Print 46 comment(s) - last by Chocobollz.. on Dec 2 at 1:43 AM

Researchers hope to improve the therapy so it can be safe for human use

Harvard Medical School researchers have found a way to reverse the aging process in mice, and are now looking to do the same for humans. 

Ronald DePinho, leader of the study and a scientist at Harvard Medical School, along with a group of Harvard researchers, have regenerated the bodies of elderly mice turning them into healthy, rejuvenated animals again. 

The aging process is not completely understood at this point, but what researchers do know is that free radicals, which are highly reactive particles created naturally within the body, damage cells which helps cause the aging process. Other known causes are ultraviolet light, smoking and other environmental factors. 

But now, DePinho and his fellow researchers at Harvard Medical School have discovered that an anti-aging therapy called telomere shortening has the potential to eliminate age-related issues like dementia and heart disease by rejuvenating old, worn out organs. 

The body typically contains cells that have 23 pairs of chromosomes, and at the end of each chromosome is a "protective cap" called a telomere. Telomeres are cut shorter every time a cell divides, causing the telomere to eventually stop working, fall into a suspended state called "senescence" or die. This process wears out cells and contributes to the aging process. 

To counter this process, DePinho and his team of researchers genetically manipulated mice, eliminating the enzyme telomerase within them. Telomerase is an enzyme that prevents telomeres from getting shorter. In lab tests, these mice aged prematurely and experienced tell-tale signs of growing older, such as loss of smell, infertility, smaller brain size, and damaged organs such as the intestines. But when given injections to reactivate telomerase, the signs of aging were reversed and tissues that were previously destroyed had been repaired. 

"What we saw in these animals was not a slowing down or stabilization of the aging process. We saw a dramatic reversal - and that was unexpected," said DePinho. "This could lead to strategies that enhance the regenerative potential of organs as individuals age and so increase their quality of life. Whether it serves to increase longevity is a question we are not yet in a position to answer."

DePinho noted that these severely aged mice showed signs of considerable restoration after only one month of treatment. Among the several restored organs in the body was the brain, which showed growth of new neurons. 

While this therapy is ideal for mice, it will be challenging to translate this type of treatment to humans because slowing the aging process this way could increase the risk of cancer in humans. Mice have the ability to create telomerase throughout the span of their lives, but telomerase eventually discontinues in humans in order to stop cells from overpopulating and possibly turning into cancerous cells. The constant production of telomerase in mice kept all of the Harvard mice from developing cancer after completing treatment. 

DePinho said that increasing the levels of telomerase in humans could possibly slow the aging process the same way it did in mice, but the heightened risk of cancer makes this therapy much too chancy for people yet. But he also pointed out that the treatment could be safe if it was administered periodically to young people who do not have living cancer cells

"The goal for human tissue 'rejuvenation' would be to remove senescent cells, or else compensate for the deleterious effects they have on tissues and organs," said David Kipling, a researcher at Cardiff University who studies aging. "Although this is a fascinating study, it must be remembered that mice are not little men, particularly with regard to their telomeres, and it remains unclear whether a similar telomerase reactivation in adult humans would lead to the removal of senescent cells."

DePinho and his fellow researchers a Harvard hope to continue working on this therapy in order to make it accessible to humans without causing severe side effects, such as cancer. If an appropriate therapy was created for humans, it could prolong the quality of life for elderly people and eliminate health problems that come with age such as stroke and dementia. 

"They key question is what might this mean for human therapies against age-related diseases?" said Tom Kirkwood, director of the Institute for Aging and Health at Newcastle University. "While there is some evidence that telomere erosion contributes to age-associated human pathology, it is surely not the only, or even dominant cause as it appears to be in mice engineered to lack telomerase. Furthermore, there is the ever-present anxiety that telomerase reactivation is a hallmark of most human cancers."

This study was published in Nature on November 28.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By wordsworm on 11/29/2010 10:50:41 AM , Rating: 4
I have often thought it futile to even dare to believe that one day science might find its way of reversing the effects of ageing.

I cannot imagine how my perspective on life would change.

