backtop


Print 5 comment(s) - last by amanojaku.. on Feb 5 at 8:17 PM

New 500GB Hitachi HDD is aimed at video streaming applications

In the computer industry, consumers always want more and technology firms are striving to provide more of what the customer wants. More capacity is especially important in video streaming applications as it controls how much video can be stored.

Hitachi has announced a new hard drive specifically for video streaming applications like surveillance called the CinemaStar C5K500. The drive is a 2.5-inch unit with up to 500GB of storage capacity. The drive is designed for video streaming applications where low power consumption and a compact design are required.

The drive spins at 5400 RPM and can be had in capacities as low as 160GB. All of the drive versions include Hitachi's SmoothStream technology to make streaming of video smoother along with time-limited error correction and thermal monitoring capability.

The drive gets the EcoTrac designation with only 1.4W of power needed during read/write operations. Hitachi claims that number is 22% lower than previous models and it expects the drives to ship worldwide in Q2 2009 at undisclosed pricing.

Hitachi VP of Product Marketing Brendan Collins said, "The explosion of digital music and photos, combined with widespread access to high-definition television content, is driving DVR capacity requirements to new levels. Home theater systems are becoming increasingly compact, as users seek out space-saving and power-efficient component designs. The new CinemaStar drive will allow DVR manufacturers to deliver compact DVRs with all the capacity and features of larger form factor products."



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

5400 RPM?
By Screwballl on 2/5/2009 3:31:06 PM , Rating: 1
Proper streaming needs a combination of the fastest I/O connections available in a PC: more and faster memory, faster hard drive, faster hard drive connection (SATA II, SCSI Ultra Wide or Fiber), more cache, multiple cores, integrated memory controller and faster FSB in the CPU (but not as reliant on actual CPU core speeds), Gigabit Ethernet for network streaming...

A 5400RPM hard drive defeats the very purpose of a live streaming system where 7200 is the minimum suggested hard drive spindle speed... who wrote this up, a hard drive PR exec?

They did get something right, making it a platter based drive is a much better choice due to the limited number of read/write times with current generation SSDs.




RE: 5400 RPM?
By Aikouka on 2/5/2009 6:11:29 PM , Rating: 3
If you're just making a private media server for a home, I am fairly certain that this drive will be just fine. I run my own media server and you certainly do not need all that you've described unless you're planning on transcoding media files. A simple file server just needs to be able to transfer the files. If you've got multiple people accessing a rather large hi-definition file, then you may have an issue if you aren't equipped properly with enough bandwidth (via the HDD and the network). But even then, if you do some math here... a 4GB BD rip (that you own, of course) that has a duration of 1.5 hours would only require a mere 776.72kB/s to play. A 100Base-T network can handle 12.5mB/s as its cap. That means you have enough bandwidth to theoretically stream the file to around 16 different locations across the network. Also, even a 5400 RPM HDD can keep up with a mere 12.5mB/s. Now of course, this isn't exact science that is taking in other factors, but needless to say... this drive shouldn't be harmful to your video streaming :).

The only aspect where I think this drive fails (which it's odd that you didn't mention this) is the capacity. 500GB is too small when you can purchase 1.5TB drives now.


RE: 5400 RPM?
By Aikouka on 2/5/2009 6:19:49 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, I completely ignored that this is a 2.5" HDD, which makes the capacity quite nice, but yet again that relies on people desiring a smaller storage device and less power. They mention surveillance, but I'm not too sure why a storage device for surveillance couldn't just use a physically larger (3.5") drive? Anyone with some expertise on surveillance technology possible share some knowledge?


RE: 5400 RPM?
By amanojaku on 2/5/2009 8:17:22 PM , Rating: 2
A smaller drive makes for a smaller unit that uses less power and generates less heat and noise. Smaller is generally cheaper, unless the components are complex. Also, smaller is easier to hide, if necessary.


RE: 5400 RPM?
By amanojaku on 2/5/2009 8:15:00 PM , Rating: 2
I disagree. This is targeted for home theater video, not video editing. There is a big difference between the bandwidths used and the methods in which data is accessed. I have a NetFlix account and see beautiful video (check out "Water, 2005") at ~1Mbit/sec (average of 1% of my 100Mbit switch connection.) Video from my NAS averages around 7Mbits/sec (average of 7%.) The DVD of Pan's Labyrinth transferred at 20% of my 54Mbit wireless. I could skip back and forth just fine. That's not even 2MB/sec, and a 5400RPM drive can deliver that in a stream. I'm not saying it's going to be quick when fast-forwarding or reversing; most likely it's expected the host platform would have sufficient RAM to hold a few minutes' worth of video in memory.


"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone




Latest Headlines
2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 10, 2012, 5:50 PM
2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 9, 2012, 11:54 AM
2/8/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 8, 2012, 1:11 PM
2/7/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews
February 7, 2012, 12:23 PM










botimage
Copyright 2012 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki