categories. Before, the only real reason why all cars are not diesel powered is because of its nitrous oxide and sulfur emissions. With the introduction of Blutec (that cuts down the amount of nitrous oxide by converting it into other environmentally inert materials) and BioDiesel, there is no other reason not to make the change. Its homegrown, its more powerful, its more efficient, and now its more environmentally friendly. Booya.




RE: BioDiesel...
By ksherman on 6/4/2007 12:21:56 AM , Rating: 3
Yeah I have been very impressed by the advnacements that diesel is making. I really want my next car to be a deisel.


RE: BioDiesel...
By KaiserCSS on 6/4/2007 12:29:23 AM , Rating: 2
Considering that diesel is about $.80 less than gas here in mid-California, yeah, I'd like my next vehicle to be clean diesel as well.


RE: BioDiesel...
By lobadobadingdong on 6/4/2007 8:23:08 AM , Rating: 2
Must be nice, diesel is usually between 10-30cents more expensive than 87 octane in Texas.


RE: BioDiesel...
By Spivonious on 6/4/2007 9:49:26 AM , Rating: 2
Here in PA diesel runs about $2.87 and unleaded runs about $2.99. Until last month's gas price rise diesel was always more expensive.


RE: BioDiesel...
By heffeque on 6/4/2007 10:12:16 AM , Rating: 2
Diesel engines have been top engines in Europe for years. Most cars sold in Europe are diesel and even some expensive sports cars have diesel engines. Not the idea America has of diesel engines, is it. It's good to see that gas is getting expensive in the states too, that way people start looking at better engines instead of bigger cars. Ecologically it's better to have expensive gas prices :-)


RE: BioDiesel...
By kilkennycat on 6/4/2007 11:06:11 AM , Rating: 3
Hmm....

I was in Ireland 4 weeks ago for a couple of weeks and deliberately did my own personal analysis of diesel vs gasoline cars as I travelled around. Roughly 10% are diesel. The biggest numerical proportion of cars in Ireland are gasoline WITH ENGINE CAPACITIES of LESS THAN 2 LITRES.... and fuel consumptions greater than 30 miles per US gallon (37 per Imperial gallon). The annual car tax in most countries in Europe is based on an engine capacity formula with steeply rising financial penalties (er, ownership disincentives) on cars with engines greater than 2 litres. Fuel conservation by this type of graduated annual taxation on motor vehicles has been the norm in all European counties for over half a century... remember that Europe had ZERO oil reserves until North Sea oil was discovered.

I drove a VW Golf when I was in Ireland ... 1.4 litre gasoline engine. Got ~ 45 miles per Imperial gallon. Excellent performance for a small car, btw. Hybrids are virtually non-existent in Ireland, even though it is now the wealthiest per-capita country in Europe. There are a noticeable number of SUVs in Ireland. However, some changes in the car taxation rules next year will make the ownership cost of a SUV highly prohibitive. As in England, where the SUV is now colloquially known as the "Chelsea tractor" (due to the number of people in that wealthy area of London who own one) the SUV is now viewed as an anti-conservation and anti-social vehicle, especially in dense urban traffic conditions and on the typically narrow roads in England (and Ireland) where the aggressive behavior of some SUV owners is potentially dangerous.


RE: BioDiesel...
By Amiga500 on 6/4/2007 11:41:30 AM , Rating: 2
I'd reckon alot more than 10% of the cars around here are diesel mate, probably around 20-30%. Of the 5 cars in our family, 3 are diesel. Thinking of the neighbours, all diesel... apart from 1 Nissan Micra.

I remember reading that nearly 50% of sales were diesel recently, but of course, there is still catching up to do with petrol cars that are still in circulation.


RE: BioDiesel...
By techhappy on 6/4/07, Rating: -1
RE: BioDiesel...
By ahodge on 6/4/2007 3:16:19 PM , Rating: 4
It's "Who Killed the Electric Car?".
Biodiesel is a very realistic viable way for the US to decrease it's reliance on foreign oil. Biodiesel burns much cleaner than diesel. Most diesel cars have a cruising range of ~500+ miles...How many electric cars can claim the same? Don't get me wrong, I would love to have a full electric. They're fast and emission free (if your power company offers clean renewable power). It's just that clean diesel technology is easy, cheap and can be renewable with the use of biodiesel. Sounds good to me.


RE: BioDiesel...
By Crassus on 6/4/2007 8:06:32 PM , Rating: 1
I owned a VW TDI Station Wagon for two years in Europe (before I went to the US). I ran it on biodiesel only. It works great when it works, but I should note that of all manufacturers only Volkswagen actually approves its engines for biodiesel use, and Bosch, who manufactures their fuel injection system, still doesn't. Some people apparently paid a lot of money for new fuel pumps after their's failed due to the more corrosive nature of biodiesel. I should also note that there doesn't seem to be a finalized standard as to the makeup of the fuel yet and that it's very sensitive to cold temperatures (transforming it to biodiesel gel :c)
As for regular diesel - this is the same stuff as heating oil, at least in Europe. Watch what the diesel price at the pump does when the demand for heating oil takes off in fall/winter.


RE: BioDiesel...
By ahodge on 6/7/2007 5:49:26 PM , Rating: 2
Biodiesel is not corrosive. It's a solvent and acts like a detergent in your fuel system. The fuel pumps wouldn't be failing from getting a nice cleaning. They'd fail from bad home made biodiesel or from biodiesel that got too cold and gelled causing the pump to run dry. Biodiesel is absolutely safe and actually better for your pump than regular diesel because of it's very high lubricity. You just have to get it from a reliable source.


RE: BioDiesel...
By LogicallyGenius on 6/5/2007 4:30:00 AM , Rating: 1
People think BioDiesel is safe , what they dont know is that any farmed BioFuel is more dangerous than any fuel in mass use till date. For bioFuel we have to clear the lungs of the world , ie. the forests.

Its a total disaster. also creating food crisis.


RE: BioDiesel...
By Howard on 6/5/2007 12:35:40 PM , Rating: 3
Please go away.


RE: BioDiesel...
By TheGreek on 6/6/2007 11:46:49 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
also creating food crisis.


With a corresponding decrease in heat disease?


RE: BioDiesel...
By TheGreek on 6/6/2007 11:47:20 AM , Rating: 2
And heart disease too.


RE: BioDiesel...
By FredEx on 6/5/2007 1:19:06 PM , Rating: 2
Imagine a plug-in Prius and it running a clean burning diesel that uses bio-diesel as its back-up. A diesel that could be twice as efficient as a the gasoline engine used in a Prius now.