The ancient wise have often said that immortality was a kind of curse. Mortality forces us to make hasty decisions. If we are immortal, what is a hundred or so years? No longer would we so much as have to choose one or two paths in life: but rather choose the order in which to execute them.

On the other hand, it would make 'until death do us part' a lot more sinister. "Will you love me forever?" "Let me sleep on it!" "Praying for the end of time so I can end my time with you!" Geeze... no, no thanks.

RE: Immortality
By Gzus666 on 11/29/2010 11:05:21 AM , Rating: 4
It doesn't make you immortal, don't be foolish. All it does is stop the decay of DNA on a split. You can still die from the millions of natural causes out there.

If anything, it will likely be a Logan's Run scenario, you just live better while you are alive.

RE: Immortality
By wordsworm on 11/29/2010 7:56:55 PM , Rating: 3
If by natural causes you mean a car hitting you, then yes I understand it won't save you from that. However, it does say that it would help save you from age related illness. That is a huge effect. Essentially, it means immortality for as long as you're not murdered, bombed, or otherwise made dead.

RE: Immortality
By delphinus100 on 11/29/2010 8:17:16 PM , Rating: 4
I'm all for this, but agree that it's merely one less thing that can kill you...

I don't think an auto accident counts as a 'natural' death, but people die through accidents and mayhem (I've known several) already. That won't change very much. (Well...except accidents involving slow reaction times, or other age-related causes.) Death still remains statistically inevitable,* but not biologically, and so, the timing becomes less certain.

I'll take it.

(* I've often phrased it to friends; "If I have to go, I want it to be something like being on an exploding starship, 400 years from now, and not withering away in a nursing home, 40 years from now...")

RE: Immortality
By wordsworm on 11/30/2010 8:33:16 AM , Rating: 2
Yeah, but that 'one thing' is the 'one thing' that gets everyone if nothing else does. Get rid of that 'one thing' and... wow, it's one hell of the right step towards immortality. imo, It's good enough to call it that.

RE: Immortality
By Da W on 12/1/2010 9:01:37 AM , Rating: 2
Eventually the whole galaxy is gonna be swallowed by the massive black hole at its center, it would think this will be the ultimate form of death.

RE: Immortality
By wordsworm on 12/2/2010 12:12:31 AM , Rating: 2
If I live to see it, that would be awesome. Hell, I'd be plenty happy just to watch our star go supernova in five or so billion years.

RE: Immortality
By aegisofrime on 11/29/2010 11:05:59 AM , Rating: 5
On the other hand, science fiction often portrays Humans as being very ambitious and aggressive due to our short lifespans, compared to whatever long-lived aliens there are in that universe. I do think that immortality will probably be a boon. When we die, a world of experience and knowledge dies along with us. With immortality perhaps we will have more time to put all those to good use.

RE: Immortality
By Kurz on 11/29/2010 11:59:47 AM , Rating: 2
Honestly Agressiveness and abitiousness has little to do with the fear of death and more our genetic wiring in the first place.

If someone is Abitious/Agressive It doesn't matter what age or point in their life they are in they'll be those things.

(Mass effect series brought that same view point)

RE: Immortality
By Iketh on 12/1/2010 4:22:52 PM , Rating: 2
I always think of space travel with immortality. All the arguments say light-speed or greater is impossible and this is what limits us from exploring the universe.

With immortality, we'll have all the time in the world...

RE: Immortality
By corduroygt on 11/29/2010 11:21:55 AM , Rating: 5
The problem with immortality is that there can only be one.

RE: Immortality
By thrust2night on 11/29/2010 10:03:01 PM , Rating: 2
The sensation you feel is the Quickening.

RE: Immortality
By killerclick on 11/29/2010 11:27:31 AM , Rating: 2
Life won't change too much. People will just get used to longer (indefinite) lifespans as most people don't spend their time dwelling on aging and dying anyway.

Many people are worried about overpopulation but I'm not and for two reasons:
1. population growth is slowly stabilizing all around the world;
2. human history up to this point has shown that people create resources more than they consume resources. The standard of living was steadily improving with population growth for the last several centuries. There is five times more people on Earth now than two hundred years ago and the average person today has much more resources at their disposal. We are ingenious critters and we can easily grow to 20 billion even with current technology, never mind seaborne solar powered vertical farms with desalination facilities.

RE: Immortality
By gamerk2 on 11/29/2010 12:53:10 PM , Rating: 3
You, my friend,don't quite understand cause and effect. We're already stretching resources to the breaking point as it is, and you think we can grow to 4x our number?

RE: Immortality
By killerclick on 11/29/2010 1:12:03 PM , Rating: 1
That's a fallacy. We're nowhere near breaking point when resources are concerned. There's never been more humans on the planet and the standard of living has never been higher. Sure there are oscillations in energy and food prices but those are economic and political issues that do not affect the overall trend.

RE: Immortality
By Dr of crap on 11/29/10, Rating: 0
RE: Immortality
By killerclick on 11/29/2010 3:17:50 PM , Rating: 1

RE: Immortality
By Flail on 11/29/2010 5:39:19 PM , Rating: 2
I loooooooooooove me some genocide.

herp derp.

RE: Immortality
By Chocobollz on 12/2/2010 1:28:02 AM , Rating: 2
Nope, that's not a fallacy, that's what I called it "thinking". Obviously, you forgot about the diminishing return effect, eg. adding more cores to a CPU will indeed push the performance up, but there'll be a limit, so too human population. You accelerate the growth and you'll hit the limit faster. The amount of works done are also not going up in proportional with the amount of people, eg. 1 people can finish the work in 1 hour, 2 people in 45 minutes, and so on. But the amount of resources needed always going in proportional, if not higher. So in effect, more people means less effective population.

You're also forgetting about all of the negative side-effects, eg. more poverty, etc. Just because you live in a peaceful neighborhood and have a high standard of living, doesn't mean it is on another side of the world. It's already very hard to live for example, in Africa, and what do you expect if you increase their population by 4 times? Yep, they'll start to migrate to another place. Let's hope your place isn't the one they're thinking of.

Oh, and the best thing is, 4x more peoples means 4x times more criminals too. And I haven't even mention about terrorists. Do you really want that many nuts? LOL

RE: Immortality
By MCKENZIE1130 on 11/29/2010 8:03:50 PM , Rating: 1
In order to meet Christmas, Some commodities have been, discount .In addition Buy $ 300 and receive a free glasses or a wallet, as a Christmas gift . welcome all friends to order. Reputation, quality, absolute guarantee. please log in: . so what, move your mouse .

RE: Immortality
By goku on 11/29/2010 8:44:17 PM , Rating: 2
I thought the reason people split up is because of aging.. That there is a disconnect and one gets "tired" or "isn't in the mood" any more while the other is. Or even worse, one is aging badly and the spouse cant stand to look at them or deal with them because one of the major reasons they're with that other spouse is because of the looks looks they had and little else.

RE: Immortality
By JediJeb on 12/1/2010 11:40:05 AM , Rating: 2
That definitely wouldn't explain why many couples split after two years of marriage while in their twenties. Most couples that split up are because they jumped in to quickly without getting to know each other well enough first.

With great power comes great responsibility
By Mogounus on 11/29/2010 12:31:57 PM , Rating: 2
While the idea of endless youth or a significantly prolonged life greatly appeals to me I can't seem to shake a certain feeling of concern about such a concept. Who would get access to this? Just the richest of us that can afford it? What about already overpopulated areas of the world? China? India? Africa? Even increasing people's lifespan by 50% would cause a huge population boom. In places in the world where hunger and scarcity of resources is an issue severe turmoil would result if they had access to this. In most Western countries it wouldn't be much of an issue as without immigration the populations would be declining anyway, so it would be more of a salvation. Either way I think the problem of aging will inevitably be solved, only question is whether humanity will be ready for it or if it.

RE: With great power comes great responsibility
By killerclick on 11/29/2010 1:14:50 PM , Rating: 2
More people means more jobs means more economic activity means improved technology means we can support even more people. It's been the trend for centuries because unlike animals humans also create resources.

RE: With great power comes great responsibility
By Mogounus on 11/29/2010 2:11:54 PM , Rating: 2
True, but at a high cost to the environment. There are already severe issues with deforestation, extinction of species, overfishing, pollution, damage caused by mining. The earth has a certain capacity to support human activity and I think we are pretty close to that limit and would say we have already exceeded a healthy balance. Unless people become more aware of their impact on the environment or a lot of technological progress is made to limit it we are faced with severe ecological damage. If you think otherwise maybe you should take a trip to India or industrial areas in China.

By killerclick on 11/29/2010 2:59:16 PM , Rating: 1
There is a cost to everything but any ecological damage can (and probably will) pay off in the longer term - just like the Industrial Revolution did. It's not like industry damages the environment for fun - industry creates economic activity which in turn increases the quality of life. Not that we shouldn't be mindful of energy efficiency and sustainability of resources but we shouldn't panic until there is a reason to panic.

By Kurz on 11/30/2010 1:32:31 PM , Rating: 2
All those issues are because they all reside in the Common Grounds. No one owns them. If someone owns them and would love for them to continue to be bountiful then they will be managed.

Hence the White/Black Rhinos are going extinct.
No one owns them so the most efficient way to get their horns is shooting them and cutting it off.
In cattle situation they'll be drugged to take off their horn.

RE: With great power comes great responsibility
By niva on 11/29/2010 9:56:09 PM , Rating: 3
You've stated that "humans create resources" multiple times in the comments of this article, but can you please give us an example of what you mean? I don't understand it. I understand how we consume resources, but what useful resources for the rest of the natural food chain have we created?

By Chocobollz on 12/2/2010 1:43:30 AM , Rating: 2
The answer is simple: WE DON'T. We can only "combine" resources. And by combining, I mean taking resources from somewhere and putting it together. That means one less resource for something other than human. Just like energy that can't be created or destroyed. His short thinking attitude wouldn't understand that simple facts.

By Skywalker123 on 11/30/2010 1:12:25 AM , Rating: 3
a bad trend that will end in disaster.

RE: With great power comes great responsibility
By delphinus100 on 11/29/2010 8:29:40 PM , Rating: 2
Who would get access to this? Just the richest of us that can afford it?

An oft-stated concern. And yet no one can tell me why it must necessarily be very expensive?

In places in the world where hunger and scarcity of resources is an issue severe turmoil would result if they had access to this.

Obviously, most of those people aren't dying of age-related causes. Cheap longevity, without changing anything else, won't change that. Knowing that you could live a thousand years, won't help you if you drink that cholera-contaminated water in front of you right now...

only question is whether humanity will be ready for it or if it.

Are we ever really 'ready' for any technology...?

By xsilver on 11/30/2010 3:07:16 AM , Rating: 2
An oft-stated concern. And yet no one can tell me why it must necessarily be very expensive?


Nothing revolutionary here
By RaggedClaws on 11/29/2010 5:25:09 PM , Rating: 5
Harvard Medical School researchers have found a way to reverse the aging process in mice, and are now looking to do the same for humans.

The scientists in this study did not reverse the aging process. The mice in the study were not old but "prematurely old". All that was done was to correct a mistake - the lack of telomerase - that caused the abnormally rapid deterioration of telomeres which led the altered mice to exhibit the DNA decay that is one aspect of the aging process. If injection of the enzyme telomerase to already old normal mice made them young again, that would have been a true reversal of age, but that is not what occurred here.

But now, DePinho and his fellow researchers at Harvard Medical School have discovered that an anti-aging therapy called telomere shortening

Actually, telomere shortening is the cause of the problem, not the cure, so it is not a therapy.

RE: Nothing revolutionary here
By delphinus100 on 11/29/2010 8:32:02 PM , Rating: 2
...That would be useful against some cancers, though.

RE: Nothing revolutionary here
By Divineburner on 11/29/2010 9:58:21 PM , Rating: 5
Finally, someone found out what they had actually done.

Look, they re-enabled a gene that they disabled in the first place that caused the premature aging, wtfmuch?

By room200 on 11/29/2010 11:29:23 AM , Rating: 4
Ohhhh crap. Just what we need; eternally young rats.

RE: hmmmmm
By wordsworm on 12/2/2010 12:23:16 AM , Rating: 2
What's wrong with politicians living longer lives? I personally would welcome the likes of Kim Jong Il and Vladimir Putin being virtually immortal. Or did you mean the rodents?

that would be a kicker
By kattanna on 11/29/2010 10:49:36 AM , Rating: 2
if only the young could benefit from this therapy for youth

RE: that would be a kicker
By Dean364 on 11/29/2010 11:25:48 AM , Rating: 3
Too bad youth is wasted on the young.

By Lugaidster on 11/29/2010 3:15:08 PM , Rating: 2
You people are looking at this the wrong way. If people could live more years (around 200 or even 300) Space travel wouldn't look so lengthy. Imagine what Einstein could've done if he lived for 100 more years. People will still die. But the posibilities by not being constrained by time are endless.

RE: Inmortality
By goku on 11/29/2010 8:48:27 PM , Rating: 2
And it would allow for people like Bernie Madoff to actually fulfill his sentence? God could you imagine how bad the Prison overpopulation problem would get? You could literally have a what is a nation inside of our Prisons.. It's bad enough people live as long as they do.

Pandora's Star <-- Book
By ZaethDekar on 11/30/2010 1:57:55 AM , Rating: 2
Pandora's Star is a book based in the future. However instead of having your stay young forever they have you clone.

I think that book and the sequel does a great job to show what humans would be like could they live longer.

Some people work the same job for 150+ years. Instead of taking a two week vacation, they save enough to take a full life vacation. People in the adult industry clone themselves every 10-20 years while some people wait 60-70 years.

However with that, because everyone lives and death is almost never a permanent thing people have become complacent. They are fine taking 100-200 years to go somewhere (such as farther into space) instead of working on a quick way to get there. Technology advancements slowed down because there wasn't the rush to get it done.

However it ended up being an issue. When they finally build a space ship (They used worm holes to travel instead of space ships) to travel to a distant star and find an alien race that is very aggressive they had to switch from slow progressing to very quick research.

More onto the topic, I feel that if they did proceed with this 'stop aging' then I for one would keep working as hard if not harder then I do now. Knowing that I can travel much farther in my lifetime when I would have ever dreamed. Our knowledge would be so vast that they would be teaching calculus in grade school however I would feel grade school would last much longer then it does now. To where you would almost have a general associates by the time you are out of school. It would be a year on history, a year on math, a year on language, and college would really be you doing your doctorate or something of that nature instead of having a masters and or bachelor.

After all this comes price though. Most likely it would only be the rich that could afford this (because someone would work to make a profit from it) and at that point we will eventually die off until we have master families in control of everything.

/End rant.

RE: Pandora's Star <-- Book
By Kurz on 11/30/2010 1:35:32 PM , Rating: 2
If it wasn't regulated and the intellectual property was let to expire on its own after the normal amount of years for drugs. Then no it will be cheap for the masses.

With my luck...
By Connoisseur on 11/29/2010 10:55:34 AM , Rating: 2
I'll be old and riddled with cancer by the time they perfect this technique. Would NOT mind being a super healthy 90 year old.

By cparka23 on 11/29/2010 2:33:47 PM , Rating: 2
But now, DePinho and his fellow researchers at Harvard Medical School have discovered that an anti-aging therapy called telomere shortening has the potential to eliminate age-related issues [...]
They're calling it telomerase reactivation in the title of the letter, because they're reactivating the enzyme telomerase. Telomere shortening, as a therapy, would literally send the patient to an early grave.

Soylent Green
By jklauderdale on 11/30/2010 2:15:54 PM , Rating: 2
So now I'm wondering how fast this becomes Cheney's version of the Lazarus Pit?

Seriously though, an extended lifespan with minimal deterioration would be a wonderful thing, but for the fact that we'll still be procreating. We'll be looking at the re-realization of the overpopulation scare, ghetto-warrens with soylent green served every 12 hours. Overpopulation mixed with global warming... scarrry

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki